The Lewandowsky participation question

UPDATE: There are so many respondents (thank you) and since it is clear that about 97% of WUWT readers hadn’t seen/participated in 2010 Lewandowsky survey, that we’ve added a second thread to get the most important part of the data.

You can still record your participation/non-participation below in the question form, but if you DID PARTICPATE in 2010 please also see this new thread:

http://wattsupwiththat.com/2012/09/14/the-lewandowsky-participation-census-re-booted/

People who previously answered that they DID participate in 2010 are encourage to drop a note in comments at that new thread.

At the suggestion of Steve McIntyre, I’m posting this request because we know that both AGW proponents and skeptics alike read WUWT daily. It therefore is the most broad reaching venue to ask this simple question:

Did you participate in the Lewandowsky conspiracy opinions survey anywhere in the year 2010 on any blog? (if you are unfamiliar with it and don’t know if you did/did not,  read Lewandowsky’s paper here)

There are two steps: First I ask you to do the poll below, then leave a comment with your usual handle in the comment section signifying your answering the question.

Note that unlike the Lewandowsky poll, safeguards are in place to prevent vote stuffing.

Step 1: Answer the question below

Step2: Leave a comment in your usual handle/name below stating your answer in Step 1 (note Steve’s re-boot at the top of WUWT to leave a comment in the other thread if you did participate).

This will be a sticky top post for a few days. Please ONLY LEAVE COMMENTS ABOUT YOUR PARTICIPATION YES/NO. Most others will be deleted. Thanks for your consideration – Anthony

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
922 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
hum
September 14, 2012 3:02 pm

Skeptic, did not.

Otter
September 14, 2012 3:03 pm

Skeptic, Did Not. And don’t believe Believer numbers for this vote, but will check again later.

Sean Peake
September 14, 2012 3:03 pm

skeptic/did not participate

Paul Westhaver
September 14, 2012 3:04 pm

How come there are 930 votes total and only 440 comments?

DR_UK
September 14, 2012 3:05 pm

Skeptic (pretty much) did not participate.

September 14, 2012 3:05 pm

I did not participate.

donald penman
September 14, 2012 3:06 pm

I’m a skeptic and I DID NOT participate in the Lewandowsky survey in 2010

Steve McIntyre
September 14, 2012 3:07 pm

SUGGESTION: We know that lots of people didn’t reply. It would be more helpful to ONLY hear from people who did participate.

Jim Barker
September 14, 2012 3:07 pm

Skeptic, no participation.

September 14, 2012 3:07 pm

Skeptic/no

Stephen Singer
September 14, 2012 3:07 pm

Did not see this survey and would have likely passed on it because of the leading questions.

September 14, 2012 3:08 pm

Sceptic – did not participate

Keith Flanders
September 14, 2012 3:08 pm

Sceptic and did not participate

BSM
September 14, 2012 3:08 pm

Yes

BernieInPipewell
September 14, 2012 3:08 pm

Skeptic, did not participate

Jean Parisot
September 14, 2012 3:08 pm

Denier, did not participate, was not invited, nor was aware.

Dermot o'Logical
September 14, 2012 3:09 pm

Skeptic. Did not participate.

September 14, 2012 3:09 pm

Wasn’t aware of the Lew survey until the furore erupted over the paper. Sceptical non-participant.

September 14, 2012 3:10 pm

Sceptic and did not participate in the poll

dalyplanet
September 14, 2012 3:10 pm

Skeptical of CAGW and did not take the poll

September 14, 2012 3:10 pm

Skeptic, no participation.

eyesonu
September 14, 2012 3:10 pm

I’m skeptical of CAGW and never knew such a poll existed at the time.

matthu
September 14, 2012 3:11 pm

I am a skeptic and I did NOT perticipate.

Andy B
September 14, 2012 3:12 pm

skeptic, did not participate

Cassio
September 14, 2012 3:13 pm

Sceptic, did not participate

1 17 18 19 20 21 37