Australian hybrid fish story – Media jumps the shark

Pretty much everyone who has seen this today shakes their head and wonders. I’m wondering too. First, the story which is being serially regurgitated without any thought in media outlets world wide:

Please  read this excepted text from the story carefully:

In what is being hailed as the world’s first evidence of inter-species breeding among sharks, a team of marine researchers at the University of Queensland have identified 57 hybrid sharks in waters off Australia‘s east coast.

Ovenden speculated that the two species began mating in response to environmental change, as the hybrid blacktips are able to travel further south to cooler waters than the Australian blacktips. The team is looking into climate change and human fishing, among other potential triggers.

Pretty clear with the headline, right? There’s more examples of this, such as this one from the Business Insider which takes the cake:

Now, read the actual press release from the University of Queensland this story was based on:

World-first discovery of hybrid sharks off Australia’s east coast

A group of leading marine scientists has discovered that sharks on Australia’s east coast display a mysterious tendency to interbreed, challenging several accepted scientific theories regarding shark behaviour.

In a joint-UQ research project, scientists have discovered widespread hybridisation in the wild between two shark species commonly caught in Australia’s east coast shark fisheries.

The Australian black tip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) and the common black tip shark (C. limbatus) have overlapping distributions along the northern and eastern Australian coastline.

Using both genetic testing and body measurements, 57 hybrid animals were identified from five locations, spanning 2000km from northern NSW to far northern Queensland. Although closely related, the two species grow to different maximum sizes and are genetically distinct.

Dr Jennifer Ovenden, an expert in genetics of fisheries species and a member of the scientific team said this was the first discovery of sharks hybridising and it flagged a warning that other closely related shark and ray species around the world may be doing the same thing.

“Wild hybrids are usually hard to find, so detecting hybrids and their offspring is extraordinary,” Dr Ovenden said.

“To find 57 hybrids along 2000km of coastline is unprecedented.

“Hybridisation could enable the sharks to adapt to environmental change as the smaller Australian black tip currently favours tropical waters in the north.

“While the larger common black tip is more abundant in sub-tropical and temperate waters along the south-eastern Australian coastline.”

Scientists from The University of Queensland, James Cook University’s Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre, the Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation and the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries are now investigating the full extent of the hybrid zone and are attempting to measure hybrid fitness.

The research, co-funded by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, identified a mismatch between species identification using mitochondrial DNA sequence and species identification using morphological characters (length at sexual maturity, length at birth and number of vertebrae).

A nuclear DNA marker (inherited from both parents) was sequenced to confirm the hybrid status.

Dr Colin Simpfendorfer from James Cook University’s Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre said black tip sharks were one of the most studied species in tropical Australia.

“The results of this research show that we still have a lot to learn about these important ocean predators,” he said.

Media: Dr Jess Morgan on 0419 676 977.

###

Important point: the press release DOES NOT contain the words “global warming” nor “climate change”.

I suspect this was the trigger for the reporter jumping the shark:

“Hybridisation could enable the sharks to adapt to environmental change as the smaller Australian black tip currently favours tropical waters in the north.

“While the larger common black tip is more abundant in sub-tropical and temperate waters along the south-eastern Australian coastline.”

So “environmental change” gets morphed into a “global warming” headline, when clearly, environmental change could be any number of things; pollution, changes in food supply, overfishing, competition, any of these (and others we don’t know about) could be factors…but “global warming” is automatically looked upon as the culprit. WUWT?

So, lets look at temperature. I asked Bob Tisdale to supply some sea temperature maps and graphs for the area. First the current available SST for Australia:

So much for the idea that the water is cooler to the southeast, and least in November. The waters of the south appear to be warming faster according to this anomaly map.

Here’s the last thirty years of sea surface temperatures from the area:

Less discerning reporters would immediately go A-Ha! The smoking gun, sea surface temperatures went up. Yes they did, and the trend is 0.135 °C/decade, and the trend line suggests Australian coastal sea temperature has increased by 0.45°C over thirty years.

But, in the last ten years (denoted by the span of the blue line) the temperatures have been pretty much flat.

Consider these points then:

1. Would you believe that one of the oldest creatures on Earth, which have managed to survive 500 million years over all sorts of temperature global temperature swings far greater,  is sensitive to SST changes of 0.15 degree per decade enough to go on a panic breeding frenzy to save itself?

File:Phanerozoic Climate Change.png
This figure shows the long-term evolution of oxygen isotope ratios during the Phanerozoic eon as measured in fossils, reported by Veizer et al. (1999), and updated online in 2004 - click for more

2. Since these “hybrid” sharks are a recent observation, it stands to reason they didn’t exist 20 years ago, maybe even 10 years ago. In this paper, the maximum lifespan of the Australian black tip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) is given:

The greatest recorded ages for C. tilstoni were 12 years for females and 8 years for males…

Davenport, S.; Stevens, J.D. (1988). “Age and growth of two commercially imported sharks (Carcharhinus tilstoni and C. sorrah) from Northern Australia”. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 39 (4): 417–433.

So clearly, this new hybrid is a recent decadal scale development, and the last ten years of temperature in the area have been essentially flat. Connecting this with “global warming” doesn’t wash.

3. Ok, back to the “speculation” part of the headline:

Ovenden speculated that the two species began mating in response to environmental change, as the hybrid blacktips are able to travel further south to cooler waters than the Australian blacktips. The team is looking into climate change and human fishing, among other potential triggers.

It seems the Blacktip Shark isn’t confined in range at all, as this 2010 paper shows (bolding mine):

Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification

Boomer, J.J., Peddemors, V. and Stow, A.J., 2010. Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification. Journal of Fish Biology, 77:1165–1172.

Summary

Sharks are prone to human-induced impacts, including fishing, habitat destruction and pollution. Therefore, effective conservation and management requires knowledge of species distributions. Despite the size and notoriety of sharks, distributions of some species remain uncertain due to limited opportunities for observation or difficulties with species identification.

One of the most difficult groups of sharks to identify correctly is the ‘blacktip sharks’. This group of whaler sharks are harvested in substantial numbers along the Australian east coast, including NSW, yet little is known of their distribution and resultant potential portion of the commercial shark catch.

The NSW Shark Meshing Program (SMP) research has collected genetic samples from most sharks caught for many years. Analysis of these samples to determine proportions of each species caught in the shark nets yielded the surprising discovery that the tropical Australian blacktip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) was regularly represented. Approximately one-third of the ‘blacktip sharks’ previously assigned to the common blacktip (C. limbatus) were identified as Australian blacktip sharks. This discovery extends the range of this tropical species over 1000km southwards into temperate waters off Sydney.

===============================

Wikipedia even has this helpful map of the range of Carcharhinus tilsoni

Distribution map for Carcharhinus tilsoni - Boomer, J.J.; Peddemors, V; Stow, A.J. (2010). "Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification". Journal of Fish Biology 77: 1165–1172.
Let me be the first to say that this media feeding frenzy looking for the global warming angle is a fish story of whopper proportions.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
189 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Jeff in Calgary
January 4, 2012 8:08 am

When I read this article yesterday on Fox News it smelled of BS. I suspect that this is the first time they have found these hibirds because it is the first time they have looked. Around here we find hybrides all the time. eg. our 2 deer species often produce hybrids (white tail and mule deer). I don’t this that this is too uncommon.

thingadonta
January 4, 2012 8:20 am

Academic method:
Split and classify.
Join and claim new discovery. Get new funds.
Split and classify.
Join and claim new discovery. Get new funds.
Split and classify.

January 4, 2012 8:27 am

Hmm reliable DNA tech is only about 10-15yrs or so old. The humane genome was just completed a couple of years ago. The coincidence is mind boggling!

January 4, 2012 8:34 am

Yikes! Next thing you know, the lawyers will start breeding, too.

Joe
January 4, 2012 8:38 am

Ok, this headline deserves it’s own internet meme.. I’ll start it off:
I woke up this morning and couldn’t find my slippers: Signs of Global Warming?
My local grocer was sold out of Cinnamon Pop Tarts: Signs of Global Warming?
The Cable Company put me on hold for 30 minutes and then hung up on me: Signs of Global Warming?

Joe
January 4, 2012 8:42 am

The 8-8 Denver Broncos will have home field advantage against the 12-4 Pittsburgh Steelers in the AFC Wildcard game: Signs of Global Warming?

Pete of Perth
January 4, 2012 8:57 am

Next up – sharktopus

pat
January 4, 2012 8:59 am

I read those reports. And questioned whether the reporters were dull-witted, or it was a purposeful attempt to delude a dull-witted public.

Pat Moffitt
January 4, 2012 9:14 am

These shark are VERY closely related and we would be well advise to remember Darwin’s caution that species were more correctly seen as matters of taxonomical convenience than any hardline drawn by Nature. Species grade into one another. The percentage of overall genetic variation (Fst) between these two sharks is a very small 0.042. There is also a possible 3rd blacktop specie swimming these waters. http://www.publish.csiro.au/?paper=MF09151
The Australian and common blacktip contrary to the impression given in the press releases overlap in almost equal numbers in northern Australian waters.
What we seem to have here are two fish populations rather than two distinct species. (Although not up on shark details) There are any number of fish species that continue to exhibi genetic isolation despite range overlap. This genetic drift implies individuals among the 2 populations are not “freely interbreeding” -but it does not mean that they never interbreed.
We may expect some of the following to be at work with this “hybridization”:
-Distinct populations generally breed with members – with mate “self selection” selection mediated by smell, visual cues and at times spawning period.
-Assortative mating (where one population is larger than the other) can select against interbreeding
-Alee effect can increase the chance of interbreeding among the populations when mate selection becomes difficult as the result of over-fishing or range expansion.
Temperature would not be the first thing I would look at here. The common blacktip’s number have been significantly decreased as a result of the trade in shark fins- my first instinct would be an alee effect -not temperature. My second is this is much more common than we realize.

DesertYote
January 4, 2012 9:17 am

For crying out loud! Just because sharks have a body plane that goes back 500 million years does not mean that this is an ancient family. As I have said before, most extant fishes INCLUDING sharks are modern in every sense of the word. The sharks in question here are species of a very important family, Carcharhinidae. This family appeared in the Eocene!

Andrew
January 4, 2012 9:24 am

Haven’t we, as a species, spent more time on the moon that we have at the bottom of the ocean?
Don’t scientists say there are MILLIONS of species yet to be discovered?
Somebody needs to post a good picture “The Fonz” on water-skis.

January 4, 2012 9:26 am

That’s quite a proof of global warming. Couldn’t they have proved a dangerous global warming by the same argument applied to homo sapiens? According to genetic and body size measurements, [SNIP: Lubos, that is not really appropriate. -REP], which may prove that the Earth will be fried by 2020.

hunter
January 4, 2012 9:37 am

There is excellent evidence polar bears are breeding with grizzlies. In North America there is a genus of plants, sarracenia, whose species all naturally hybridize into viable offspring.Hybridization is very common in nature.
The ‘journalists’ who came up with this article are only demonstrating weak ethics and poor skills.

Doctor Gee
January 4, 2012 9:38 am

Nice to know that the Australian blacktips have apparently overcome their longstanding prejudices against the common blacktips given their obvious (nomenclature) superiority.

kbray in california
January 4, 2012 9:38 am

Hybrid Sharks.
Maybe they run on different kinds of fuel.
Maybe they can eat batteries.
Maybe the dorsal fin is taller to catch more wind.
Maybe they run on natural gas propulsion.
Just some sharks trying to saving the planet.
We are not alone…
The truth is out there…
Climate change sure causes some pretty weird stuff.
God only knows what’s next…
sarc/off.

john
January 4, 2012 9:56 am

Splake is another hybrid fish.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Splake

DesertYote
January 4, 2012 9:58 am

I haven’t read the paper yet, but I get the impression, that the meristics would place the hybrid individuals in one species or another. It was only through DNA analysis that indications of hybridization was revealed. I’m not really a shark guy, being much more interested in fresh water. But these sharks are important. They belong to a genus with a lot of very closely related species. Some are legendary, e.g. the Bull Sharks. BTW, I seem to remember that the Blacktip sharks are one of the main species used for sharkfin soup, hmmm.

John T
January 4, 2012 10:12 am

Has anyone ever looked for hybrid sharks before?
The ability to do genetic testing on hundreds (thousands?) of sharks isn’t exactly something that’s been around for a century. Just because the technology to detect something exists and is used to detect something for the first time does not mean its the first time its happened.
In other words, I’m guessing sharks have been interbreeding for millions of years and this is the first time humans noticed.

oeman50
January 4, 2012 10:13 am

Alan Watt says:
January 4, 2012 at 6:38 am
How do we know shark hybridization has not happened before? They’ve been around for a really long time after all and these two species are closely related anyway. The only way to tell an individual shark is a hybrid is DNA testing. So the “never” as in “never happened before” turns out to be the recent period over which DNA testing has been available and actually used on a representative shark sampling. That’s a kind of limited definition of “never”.
========================
Good point, Alan, I thought the same thing when I read the real press release. We have just begun to use DNA mapping to investigate species and their relationships to each other. I am sure there are many more surprising discoveries to be made as data are accumulated. And, I said it here first, they are ALL caused by global warming! Bwahahahaha!

Dave Worley
January 4, 2012 10:16 am

I too watch Diane Sawyer jump the shark, in living color, last night.
http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/technology/2012/01/hybrid-sharks-found-off-australia/
Still waiting for the mass extinctions to begin.
/snark

January 4, 2012 10:48 am

These sharks have been jumped from two directions. As you so aptly point out, the media have jumped on shouting ‘global warming’ when there is nothing in the story to indicate this was involved at all. But prior to that, the marine biologists jumped on shouting ‘hybridization’ when the simple existence of viable crosses between the two populations supports the idea that these are two *races* of sharks within the same species.
The ability to produce fertile offspring is a satisfactory functional definition of ‘species’ for population biology.

Al Gored
January 4, 2012 10:56 am

Shame what global warming did to John Huntsman last night.
And it made me burn my toast this morning.
But back on topic. Time to do some DNA tests on Obama.

Pat Moffitt
January 4, 2012 10:58 am

Desert Yote,
“BTW, I seem to remember that the Blacktip sharks are one of the main species used for sharkfin soup, hmmm.”
See my comment above this can cause the alee effect with the commercially harvested common blacktips searching for mates.

George E. Smith;
January 4, 2012 11:12 am

So just what is the Physics behind Temperature induced cross breeding. Anybody got any ideas how many base pair switches occur per deg C rise in lower tropospheric Temperatures.
Does this mean that humans from tropical Eritrea might now be able to crossbreed with humans from Siberia or northern Scandinavia.
How much ocean Temperature rise is necessary for sharks to cross breed with porpoises ?
My theory is that the rising popularity of shark fin soup has made it more difficult to see whether that shark over there is a black tip or a white tip, so the sharks are simply confused about who they fraternize with.

DesertYote
January 4, 2012 11:18 am

Pat Moffitt
January 4, 2012 at 10:58 am
###
Oh, hadn’t thought that far (actually at work and not supposed to be thinking about fish at all). Sure make a lot of sense to me.