Weekly Climate and Energy News Roundup

Brought to You by SEPP (www.SEPP.org) The Science and Environmental Policy Project


Quote of the Week:

“In their statement Sunday, Science editors said, “The scientific process is a naturally self-correcting one, as scientists attempt to replicate published results.” WSJ July 9, 2012


Number of the Week: 0.007%



By Ken Haapala, Executive Vice President, Science and Environmental Policy Project (SEPP)

Challenging the Orthodoxy: Some of the biggest news this week comes from a number of new papers that challenge the procedures and findings of the UN Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). These challenges include the data and data manipulation used, and the divergence between model projections and observations.

Procedures: Meteorologists Joe D’Aleo and Anthony Watts, and others, have long challenged procedures used to correct errors in the 20th century data record including a statistical procedure called homogenization. These apply to the data reported by the Global Historical Climatology Network (GHCN) and are used by the three entities that report surface temperature trends, NOAA, NASA-GISS, and the Climatic Research Unit (CRU). Researchers E. Steirou and D. Koutsoyiannis presented to the European Geosciences Union that they found in 67% of the stations examined the procedures used introduced a greater warming trend (or lessened a cooling trend). Using random chance, one would expect the percentage to be about 50%. Upon examination of the series, the raw data indicated an increase in global temperatures of 0.42 deg C while the adjusted data indicated an increase of 0.76 deg C. If this new research is replicated, it seriously affects the findings. 

Steve McIntyre pointed out that the statistical procedures used by the GHCN were never discussed in a journal focused on statistics. As with the hockey-stick, which had statistical problems, climate scientists should seek independent review of their statistical procedures by those knowledgeable in statistics, and not colleagues in climate science. McIntyre, McKitrick, and later Wegman, who demonstrated the bias introduced by the procedure used in the hockey-stick were bitterly attacked by the climate science community for doing so. It remains to be seen how this insular community will respond to this new research. The research demonstrates the hollowness of claims that only climate scientists are fit to analyze climate data. Please see links under Challenging the Orthodoxy.

Models: Roger Pielke Sr, and others, posted a number of new papers that show a significant divergence between projections from models and actual observation, including for temperatures, sea surface temperatures, precipitation, and water vapor. These divergences illustrate the foolhardiness of using climate models to predict future weather (climate) conditions on any scale, be it local, regional, or global.

One of the new papers focuses on how human alteration of the land surface can raise recorded minimum temperatures. This is particularly important, because the main influence of increased greenhouse gases, such as atmospheric carbon dioxide, is not an increase on the daytime highs but an increase in the nighttime lows. This was shown by John Christy, et al. for the San Joaquin valley in California which underwent urbanization and irrigation (increases in the primary greenhouse gas, water vapor), and, as Ross McKitrick has pointed out, these socio-economic factors are ignored by the IPCC. Please see links under Challenging the Orthodoxy and Models v. Observations.

It should be noted that these new papers, as well as others such as the one showing a 2,000 year general cooling trend with significant variation, do not disprove the hypothesis that human emissions of CO2 are causing global warming. But, they show that climate science, as practiced by the IPCC, is inadequate and that the models used fail to account for major natural influences, and have no predictive skill.


Climategate: The Norfolk police responsible for investigating the breach of security that resulted in the leak of the University of East Anglia (UEA) Climategate emails in the fall of 2009 announced they are no longer pursuing the case. The statute of limitations (time in which charges can be filed) is running out and the police have no positive leads. The police said the breach was the result of a hacker rather than a leaker at the University. No doubt many who closely followed the case are not quite so certain the conclusion is correct. Steve McIntyre, who has requested the remaining emails under the Freedom of Information Act, wondered what will happen to the emails now the computer has been returned to UEA.


Drought: The hot, dry weather in the Midwest has resulted in a dramatic decline in the projected corn crop (maize). Since the US is a major exporter of food crops, the drought has raised the possibility of significant price increases worldwide. Further, from 23 to 30% of the corn is used in making the biofuel ethanol (number depends upon definitions used to classify the use and how much goes to other uses after the ethanol is made). Consequently, the use of agriculture land and crops to make biofuels is being severely criticized. The US tax subsidies in the form of a tax credit expired at the end of 2011, which had an estimated cost of $6.9 Billion per year. But the Federal mandates of at least 10% ethanol in gasoline remain. If food prices increase significantly, the biofuel industry will come under significant criticism. (The US Navy has an extremely expensive biofuel program that is based on chicken fat and algae, not on corn or other crops.) Please see links under Alternative Energy – Other.


EIA Levelized Costs: In June, the Energy Information Administration (EIA) published its annual Energy Outlook, which did not include its estimates of levelized costs of generating electricity. These estimates are probably the best estimates generally available to the public giving cost comparisons of generating electricity by competing methods. These estimates include capital costs, operating and maintenance costs (including fuel), and transmission investment. The costs are calculated over an expected project life of 30 years.

On July 12, the EIA released its latest estimates using 2017 as the projected base year for comparison. This allows for reasonable lead times to plan and construct generating facilities. Some methods, such as nuclear, need considerably longer lead times. The estimated costs vary significantly by region and must be so adjusted. Gas-fired plants do not perform well unless there is a pipeline delivering the gas.

In the latest estimates, the EIA tried to include the increase in costs due to new EPA regulations such as Mercury and Air toxics Standards and the Cross-State Air Pollution Rule. It also included a small annual adjustment arising from EPA efforts to limit carbon dioxide emissions. However, it did not include the impact of the EPA attempting to shut-off any new construction of coal-fired power plants. In addition the Gulf of Mexico production data was revised downward to reflect the regulatory efforts of the Department of Interior.

Very interestingly, the plant types were divided into two categories, dispatchable, and non-dispatchable. If the technology is reliable, and plant operators can predict how much energy they can produce on a given day (at least 24 hours in advance), it is considered dispatchable. If the technology relies on the whims of nature, and the operator cannot predict they can produce on a given day (at least 24 hours in advance), it is non-dispatchable. Solar and wind fall into the latter category. Also, off-shore wind was dropped off the estimates as a feasible technology. No doubt, some groups will be angered by this.

Advanced combined-cycle natural gas is estimated to be, by far, the lowest cost means of generating electricity for ordinary purposes with conventional combined cycle slightly higher. The costs of conventional coal, the next major fuel, are estimated to be about 50% greater.

The estimates for combined-cycle natural gas did not fall significantly from the 2009 estimates even though the price of natural gas is now comparatively low. The reason is that EIA estimates the price of natural gas will increase to about $4.5 per million BTUs by 2017, up from about $3 per million BTUs paid by utilities today. Clearly, the EIA expects a market shake-out resulting in less drilling and new production because the prices received today are lower than the costs of production. Please see link under Energy Issues – US.


A New Energy World? Commentator Walter Russell Mead has a series of provocative essays on what he terms the energy revolution – extraction of oil and gas from shale and from deepwater sources. Some may consider that he is too optimistic about the potential from these sources. Certainly, the practical history is not sufficiently long to make any long term predictions. Further, he may be too optimistic about the willingness of governments to permit the development of these resources. The recent actions of the US EPA and the Department of Interior are not encouraging and the outright banning of hydraulic fracturing in France is discouraging. Nonetheless, his projections of the geo-political consequences for the US and for the world are interesting.


Quote of the Week: One would hope the editors of Science would heed their words rather than reject qualified rebuttals to articles they have published on topics relating to climate. It is doubtful Science would have published any of the articles linked today that question IPCC data and procedures. (The quote was in regard to Science publishing an article rebutting a prior article stating that arsenic can replace phosphorus as one of the six elements needed for life.)


Number of the Week: 0.007%. The summertime warming chorus is increasing its volume. A chunk of ice equal in area to twice that of Manhattan broke off from a Greenland ice sheet. This immediately became an important symbol of global warming and rising sea levels – the ice sheet will disappear and coastal communities will drown. According to reports, the area of the chunk is estimated to be 46 square miles. According to Wikipedia, the area of the Greenland ice sheet is estimated to be 660,235 square miles. Thus, the chunk is 0.007% of the area of the Greenland ice sheet. Since the Greenland ice sheet has a variable thickness up to over 10,000 feet, a calculation of the percentage of mass lost would be trivial. See links under Communicating Better to the Public – Exaggerate or be Vague?



For the numbered articles below please see this week’s TWTW at: www.sepp.org. The articles are at the end of the pdf.

1. How Insider Politics Saved California’s Train to Nowhere

The high-speed rail line may never be built, but it will save a few Democratic seats.

By Allysia Finley, WSJ, Jul 13, 2012


2. Trade Dries Up Along With Mississippi

By Cameron McWhirter, WSJ, Jul 13, 2012





Climategate Continued

Climategate police inquiry closes

By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Jul 18, 2012


Scotland Yard Interviewed

By Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, Jul 19, 2012


Police closes UEA investigation

By Staff Writers, Norfolk Constabulary, Jul 18, 2012 [H/t Climate Audit]


Suppressing Scientific Inquiry

JGR Paper Submitted: Modeling Ocean Warming Since 1955

By Roy Spencer, Global Warming, Jul 18, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Announcing a new paper submitted for review. Apparently Spencer’s name strikes fear in the hearts of editors of the Geophysical Research Letters.]

“AGU Journals Should Ask Authors to Publish Results

By Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, Jul 14, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Editors of American Geophysical Union journals should follow their own rules for publication, but do not.]

Challenging the Orthodoxy

Smaller 20th Century Warming: Hotter Medieval Warm Period

By David Whitehouse, The Observatory, Jul 17, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Statistical overestimate of recent temperature trends, empirical research shows underestimation of Medieval temperatures.

Station Homogenization as a Statistical Procedure

By Steve McIntyre, Climate Audit, Jul 17, 2012


[SEPP Comment: McIntyre discussion on the statistical processes leading to overestimation of 20th century temperature trends.]

New paper blames about half of global warming on weather station data homogenization

By Anthony Watts, WUWT, Jul 17, 2012


Static Climate Models In A Virtually Unknown Dynamic Atmosphere

By Tim Ball, A Different Perspective, Jul 13, 2012


[SEPP Comment: A step-by-step explanation into what is not known yet claimed to be definitive.]

CMIP5 Climate Model Runs – A Scientifically Flawed Approach

By Roger Pielke, Sr, Climate Science, Jul 20, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The predictive skill of the new set of models used in the upcoming IPCC report may be no better than the old models – no skill.]

BOMs new data set, ACORN, so bad it should be withdrawn (954 min temps larger than the max!)

By Jo Nova, Her Blog, Jul 16, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Errors in official Australian historic temperatures.]

Climate change readings ‘inaccurate’

By Trevor Quinn, Aukland Now, Jul 16, 2012 [H/t WUWT]


SEPP Comment: Questioning the official New Zealand historic temperatures.]

Twenty Times More Likely (Not): The Science

By John Nielsen-Gammon, Houston Chronicle, Jul 20, 2012 [H/t Climate Etc.]


[SEPP Comment: Debunking NOAA’s press release claiming established probabilities of events such as last year’s Texas heat wave on global warming.]

Winning the War with Global Warming Alarmists

By Walter Cunningham, Space News, Jul 10, 2012 [H/t Joe Bast]


Tree rings suggest Roman world was warmer than thought

By Fred Pearce, New Scientist, ICECAP, Jul 20, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The following response by Rupert Wyndham to this inadequate description by Pierce of the research is worth the read.]

UK Temperature Trends

By Paul Homewood, Not a Lot of People Know That, Jul 19, 2012 [H/t GWPF]


[SEPP Comment: Met Office using Mr. Mann’s clippers to snip early data.]

Defending the Orthodoxy

Climate scientists want ‘serious’ State Dept. review of oil sands emissions

By Ben Geman, The Hill, Jul 17, 2012


Fed agency: June fourth hottest on record worldwide

By Ben Geman, The Hill, Jul 16, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The statement is misleading. Measurements were hardly global in the early part of the record.]

Questioning the Orthodoxy

IPCC Admits Its Past Reports Were Junk

By Joseph L. Bast, American Thinker, Jul 16, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Note that this was written based on the initial report of the InterAcademy Council (IAC), not the final report which was heavily sanitized.]

The Mother of All Hoaxes

By Alan Caruba, Warning Signs, Jul 17, 2012


That Scientific Global Warming Consensus…Not!

By Larry Bell, Forbes, Jul 17, 2012


About that overwhelming 97-98% number of scientists that say there is a climate consensus…

By Antony Watts, WUWT, Jul 18, 2012


[SEPP Comment: A follow-up with a graph on the link above. The visual impression is striking.]

Madrid 1995 And The Quest For The Mirror In The Sky, Part II

By Bernie Lewin, Enthusiasm, Scepticism and Science, Jul 1, 2012


[SEPP Comment: IPCC searching for the human fingerprint to global warming.]

Climate change caused by seawater, claim scientists

By Staff Writers, The Scotsman, Jul 19, 2012 [H/t GWPF]


Questioning European Green

The law of unintended consequences

By Martin Livermore, Scientific Alliance, Jul 20, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Some well-intended schemes become disasters. The US biofuel tax credit subsidy costing about $6.9 Billion per year ended in December 2011, but the Congressional mandate continues.]

Doubts Rising over German Switch to Renewables

By Staff Writers, Spiegel Online, Jul 17, 2012 [H/t GWPF]


Sand, salt, volcanoes add to EU clean air challenge

By Stephanie Ebbs, World Environment News, Jul 16, 2012 [H/t Hugh Sharman]


[SEPP Comment: Nature polluting.]

Average Chinese person’s carbon footprint now equals European’s

The per capita emissions of the world’s largest national emitter is almost on a par with the European average, new figures show

Duncan Clark, Guardian, UK, Jul 18, 2012 [H/t SPPI]


Questioning Green Elsewhere

Which Is Better for the Environment: Transit or Roads?

By Randal O’Toole, NCPA, July, 2012 [H/t John Olson]


[SEPP Comment: Questioning benefits of public transit.]

Polar Bears And Inuit Victims of Environmental Hysteria and Inadequate Science, Not Global Warming.

By Tim Ball, A Different Perspective, Jul 18, 2012


Australia’s Green Ideological Disaster

By Sam Fielding, American Thinker, Jul 19, 2012


Expanding the Orthodoxy

U.S. ranks low in energy efficiency

By Staff Writers, Washington (UPI), Jul 13, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The easiest way to improve energy efficiency is to put Americans in European sized homes, with accompanying population densities, and no air conditioning, as some environmentalists demand.]

Seeking a Common Ground

Rob W in the Courier

By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Jul 20, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Montford states why the new paper on temperatures in Northern Europe for the past since the Roman Warm Period does not does not disprove the claim of human caused global warming.]

Communicating Better to the Public – Exaggerate, or be Vague?

Democrat Markey says massive ice break makes case for climate change action

By Ben Geman, The Hill, Jul 18, 2012


Crack in the Earth: Greenland glacier loses ice island twice the size of Manhattan

By Anthony Watts, WUWT, Jul 17, 2012


Greenland glacier loses large mass of ice

By Juliet Eilperin and Jason Samenow, Washington Post, Jul 17, 2012


What else did the ’97% of scientists’ say?

By Barry Woods, WUWT, Jul 18, 2012


[SEPP Comment: A rather long explanation of a sensationalist poll that was essentially meaningless.]

Communicating Better to the Public – Make things up.

A World Without Coral Reefs

By Roger Bradbury, NYT, Jul 13, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The research on ocean acidification projects a 2 deg C rise in ocean temperature by 2050 to 2100. Yet the atmosphere has stopped warming and there has been little or no warming of the oceans in the tropics.]

The challenges facing the vulnerable Antarctic

By Staff Writers, Melbourne, Australia (SPX) Jul 18, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The “vulnerable” Antarctic. Try living there without modern equipment!]

The Endless Summer

By Mark Bittman, NYT, Jul 18, 2012


[SEPP Comment: From the Times magazine food columnist.]

Texas Tall Tales and Global Warming

By Cliff Mass, Guest Post, WUWT, Jul 15, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The conclusion demonstrates that the author is not a global warming skeptic.]

Models v. Observations

Guest Post “Modeled European Precipitation Change Smaller Than Observed”

By Ronald van Haren, Geert Jan van Oldenborgh, Geert Lenderink andWilco Hazeleger, Royal Dutch Meteorological Institute (KNMI), Pielke Climate Science, Jul 17, 2012


New Paper “SST And Circulation Trend Biases Cause An Underestimation Of European Precipitation Trends” By Van Haren Et Al 2012

By Roger Pielke Sr, Climate Science, Jul 16, 2012


New Paper “Weather And Climate Analyses Using Improved Global Water Vapor Observations” By Vonder Haar Et Al 2012

By Roger Pielke Sr, Climate Science, Jul 16, 2012


New Paper “Parameterization Of Instantaneous Global Horizontal Irradiance At The Surface. Part II: Cloudy-Sky Component” By Sun Et Al 2012

By Roger Pielke Sr, Climate Science, Jul 29, 2012


These errors are clearly larger than the few W m-2 that are due to human climate forcings, and even large relative to the natural variations of radiative fluxes. This is yet another example of why the IPCC models are not robust tools to predict changes in global, regional and local climate statistics.

Measurement Issues

Further Confirmation Of The Misinterpretation Of Miniumum Land Surface Temperature Trends By NCDC, CRU, GISS And BEST As Part Of A Diagnostic Of Global Warming

By Roger Pielke Sr, Climate Science, Jul 18, 2012


In other words, the magnitude of multi-decadal land temperature trends, as a diagnostic of global warming, as reported by NCDC, GISS, CRU and BEST for the last several decades is significantly overstated. These organizations are miscommunicating the complete explanation for observed surface temperature trends over land.

Fahrenheit vs. Celsius

By Roger Pielke Jr, His Blog, Jul 16, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Amusing look at three temperature scales from a human prospective.]

Changing Weather

US suffers worst drought in 56 years

By Staff Writers, Washington (AFP), July 16, 2012


Tornado Season Statistics Update – ‘remarkably quiet’

By Paul Homewood, WUWT, Jul 16, 2012


Blowing smoke over global warming

Hot snapshots screen out the chill

Editorial, Washington Times, Jul 16, 2012


Cold Winter and Summer Have Some Ready to Leave Alaska

After record-breaking winter, cool summer is a bummer

By Janessa Webb, KTVA Alaska, Jul 20, 2012 [H/t Gordon Fulks, Steven Goddard]


Changing Sea Ice

New Paper Challenges Climate Models That Predict Ice-Free Conditions In The Arctic

By Hockey Schtick, GWPF, Jul 8, 2012


Cap-and-Trade and Carbon Taxes

Carbon prices fall to new record low — $4 per ton (Australians will pay $23 – that’s 500% more!)

By Jo Nova, Her Blog, Jul 17, 2012


GOP leaders slam the door on carbon taxes

By Ben Geman, The Hill, Jul 16, 2012


Energy Issues – Non-US

New Gulf pipeline to bypass ‘world’s most important oil chokepoint’

By Yadullah Hussain, Financial Post, Jul 13, 2012


Arctic oil: Putin’s last chance

By Matthew Hulbert, European Energy Review, Jul 19, 2012


Canada’s Arctic push: Left out in the cold?

By Yadullah Hussain, Financial Post, Jul 20, 2012


IEA Misses the Point on Renewables

By Andrés Cala, Energy Tribune, Jul 18, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Policy on Renewables should be based on economics not an ideological imperative. In some countries renewables may make economic sense, especially hydro.]

Clinton urges Mekong nations to avoid US dam mistakes

By Staff Writers, Phnom Penh (AFP), July 13, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Keep them electricity free. See link immediately above.]

Italy Seeks $18 Billion Investment Ditching Offshore Ban: Energy

By Ladka Bauerova and Chiara Vasarri, Bloomberg, Jul 19, 2012 [H/t GWPF]


Energy Issues — US

Levelized Cost of New Generation Resources in the Annual Energy Outlook 2012

By Staff Writers, EIA, Jul 12, 2012


Energy Revolution 3: The New American Century

By Walter Russell Mead, American Interest, Jul 18, 2012


Energy ‘Rebounds’ and ‘Backfires’: An Introduction and Literature Overview

By Robert Michaels, Master Resource, Jul 17, 2012


Oil and Natural Gas – the Future or the Past?

Enough Oil for Independence?

By Donn Dears, Power For USA, Jul 20, 2012


Liquids can’t prop up natural gas companies’ profits for long: S&P

By Yadullah Hussain, Financial Post, Jul 10, 2012


Washington looks to North Dakota for economic, energy blueprint

By Rob Bluey, Hot Air, Jul 14, 2012


Experts: arctic drilling for security

By Yue Wang, Medill News Service, Washington (UPI), Jul 16, 2012


The ecology of natural gas

By Staff Writers, Washington DC, (SPX) Jul 17, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Starting the base to attack natural gas use.]

Thanks in Good Measure to Fracking U.S. Carbon Dioxide Emissions Down 9 Percent From 2007 Peak

By Ronald Bailey, Reason, Jul 20, 2012


[SEPP Comment: A poor economy and high gasoline prices also helped.]

Feeding China’s Energy Appetite, Naturally

By Kevin Jianjun Tu and David Livingston, Energy Tribune, Jul 17, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Explaining why a Chinese oil company may buy natural gas assets of the US Chesapeake Energy in spite of low natural gas prices in the US.]

Washington’s Control of Oil and Gas

Shell’s Arctic drilling plan could go down to the wire

By Ben Geman, The Hill, Jul 17, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Washington’s performance is called slow-rolling.]

Obama Continues to Despise American Energy

By Eileen F. Toplansky, American Thinker, Jul 19, 2012


Return of King Coal?

China’s downturn affecting coal

By Staff Writers, Beijing (UPI) Jul 19, 2012


[SEPP Comment: According to the estimate China consumes 300 million tons of coal a month. (That was the EIA estimate in 2010.) About 30% more than the US.]

India to boost coal imports

By Staff Writers, New Delhi (UPI), Jul 17, 2012


Nuclear Energy and Fears

Picture record of tsunami arrival

By Staff Writers, WNN, Jul 11, 2012


Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Solar and Wind

Pumping Up Storage

By Donn Dears, Power For USA, Jul 17, 2012


[SEPP Comment: A discussion on the need to store electricity due to expansion of solar and wind.]

Italy’s Solar Bust: Just Another Data Point

By Carlo Stagnaro, Master Resource, Jul 20, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Italy’s policies created a disaster – high direct subsides, mandates creating unlimited demand, and implicit subsidies of other forms of generation having to provide back-up. Same theme, different country.]

Bulgaria’s renewables market goes from boom to bust

By Mariyana Yaneva, European Energy Review, Jul 19, 2012


[SEPP Comment: Same theme, different country.]

Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Energy — Other

Politicians cause another food crisis

By Andrew Montford, Bishop Hill, Jul 20, 2012


A soaring food price fear

By Karen Maley, Business Spectator, Jul 20, 2012 [H/t GWPF]


Paraguayan Food Vs Fuel

By Natalia Alonso, Oxfam, Jul 17, 2012


Navy pushes forward with ‘Green Fleet’ despite GOP resistance

By Zack Colman, The Hill, Jul 19, 2012


Geothermal project will cut university carbon footprint in half

By Staff Writers, Muncie IN (SPX), Jul 16, 2012


[SEPP Comment: The press releases do not discuss the capital costs. According to Clean Technica the capital cost of the project is $50 million. The internal rate of return is hardly spectacular. http://cleantechnica.com/2012/03/26/ball-state-dedicates-largest-closed-loop-geothermal-system-in-america/]

Platinum is wrong stuff for fuel cells

By Staff Writers, Cleveland OH (SPX), Jul 17, 2012


Alternative, Green (“Clean”) Vehicles

RNC hits Obama on loan to automaker

By Ben Geman, The Hill, Jul 19, 2012


California Dreaming

Jerry Brown signs rail bill, avoids Central Valley opponents

By David Siders, Sacramento Bee, Jul 19, 20122


[SEPP Comment: The two urban areas that supposedly benefit the most had to be bribed?]

California Air Resources Board cap and trade program circumvents state open meeting laws with a Moonbeam assist

By Anthony Watts, WUWT, Jul 14, 2012


[SEPP Comment: A government agency forming a private corporation to avoid public disclosure when imposing hidden taxes. Long but interesting.]

Review of Recent Scientific Articles by NIPCC

For a full list of articles see www.NIPCCreport.org

Acclimatization of Corals to Thermal Stress

Reference: Bellantuono, A.J., Hoegh-Guldberg, O. and Rodriguez-Lanetty, M. 2012. Resistance to thermal stress in corals without changes in symbiont composition. Proceedings of the Royal Society B 279: 1100-1107.


A Data-Rich 1200-Year Temperature History of the Northern Hemisphere

Reference: Ljungqvist, F.C., Krusic, P.J., Brattstrom, G. and Sundqvist, H.S. 2012. Northern Hemisphere temperature patterns in the last 12 centuries. Climate of the Past 8: 227-249.


Effects of Rising Temperatures on the Progamic Phase of High-Mountain Plants

Reference: Steinacher, G. and Wagner, J. 2012. Effect of temperature on the progamic phase in high-mountain plants. Plant Biology 14: 295-305.


The Potential for Adaptive Evolution to Enable the World’s Most Important Calcifying Organism to Cope with Ocean Acidification

Reference: Lohbeck, K.T., Riebesell, U. and Reusch, T.B.H. 2012. Adaptive evolution of a key phytoplankton species to ocean acidification. Nature Geoscience 5: 346-351.


“contemporary evolution could help to maintain the functionality of microbial processes at the base of marine food webs in the face of global change [italics added].”

[SEPP Comment: Nature adjusts as it has for eons.]

Other Scientific News

The Clovis First Theory is put to rest at Paisley Caves

By Staff Writers, Copenhagen, Denmark (SPX) Jul 16, 2012


Other News that May Be of Interest

Farmers to fight a £6bn asbestos scam

A legal challenge is being mounted to the new asbestos regulations

By Christopher Booker, Telegraph, UK, Jul 14, 2012


Universities lobby for a seat at the table

By Mara Grebnick, David Unger & Jean Song, Medill News Service, Washington (UPI) Jul 20, 2012


Charles Sturt’s time: so hot that thermometers exploded. Was Australia’s hottest day in 1828? 53.9C!

By Jo Nova, Her Blog, Jul 15, 2012


Oh Great: US geoengineers to spray sun-reflecting chemicals from balloon

By Staff Writers, Blacklisted News, Jul 18, 2012 [H/t ICECAP]




Study: Wolverines need refrigerators

Will insects and bacteria consume more of the wolverine’s food if the climate warms?

Press Release: Wildlife Conservation Society, Jul 12, 2012 [H/t WUWT]


Molecule bottled water is ‘pure’ nonsense

By Steve Cuozzo, New York Post, Jul 19, 2012 [H/t ACSH]



On the Road Again: At the end of the month Fred Singer will be traveling and speaking at various locations. Talks include:

July 27, 11 am Seminar: Brookhaven National Lab, Patchogue, Long Island, New York

Doctors for Disaster Preparedness, Long Island Marriot, 101 James Doolittle Blvd, Uniondale, NY


July 29, 9:00 am, Registration may be required

Heartland Institute

July 30, 2012, 11:30 am – 1:30 pm One South Wacker Drive, #2740, Chicago, Il 60606

Registration required, $10, Contact Tonya Houston at thouston@heartland.org or 312/377-4000

The 15th Annual International Mars Society Convention

August 3 to 5, 2012 Pasadena Convention Center, CA


Morning of Aug 4, Registration may be required


0 0 votes
Article Rating
Newest Most Voted
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Mindert Eiting
July 22, 2012 11:39 pm

I would not call homogenization a statistical procedure. Statistics is applied mathematics and therefore statistical procedures are trivial. This means that you cannot lie with statistical procedures, as is sometimes thought. Computing a mean is a simple statistical procedure and Principal Components Analysis an example of a complex procedure being in the end completely trivial. Homogenization is a procedure of altering data on the basis of non-mathematical assumptions. Nowhere in the professional statistics literature this procedure can be found. How could a statistician say that you should add certain values to nineteenth century temperature data? If it were introduced in statistics and therefore in mathematics, the result would be as disastrous as making the whole of mathematics dependent on the assumption that our moon is made of cheese.

George E. Smith;
July 23, 2012 12:30 pm

Well I have only one observation about the “data homogenisation” . To me, the gig was up, in Jan 2001, in a report by John Christy et al following about 20 years of data from some oceanic buoys, that simultaneously measured ocean surface water Temperature, at a fixed -1 metre depth, and the atmospheric (lower troposphere) Temperature at + 3 metres altitude, in the same location on the same buoy.
Historically, it was assumed that these Temperatures were the same, and that the Temperature measured in a bucket of water on deck, having been dragged aboard from some totally unknown depth, or taken aboard in an engine room colling water intake, and measured in the heat of the engine room, was a perfectly good proxy for the air Temperature measured a few feet above the Weber grill at some land based standard weather measuring site, or in the jet exhaust blast over a concrete airport runway.
Now with ocean currents being a few knots at most, but wind speeds of tens to hundreds of knots; why anyone would even imagine that the temperatures would be the same, with air over Hawaii today, becoming air over the USA, next week, is beyond my understanding.
And if you send your survey ship, back to the same GPS co-ordinates six months from now, the normal meandering of oceanic currents will ensure that you are not back in the same water you were six months ago, so your location data is totaly bogus.
Well Christy et al reported FOR THAT 20 YEAR PERIOD, that the warming from the air Temperature data, was something like 60% of what was reported by the surface water Temperature data. So that means that the 150 years or so of world Temperature measurement data, of which 70% relates to Temperatures over the oceanic regions, is all nonsense.
The most important discovery of the Christy study, was thast the air and water Temperatures, not only are NOT the same, but they are also NOT correlated; which is a polite way of saying that it is not possible to correct the 150 years of oceanic water Temperature data, to get true lower troposphere Temperatures for 70% of the earth surface area.
So I really don’t care which of the 13 or so teraflopcomputer models of global Temperature anomalies, is the current favorite of the warmists; the data that goes into them is clearly rubbish.
We don;t have any idea what the mean global lower troposphere or even surface Temperature really is. Well maybe I’m stretching it a bit. We are fairtly sure that on any given northern summer day, the gobal mean Temperature is somewhere between -130 deg F, and +140 deg F, that being the approximate maximum total extreme daily Temperature range simultaneously available on earth between North African deserts, and tourist places, like Vostock Station.
And due to an elaborate explanation by Galileo, we can say that there are an infinite (or very large number) number of places on earth, that have ANY Temperature reading between the extreme limits for that particular day.
So no, I don’t believe the earth is 0.42 or 0.76 deg C hotter than it was 150 years ago, or that anyone knows what it is.

M Courtney
July 24, 2012 12:07 am

Cliamtegate investigation closed: Perhaps there should be an investigation into the investigation?
How could Tallbloke have his PCs nicked but RealClimate got away unscathed. RealClimate were the 1st to get the emails and are linked to the UEA.
Neil Wallis has already come to the attention of the police for his time at the News of the World.
It certainly looks like the UEA have enabled him to continue his practises.

%d bloggers like this:
Verified by MonsterInsights