Climate skeptic instructor fired from Oregon State University

Gordon Fulks sends this summary of the situation and asks that it be distributed. I’m happy to oblige. For some background on Dr. Drapela’s skeptical views, this slideshow “Global Warming Cracked Open” might give some insight into OSU’s booting him out.  – Anthony

===========================================================

From Gordon Fulks:

Hello Everyone,

In theory at least Oregon State University (OSU) seems to be a bastion of academic freedom, diversity, and tolerance. A wide range of ideas are openly discussed. The most viable rise to the top and the least viable fade away. But it is all a fairy tale, because OSU operates under a politically correct regimen that dictates what is acceptable to say and what is not. Transgressors who dare to be different are eventually weeded out so that the campus maintains its ideological purity.

OSU is not yet as swift or efficient as the Soviet system when Joseph Stalin was trying to quash dissent among biologists who refused to go along with Trofim Lysenko. If warnings to compromise their integrity were not followed, Stalin simply had biologists shot. That quickly thinned the ranks of all biologists and persuaded the remaining ones to comply with Stalin’s wishes. Of course, it also destroyed Soviet biology, because Lysenko was pedaling nonsense. And Russian biology has never recovered.

We learned over the weekend that chemist Nickolas Drapela, PhD has been summarily fired from his position as a “Senior Instructor” in the Department of Chemistry. The department chairman Richard Carter told him that he was fired but would not provide any reason. Subsequent attempts to extract a reason from the OSU administration have been stonewalled. Drapela appears to have been highly competent and well-liked by his students. Some have even taken up the fight to have him reinstated.

What could possibly have provoked the OSU administration to take precipitous action against one of their academics who has been on their staff for ten years, just bought a house in Corvallis, and has four young children (one with severe medical problems)? Dr. Drapela is an outspoken critic of the theory of Anthropogenic Global Warming, the official religion of the State of Oregon, the Oregon Democratic Party, and Governor John Kitzhaber.

Five years ago, Oregon State Climatologist George Taylor went around quietly saying that he was not a believer. Then Governor Ted Kulongoski and many faculty at OSU including Dr. Jane Lubchenco made life impossible for Taylor, and he retired. (Lubchenco is now head of NOAA in the Obama administration.) Under those currently in charge, OSU climate research has grown to be a huge business, reportedly $90 million per year with no real deliverables beyond solid academic support for climate hysteria. A small army of researchers ponder the effects of Global Warming on all sorts of things from tube worms living along the Oregon Coast to butterflies inland. When the climate refuses to warm (as it has for the last twenty years), they just study ‘warming in reverse!’ Most of us call that “cooling,” but they are very careful not to upset their Obama administration contract monitors with politically incorrect terminology.

Skeptics of Global Warming who oppose the OSU approach and oppose the politicians who make it all possible but do not work for OSU also find themselves attacked. Dr. Art Robinson who is running against Peter DeFazio for an Oregon Congressional seat found three of his children under attack at OSU. All were attempting to obtain advanced degrees in the Nuclear Engineering Department and were threatened with dismissal. Because Robinson fought back, we understand that the OSU administration backed down.

As to the latest victim of political correctness at OSU, Dr. Nickolas Drapela gives us an excellent synopsis of what is going on:

The fact of the matter is that it is now two weeks since I was fired and no one has had the cajones or the common courtesy to even tell me why. I have spoken with the Dept. Chair (Rich Carter) who fired me, and he refused to tell me why. I spoke to the Dean of Science (Vince Remcho) and he couldn’t tell me why. I spoke to HR who set up a meeting with me, then cancelled it an hour before. Then I went to the Vice President of Academic Affairs (Becky Warner) and she sent me back to Rich Carter, the chemistry chair.

It’s just a sad, sad state of affairs that an institution like OSU would fire a good employee for (ostensibly) no reason and then run around and hide from the person they fired. I had stellar teaching evaluations, I won College of Science awards for teaching, and published textbooks. My class sections were always full and I was well-liked by students (see ratemyprofessors.com). I was doing my job very well. But I guess I didn’t march in step with their philosophies.

There were quite a few student protests over this at OSU (Barometer, Facebook, etc.) but to no avail.

I was given no severance and had no warning this was about to happen. In fact, I was lured into the chair’s office under the guise of a fallacious story before being fired.

As you know, I was probably the most visibly-outspoken critic of the Global Warming doctrine at OSU. I gave several public talks on the topic and did research in the area which I regularly posted on the web. I was also on a few talk radio shows in the area. I think they finally just said, we can’t have this.

Can it be that a university whose motto is “Open minds. Open doors” cannot abide even one faculty member who disagrees with their dogma? I suppose I am too naive, but I’m still reeling from it. Unbelievable.

I should say that they regularly read all my email communications, which is why I am writing from this private email address. That has been going on for quite some time now.

As far as my options at this point, like I said I haven’t even really grasped what has just happened. I don’t know what I’m going to do, or what options I have yet. I’m sure OSU wants their story to be tight and perfectly identical among all administration before coming out with an official reason why I was fired, hence the long wait and refusal to speak to me.

I truly thank you for your concern, and I hope there is some recourse, even just for the sake of exposing what is happening at OSU.

In a separate e-mail Drapela went on to say:

Thanks so much for your support and your concern. That’s really nice. My students were all really upset about it. They started an email writing campaign to have me re-hired but I guess no one cares what they think.

I find that the people who want to keep things secret all the time are usually the people that have something to hide. It is certainly ok by me for you to disseminate this story. But I’m sure OSU would be horrified.

I’m not sure how I will support my family at this point. We just bought a house in Corvallis. I have four kids, one of whom has a rare, blood disorder and requires regular trips to Doernbecher’s Children’s Hospital for treatment. Now we will be without health insurance.

We can only speculate as to how the decision to fire Drapela was made. Unlike the decision to force Taylor out (which came from the governor’s office), this decision was likely internal to OSU with the implicit backing of Governor Kitzhaber and NOAA administrator Lubchenco. I would suspect that Dr. Phil Mote (Director of their Climate Change Research Institute) had a hand in the decision, because he has previously been highly intolerant of those who oppose his ideas and could potentially threaten his business empire.

Please join with me in supporting Nick Drapela. Please join with me in supporting objective science, as well as academic freedom, diversity, and tolerance. The issues here go far beyond just Global Warming and strike at the very heart of who we are as scientists and Americans.

Gordon J. Fulks, PhD (Physics)

Corbett, Oregon USA

P.S. Please circulate this e-mail far and wide. The world needs to know what is going on here.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
239 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
enyaw gnorts
June 11, 2012 9:14 pm

My third daughter attends UO, my disenchantment with their liberals teaching was tempered when her sister expressed interest in OSU. I will do what it takes to see that doesn’t happen now. A few hundred of us at $94,000 a pop may get their attention. (and I will let them know)
BTW thats 2012 dollars so it would be well over 100K in a few years.
We need to protect people like Dr. Drapela, is there a fund we can donate to?

neill
June 11, 2012 9:16 pm

‘OSU is a wonderful campus. In fact, Michelle Obama’s brother Craig Robinson is the head coach for the Beavers at OSU.’
Like a B horror-flick. Run screaming for the hills…..!

June 11, 2012 9:23 pm

Reblogged this on Climate Ponderings and commented:
SMELLS LIKE FEAR…AT OSU NOAA

June 11, 2012 9:29 pm

Question: what can be done about this? This is completely outrageous.

June 11, 2012 9:42 pm

kramer said:
June 11, 2012 at 8:05 pm
Jaewonnie said:
June 11, 2012 at 4:47 pm
Green is the new McCarthy…
Yeah but McCarthy was right, there were communists in our government.
————————————————-
I agree with davidmhoffer:
What do you mean WERE!

rk
June 11, 2012 9:44 pm

we are really faced with a Leviathan. This is somewhat OT, but I’m struck at the force that the Greens have…even as there seems to be more doubt among the citizens.
Bank of America is pledging 50B dollars to climate change.
“The bank’s new initiative includes lending, equipment finance, capital markets and advisory activity and carbon finance, as well as advice and investment help.
Bank of America will focus on promoting energy efficiency; renewable energy, including wind, solar and hydropower; lower-carbon transportation like electric and hybrid vehicles; and water and waste treatment and disposal initiatives.”
http://www.nasdaq.com/article/bank-of-america-pledges-50-billion-to-combat-climate-change-20120611-00784

June 11, 2012 9:48 pm

Oh – and where can I contribute to the Fulks defence fund?

michaeljmcfadden
June 11, 2012 9:54 pm

Additional note: Prof. Enstrom’s actual article on “Combating Lysenko Pseudoscience”:
http://www.scientificintegrityinstitute.org/defense.html
As noted, the parallels are overwhelming.
– MJM

RockyRoad
June 11, 2012 10:05 pm

I thought the main reason for going to university was to discuss.
What’s to discuss if everybody has exactly the same ideas on everything?
Boring……………………….

Eric
June 11, 2012 10:10 pm

Mike says:”The problem is obvious, Corvallis is in the heart of a very green green valley. The sun goes away every October not to return until the following May. In the inbetween times they suffer through intense guilt for having logged every decent hemlock and fir from Coos Bay to Hebo and a gray pergutory of cloud mass gathers and drizzles insessently, mother nature shedding her tears as only she can, until the institutional inmates go a bit clock work orange so to speak.”
Funny, I was in that valley a month ago. I was logging fir. Last year I was there as well. I planted 4400 trees. Mostly fir. Lots of timber left and it was being well managed until the spotted owl fiasco. Now unfortunately those beautiful trees will rot and probably burn. Oh, and the week that I was logging the weather was sunny all week…I guess mother nature likes me and was smiling down on me for ensuring that I didn’t waste her resources by letting them burn.
Go Ducks!

June 11, 2012 10:22 pm

Anthony, you mean ‘peddling’, not ‘pedaling’.
REPLY: Do I? where?

gnomish
June 11, 2012 10:34 pm

don’t we wish everyone had the integrity of Nickolas Drapela?
Eric – I lived in a former logging town on vancouver island. it’s all but a ghost town, now.
every man jack of them wished the mill would return so they could get employment.
nobody feels guilt, eric. they feel poverty.
but there’s welfare- you probably call it ‘entitlement’…
i guess that can go on as long as there are natural resources to sell, though.
mining and agriculture don’t require value added. they can be run on slave labor, in fact.

Kozlowski
June 11, 2012 10:41 pm

This is why Oregonians need to vote for Art Robinson. Get a toehold in politics and start throwing the weasels out one by one. I have already donated to Art Robinson’s campaign. I hope everyone else does too. At least with some political power those currently abusing their positions can be held to account.
http://www.artforcongress.com/

Just some guy
June 11, 2012 10:45 pm
June 11, 2012 10:46 pm

Oregon is becoming dysfunctional at a level few people understand. Its sad, I was born here, raised here, left and return. Sadly I expect to move on again. The state revolves around downtown Portland.
They have free light rail, but the state needs to increase gas taxes on those that drive, to pay for the bike paths being embraced everywhere in Portland. However, there isn’t any funds left to spend on special projects and designs are being rejected. Meanwhile roads in use are being neglected because all of the funds are diverted for special projects.
The State of Portland designed a new bridge, spending $140 million on pre design and engineering, only to be told their plan is too low for the US Coast Guard, which will veto its design. 7 years and $140 million spent and the design wont allow the USCG to drive a known and specific dredge up river. They want the ship modified now.
They still wont admit their mistake, trying to get up river private construction companies to assemble below the bridge at unknown future yards, because the bridge would stop up river existing manufacturing jobs.
Oregon is current looking at requiring people to install computer boxes for their smart phone communicate with, to tax each car by the mile. Because E cars are getting free roads, and they cant tax E cars at the DMV level as that would appear to abuse the E cars. So ALL cars must install GPS type boxes. This is not a joke. The State of Portland is amazing.

Eric
June 11, 2012 10:49 pm

gnomish,
I don’t follow your post completely did you notice that I was responding to Mike? I wasn’t the one that made the “guilt” comment.

gnomish
June 11, 2012 10:58 pm

just some guy:
you increased his traffic by 100%, too…lol

izen
June 11, 2012 11:01 pm

surely the reason his contract was not renewed is that he was telling lies to the students as is clear from his slides.
people are entitled to their own opinions, but not their own facts.
For the last 12 months solar activity has been the lowest ever recorded.
The last 12 months have also been the warmest in the historical record in the lower 48.
That refutes the correlation between solar activity and temperature as would have been obvious IF he had updated his slides to include the last few decades of factual information.
Do people really want university instructors that tell their students wrong information ?

davidmhoffer
June 11, 2012 11:05 pm

Just some guy says:
June 11, 2012 at 10:45 pm
I just called David Appel an ass, justifiably…
>>>>>
I dropped in on that odious blog to see if your comment had made it through (it did! itz the only comment!) but reading Appell’s article is…surreal. He tries to paint Drapela’s comments about Hansen as over the top by calling them…. “cloying”. What are these “cloying” comments that are so egregious that Appell deems them grounds for dismissal? Well here they are, quoted from Appell’s blog and attributed to Drapela:
********************
My dear colleague Professor Hansen, I believe, has finally gone off the deep end.
The “consensus” card. I feel sorry for this human being….
Errant, capricious statements. 99% certainty on global warming? This sounds truly more like a senile senior citizen that a lucid scientist….
Ultimatums. Act now or you die. Right now. This very instant. Don’t think. You have 5 seconds to decide. I ask you, is this science or high-pressure salesmanship? But I cannot go on….
The fact that the head of NASA’s Goddard Institute apparently has the inability to use reason unsettles me. I’m worried about Professor Hansen….
********************
That’s “cloying”? So “cloying” that it justifies dismissal? If so, there’s enough cloying comments attributed to Hansen to land him in jail. Of course it is only “cloying” when you are critical of warmists, perfectly fine if you actually threaten violence (Greenpeace “we know where you live”, the 350.org splatter vids, calls for jailing of business execs by Hansen, Suzuki and others).
Oh wait, those were actual direct threats. Not nearly so egregious as comments that are “cloying”.

James Allison
June 11, 2012 11:06 pm

Jim Salinger was fired from NIWA allegedly for his outspoken views supporting AGW. Ain’t it weird how having views at either end of this debate are considered unacceptable by some organisations. Jim’s case is really weird because I understand NIWA still still shows on their website the manipulated temperature data resulting from Jim’s original work.

Latimer Alder
June 11, 2012 11:13 pm

Delighted, but not surprised, to see from the slideshow that Dr Drapela is a chemist. Chemistry is necessarily an intensely practical, experimentally based subject. And it is the lack of any experimental proof of anything to do with global warming that is an important plank in making me – a one-time chemist – a sceptic. If you start from the proposition
‘Show me the experiment that demonstrates ‘The Science is Settled’ as I did, it only takes a few days to come to the conclusion that there is no such crucial experiment. Indeed there is very little reliable observational stuff at all. Just a lot of handwaving and modelling and treemometer worship interspersed with a good dollop of wishful thinking and dodgy statistics.
So Dr. Drapela is right to view ‘Global Warming’ as primarily a sociopolitical argument. Its connections with mainstream science are tenuous at best and minimal at worst.
But just one question…I see that he cites IBM among the corporates who benefit from the green gravy train. This is news to me. Can anybody give further details? Thanks.

Eric
June 11, 2012 11:23 pm

izen:
The slides were dated 2008, and he is a liar because of 2012 data? Also, he is not the first or last person to correlate solar activity to the recent rise in temps. They are all liars too? What is the difference between being wrong and lying?
Also, how many college students have been shown “An Inconvenient Truth”? Talk about teaching wrong information!

David Jones
June 11, 2012 11:50 pm

jo reeves says:
June 11, 2012 at 8:24 pm
“I am not saying that this is right under any circumstance, but I do believe any company or organization should have the right to terminate anyone for any reason. I believe that telling an individual or company that you have to hire or can’t fire this person because of race, religion, sexuality, weight, or beliefs is overregulation.”
So your view is that “any company or organisation should have the right to fire anyone…………”at any time, without given reason or notice…
because the individual is….oh I don’t know, say black-skinned or Jewish. Is that correct?
You would have been a happy European in the 1930s!!
Be careful what you wish for!!

davidmhoffer
June 11, 2012 11:54 pm

Latimer Alder;
But just one question…I see that he cites IBM among the corporates who benefit from the green gravy train. This is news to me. Can anybody give further details? >>>>>
I’ll won’t comment on the specifics regarding IBM, but I can certainly shed some light on the issue in general. Corporate data centres consume enormous amounts of energy just to run the servers and storage arrays. If the cooling systems fail, there is so much heat generated that the computers and storage arrays will actually melt.
Power companies often offer incentives to reduce power consumption to reduce load on their grid if it is approaching capacity, or for political reasons, or because it is good business (the rates many utilities are forced into for their domestic market are far lower than the rates they can get on the open market, so they actually make more money by paying their domestic customers to use less power).
Many vendors and consultants in the IT sector figured out how to show their customers a positive ROI by upgrading to newer more power efficient equipment. Many of these upgrades would not have been economical without the incentives from the power companies. Lots of consultants made lots of money building the business cases and lots of vendors made lots of money selling hardware upgrades that would not have happened otherwise.

P. Solar
June 12, 2012 12:13 am

I would not have waited two weeks if I was dismissed without reason.
First thing : get legal advise . Send a registered letter to said employer demanding a clear statement of the reason for dismissal. Then take necessary legal steps to claim damages for unfair dismissal.
Dr. Drapela’s:
“I’m not sure how I will support my family at this point. We just bought a house in Corvallis. I have four kids, one of whom has a rare, blood disorder and requires regular trips to Doernbecher’s Children’s Hospital for treatment. Now we will be without health insurance.”
Ain’t the free market great? I suppose the usual anti-Obama ranters here will be piling in with comments like “get a job lamer, what do you expect a free ride, this is America”.