Letter to the Editor
Watts Up With That?
23rd July 2012
Nothing illustrates the anti-human ethos of the Greens better than their support for “biofuels”.
That trendy name cannot hide the fact that encouraging and mandating the burning of food for motor fuel creates nothing but negatives for the environment and for human welfare, but will have no effect on climate.
The biofuel scheme relies on taxpayer subsidies and legislated market-sharing. It wastes land, fuel, fertiliser, water and financial resources to produce ethanol from sterile monocultures of corn, soya beans, palm oil and sugar cane. Most of the land used was cultivation that once produced food. Some is stolen from peasant landowners or obtained by ploughing natural grasslands or clearing virgin forests. The distilling process produces good alcohol but an inferior motor spirit that can damage some engines and has only 70% of the energy of petrol and diesel.
The biofuel schemes have already inflated world food prices. Shortages and famines will increase. This food-burning policy is taking us back to the hungry years before tractors, harvesters, trucks and diesel fuel when teams of draft horses, working bullocks, stock horses and farm labourers consumed 80% of farm output. Some may like to return to those bucolic days, but then most city populations would not find food on their supermarket shelves. In trendy green jargon, big cities would be “unsustainable”.
Here is a new slogan which is kind to humans AND the environment:
“Don’t Burn Food for Fuel”.
Viv Forbes,
Rosewood Qld Australia
I am happy for my email address to be published.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

You can bet your bippy that numerous fire departments (and others who must rely on their small engines!) have started to fuel their small 2-cycle engines with alcohol-free gasoline products as offered by these folks: http://www.seffuels.com/
and as reviewed by: J and J Small Engine Blog
.
Being here in dried up Nebraska, I’m feeling a coin toss is needed when it comes to so-called Bio-fuels. Much of the waste ends up feeding livestock that also feeds us. If we can get the good stuff out of that grain and such first, ok. Not like the prime stuff gets used for making ethanol and pre-cooking it would seem to me, better for the livestock.
Not understanding the wheat thing. Most of it gets harvested before it gets hot outside anyway. (June)
Seed oil being converted to bio-diesel should actually be a good way to keep it from ending up in a landfill. Cottonseed oil doesn’t take food out of peoples mouths and yes, hemp will grow anywhere. Hempoil burns super hot.
Ethanol sucks in 2 cycle motors. They just won’t warm up. Seems to shorten the life of these motors also.
I don’t mind people trying things if they work. Some may need some assistance to make it work right and should give up when it doesn’t but, there is a baby in that water. Don’t throw it all out.
(And for a giggle) When I meet a vegetarian I say “my food poops on your food”.
Overblown; an extensive review of the literature a few years ago on the hemp plant/hemp material substitutes showed no such validity to miracle claims (e.g. hardiness, good growth in less than ideal circumstances etc.) … rather, this would seem to be a myth that just will not ‘go away’ (meanwhile, crops, plants, materials et al with MUCH more suitable to purpose have been discovered, cultivated and developed over the years) …
.
Al Gore on ethanol:
“One of the reasons I made that mistake is that I paid particular attention to the farmers in my home state of Tennessee, and I had a certain fondness for the farmers in the state of Iowa because I was about to run for President.”
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10001424052748703572404575634753486416076.html
Ouch!
Did you really say that, and do you mean it?
Wouldn’t you rather address this from the long-term perspective of property rights/property ownership and ‘freedom’ or democracy in the lands where ‘starvation’ is the problem rather than what was first proposed in your post?
(You do realize that most of the ‘wealth’ an individual may have aside from house and car may well be in the form of stocks and bonds .. and further up the scale that ‘wealth’ represents the brick and mortar of a company which employs people for the purpose of some activity that supplies a demand and for which a profit allows continued existence of that enterprise? Start ‘redistributing’ that brick and mortar ‘wealth’ and you will no longer have a business from which ‘wealth’ may be obtained on a continuing basis … )
.
“Nothing illustrates the anti-human ethos of the Greens better than their support for “biofuels”.
Greens supporting biofuels to save the World from ‘evil’ fossil fuel and CO2 emissions. Is the same as campaigning for ‘Green” Mercury CFLs. While protesting about mercury contamination.
There’s been reports including an EU one which finds biofuels produce about the same or infact produce more CO2 emissions than fossil fuel. Soyabean oil was 4x higher with CO2 emissions.
So greens fail with their Gaia saving fantasyworld again.
Dude, but like, did you like know that a single pound of all natural hemp can feed a family of four for 1000 years, and produce enough organic hemp oil to power their 1968 VW type 2 for over a million miles? It’s true, I read it on an internet!
*Sigh* I wish the anti-biofuel brigade would educate themselves…
FACT: The largest crop grown in the United States is… wait for it… TURF! That’s right, lawn. Pristine grass fields designed in the shape of dog legs for your golf courses, rectangles for your football fields, squares for your kids’ schools and patches for your backyard kingdom. Turf is the most managed, most watered, most polluted, most energy intensive and not to mention, most useless “crop” in the universe.
FACT: Existing corn ethanol processes maintain <70% of the protein content from the corn feedstock which is carried through as wet or dry distillage. The food value of the crop is not lost. As such, the whole, ‘food vs. fuel paradigm’ was a complete hoax – propagated by vested interests.
FACT: American GMO yellow dent corn does not feed people. American GMO yellow dent corn destined for export –also- does not feed people. This so-called ‘corn’, is purchased by global conglomerates for factory farms and the production of other products e.g. HFCS. Obviously we need more processed food, more pink slime, more Coca-Cola, more diabetes, obesity and heart disease on planet right?
FACT: US crops like corn, sugar, cotton et cetera, are grossly subsidised at the expense of the rest of the developing world. Go read up on how and why Cuba’s sugar industry was destroyed. Or why Mexican farmers have had to give up their livelihood – a livelihood that persisted for generations in the birthplace of corn.
FACT: People on this planet aren’t starving because there isn’t enough food. They’re starving because the distribution system is corrupt and because capitalism only works when somebody, somewhere, is being exploited. Do yourself a favor and watch Darwin’s Nightmare. I promise, henceforth, you will never look at a starving child in the same light again.
Club of Rome indeed.
Guy shows that even lunatics are welcome to post here.
Smokey says:
July 22, 2012 at 3:34 pm
Carl Brannen,
Your arguments seem dubious to me.
—————————-
He’s pretty well spot on Smokey. Unfortunately, I’m too busy to collate a bunch of links for you (I know you like that). I would suggest that you get a free subscription to Biofuels Digest and you will see the flip side of the coin – over time. You will be able to cut through the partisan sh!t and get to the truth.
There is no MTBE in the US anymore, so as CB points out, ethanol is indispensable.
I’m in a business that will compete with the ethanol industry for feedstocks so, as a competitor, I have to know the space, but I don’t have a vested interest in saying this.
Also, there are some really major developments in biofuels and specialty chemicals going on right now in the US. Sure, there are freeloaders, but there will be winners too.
Maybe the people whining about not getting food from the US because of this should get off their ar$e$ and vote for people who are competent enough to organize food production programs in their own countries.
Also, interestingly, the more green and holier than thou Green Democratic Fake Socialist Republic of Europe is actually too useless to make its own ethanol, and now has ETBE (the ethyl version of MTBE) in most of its gasoline/petrol. So they whinge and whine about the environment and CO2 while simultaneously shoving metric tons of this major pollutant into the environment.
An excellent posting focusing on a large and urgent humanitarian problem. It has sparked off some very good responses and quite a few lunatic responses from the usual suspects.
Despite the recent headlines about the corn shortage, when one actually reads the USDA Corn crop report – you find out the truth is something less dire.
The truth is the early spring, adequate moisture – very favorable conditions, along with the 95.9 million acres planted (vs 91.9 and 88.2 for 2011 and 2010) – had led them to increase the projected yield from the 152.8 and 147.9 bushels/ac of 2010 and 2011, to 166 bu/ac in their Jun 2012 projection.
The lack of moisture in some parts of country thru July caused them to reduce that optimistic yield forecast to a more realistic 146 bushels/ac in their July report. The same report however noted that planted acres were actually larger yet – 96.4 million acres.
This week has seen rain across the Upper Midwest, and there is an expected break in the stationary high allowing cooler Canadian air in to the area. Moisture primarily, and more seasonal temps, will likely see the recent USDA downgrade overly strong.
Even with the current USDA estimate the corn crop is projected to be 12,720 million bushels, almost exactly the same as 2011 and 2010’s 12,358 and 12,447 respectively.
Corn used for ethanol was 5,021 mill/bu in 2010, 5,050 in 2011, and was originally projected at 5,450 for 2012. Current projection is 4,900 million bushels – 150 million bushels less than last year.
Simply put, as of today, even with the significant downgrade by the USDA – the US Corn crop will be larger than 2011 by nearly 400 million bushels.
How about that terrible old price increase? The USDA crop report shows avg Farm Price of $5.10 per bushel in 2010 and $6.10 to $6.30 per bushel for 2011. They projected a price of $4.20 to $5.00 for 2012, but with the downgrade expected the price to be $5.40 to $6.40.
In other words – even with the reduced production the price spike being touted in the press – is simply a reversion to the avg prices from LAST YEAR.
And the reality is with this weeks rain and cooler temps projected across much of the upper Midwest corn belt, those yields and acres harvested will very likely increase – increasing the yield and overall production.
These facts haven’t deterred the fear mongers – there are press reports like this one – about food shortages, and massive price increases, and calls for ending the ethanol mandate.
These practices are EXACTLY like the AGW alarmists using recent heat, drought, tornado’s and the like to whip up their scare-mongering. And the claims made by each are equally unsupported by the real facts.
Notice how a lawn mower that used to last 15 years now lasts 2? Ethanol. And EPA mandated nonadjustable carburetors. Plus they suck fuel at up to 3 times the rate of old.
Guy says:
“FACT: The largest crop grown in the United States is… wait for it… TURF! That’s right, lawn. Pristine grass fields designed in the shape of dog legs for your golf courses, rectangles for your football fields, squares for your kids’ schools and patches for your backyard kingdom. Turf is the most managed, most watered, most polluted, most energy intensive and not to mention, most useless “crop” in the universe”
Got the U.S. farm acreage planted in turf, vs corn, or wheat, for example?
I was recently challenged on my similarily worded statement. Some now claim the bio-fuel wasn’t a “green” program but initiated capitalistic pigs and greedy farmers. While I disagreed, I realized that I didn’t have the means to prove otherwise.
Has anyone else encountered this…? and where is a good rebuttal? GK
A. Scott says:
July 22, 2012 at 3:51 pm
==================
You should be getting pretty good at trying to defend the ethanol lobby. In the past thread on ethanol at WUWT you were refuted quite decisively. While you obviously have a vested interest in ethanol in some manner and are well versed with launching a defense for it, the masses are getting wise just as happened with the CAGW lobby. You should call in the rest of the ethanol team now to stem the discussion. It’s much worse than you thought.
@_Jim …
I see you’re back at it with the same unsubstantiated claims. A read of your “Biofuels Boost Food Prices” link show exactly …. ZERO … evidence to support this claim. Rather it’s statements regarding this are:
Your “proof” consists of “experts differ” and “We’re pretty sure” … not a single shred of fact provided. And a “Suzanne Goldberg” Guardian story listed in footnotes as a sore.
Sorry … simply laughable.
Attempt at moral equivalency by simple assertion (as if we have never SEEN this ploy before) AND this has been debunked …
As Viv says:
“I don’t care who makes ethanol from what, as long as it does not rely on
(1) legislated markets,
(2) subsidies,
(3) price controls,
(4) tax breaks or
(5) deceptive or coercive marketing. ”
But Ray says ALL this apply to the petroleum industry as well, and it does not …
What do you need Ray, cites of every P.L. (Public Law) and ‘statute’ passed by the US congress in order to ‘believe’ differently that ethanol IS mandated for use, IS subsidized and the producers ARE given specific tax breaks in their business of ethanol production?
.
Smokey – wasn’t too hard – type turf grass crop in Google – the first link I get is a US News and World Report story that says exactly that – Turfgrass is America’s biggest crop.
http://www.usnews.com/usnews/culture/articles/050516/16lawn.htm
The study cited notes over 40 million acres, and the US Turgrass people say appx 46.5 million – both appear to be 2004/2005 numbers. The 2005 corn crop was over 81 million acres so it clearly is not the largest crop – but it is one of the largest.
I think the characterization regarding the turf crop is likely highly accurate. While agriculture is still by far the top of the list in urban areas the effects of watering, fertilizing and maintaining all those lawns are one of if not the biggest issue for wetlands, ponds, lakes, rivers and the like.
I went electric back a few years now, pat; I don’t miss the hard-starting messing with gasoline one bit, even though the cord is a PIA but one learns techniques to deal with that (think: ‘rope tricks’ et al) …
.
Geewhiz is this argument going on, still? Ethanol from corn is a despicably stupid idea. Don’t play with your food! There must be 100 different ways from Sunday to make ethanol. We don’t have to use our food, and feed. We had this conversation some time ago. If anyone cares to look I posted some links. The facts are ethanol shot the price of corn through the roof. Yes, there are now processes which allow much of the protein to be utilized, but only in a limited manner. It depends on the digestive processes of the animal. The energy used to get the energy gained is silly stupid, but I don’t have the number handy.
It isn’t so much the corn alone, it is the ripple effects it has had. With the price up, farmers don’t plant other crops….. such as wheat. The cost of cattle feed goes up, along with just about any other farm animal’s feed. So, the cost didn’t rise on just one crop, it did just about across the board.
Entire new infrastructures had to be built….. all of that money, time and material….. to do what, exactly? Oh, well there was the added “benefit” of having to retool our engines. God knows the American people needed that! And timely it was! Is there anything else the ethanol people want to drive the cost up on? Or are you going to wait for the double dip? Or maybe just help cause another one? Jack wagons.
In the end, this is an industry that simply saps capital out of the pockets of the populous. It produces no extra value to anything. It has failed to decouple our fuel prices from oil. And only decreases the world’s food supply.
Smokey at 4:34 , Smartly done! 🙂
@Patrick Guinness: “Notice how a lawn mower that used to last 15 years now lasts 2? Ethanol.”
Complete rubbish. Small engines built recently generally work fine on ethanol. OLDER products have SOME issues.
And the reason your lawnmower today last 2 years not 15 is because you buy absolute crap. We simply refuse to pay for quality any longer – which means even buying a higher end brand means getting a cheap quality product compared to 15 years ago.
I have a 15 year old Toro with a Briggs & Stratton motor.. I have not run anything BUT E10 in it for YEARS and have NEVER had a single problem.
A. Scott says:
July 22, 2012 at 4:49 pm
================
Would like to tell us what the price of corn was prior to the government ethanol mandate? IIRC last years price was a record by about 600% above the avg prior to government mandates for ethanol.
Would you like to tell us how much of a reduction in planted acres of soybeans, oats, and other grains were reduced as a result of the government ethanol mandate?
Would you like to tell us how much the price of the grains increased with the land being converted to corn production?
Would you be more truthful with your figures on this thread than the last?
Would you tell us why you have such a dedicated interest in defending the corn lobby?
Were I a supporter advocating for the continued use of crop-land and corm for fuel purposes I could not have said it better … as it is, your prose is not so much agit-prop as it is the converse, “apathy-prop” … as in: “all is well, move along now, nothing to see here” … “corn used for ethanol is generally not corn used for food” … and so on.
But, much of what you assert stands in direct contradiction to published studies and white-papers looking at the overall energy budget, never the mind the other ‘costs’ e.g. to the land or the distortion of the markets overall due to mandates, paid-out subsidies sourced directly from the public till and the like …
“Follow the Money” … see where it leads, where and by whom was it appropriated and who it benefits; Solyndra wasn’t the first “Crony Capitalism” green-based project that was paid for off the backs of the taxpayer …
.