Australian hybrid fish story – Media jumps the shark

Pretty much everyone who has seen this today shakes their head and wonders. I’m wondering too. First, the story which is being serially regurgitated without any thought in media outlets world wide:

Please  read this excepted text from the story carefully:

In what is being hailed as the world’s first evidence of inter-species breeding among sharks, a team of marine researchers at the University of Queensland have identified 57 hybrid sharks in waters off Australia‘s east coast.

Ovenden speculated that the two species began mating in response to environmental change, as the hybrid blacktips are able to travel further south to cooler waters than the Australian blacktips. The team is looking into climate change and human fishing, among other potential triggers.

Pretty clear with the headline, right? There’s more examples of this, such as this one from the Business Insider which takes the cake:

Now, read the actual press release from the University of Queensland this story was based on:

World-first discovery of hybrid sharks off Australia’s east coast

A group of leading marine scientists has discovered that sharks on Australia’s east coast display a mysterious tendency to interbreed, challenging several accepted scientific theories regarding shark behaviour.

In a joint-UQ research project, scientists have discovered widespread hybridisation in the wild between two shark species commonly caught in Australia’s east coast shark fisheries.

The Australian black tip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) and the common black tip shark (C. limbatus) have overlapping distributions along the northern and eastern Australian coastline.

Using both genetic testing and body measurements, 57 hybrid animals were identified from five locations, spanning 2000km from northern NSW to far northern Queensland. Although closely related, the two species grow to different maximum sizes and are genetically distinct.

Dr Jennifer Ovenden, an expert in genetics of fisheries species and a member of the scientific team said this was the first discovery of sharks hybridising and it flagged a warning that other closely related shark and ray species around the world may be doing the same thing.

“Wild hybrids are usually hard to find, so detecting hybrids and their offspring is extraordinary,” Dr Ovenden said.

“To find 57 hybrids along 2000km of coastline is unprecedented.

“Hybridisation could enable the sharks to adapt to environmental change as the smaller Australian black tip currently favours tropical waters in the north.

“While the larger common black tip is more abundant in sub-tropical and temperate waters along the south-eastern Australian coastline.”

Scientists from The University of Queensland, James Cook University’s Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre, the Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation and the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries are now investigating the full extent of the hybrid zone and are attempting to measure hybrid fitness.

The research, co-funded by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, identified a mismatch between species identification using mitochondrial DNA sequence and species identification using morphological characters (length at sexual maturity, length at birth and number of vertebrae).

A nuclear DNA marker (inherited from both parents) was sequenced to confirm the hybrid status.

Dr Colin Simpfendorfer from James Cook University’s Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre said black tip sharks were one of the most studied species in tropical Australia.

“The results of this research show that we still have a lot to learn about these important ocean predators,” he said.

Media: Dr Jess Morgan on 0419 676 977.

###

Important point: the press release DOES NOT contain the words “global warming” nor “climate change”.

I suspect this was the trigger for the reporter jumping the shark:

“Hybridisation could enable the sharks to adapt to environmental change as the smaller Australian black tip currently favours tropical waters in the north.

“While the larger common black tip is more abundant in sub-tropical and temperate waters along the south-eastern Australian coastline.”

So “environmental change” gets morphed into a “global warming” headline, when clearly, environmental change could be any number of things; pollution, changes in food supply, overfishing, competition, any of these (and others we don’t know about) could be factors…but “global warming” is automatically looked upon as the culprit. WUWT?

So, lets look at temperature. I asked Bob Tisdale to supply some sea temperature maps and graphs for the area. First the current available SST for Australia:

So much for the idea that the water is cooler to the southeast, and least in November. The waters of the south appear to be warming faster according to this anomaly map.

Here’s the last thirty years of sea surface temperatures from the area:

Less discerning reporters would immediately go A-Ha! The smoking gun, sea surface temperatures went up. Yes they did, and the trend is 0.135 °C/decade, and the trend line suggests Australian coastal sea temperature has increased by 0.45°C over thirty years.

But, in the last ten years (denoted by the span of the blue line) the temperatures have been pretty much flat.

Consider these points then:

1. Would you believe that one of the oldest creatures on Earth, which have managed to survive 500 million years over all sorts of temperature global temperature swings far greater,  is sensitive to SST changes of 0.15 degree per decade enough to go on a panic breeding frenzy to save itself?

File:Phanerozoic Climate Change.png
This figure shows the long-term evolution of oxygen isotope ratios during the Phanerozoic eon as measured in fossils, reported by Veizer et al. (1999), and updated online in 2004 - click for more

2. Since these “hybrid” sharks are a recent observation, it stands to reason they didn’t exist 20 years ago, maybe even 10 years ago. In this paper, the maximum lifespan of the Australian black tip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) is given:

The greatest recorded ages for C. tilstoni were 12 years for females and 8 years for males…

Davenport, S.; Stevens, J.D. (1988). “Age and growth of two commercially imported sharks (Carcharhinus tilstoni and C. sorrah) from Northern Australia”. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 39 (4): 417–433.

So clearly, this new hybrid is a recent decadal scale development, and the last ten years of temperature in the area have been essentially flat. Connecting this with “global warming” doesn’t wash.

3. Ok, back to the “speculation” part of the headline:

Ovenden speculated that the two species began mating in response to environmental change, as the hybrid blacktips are able to travel further south to cooler waters than the Australian blacktips. The team is looking into climate change and human fishing, among other potential triggers.

It seems the Blacktip Shark isn’t confined in range at all, as this 2010 paper shows (bolding mine):

Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification

Boomer, J.J., Peddemors, V. and Stow, A.J., 2010. Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification. Journal of Fish Biology, 77:1165–1172.

Summary

Sharks are prone to human-induced impacts, including fishing, habitat destruction and pollution. Therefore, effective conservation and management requires knowledge of species distributions. Despite the size and notoriety of sharks, distributions of some species remain uncertain due to limited opportunities for observation or difficulties with species identification.

One of the most difficult groups of sharks to identify correctly is the ‘blacktip sharks’. This group of whaler sharks are harvested in substantial numbers along the Australian east coast, including NSW, yet little is known of their distribution and resultant potential portion of the commercial shark catch.

The NSW Shark Meshing Program (SMP) research has collected genetic samples from most sharks caught for many years. Analysis of these samples to determine proportions of each species caught in the shark nets yielded the surprising discovery that the tropical Australian blacktip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) was regularly represented. Approximately one-third of the ‘blacktip sharks’ previously assigned to the common blacktip (C. limbatus) were identified as Australian blacktip sharks. This discovery extends the range of this tropical species over 1000km southwards into temperate waters off Sydney.

===============================

Wikipedia even has this helpful map of the range of Carcharhinus tilsoni

Distribution map for Carcharhinus tilsoni - Boomer, J.J.; Peddemors, V; Stow, A.J. (2010). "Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification". Journal of Fish Biology 77: 1165–1172.
Let me be the first to say that this media feeding frenzy looking for the global warming angle is a fish story of whopper proportions.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
189 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kbray in california
January 4, 2012 2:41 pm

That second shark photo (Business Insider)….
It’s OK, it’s a GREEN Shark..!!

newtlove
January 4, 2012 3:12 pm

Due to Climate Change at the end of the Roman Warm Period, the Red-Headed Northern Homo Sapiens moved south and interbred with the Northern European Homo Sapiens, creating cross-species hybrids that are still present today.
After surviving the next mini-ice-age, these cross breeds traveled widely during the Medieval Warm Period, producing further cross-species breeding with Homo Sapiens in the Mediterranean and on the North and South American continents.
Later, these crossbreeds started plantations in the southern part of North America, and they imported Negroid Homo Sapiens from Africa. This led to more crossbreeding between the species.
Next, these crossbred mutants wanted to build a railroad across the United States (a hotbed of crossbreeds) and so they imported many Chinese Homo Sapiens to work on the railroad, and of course, crossbreeding occurred.
These evil crossbreeds are the creators of the huge increase in CO2 which is driving Climate Change.
According to the latest Environmental Reactionary Press Releases, Climate Change drives crossbreeding of species that should never have occurred.
If we don’t stop the Australian Black Tipped Shark from breeding with the Common Black Tipped Shark, they will eventually join man in creating more CO2 than they would have, and thus drive Global Warming even faster to the brink of Earth’s destruction.
We must immediately build ice plants to make enough ice to cool the ocean enouch to keep the Australian Black Tipped Shark from breeding with the Common Black Tipped Shark! If we don’t, all Sharkdom is doomed!
/sarc ! ! ! !

January 4, 2012 3:28 pm

‘”It’s very surprising because no one’s ever seen shark hybrids before, this is not a common occurrence by any stretch of the imagination,” Morgan, from the University of Queensland, told AFP.’
Then we get this mysterious addition:
‘”This is evolution in action.”‘
Really? I’d call it sex.
I’d never have though that sex between a horse and a donkey producing a mule was
“evolution in action.” Everything is AGW everything is evolution… everything is everything.
sigh…

Pat Moffitt
January 4, 2012 3:35 pm

Philip Mulholland says:
January 4, 2012 at 2:32 pm
I agree with Philip Bradley January 4, 2012 at 1:46 pm. This might be an example of a cline . A cline is one of the more interesting aspects of biology, and the most interesting example of a cline is the ring species.
I’m not sure how this is a cline as the Australian blacktips almost completely overlaps the Australian range of the common blacktip. In fact over most of this range the population split between Australian and common is 50:50.

David L
January 4, 2012 3:57 pm

First we are told animals won’t be able to adapt to AGW, then they claim this shark is quickly adapting to AGW. Once again, they want it both ways.
I guess really this should weaken the AGW scare because apparently species can and will adapt… so why worry?

January 4, 2012 4:10 pm

Pat
OK. Just might be, but not certainly.
Then again, remember that the ocean is three dimensional 🙂

treegyn1
January 4, 2012 4:14 pm

Responding to the 2 Phils and Pat re: clines.
Clinal variation is the gradual change in a trait or traits over a recognized environmental gradient, and is usually referring to variation within a single species. An excellent example is balsam fir and the clinal variation exhibited by cone bracts. In the southern Appalachians on the highest mountain tops, the tree is known as Fraser fir, and for a while was known taxonomically as Abies fraseri. Now known as A. balsamea var. fraseri. The cone bracts of Fraser fir extend well beyond the cone scales, giving the cones a feathery appearance.
As one moves north along the Appalachian Mountain range, balsam fir grades into A. balsamea var intermedia, or intermediate fir. Here the cone bracts are much shortened, but still extend beyond the cone scales.
Finally, true balsam fir (A. balsamea, var balsamea) in New England and eastern Canada, the cones appear completely smooth – the bracts are totally enclosed by the cone scales. If one were to take samples of each fir from each part of the range, the variation would be discontinuous, suggesting 3 species. However, sampling stands close together in space, there would be non-significant differences in bract length, suggesting a single species with clinal variation.

johanna
January 4, 2012 4:27 pm

I’m inclined to agree with PPs that it’s a cline. It may be that individuals at the extreme geographic boundaries (north and south) of this cline have difficulty interbreeding, but the ones with overlapping habitat have probably been doing it for ever.
Taxonomy wars are every bit (if not more) bitter than climate change wars. As an Australian orchid enthusiast, I have had some of my pet orchids renamed 3 times in 30 years. Fortunately, the orchids don’t seem to mind. What’s more, some of them cross-pollinate naturally in the most libidinous fashion in my garden (presumably under cover of darkness) despite what the books say. I think it demonstrates the low level of scientific literacy among orchids.

Pat Moffitt
January 4, 2012 4:50 pm

Philip Mulholland says:
Pat
OK. Just might be, but not certainly.
Then again, remember that the ocean is three dimensional 🙂
They both inhabit shelf water and about the same range of depths (3rd dimension?).

Billy Liar
January 4, 2012 4:57 pm

University of Queensland scientists try to mate with large research grant.

January 4, 2012 5:02 pm

Philip Foster said January 4, 2012 at 3:28 pm
‘”I’d never have though that sex between a horse and a donkey producing a mule was
“evolution in action.” Everything is AGW everything is evolution… everything is everything.
sigh…”
And herring gulls from the American east coast are not the same species as those from western Europe and they are the same species. Welcome to the Wonderful World of Post-modernism.

January 4, 2012 5:02 pm

I did the obvious thing this morning and emailed Jessica Morgan the following:
From: Dennis Kuzara [mailto:xxxxxxxxxx]
Sent: Thursday, 5 January 2012 1:04 AM
To: jessica.morgan@uq.edu.au
Subject: Is this quote accurate?
Jessica
Dina Spector of the Business Insider,| Jan. 3, 2012, 3:09 PM, stated the following:
> The world’s first hybrid shark was discovered by scientists in waters off Australia’s east coast on Tuesday, reports Amy Coopes of the AFP.
>
> According to lead researcher Jess Morgan, the hybridization might be a sign that the animals are adapting to rising temperature levels as a result of climate change.
The press release made no mention of “climate change” or “global warming”. Is the quote in this news article that is attributed to Jess Morgan, (which I assume is Jessica Morgan) accurate?
Since sea surface temperatures have increased less than 0.45 degree C over the last 30 years, clarification of any known ties between shark interbreeding and climate change would be appreciated.
Thank you
Dennis Kuzara
And I received this reply:
On 1/4/2012 7:34 PM, Morgan, Jessica wrote:
Quote not correct – I have now stated numerous times that it is extremely unlikely that climate change caused the hybridization event – however, the hybrid-Australian blacktips are now being seen further south of their known range (Australain blacktips have a tropical distribution) in cooler waters suggesting that the hybrids may have a wider temperature tolerance than their parents (ie the hybrids may be better adapted to handle changing water temperatures). That long statement is being condensed and printed as your quote below.
Jess
I will now ask Dina Spector why she misquoted Jess

January 4, 2012 5:30 pm

Dennis Kuzara quoted Jess, Morgan:
“Quote not correct – I have now stated numerous times that it is extremely unlikely that climate change caused the hybridization event – however, the hybrid-Australian blacktips are now being seen further south of their known range…”
Wowsers! Hybrid vigour — who’da thunk it?

January 4, 2012 5:42 pm

The sent time on the email to Jessica Morgan was 10:04AM EST Jan 4, 2012, but what I printed out from the reply was the Australian time (when she received it).
According to Jessica, the sharks are now being seen in in cooler waters, which is the opposite of the reporter’s “suggestion”.
In any case, the discussion here has little to do with sharks and a lot to do with media bias and reporters who inject their own biases into their reporting. When it is found that a reporter misrepresents the fact, they should be called out on it.

January 4, 2012 5:46 pm

You know, one of the main groups that keep promoting the CAGW myth are the “warmoulists” in the media.
It is a travesty that more people aren’t aware of this.

Dennis Pidge
January 4, 2012 5:52 pm

Next up. Global warming causes inter-racial marriages to produce Euro Asian children. I just had to say this!

Deeledum
January 4, 2012 6:08 pm

If it can happen in water it should be happening on land as well. I expect to see sightings of new species any day now. My first guess is some kind of Polar Bear/Penguin hybrid; I’m assuming one of them has enough for the airfare.

Pat Moffitt
January 4, 2012 6:15 pm

Dennis Kuzara says:
“however, the hybrid-Australian blacktips are now being seen further south of their known range (Australain blacktips have a tropical distribution)”
The explanation given to you by Jessica Morgan does not seem to fit with the most recent research (2010) by Boomer et al. that shows the Australian blacktip’s range is not confined to the tropics but extends well into temperate waters.
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02770.x/abstract
I don’t see how even the hybrid range extension claimed by Morgan holds up.

January 4, 2012 6:41 pm

I’m an American who married an Australian. That MUST be a sign of global warming.

DesertYote
January 4, 2012 7:53 pm

Al Gored
January 4, 2012 at 1:33 pm
###
I could not find the David Meech paper, but I am sure I have a pdf of it somewhere, but I did find my bookmark for the two important Wilson papers.
http://www.jstor.org/pss/1383781
http://www.nrcresearchpress.com/doi/abs/10.1139/z03-059
The Meech paper, if I remember correctly, is pretty much the same.
I’ll do some more digging after I finish my Wednesday errands.

John Robertson
January 4, 2012 8:01 pm

Huffington Post also didn’t bother to go to the source before printing this story:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/hybrid-sharks-australia-coast_n_1181491.html
Sad, they only went as far as the Australian Broadcasting Corp for their version of the story.
What is interesting to me is this hybridization may be the shark’s response to increased predation of sharks by humans. This is leading to various ecological niches forming where some breeds of sharks have been over hunted, and these holes are now being filled by the hybrids.

January 5, 2012 12:39 am

“SNIP: Lubos, that is not really appropriate. -REP”
It’s not “appropriate” because it’s normal in the society not to look at these things rationally: and this clearly doesn’t apply to climate alarmists only. In reality, the reasons why genetically sufficiently distant individuals crossbreed are completely analogous for humans and sharks. It just happens, there’s no law that could prevent it.
So as long as we view these things rationally and as long as we find it OK to intervene into the two shark parents’ intimate privacy, we should be able to understand that doing the same thing with the major homo sapiens example is the same thing. But that’s not how these things are being treated, as the censorship above shows as well. These silly taboos are really the primary reason why people are so eager to believe various anthropocentric, anthropomorphic, and anthropogenic theories of natural phenomena.
People are led to think that humans play a qualitatively different role in Nature even in respects in which they’re clearly just another species.

January 5, 2012 1:57 am

The “Species Barrier” is more like a “species strong suggestion”. I go into it in some depth in a comment here:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2011/12/27/open-talk-tuesday-5/#comment-28532
but the short form is that there are A LOT of hybrids between species and many are fertile. The “species do not interbreed” is a useful shortcut taught in high school, kind of like Newtonian Mechanics, Useful, but incomplete and not always correct.
See:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triangle_of_U
for the THREE different species with different chromosome counts that cross to make the SIX different broad groups of brassicas. Cabbages, kale, turnips, mustards, etc.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Toast_of_Botswana
has an interesting example with sheep / goats with sporadic fertile offspring.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Hybrid_%28biology%29
lists a whole lot more (including one of my favorites, the Zonkey… looks like a Donkey with zebra striped socks on 😉
BTW, humans have a different chromosome count than our Chimp-like ancestor. We merged two chromosomes IIRC. That means the first “human” had to cross back with a different chromosome count mate, then stabilize the cross by repeated culling. (like one would do with the sheep/goat cross if desired).
Species cross rather more often than most folks think and WE would not exist if you could not have sporadic crossing even with different chromosome counts.
The shark story ought to say: “Absolutely normal sex happened and nothing of interest”.
Now if they had different numbers of chromosomes and were strongly isolated species, it would be much more interesting; but still quite normal.

Jerry Monk
January 5, 2012 2:47 am

Tom Davidson says:
January 4, 2012 at 10:48 am
“These sharks have been jumped from two directions. As you so aptly point out, the media have jumped on shouting ‘global warming’ when there is nothing in the story to indicate this was involved at all. But prior to that, the marine biologists jumped on shouting ‘hybridization’ when the simple existence of viable crosses between the two populations supports the idea that these are two *races* of sharks within the same species.”
He said *races* He’s a racist!!!! Shock!! Horror!!!
BTW, I can guess what Lubos (sorry, I don’t know how to do the accent in Ubuntu) wrote, and suspect it was amusing. Pity about the prudery of Americans.