From the NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center, it seems the days of the Orion P3 Hurricane Hunter aircraft may soon be numbered.
NASA mission sending unmanned aircraft over hurricanes this year
![Global+Hawk[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/globalhawk1.jpg?w=300&resize=300%2C239)
Several NASA centers are joining federal and university partners in the Hurricane and Severe Storm Sentinel (HS3) airborne mission targeted to investigate the processes that underlie hurricane formation and intensity change in the Atlantic Ocean basin.
NASA’s unmanned sentinels are autonomously flown. The NASA Global Hawk is well-suited for hurricane investigations because it can over-fly hurricanes at altitudes greater than 60,000 feet with flight durations of up to 28 hours – something piloted aircraft would find nearly impossible to do. Global Hawks were used in the agency’s 2010 Genesis and Rapid Intensification Processes (GRIP) hurricane mission and the Global Hawk Pacific (GloPac) environmental science mission.

“Hurricane intensity can be very hard to predict because of an insufficient understanding of how clouds and wind patterns within a storm interact with the storm’s environment. HS3 seeks to improve our understanding of these processes by taking advantage of the surveillance capabilities of the Global Hawk along with measurements from a suite of advanced instruments,” said Scott Braun, HS3 mission principal investigator and research meteorologist at NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md.
HS3 will use two Global Hawk aircraft and six different instruments this summer, flying from a base of operations at Wallops Flight Facility in Virginia.
“One aircraft will sample the environment of storms while the other will measure eyewall and rainband winds and precipitation,” Braun said. HS3 will examine the large-scale environment that tropical storms form in and move through and how that environment affects the inner workings of the storms.
HS3 will address the controversial role of the hot, dry, and dusty Saharan Air Layer in tropical storm formation and intensification. Past studies have suggested that the Saharan Air Layer can both favor or suppress intensification. In addition, HS3 will examine the extent to which deep convection in the inner-core region of storms is a key driver of intensity change or just a response to storms finding favorable sources of energy.
The HS3 mission will operate during portions of the Atlantic hurricane seasons, which run from June 1 to November 30. The 2012 mission will run from late August through early October.
![Global+Hawk+GRIP+Mission[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/06/globalhawkgripmission1.jpg?resize=640%2C480&quality=83)
Another set of instruments will fly on the Global Hawk focusing on the inner region of the storms. Those instruments include the High-Altitude Imaging Wind and Rain Airborne Profiler (HIWRAP) conically scanning Doppler radar, the Hurricane Imaging Radiometer (HIRAD) multi-frequency interferometric radiometer, and the High-Altitude Monolithic Microwave Integrated Circuit Sounding Radiometer (HAMSR) microwave sounder. Most of these instruments represent advanced technology developed by NASA, that in some cases are precursors to future satellite sensors.
NASA’s Science Mission Directorate Global Hawk aircraft will deploy to Wallops Flight Facility from their home base at NASA’s Dryden Flight Research Center on Edwards Air Force Base, Calif.
“HS3 marks the first time that NASA’s Global Hawks will deploy away from Dryden for a mission, potentially marking the beginning of an era in which they are operated regularly from Wallops,” said Paul Newman, atmospheric scientist at NASA Goddard and deputy principal investigator on the HS3 mission.
NASA’s Science Mission Directorate in Washington is establishing a Global Hawk operations center for science operations from Wallops.. “With the Global Hawks at NASA Dryden in California, NASA Wallops will become the ‘Global Hawk – Eastern’ science center,” Newman said.
From rockets studying the upper atmosphere to unmanned aircraft flying over hurricanes, NASA’s Wallops Flight Facility is fast becoming a busy place for science. Wallops is one of several NASA centers involved with the HS3 mission. Others include Goddard, Dryden, Ames Research Center, Marshall Space Flight Center, and the Jet Propulsion Laboratory.
The HS3 mission is funded by NASA Headquarters and managed by NASA’s Earth System Science Pathfinder Program at NASA’s Langley Research Center, Hampton, Va. The HS3 mission also involves collaborations with various partners including the National Centers for Environmental Prediction, Naval Postgraduate School, Naval Research Laboratory, NOAA’s Hurricane Research Division and Earth System Research Laboratory, Northrop Grumman Space Technology, National Center for Atmospheric Research, State University of New York at Albany, University of Maryland – Baltimore County, University of Wisconsin, and University of Utah.
=============================================================
More images like the ones I added above are in the NASA Global Hawk gallery here
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
This is part of NASA’s dangerous-looking cloud naming program.
Once we get past the WSLOA (We Sure Love Our Acronyms), this appears to be real science. Just because NASA also does some stuff we find laughable – or even “evil” – we shouldn’t dis the real science. I doubt if this is the kind of thing the “letter from the astronauts” is complaining about! Pity that the one discredits the other!
Umm, can these drones penetrate the eyewall, or are they only going to flirt with the edges ?
Bill, you’re waving around your anti-robot bigotries around again. 🙂
Read the article people, the Global Hawk will “overfly” the hurricane. In other words, it does not fly though it, but over it. Much safer that way.
Owen in Ga says:
June 2, 2012 at 10:11 am
Bill Tuttle: When I was in the business, we called them Predator B on the ATO. Someone started calling them Reaper but I think that was at the “Company”.They tended to be off ATO and nearly shot down a couple of times as a result (that’s why the “Company” has advisers at the warfighter HQ.) The ADO tends to get a little nervous about UFOs in his zone.
They (meaning, “They” — nudge, nudge, wink, wink) changed the designation when the outfit I used to work for took over the maintenance (unit-through-intermediate level) for the B-models in Balad. Somebody tried to get some non-contractual work done on a couple of A-models by throwing his rather substantial weight around and claiming that “a Predator is a Predator.”
Everybody got nervous when an -A and a pair of -Bs went through their airspace at night — they’re quiet, but they’re not silent…
Rhoda R says:
June 2, 2012 at 12:20 am
Are these drones powerful enough to handle hurricane winds?
They don’t have to be — they’ll be flying at least 20,000 feet above them.
“They don’t have to be — they’ll be flying at least 20,000 feet above them.”
True, but none of these drone aircraft can take very much wind when it comes to taking off or landing. Hope they have several landing sites planned out. Shouldn’t be too difficult to arrange 3 or 4 across a wide area so they can go wherever the hurricane won’t be.
Benjamin W says:
June 3, 2012 at 12:29 pm
“They don’t have to be — they’ll be flying at least 20,000 feet above them.”
True, but none of these drone aircraft can take very much wind when it comes to taking off or landing. Hope they have several landing sites planned out. Shouldn’t be too difficult to arrange 3 or 4 across a wide area so they can go wherever the hurricane won’t be.
With their range and endurance, they could operate from Kansas and still have a useful time on station. NASA designated several contingency shuttle recovery sites back in the day, several of which were commercial airports.
Benjamin W,
I have seen DOD estimates of the cost per hour for the SR 71, nearly an order of magnatude higher than the number you referenced, and in 1972 dollars
–
Here are the NRO comparative stats on the two machines prepared after the 1967 flyoff. (SECDEF determined that the country could not afford to operate both systems and Pres. Johnson agreed with him.) As I recall, a special DOD group then considered which one to keep and decided in favor of the SR-71. CIA strongly objected; DCI appealed to the President but to no avail. A-12s recalled from Kadena in 1968 and placed in storage.
These airplanes were expensive to build and to operate. Around 1972, SAC Hq calculated the flying hour cost of a single SR-71 at $250,000/h
http://cryptome.org/2012/05/cia-sr71-a12.pdf