Guest post by Bob Tisdale
This post will serve as the Preliminary Sea Surface Temperature Anomaly Update for June 2012, since we’ll be using preliminary June 2012 data in it. Last week ended on June 30th, so the preliminary data should be close to the official June data, which does not come out until Monday July 9, 2012. Refer to the schedule on the NOAA Optimum Interpolation Sea Surface Temperature Analysis Frequently Asked Questions webpage.
Anthony Watts often starts a post with, “I get mail.” And sometimes I get mail from Anthony Watts. This post takes a look at the curious sea surface temperature anomaly patterns Anthony and Roger Sowell expressed interest in.
Many people, including me, have the Unisys daily maps of sea surface temperature anomalies as one of their browser favorites. Figure 1 shows the map dated July 1, 2012. I also take a look at the Unisys sea surface temperature anomaly animation at least once a week. As of today, there’s cool waters flowing toward the central tropical Pacific out of the North Pacific, and in the northeastern South Pacific, there’s the pocket of warm waters off the coast of South America feeding northward. This will be an interesting El Niño to watch.
Figure 1
The map shows very low sea surface temperature anomalies in the Bering Sea. For those of you who don’t recall where the Bering Sea is, it’s south of the Bering Strait between Alaska and Russia and north of the Aleutian Island chain. In the eastern North Pacific, there’s a pattern that many would consider a negative Pacific Decadal Oscillation (PDO) spatial pattern. Toward the west, though, during a negative PDO pattern one would expect positive anomalies in the western boundary current extension east of Japan called the Kuroshio-Oyashio Extension or KOE. But the typical PDO pattern that people look for is stronger in boreal winter. Right now the North Pacific is transitioning from the aftereffects of the 2011/12 La Niña to the upcoming El Niño.
Are the sea surface temperature anomalies in the Bering Sea unusually cool? Looking at Figure 2, the sea surface temperature anomalies for the Bering Sea have been cooler in the past, most recently during the 1998/99/00/01 La Niña. Is the recent drop caused by the unusual amount of sea ice packed to the north of Bering Strait? Dunno. One thing is certain, sea surface temperature anomalies for the Bering Sea have been cooling steadily since 2003-04.
Figure 2
And that’s consistent with the entire North Pacific, Figure 3. Sea surface temperature anomalies, based on the smoothed curve, peaked there in 2004/05 and have been cooling since–with an ENSO-related wiggle or three. And the North Pacific is a big chunk o’ water.
Figure 3
Referring back to the map in Figure 1, over in the North Atlantic, there’s that trough of cool anomalies. It stretches northeast from the Gulf of Mexico to the North Sea and Baltic Sea. I don’t recall that pattern in any of the sea surface temperature anomaly animations I’ve created. Then again, most of those have been based on the Reynolds OI.v2 data, which start in November 1982. I took another look at the animation of Global sea surface temperature anomalies I had prepared three years ago that’s posted on YouTube. I didn’t see that same cool trough in the North Atlantic. And I had used a contour interval of 0.2 deg C in the animation to make patterns like the trough stand out. That doesn’t mean the cool trough hasn’t existed before; it just hasn’t shown itself (or shown itself as clearly?) in the last 30 years.
But you always have to keep in mind that the color scaling of the Unisys sea surface temperature anomaly maps are weighted toward blues and greens, which most of us associate with negative (cool) sea surface temperature anomalies. The light blues in the Unisys maps include anomalies as high as +1 deg C, and greens extend up to +2 deg C, where most presentations are showing yellows, oranges and reds at those levels. That’s why I also have the map at Australia’s EldersWeather webpage as a favorite. See Figure 4. Its color scale is similar to the one I use in the monthly sea surface temperature anomaly updates. It helps to put things back in perspective. The cool trough in the North Atlantic is still there, but it’s not as impressive.
Figure 4
What stands out more in that map are the high sea surface temperature anomalies along the east coast of North America, north of North Carolina, that reach up toward southern Greenland. They formed over the past couple of months. Part of that is caused by a residual seasonal cycle in the anomalies, and part of it is “weather-related” warming. Figure 5 shows the time-series graph of sea surface temperature anomalies for the Northwest North Atlantic–refer to the coordinates on the graph. It captures the hotspot from Newfoundland and Labrador to southern Greenland. There have been warmer sea surface temperature anomalies there, but that was the summer following the 2009/10 El Niño. We’ll just have to see where they wind up and how long they persist this year.
Figure 5
The recent elevated Northwest North Atlantic sea surface temperature anomalies did not have a major impact on the sea surface temperature anomalies for the North Atlantic as a whole, Figure 6. The seasonal upward swing there is not abnormal.
Figure 6
Since the decrease in North Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies (Figure 3) was much greater than the rise in the North Atlantic data (Figure 6), the Northern Hemisphere sea surface temperature anomalies, Figure 7, dropped in June 2012. But that was countered by the increase in the Southern Hemisphere data, Figure 8. (If NOAA updated their base years for anomalies, some of those seasonal swings would decrease.) The offsetting chnages in hemispheric data caused there to be basically no change in Global sea surface temperature anomalies, Figure 9. They dropped about -0.01 deg C—as I said, basically no change in Global sea surface temperature anomalies.
Figure 7
HHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 8
HHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 9
The preliminary monthly NINO3.4 sea surface temperature anomalies for June (0.45 deg C) are just shy of the 0.5 deg C threshold of an El Niño event. NINO3.4 sea surface temperature anomalies are a commonly used index for the frequency, magnitude and duration of El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO) events. See Figure 10. And the weekly NINO3.4 sea surface temperature anomalies (Figure 11) for the week centered in Wednesday June 27thare at 0.73 deg C. That’s well into weak El Niño range. I’ve also included NINO1+2 sea surface temperature anomalies in Figure 11. The NINO1+2 region is bordered by the coordinates of 10S-0, 90W-80W, which is centered just south of the equator in the far eastern tropical Pacific. As you can see, they’ve been elevated for a number of months. The 2012/13 El Niño is starting as an East Pacific El Niño, which are typically stronger than Central Pacific El Niño events. We shall see how well the upcoming El Niño maintains that “typical” ENSO characteristic.
Figure 10
HHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 11
Figure 12 is a graph of weekly Global sea surface temperature anomalies centered on Wednesday June 27th. They’re making their wiggly transition from their responses to the La Niña and to the upcoming El Niño. Something stands out for me in Figure 12 and in the monthly global sea surface temperature anomalies, Figure 9. Note how the La Niña-related seasonal minimum straddling 2011/12 is noticeably cooler than the seasonal minimum of 2010/11. Yet the 2010/11 La Niña was much stronger than the 2011/12 La Niña.
Figure 12
And the last two illustrations show the preliminary June sea surface temperature anomaly graphs for the East Pacific and for the rest of the world, the Atlantic-Indian-West Pacific Oceans. Those two subsets capture the data from pole to pole. I present the global data divided into those two subsets in my monthly sea surface temperature updates for very obvious reasons. The East Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies from pole to pole haven’t risen in 30 years, and that dataset represents about 1/3rd of the surface area of the global oceans. You could cut and paste a Super El Niño at the end of it and the trend would still be flat. Then there’s the “rest-of-the-world” data, which represents the other 2/3rdsof the global ocean surface area. It rose in very clear steps over the past 30 years. The steps are caused by major El Niño events that are followed by La Niña events, and those are El Niño events that also have not been counteracted by the effects of explosive volcanic eruptions, which is what happened in 1982/83. Sea surface temperatures in the Atlantic-Indian-West Pacific oceans don’t rise between the major El Niño events, even with the effects of a rising Atlantic Multidecadal Oscillation. And that means the sea surface temperatures for the South Atlantic, Indian and West Pacific Oceans decrease between those events. That and the fact that the East Pacific sea surface temperature anomalies have actually decreased over the past 30 years are hard to explain with the anthropogenic global warming hypothesis, especially when the climate models used by the IPCC don’t reproduce those global sea surface temperature patterns. Those models show no skill whatsoever.
Figure 13
HHHHHHHHHHHHHH
Figure 14
WOULD YOU LIKE TO UNDERSTAND WHY THE ATLANTIC-INDIAN-WEST PACIFIC DATASET SHIFTS UPWARD IN RESPONSE TO MAJOR EL NIÑO EVENTS?
Over the past three years, in so many posts it’s not practical to link them here, I’ve presented the El Niño-Southern Oscillation (ENSO)-related processes that cause the blatantly obvious upward shifts in sea surface temperature anomalies for the Atlantic, Indian and West Pacific data shown above. I’ve also explained why the East Pacific shows no warming over the past 30 years. You’re welcome to use the search function on this webpage.
In my upcoming book, I go into lots more detail about how ENSO causes those upward shifts. I’m hoping to publish it in late July, early August of this year. The only things slowing down the process are the new chapters I’ve added under the section of general ENSO discussions, and those are discussions I have not posted on my blog.
SOURCE
The Reynolds Optimally Interpolated Sea Surface Temperature Data (OI.v2) are available through the NOAA National Operational Model Archive & Distribution System (NOMADS) website.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.














Stephen Richards
I live in SW England. Its gloriously hot in my part….Ok I lied….
A good test of a summer is how the outdoor tomatoes do. I’ll let you know once I can fight the kayaking slugs off
tonyb
The pattern of planetary winds have changed as the global temperatures decrease.
People consistently fail to go to cause getting stuck with effect because it is useful for political climate science. To provide cause would take them away from human CO2 to the sun – an unacceptable destination.
Supporters of IPCC climate science are claiming the current pattern (effect), particularly the warming in eastern North America, are proof they were right. Here are two recent examples; “This is what global warming looks like at the regional or personal level,” said Jonathan Overpeck, professor of geosciences and atmospheric sciences at the University of Arizona. “The extra heat increases the odds of worse heat waves, droughts, storms and wildfire. This is certainly what I and many other climate scientists have been warning about.”
“Kevin Trenberth, head of climate analysis at the National Center for Atmospheric Research in fire-charred Colorado, said these are the very record-breaking conditions he has said would happen, but many people wouldn’t listen. So it’s I told-you-so time, he said.”
Source: http://apnews.myway.com/article/20120703/D9VP9J681.html
Actually all this proves is they don’t understand basic climatology. The effect they focus on are changing global wind patterns, the cause they ignore are changes in the sun that are causing cooling, which results in increased meridional flow and potential for increased temperature differences along frontal zones. I wrote about it here:
http://drtimball.com/2012/current-global-weather-patterns-normal-despite-government-and-media-distortions/
“But you always have to keep in mind that the color scaling of the Unisys sea surface temperature anomaly maps are weighted toward blues and greens, which most of us associate with negative (cool) sea surface temperature anomalies. The light blues in the Unisys maps include anomalies as high as +1 deg C, and greens extend up to +2 deg C, where most presentations are showing yellows, oranges and reds at those levels.”
Bob, Unisys also has a more traditional SST map. Just click on SST Anom-New, just to the right of SST Anom. It’s a lot easier to distinguish between warmer and cooler than normal water on that scale.
@ur momisugly Joseph Bastardi (July 3, 2012 at 3:48 am)
Could you expound on this please? It sounds intriguing.
RE: Joseph Bastardi says:
July 3, 2012 at 3:48 am
This is really bad news for CA. We got our wake up call toward the end of the last negative PDO (the infamous, but forgotten / unknown by 35 years of transplants 1974 – 1977 drought). That wake up call ought to have spurred massive upgrade of water infrastructure. That did not happen and to add insult to injury dams have been demolished ostensibly to benefit salmon and steelhead. OK, here we are, on the eve of a slow motion disaster.
The Atlantic cold trough is the Gulf Stream.
The “T bone” off South America has already shot three tentative salients of anomolously warm water west along the equator this year, and backed off.
It appears the trade winds are failing in the South Pacific but not in the North Pacific. Perhaps this is why negative PDO reduces ENSO.
If ENSO is really an exorcism of energy from the oceans transferred to the atmosphere, and the Pacific is the only ocean capable of this, that would explain why the Pacific is cooling and the Atlantic and Indian oceans account for the stairstep apparent in the global data.
We will have to wait a millenium or so for the THC to even this out?
It is an interesting thought experiment to try and imagine ENSO in a Panthalassic Ocean.
RE: Pamela Gray says:
July 3, 2012 at 7:48 am
A possible harbinger of the 4/5ths Death.
These SSTs are simply consistent with MPH propagations, debunking the fallacy of the Polar Front…
Bob.
What would a graph of Volcano-adjusted East Pacific SST Anomalies graph look like for the northern half only say 20-90N, 180-80W?
Pamela Gray says: “Where can we pre-order the book? I don’t kindle and don’t want the pdf. I want the hard-back addition to my real, not virtual, library.”
Sorry. I don’t have any plans for hardcover edition. The publishing costs for a 300+ page book with color images are very high–so high that I couldn’t justify buying one through a vanity press.
Max Hugoson says: “Can you get the ‘area average’ from some source or by some means?”
Please re-ask your question.
matt v. says: “What would a graph of Volcano-adjusted East Pacific SST Anomalies graph look like for the northern half only say 20-90N, 180-80W?”
Simple answer: Wiggly lines.
I didn’t think that answer would satisfy you–figured you’d want to see it. I ended the data at 65N:
http://i45.tinypic.com/14jz3p0.jpg
gymnosperm says: “The Atlantic cold trough is the Gulf Stream.”
Certainly would have be faster for me to write it as the cold trough along the Gulf Stream and North Atlantic Current.
Ah, but the Kindle “books” are murder when graphs and scientific/engineering data is (tried to be) presented in any intelligent manner.
The black and white/grey-and-white images on a Kindle hide all the info in colored graphs, and the small size of a graph/plot/table – particularly when the table is a half-page, make plots very difficult to read and understand. Worse, or equally bad, the lack of pages means its very hard to flip and forth to previous/next pages to review info effectively
Robert:
Yes, I can re-ask the question. With the basis explained, and the reason for asking and desired “use” of the information which might be obtainable.
Look, the value of “anomaly” which is given…is given as a 3-D plot. I.e., the 3rd dimension is the color, which is the number of degrees of “anomaly”. Excuse me for pointing out the LEFTIST TACTIC of defining debate by language, but the more PROPER way to refer to this is DEVIATION FROM SOME ARBITRARILY DETERMINED BASIS. So that is the way I will refer to it. Now that I have that off my chest, we have a certain total “sea area”. Per a grid of some refinement or lack thereof we have a value assigned to each grid location. A value in a standard temperature unit. (Say 0.5, -0.8, 1, -3 C, etc.)
SO if I had 100,000 such divisions, with the associated DEVIATIONS FROM THE ARBITRARY STARTING REFERENCE BASIS…I could add ALL of those values together, divide by 100,000 and obtain the overall average. (My suspicions are, with the current data set, it would be close to ZERO.)
NOW, whereas AVERAGE TEMPERATURE is a farcical meaningless term, THIS average “temperature” would really, have a modicum of value. That would be because for every degree F (excuse me, I’m a dinosaur!) and every pound (British units) of water (yes, it’s a force… ok, the MASS of water causing 1 lbf in a standard gravity field) there would be ONE BTU of energy involved.
THUS in this case the “average” temperature (because we are dealing with WATER, and a FINITE amount and amounts that don’t shift that fast or that much..) would give us an idea IF THERE REALLY HAS BEEN A MARKED SHIFT IN THE ENERGY BALANCE OF THE ATM AND THE SURFACE LAYERS OF THE EARTH or not.
I’m hoping that I’m making my reason for asking clear. And I also hope that we could access a TABULAR form of this data somewhere rather than the more limiting (in terms of analysis) graphical presentation.
Yours,
Max H.
Bob – I am with Pamela here about a book, however, if you nocando, I will gladly settle for pdf. Keep up the good work.
I get a whiff of climate alarmism from some of these posts.
For heaven’s sake, we are not in control of climate, so it is pointless to worry and fret.
So long as we have insulated homes and a ready energy supply we will be fine.
Our greater threat is probably new viruses, but there is little one can do to prepare for them either.
Best to make the most of what we have.
Bob,
Lulu.com will produce single printed copies in book form from a pdf. I did one 3 or 4 years back. The result was satisfactory. Cost about $10 per copy.
I note in the third paragraph that the color temperature legend at the bottom of the Unisys sea surface temperature anomaly animation, jumps around like water droplets on a hot skillet during the animation. Shouldn’t an accurate animation control the values of the colors so they appear rock solid? Something is wrong, in my opinion.
Will it be available on Amazon?
Joseph Bastardi says:
July 3, 2012 at 3:48 am
Very interesting post and a very pleasant surprise to see such straightforward candor on your predictions.
A question regarding: “… and the worry has to be in close development in a low ace[sic] season in the atlantic overall….”
For ace did you mean ice or is ace acronym I just don’t recognize? Thanks.
F. Ross;
I think ace=ACE=Accumulated Cyclone Energy
Only now have I found time to glance through Bob’s graphs. I haven’t read any comments.
I just want to say that it is a huge relief to simply see observations. I spend far too much time in the world of projections. IE: The world of “might” and “maybe” and “could.”
My ventures into that world involve eating crow, for if you dare forecast you are going to experience being wrong. For example, I imagined the current upsurge into El Nino territory would fail and we’d dip a third time into La Nina territory.
Crow doesn’t taste too bad. You can actually develop a taste for it, especially because you learn by making mistakes. However, in order to learn, it helps immencely to compare your incorrect imaginings with hard facts.
This is where Bob’s observations are like water in a desert. His presentations enable one to see what HAS happened, and IS happening, and skip the bother of the future, and “might” and “maybe” and “could.”
Of course, as down to earth as such observations are, that’s not where the fun is.
Therefore I am glad to see Bob is venturing past the safe ground of what has happened, and, in his new book, is daring to suggest the WHY of it all.
Risky, Bob, risky. Even if your theory is 99% correct, you’ll wind up being 1% wrong.
Welcome to the club.
RE: Joseph Bastardi says:
July 3, 2012 at 3:48 am
“….You can’t hide declines, fudge or adjust data, or run from errors when one tests in real time. More exciting and really, though it stings when wrong, the real way to have things peer reviewed! Would take WUWT readers any day for that.”
Amen.
By the way, from time to time you mention 1976 is being like the current situation. That makes me very nervous, because the following winter (1976-77) was especially bitter on the east coast, while the prior winter (1975-76) was mild, as our last winter was, in the east.
Back then I rejoiced in a nasty winter, but I have gotten old and soft, and don’t look forward to getting clobbered by cold. Therefore I tend to wish-cast, seeking signs next winter will not be as bad as 1976-77. One thing I wish-cast my line onto is the fact the AMO was cold back then, and is still warm now.
My fear is that a warm AMO will not make it warmer in the east. It will only make it moister, and lead to more snow.
What’s your take on this?
@Brian H says:
July 3, 2012 at 6:25 pm
Thanks for the explanation.