Big Wind

 

A wind farm is to be built near a nature preserve despite Osage Indian protests

Guest post by Dale R. McIntyre

A big-city corporation rams through industrial development on a pristine landscape against the wishes of the local Native Americans, who fear their burial grounds and traditional use of the land will be impaired. Sound familiar?

There are twists, however, and irony enough to make it a “three-pipe problem”.

The corporation is Wind Capital Group LLC, of St. Louis, building a wind farm west of Pawhuska, Oklahoma.

The Native Americans are the Osage Nation of Oklahoma, and the traditional land use they see threatened is oil and gas drilling.

On Thursday, Dec. 15th, 2011, Wind Capital Group won a ruling from US district judge Gregory Frizzel that the wind farm could proceed despite the protests of the Osages.

Wind Capital wants to rush construction of the wind farm to qualify for a 2.2 cent/kW-hr federal tax subsidy, loss of which would “jeopardize the very existence of the wind facility.” (Tulsa World, Dec. 16th, 2011, p. 1)

Osage Nation Principal Chief John Red Eagle has stated that”…the target area for wind development would intrude upon sacred Osage burial sites, posing a major threat to the tribe’s culture.”(Bartlesville Examiner-Enterprise, Dec. 16th, 2011,, p.1)

The eastern edge of the proposed wind farm site is about 3 miles from the boundary of the Tallgrass Prairie Preserve, home to 2500 bison on one of the last remnants of pristine tallgrass prairie left on the continent. To the east, Bluestem Lake hosts Canadian geese, pelicans, red-tailed hawks and peregrine falcons. Bald eagles winter over at Kaw Lake to the west.

I own land, fish, hunt and[ ramble] in the area so I know it as a majestic rolling grassland. In spring the Indian Paint Brushes, the red clover, bluebonnets and a dozen varieties of sunflower paint the landscape in a riot of color bold enough to delight Chagall. Deer and puma, wild turkey and coyotes play deadly games of hide and seek in the thick groves of cottonwood, cedar and blackjack oak along the creek beds.

The sight and sound of large wind turbines grates the nerves in such a place, as does their grisly record of killing birds. But the Osage Nation has another very pragmatic objection; they fear the wind farm will interfere with their oil and gas drilling.

In 1906, the Osage Nation took control of all mineral rights in the 1.5 million acre Osage Indian Reservation, now Oklahoma’s Osage County. Since then, surface rights pass by sale from owner to owner, but the mineral rights stay with the Osage tribe.

Thus for over 100 years, oil and gas have been critical to the economy of Osage County.  The royalties are shared out among tribal members every year, and make a welcome addition to hardscrabble incomes from ranching and farming. “Big Oil” has no presence in Osage County. Small local companies produce the wells and many very welcome local jobs. Osage County wells are small “stripper wells”, pumped by nodding “pump jacks”. They typically make 2 to 10 barrels of crude per day.

(Larger firms may join in future as more complicated horizontal wells are drilled to exploit the “shale gas revolution.”)

Chief Red Eagle insisted in court that the wind farm would impair this vital tribal revenue stream by intefering with access to key drilling sites.

Wind Capital Croup brought experts to court who testified that the inconvenience to oil and gas drillers would be small. The judge agreed.

Wind Capital Group spokesmen say they are eager to work with the Osage Nation. They point out that the wind farm will create jobs (Construction will require 150-200 workers,  but the construction contractor, RMT Inc., is from out of state. Permanent jobs are estimated as “12-15”. The believe property taxes on the wind farm will be a windfall to the tiny nearby rural school district of Shidler.

Tales with devilish villains and saintly heroes are for movies. Wind Capital Group is playing by the rules, and building on private land, whose owners have the right to exploit their property for lawful gain. The Osage Nation is not a collection of beggarly blanket Indians. They are well-represented, well-connected politically, with a shrewd sense of their rights and a determination to assert them. On January 24th, 2012, Chief Red Eagle announced a formal appeal of Judge Frizzell’s ruling (Lucinda Bray, Pawhuska Journal-Capital, Jan 25th, 2012)

As for those burial grounds, well, they are not so sensitive that oil and gas drilling disturbs them.

But all who dream of low-carbon energy should recognize that wind farms will intrude on huge areas considering the small amount of intermittent power they produce. The areas thus intruded upon are not sterile desert or blighted brownfield urban sites. The Osage County Wind Project is cheek-by-jowl with one of the most idyllic nature preserves in mid-continental America. Another wind farm, near Woodward, Oklahoma, is a prime suspect in the disappearance of the bats from neary Alabaster Caverns.

The Tall Grass Prarie Preserve - Image from Panaramio

Since these wind farms do not proceed at all in the absence of whacking great federal subsidies, wind farm projects seem to be creating a new special interest group, with its own lobbyists, its own pet legislators, and its own corporate sponsors determined to preserve a very high rate of return on capital.

Call it “Big Wind”.

Meanwhile, the bison in the Tallgrass Prairie Preserve will just have to learn to graze, fight, breed and give birth to the high-pitched whine and stroboscopic “swish” of the turbines.

As for the birds, the geese, the pelicans, the eagles and those graceful, soaring hawks making their “lazy circles in the sky”, well, they’ll just have to watch where they’re going. Inattention will get them chopped into coyote sashimi by the turbine blades.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
125 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John Marshall
February 2, 2012 2:13 am

Desperate for the subsidies they ride rough shod over all.

Tom
February 2, 2012 2:15 am

Can we *please* drop the “grisly record of killing birds” line? Any actual research that’s been done has found that a wind turbine could kill as much as… er… 0.6 birds per year. And that’s the upper limit – the average is more like 0.2 (see Garcia 2007, Lekuona and Ursua, 2007 – Dirksen et al, 2007 found much lower rates). That’s right, each “bird-shredder” kills four birds in its twenty-year life, and some particularly vicious examples kill as many as twelve birds in twenty years.
If you really care about birds, there are bigger problems in the world. Radio masts, for instance – many of them situated in countryside / wilderness areas, on high ridges, just like turbines – kill 4.5 million birds per year (Erickson et al 2005). And simple glass windows account for more than half a billion.
If you have a slavish objection to windmills and are looking for any objection – sorry for interrupting, go right ahead.

February 2, 2012 2:22 am

The most telling sentence in this article is:-
Wind Capital wants to rush construction of the wind farm to qualify for a 2.2 cent/kW-hr federal tax subsidy, loss of which would “jeopardize the very existence of the wind facility.”
In other words, if the tax-payer was not being screwed by the government to give cash to Wind Capital, there would be no economic sense in building this monstrous wind farm.
This is lunacy run rampant.

February 2, 2012 2:25 am

I wonder which large mammals like caribou would prefer to be around at mating and calving season.
A) A field full of noisy, strobing wind turbines,
B) Or a nice quiet Trans Alaskan Pipeline that serves as a wind break?

February 2, 2012 2:25 am

This nonsense is playing out all over the world. We have a similar situation where we live – but minus the oil and gas. The corruption will hopefully be exposed very soon.
http://www.palmerston-north.info

Lady in Red
February 2, 2012 2:34 am

Nah, it’s Solyndra all over again. Wind Capital Group got $107 million in taxpayer bucks —
and is hosting a $25K plate fundraiser for Obama:
http://moneyrunner.blogspot.com/2011/09/wind-capital-group-gets-107-million.html
…Lady in Red

Jason
February 2, 2012 2:34 am

“Big Wind” is going to be that funny sound when the subsidies are eventually taken away.

Lady in Red
February 2, 2012 2:41 am

Here’s a report on protest events from outside the Wind Capital Group/politically connected Carnahan family fundraiser for Obama:
http://bigjournalism.com/dloesch/2011/10/04/obama-supporters-cuss-at-tea-partiers-their-kids-call-black-congressional-candidate-uncle-tom/#more-226132
…Lady in Red

DirkH
February 2, 2012 2:43 am

Tom says:
February 2, 2012 at 2:15 am
“Can we *please* drop the “grisly record of killing birds” line? Any actual research that’s been done ”
I’m European so I care little whether the Americans have an eagle or a wind turbine as their symbol; but I do notice the absence of any source citation in your claim.

DirkH
February 2, 2012 2:47 am

DirkH says:
February 2, 2012 at 2:43 am
“Tom says:
February 2, 2012 at 2:15 am
“Can we *please* drop the “grisly record of killing birds” line? Any actual research that’s been done ”
I’m European so I care little whether the Americans have an eagle or a wind turbine as their symbol; but I do notice the absence of any source citation in your claim.”
And I should learn to read before I comment. I wanted to say “link”, then changed it to “source citation”, but you did cite sources. So I’m away, googling them now.

February 2, 2012 2:49 am

Hmmm I wonder what rabid environmentalists would do if a development they opposed went ahead anyway?
Do as a rabid environmentalist would do, legal or otherwise.

Otter
February 2, 2012 2:49 am

Note to the Osage: GO FOR IT, GUYS!
I’ve always been on the Indian’s side (well, mostly. I Have done a lot of history research).
As to a comment above about .2 birds a year…. I have to wonder if the people who take care of the turbines, don’t squirrel away the corpses they must find, and then say ‘We’ve only seen a few birds hit.’ Not out of anything Evil, mind- they just want to preserve their jobs, and I don’t blame them. Besides, there’s probably an internal memo out there, somewhere- ‘hide the bodies or else!’

DirkH
February 2, 2012 2:51 am
Urederra
February 2, 2012 2:59 am

I am with Tom on the bird killing. Also, my guess is that those accidents are not completely random. Sick birds must have greater odds than healthy ones. It is natural selection at work, just like an old, sick or unfit zebra has more chances of getting captured by a lion or a man who uses his cell phone while driving has more chances of having an accident than one who doesn´t.

DirkH
February 2, 2012 3:11 am
Jakehig
February 2, 2012 3:11 am

There seem to be wildly-varying figures for bird-kill by turbines.
The UK’s Royal Society for the Protection of Birds has a case study for a farm of 57 turbines where the Environmental Impact Study estimated over 200 deaths per year amongst geese. However hard data for actual kills – birds and bats – is not easy to find (at least by my fumbling efforts). Yet the info must exist as some of these systems have been in use for 10+ years and, in the UK, the operators are obliged to monitor bird strikes.

February 2, 2012 3:18 am

It is an outrage. Try asking for a performance guarantee not for “MWhrs produced” or “bogus tons of CO2 saved” but for “actual conventional fuel subsituted”.
Wind fraudsters advertise “energy savings”. In the Falklands (a good example of a closed, easy to measure system) the wind types were advertizing “40% energy savings”:
http://en.mercopress.com/2010/02/17/wind-turbines-to-supply-40-of-falklands-power
Actual fuel saved 4.3% – 8.3% depending on the season. http://kirbymtn.blogspot.com/2008/02/less-than-one-fourth-of-projected-fuel.html
Also k.i.m. Germany’s actual experience. They have about 22,000 installed wind MW, said to produce 6-7% ot total AVERAGE annual demand (I have no figures on actual fuel substituiton but it is a different % number) and, thanks to this achievement, they prevent blackouts only by importing emergency electricity from Austria and France to prevent blackouts, PLUS they have to shed excess random power to Poland and the Czech Republic, to avoid frying their own grid (but frying the neighbors’ grids, instead). A casual search will verify these statements.
The wind generation fraud is of the same magnitude as “climatemania” and equally arcane to comprehend as one has to be an old-fashioned power grid engineer to understand trivia about grid stability, AND a micro economics utility pricing expert to see the financial scam. Wind generators produce quasi random power, fluctuating with wind speed to the third power, which assumes that it is either an insignificant % of total demand, or that there are suckers around the local grid to absorb excess (random power).
Never mind the verses “… purple mountain majesties above the enameled plain” may have to be rewritten to reflect obsolete rusting metalic poles as a new decor.

February 2, 2012 3:25 am

Every time I see a wind farm in future I will be thinking there goes more of my tax dollars. The same goes for solar panels on domestic roof tops. In Australia you get a subsidy for the capital costs and then sell all the power you generate at about twice what it then costs you to buy back what you need. You don’t just sell the surplus that you generate above your own needs: you sell the lot at a crazy subsidised price. I’d really like to see figures for the total government subsidies on all renewable energy.

February 2, 2012 3:46 am

I grew up in Ponca and acquired a respect and sympathy for the Osage. 50 years ago they were pretty much lost in an alcoholic haze, unable to adapt their warrior culture to the US game.
Contrast with the Cherokee, starting from a village culture, who were able to keep up with the whites and often get ahead of us. They quickly figured out how to leverage their oil money into real power.
With that background, I’m very pleased to see that the Osage have sharpened up their act! They’ve clearly learned how to play the US game, and they clearly understand the difference between real resources and fake resources. They didn’t win this round, but I’m betting they’ll win in the end.

Marion
February 2, 2012 3:48 am

Re : Tom says:
February 2, 2012 at 2:15 am
“Can we *please* drop the “grisly record of killing birds” line? Any actual research that’s been done has found that a wind turbine could kill as much as… er… 0.6 birds per year. And that’s the upper limit – the average is more like 0.2 (see Garcia 2007, Lekuona and Ursua, 2007 – Dirksen et al, 2007 found much lower rates). That’s right, each “bird-shredder” kills four birds in its twenty-year life, and some particularly vicious examples kill as many as twelve birds in twenty years.”
Tom, I’m not sure where you get your statistics from but the ‘…er…0.6 birds per year’ certainly was not the experience of a primary school in the UK who although desperate to prove their ‘eco-friendly’ credentials were forced to turn off their turbine after it killed at least 14 birds in the space of just 6 months badly upsetting the school children who witnessed it.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/energy/7870929/Primary-school-forced-to-turn-off-wind-turbine-after-bird-deaths.html
No doubt the difference between the ‘actual research’ and the reality!!

Johnnythelowery
February 2, 2012 3:53 am

There is a rumour (which i’m starting) that Penn State, after the catastrophe of their Nittany Lion tag going the way of ‘the cougar’ (what do you call an older women who likes young men…Cougar. Whatdya call an older Man who likes young men…) . They might be changing their name to:
MichaelBunkport

February 2, 2012 4:23 am

The lunacy of Big Wind is something I explore in Don’t Sell Your Coat, which is now out on Nook, iPad, and Kindle.
Kindle here: http://amzn.to/w0Lj6H

JimBob
February 2, 2012 4:38 am

Those are my old stomping grounds. Osage and Pawhuska Counties are beautiful, especially in the spring when everything is green. I’ve always hoped of moving back there and buying a nice piece of land on which to retire. Now it looks like I’ll be paying taxes to ruin the beautiful landscape I’d hoped to help preserve. There’s irony in there somewhere.
The same thing has already happened in Kansas, with the Elk River wind farm. Southeast Kansas has some truly beautiful scenery but the big wind farm pollutes it for miles and miles. I think it’s ironic that you can’t build a shed in your back yard in some communities without someone complaining it’s an eyesore, but if you are “green” you can build a wind farm that is an eyesore for dozens of square miles and get away with it.

david
February 2, 2012 4:39 am

Birds and windfarms…
Tom has a point:
There might be ten billion birds in spring and up to 20 billion in fall. That is billion, and of course from that number some 10 billion die each year from all causes.
The following site tries to summarize the total bird population in the U.S. and North America.
http://birdstuff.blogspot.com/2002/07/how-many-birds-are-there.html
Look like Wind turbines are not a big source of bird deaths, yet.
I am no fan of wind farms, they blight the landscape and are a miss-allocation of resources. But, now I am educated on their impact on birds.
One final note: Where wind farms are sites, will have an impact on the local population, that could have adverse effects on birds that are threatened.

Steve Keohane
February 2, 2012 4:44 am

Tom says:February 2, 2012 at 2:15 am
Can we *please* drop the “grisly record of killing birds” line? Any actual research that’s been done has found that a wind turbine could kill as much as… er… 0.6 birds per year. And that’s the upper limit – the average is more like 0.2 (see Garcia 2007, Lekuona and Ursua, 2007 – Dirksen et al, 2007 found much lower rates). That’s right, each “bird-shredder” kills four birds in its twenty-year life, and some particularly vicious examples kill as many as twelve birds in twenty years.
If you really care about birds, there are bigger problems in the world. Radio masts, for instance – many of them situated in countryside / wilderness areas, on high ridges, just like turbines – kill 4.5 million birds per year (Erickson et al 2005).

Maybe if we call the radio towers ‘turbines’ they won’t kill so many birds either…/sarc

1 2 3 5