Climate skepticism blamed on the economy, stupid

Of course, things like lack of any warming trend for a decade couldn’t have anything to do with it. Could it? Climategate? Glaciergate? Fakegate? Naw. It’s the economy, stupid.

Source: http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:2001/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:2001/trend

Climate Change Skepticism Stems from Recession, UConn Study Finds

By: Christine Buckley, CLAS Today

In recent years, the American public has grown increasingly skeptical of the existence of man-made climate change. Although pundits and scholars have suggested several reasons for this trend, a new study shows that the recent Great Recession has been a major factor.

Lyle Scruggs, associate professor of political science in UConn’s College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, suggests that this shift in opinion is related primarily to the public’s concern about the economy.

“That the economy impacts the way people prioritize the problem of climate change is uncontroversial,” says Scruggs. “What is more puzzling is why support for basic climate science has declined dramatically during this period.

“Many people believe that part of the solution to climate change is suppression of economic activity,” which is an unpopular viewpoint when the economy is bad, Scruggs continues. “So it’s easier for people to disbelieve in climate change, than to accept that it is real but that little should be done about it right now.”

Scruggs and UConn political science graduate student Salil Benegal published their findings online in the journal Global Environmental Change on Feb. 24. An abstract is available here.

The study relies primarily on information drawn from a number of national and international public opinion surveys dating to the late 1980s.

The researchers found significant drops in public climate change beliefs in the late 2000s: for example, the Gallup 2008 poll reported that between 60 and 65 percent of people agreed with statements of opinion that global warming is imminent, it is not exaggerated, and the theory is agreed upon by scientists. By 2010, those numbers had dropped to about 50 percent.

The authors also found a strong relationship between jobs and people’s prioritization of climate change. When the unemployment rate was 4.5 percent, an average 60 percent of people surveyed said that climate change had already begun happening. But when the jobless rate reached 10 percent, that number dropped to about 50 percent.

The paper also evaluated three other explanations for the crisis in public confidence: political partisanship, negative media coverage, and short- term weather conditions.

“We think that this is the first study to consider the economy and these explanations at the same time, says Scruggs.”

Of these, the authors found that faith in climate change dropped across political parties, among Republicans, Democrats, and independents. They also found that that the “Climategate” email hacking controversy and reported errors in the 2010 Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) report, which both occurred after public faith in climate change began to drop, were not factors.

The authors did find that if people had experienced a recent change in short-term weather, they were more likely to believe that climate is changing over the long-term. But when the study controlled for these effects, the economy mattered more than the weather, says Scruggs.

The authors also marshaled international evidence showing that European opinion points in the same direction.

“There is probably a stronger overall ‘pro-climate’ ethos in Europe,” says Scruggs. “Still, even in Europe, countries experiencing more severe national recessions saw larger declines in beliefs that global warming was occurring.”

The researchers speculate that cognitive dissonance, which arises when people experience conflicting thoughts and behaviors, could explain this pattern. Most people view economic growth and environmental protection to be in conflict, so admitting that climate change is real but should be ignored in favor of economic growth leads to an internal philosophical clash.

“Psychologically, people have to evaluate economic imperatives in the recession, and that can create conflicting concerns,” Scruggs says.

When confronted with a desire to boost the economy, he continues, people seem to convince themselves that climate change might not really be happening.

Now that the economy is beginning to bounce back and the unemployment rate is shrinking, Scruggs says it makes sense that belief in global warming has begin to rebound.

“We would expect such a rebound to continue as the economy improves,” he says. “You wouldn’t make that prediction if you think something else, like political rhetoric, is the issue.”

============================================================

Per the top graph, so as to dispel the wailing and gnashing of teeth from the defenders of faith, here’s the larger HadCRUT record for the last 30+ years – it WAS warming, but seems to have stopped in the last decade and is now headed down a bit.

Source: http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:1980/plot/hadcrut3gl/from:2001/trend

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
139 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jimbo
March 14, 2012 12:08 am

Anthony, reconsider the heading:
“Climate skepticism blamed on the economy, stupid”
to
Global warming skepticism blamed on the economy, stupid

Graphite
March 14, 2012 12:24 am

Wasn’t Lyle Scruggs in the Beverly Hillbillies?
And if he wasn’t, with that name he shoulda been.

Dr Burns
March 14, 2012 2:12 am

Still no Hadcrut3 data for Jan 2012 !

Ammonite
March 14, 2012 2:53 am

Roger Knights says: March 14, 2012 at 12:08 am
Hi Roger. You link to a number of WUWT posts critical of Foster and Rahmstorf. Bob Tisdale’s post shows that ENSO behaviour is complex and its full complexity cannot be expressed in a simple ENSO index. Yet El Nino’s result in higher measured temperature and La Nina’s lower. Hmm… It is not hard to see how Bob’s treatment can be accurate yet F&R still use the index credibly.
One of the beauties of F&R is that its merit or otherwise can be ascertained across short time frames. Their trend is statististically significant down to ~5 years. So the lazy course is to reconvene in 2018 (say) to see how their analysis has performed. Expect new temperature highs whenever El Nino’s of sufficient strength arise.

DEEBEE
March 14, 2012 3:03 am

Given that our federal response to the real estate bubble has been like the Japanese response to theirs , more than 20 years ago. IMO we expect to have an anemic economy for a generation. OMG alarmists are screwed.

March 14, 2012 5:46 am

Shortpoet-GTD says:
March 13, 2012 at 5:07 pm
At altenergyshift.com we have analysed the sources of anti-climate denial in extent. You are welcome to debate our findings but be prepared for a taste of humility. Hayden
Hayden, your claim is misleading. You have analyzed nothing except the failure of your site. Where is this “analysis”? The “articles” on your site are typically submissions by guest nitwits, often a single paragraph in length, with half-a-dozen comments by other nitwits. You are flogging a dud, desperately trying to mooch crumbs and droppings from here, the most popular climate site.

richard verney
March 14, 2012 6:41 am

Its not due to the economy per se.
The fact is that for years, the costs associated with going green were not being felt by the consumer. The costs were on business and there response was to relocate, or to the extent that prices were driven higher, people thought that this was lal part and parcel of inflation and the general cost of living.
However, the bill is now coming in. In today’s economy, people can see the effect of the loss of manufacturing and the associated loss of job opportunity. People can also now see the extra costs on their own energy bills. In the UK, billing has not been transparent and much of the green subsidies are hiden and not clear from a quick review of the bill. However, that is beginning to change. So too, is MSM who are now beginning to report on the additional costs.
When one is being asked to pay for something, one starts enquiring (I) why am I paying this? (ii)what have I got for my money? (iii) Is it good value? etc etc.
It is because of this that AGW is coming under increasing scrutiny and people are beginning to wake up to the fact that there is little substance in AGW and the response to tackling the perceived threat appears to have been grossly miscalculted. It is another example of government waste, but on a monumental scale.
Skeptism is here to stay even if the economy improves (which at least in much of Europe and the UK looks a long off affair).

Jean-Paul
March 14, 2012 8:20 am

Here in Europe, “we” don’t have a stronger “pro-climate ethos”. It is the bureaucrats who call themselves our representatives, or our leaders, (they have copyrighted those words by making any political concurrence impossible) that have an apparent stronger pro-climate belief. It makes them able to overtax everyone and everything.

Unattorney
March 14, 2012 9:35 am

The warming fantasy seems somehow connected with the belief we can borrow and print unlimited amounts of money. Building pyramids to please the weather gods will create lots of jobs.

Werner Brozek
March 14, 2012 2:02 pm

Dr Burns says:
March 14, 2012 at 2:12 am
Still no Hadcrut3 data for Jan 2012 !

It was posted at 0.218; then it disappeared.

Werner Brozek
March 14, 2012 2:15 pm

Ammonite says:
March 13, 2012 at 4:36 pm
Do you believe projecting from an El Nino high to a La Nina low…

Please check out the following RSS for the past 15 years and 3 months. It is flat and the green line goes from a La Nina to a La Nina. Furthermore, look at the lowest point on the right. Talking about the warmest La Nina on record as others have claimed no longer makes much sense either.
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/rss/from:1995/plot/rss/from:1996.9/trend

March 15, 2012 6:20 am

Doug Cotton says:
REPLY: This is just repackaged “Slaying the Sky Dragon” rubbish. Cotton asked me to carry it and I’ve flat out refused. They created a “journal” to try to legitimze papers published there, which to me speaks of desperation.
It’s also reached a level where it is now nothing more than spam.

March 15, 2012 7:44 am

Doug says:
Real unemployment is far above what is reported. They changed how it is calculated from 3 years ago.
Wouldn’t surprise me at all – do you have a source to back that?

1 4 5 6