I got a chuckle out of this new buzzword that NOAA has created in this press release: “climate disasters”. Personally, I think they’ve been caught up the disaster hype.
Why?
Well, because the term is undefined. It isn’t even in NOAA’s own glossary of meteorological terms, seen here: http://www.erh.noaa.gov/er/box/glossary.htm or in the main glossary here: http://weather.gov/glossary/index.php?letter=c
The AMS glossary doesn’t define it either: http://amsglossary.allenpress.com/glossary/search?p=1&query=%22climate+disaster%22&submit=Search
Unable to find term ‘”climate disaster”‘
Nor the Weather Channel: http://www.weather.com/glossary/c.html
NSIDC, that home of that master of disaster “the Arctic is Screaming” Dr. Mark Serreze, doesn’t have it either: http://nsidc.org/arcticmet/glossary/
Why, even the National Climatic Data Center, author of this press release, doesn’t have it:
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/ctl/glossary.html
So what is a “climate disaster”? Something apparently just made up on the spot to sound scary to apply to the “weather is not climate unless we say it is” meme.
NOAA: 2011 a year of climate extremes in the United States
NOAA announces two additional severe weather events reached $1 billion damage threshold, raising 2011’s billion-dollar disaster count from 12 to 14 events
January 19, 2012
Selected Annual Climate Records for 2011 – Green dots show the wettest, yellow dots the driest, red dots the warmest and blue dots the coolest records.High Resolution (Credit: NOAA)
According to NOAA scientists, 2011 was a record-breaking year for climate extremes, as much of the United States faced historic levels of heat, precipitation, flooding and severe weather, while La Niña events at both ends of the year impacted weather patterns at home and around the world.
NOAA’s annual analysis of U.S. and global conditions, conducted by scientists at NOAA’s National Climatic Data Center, reports that the average temperature for the contiguous U.S. was 53.8 degrees F, 1.0 degree F above the 20th century average, making it the 23rd warmest year on record. Precipitation across the nation averaged near normal, masking record-breaking extremes in both drought and precipitation.
On a global scale, La Niña events helped keep the average global temperature below recent trends. As a result, 2011 tied with 1997 for the 11th warmest year on record. It was the second coolest year of the 21st century to date, and tied with the second warmest year of the 20th century.
Key highlights of the report include:
U.S. weather and climate disasters
- NOAA has identified two additional events in 2011 that caused an economic impact of $1 billion or greater, bringing the total number of major billion-dollar weather and climate disasters to 14 (not including the pre-Halloween snowstorm in the Northeast, which is still being analyzed).
From extreme drought, heat waves and floods to unprecedented tornado outbreaks, hurricanes, wildfires and winter storms, a record 14 weather and climate disasters in 2011 each caused $1 billion or more in damages — and most regrettably, loss of human lives and property.High Resolution (Credit: NOAA)
- Tropical Storm Lee, which made landfall on the Gulf Coast on September 2, caused wind and flood damage across the Southeast, but considerably more damage to housing, business and infrastructure from record flooding across the Northeast states, especially Pennsylvania and New York. The storm occurred in an area that had experienced high rainfall from Hurricane Irene barely a week earlier.
- A Rockies and Midwest severe weather outbreak, which occurred July 10-14, included tornadoes, hail and high winds. Much of the damage was from wind, hail, and flooding impacts to homes, business, and agriculture.
Nationally
- Warmer-than-normal temperatures were anchored across the South, Mid-Atlantic and the Northeast. Delaware had its warmest year on record, while Texas had its second warmest year on record. The U.S. has observed a long-term temperature increase of about 0.12 degrees F per decade since 1895.
- Summer (June-August) 2011 was the second warmest on record for the Lower 48, with an average temperature of 74.5 degrees F, just 0.1 degree F below the record-warm summer of 1936. The epicenter of the heat was the Southern Plains, where Louisiana, New Mexico, Oklahoma and Texas all had their warmest summer on record. The 3-month average temperatures for both Oklahoma (86.9 degrees F) and Texas (86.7 degrees F) surpassed the previous record for warmest summer in any state.
- With the exception of Vermont, each state in the contiguous U.S. had at least one location that exceeded 100 degrees F. Summertime temperatures have increased across the U.S. at an average rate of 0.11 degrees F per decade. Much of this trend is due to increases in minimum temperatures (“overnight lows”), with minimum temperature extremes becoming increasingly commonplace in recent decades.
- Despite a “near normal” national precipitation average, regional precipitation outcomes varied wildly. Texas, ravaged by exceptional drought for most of 2011, had its driest year on record. In contrast, seven states in the Ohio Valley and Northeast — Connecticut, Indiana, Kentucky, New Jersey, New York, Ohio, and Pennsylvania — had their wettest year on record.
- The past nine years have been particularly wet across the Northeast region – since 2003, the annual precipitation for the region is 48.96 inches, 7.88 inches above the 20th century average. Precipitation averaged across the U.S. is increasing at a rate of about 0.18 inches per decade.
- Precipitation extremes and impacts were most prevalent during spring (March – May) 2011. Across the northern U.S., ten states were record wet, and an additional 11 states had spring precipitation totals ranking among their top ten wettest. These precipitation extremes, combined with meltwater from a near-record snow pack, contributed to historic flooding along several major rivers across the central United States.
- Meanwhile, drought rapidly intensified in the southern Plains, where Texas had only 2.66 inches of precipitation, its driest spring on record. This led to record breaking drought and wildfires, which devastated the southern Plains. Following 2010, during which drought across the country was nearly erased, the 12 percent of the continental U.S. in the most severe category of drought (D4) during July 2011 was the highest in the U.S. Drought Monitor era (1999-2011).
- The spring brought a record breaking tornado season to the United States. Over 1,150 tornadoes were confirmed during the March-May period. The 551 tornado-related fatalities during the year were the most in the 62-year period of record. The deadliest tornado outbreak on record (April 25-28th) and the deadliest single tornado (Joplin, Missouri) contributed to the high fatality count.
Globally
- This year tied 1997 as the 11th warmest year since records began in 1880. The annual global combined land and ocean surface temperature was 0.92 degrees F above the 20th century average of 57.0 degrees F. This marks the 35th consecutive year, since 1976, that the yearly global temperature was above average. The warmest years on record were 2010 and 2005, which were 1.15 degrees F above average.
- Separately, the 2011 global average land surface temperature was 1.49 degrees F above the 20th century average of 47.3 degrees F and ranked as the eighth warmest on record. The 2011 global average ocean temperature was 0.72 degrees F above the 20th century average of 60.9 degrees F and ranked as the 11th warmest on record.
- Including 2011, all eleven years of the 21st century so far (2001-2011) rank among the 13 warmest in the 132-year period of record. Only one year during the 20th century, 1998, was warmer than 2011.
- La Niña, which is defined by cooler-than-normal waters in the eastern and central equatorial Pacific Ocean that affects weather patterns around the globe, was present during much of 2011. A relatively strong phase of La Niña opened the year, dissipated in the spring before re-emerging in October and lasted through the end of the year. When compared to previous La Niña years, the 2011 global surface temperature was the warmest observed.
- The 2011 globally-averaged precipitation over land was the second wettest year on record, behind 2010. Precipitation varied greatly across the globe. La Niña contributed to severe drought in the Horn of Africa and to Australia’s third wettest year in its 112-year period of record.
- Arctic sea ice extent was below average for all of 2011, and has been since June 2000, a span of 127 consecutive months. Both the maximum ice extent (5.65 million square miles on March 7th) and the minimum extent (1.67 million square miles on September 9th) were the second smallest of the satellite era.
- For the second year running, NCDC asked a panel of climate scientists to determine and rank the year’s ten most significant climate events, for both the United States and for the planet, to include record drought in East Africa and record flooding in Thailand and Australia. The results are at http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/climate-monitoring.
Scientists, researchers and leaders in government and industry use NOAA’s monthly and annual reports to help track trends and other changes in the world’s climate. This climate service has a wide range of practical uses, from helping farmers know what and when to plant, to guiding resource managers’ critical decisions about water, energy and other vital assets.
NOAA’s mission is to understand and predict changes in the Earth’s environment, from the depths of the ocean to the surface of the sun, and to conserve and manage our coastal and marine resources.
h/t to Dr. Ryan Maue
I predicted they would run out of bad words to describe their alarmism back in 1997 in a satirical article : http://www.newsbiscuit.com/2007/11/26/climate-change-scientists-warn-loads-more-bad-stuff/
“climate disaster”
The word „disaster“ is not the problem, the word CLIMATE is a disaster;
more at: http://www.whatisclimate.com/
What is the scientific definition of “climate”?
I will challenge each and every starting point and each and every end point and each and every length of your time window.
I can’t quite figger if it’s us disasterizing the climate, or the climate disasterizing us. It’s all so interactively disruptive!
Was that 17 record maxima and 2 record minima?
Disaster- that’s a misfortune attributable to the unfavourable position of a planet relative to Earth. Little wonder the term “climate disaster” can’t be found in the American Meteorological Society’s glossary.
Although I’m sure you’re not going to like this, I spent some time years ago looking for definitions for “smoking-related illness” and “smoking-related death” and, to my utter perplexity, couldn’t find any. I even asked a couple pneumologists and public health specialists who, after a few seconds of puzzlement, admitted there were no definitions for these, just a vague description for the use of journalists.
I blame Hollywood and all those disaster movies. People can’t diferentiate between fiction and non-fiction now.
Why are local temperature records always broken in a different location to last time?
John Silver says: (January 20, 2012 at 2:05 am ) “What is the scientific definition of “climate”?”
The WMO site has a theme-section. Concerning weather the section “Weather” offers no explanation but has the opening sentence: “Everyone is interested in the weather”, while subsection: What is Climate begins with the sentence: “At the simplest level the weather is what is happening to the atmosphere at any given time.” In the same section the Organization offers for climate three options namely:
• in a narrow sense Climate is usually defined as the “average weather,”
• in a more rigorously way, Climate is the statistical description in terms of the mean and variability of relevant quantities over a period of time, and
• in a broader sense, Climate is the status of the climate system which comprises the atmosphere, the hydrosphere, the cryosphere, the surface lithosphere and the biosphere.
Sorry that is not a scientific definition, but the best you can find!!
@Anthony
The U.S. illustration looks like weather to me.
Moreover there were no new temperature or precipitation records set in 90% of the U.S. judging from the appearance of that map. A headline could just as easily be “No Climate Change in Vast Majority of States”.
If an insurance companies mathematician took a look at NOAA’s cost calculations how much lower would the end result be I wonder?
‘Climate disaster’ is what CAGW fallacies do to the economy.
The Ozone Fraud, which cost the world a trillion dollars,
is a certifiable climate disaster.
The Rachel Carson Fraud, which banned DDT
and thus killed and sickened billions, was a practice run.
The ultimate enviro-dream is humanity’s extinction,
as spelled out so longingly in the History Channel Series
Life After People.
Keep in mind that a considerable amount of NOAA funding has an interest in maintaining ‘The Alarm’.
I would like to see a trend graph of inflation-adjusted “climate disaster” damages, versus population and normalized for GDP. As the country grows, more and more area is taken from the pool of wilderness/no witnesses/no monitoring group to the populated/economically productive/intense monitoring category. Of course weather will have a larger impact, but compared to what baseline?
I would also like to see a graph showing the number of NOAA alarm reports against its funding level in the next fiscal year.
Stupid attention grabbing media spin to try and maintain top step in funding from dumb politicians is a dual edged sword. NOAA only has to look at the Australian CSIRO to see what happens to what was once an excellent and widely respected scientific body, with a well earned past record revered by most older Australians, and thrown away by a faction of activists who destroyed that reputation by issuing press releases that Australians should get used to rain free seasons and permanent drought all based on corrupted modeling.
Their press releases were triumphantly echoed by the warmist elite as proving their case of doom, then it rained and it rained, just like it had done in the past and we remembered the past floods, the past extremes of variable weather, checked the old newspaper reports, the data and exposed the deceit.
In a nutshell CSIRO lost the confidence of Australians that have lived with such weather all their lives. As of warning to NOAA, forget the Hansen dream of channeling millions of geo engineering windfall dollars from dumb politicians who want spin instead of science – you poison the well of public confidence with such stupidity and it will take years to regain your once proud reputation.
Remember also that within the NOAA organisation, there are genuine scientists who resent the path of distruction and debasement of scientific principles by some leading activists, a path chosen to create and invent fear to feed their own ego’s and financial reward. Observe the growing backlash here in Australia, pent up and fed up, with the politics and lying spin.
The genuine scientists who have been dismayed with the antics of the activists and destruction of trust are slowly and cautiously speaking up, first to like minded colleagues then to friends and finally the public.
That is the true Climate Disaster but let it be the “Team” the “false prophets of science” that bear the reality not NOAA – time to blow the whistle!!
A press release noting that 2011 was one of the hottest years on record, and you think the important thing is to question whether NOAA has glossary entry for climate disaster? Excellent misdirection skills, Anthony.
dvunkannon says:
January 21, 2012 at 9:18 am
“A press release noting that 2011 was one of the hottest years on record, and you think the important thing is to question whether NOAA has glossary entry for climate disaster? Excellent misdirection skills, Anthony.”
You’re starting your comment with a misdirection yourself; as 2011 was the second coolest of the years since 2000; so probably seeing misdirection in what others write is a projection on your side.
When you go down after a maximum, you are close to the maximum for a while. Think about it.
Here’s an excellent graph by NOAA showing the yearly change in temperatures. Try to find a trend.
http://www.c3headlines.com/2012/01/new-noaa-data-debunks-establishment-science-msm-claim-of-dangerous-accelerating-warming.html
Something apparently just made up on the spot
English is full of such neologisms. These are really just “natural disasters”, but “climate disasters” communicates the hypothesized link to changes in weather caused by accumulating CO2. You don’t like it, and the causal attribution is not soundly (to my mind) supported by the evidence taken all together, but the meaning is clear.
The only difference between a rut and a grave is the depth of the hole.
And these jokers seem to have been digging rather a deep rut for themselves.
Time to stop digging and wind your collective neck in, perhaps, fellas??