Pretty much everyone who has seen this today shakes their head and wonders. I’m wondering too. First, the story which is being serially regurgitated without any thought in media outlets world wide:
Please read this excepted text from the story carefully:
In what is being hailed as the world’s first evidence of inter-species breeding among sharks, a team of marine researchers at the University of Queensland have identified 57 hybrid sharks in waters off Australia‘s east coast.
…
Ovenden speculated that the two species began mating in response to environmental change, as the hybrid blacktips are able to travel further south to cooler waters than the Australian blacktips. The team is looking into climate change and human fishing, among other potential triggers.
Pretty clear with the headline, right? There’s more examples of this, such as this one from the Business Insider which takes the cake:
Now, read the actual press release from the University of Queensland this story was based on:
World-first discovery of hybrid sharks off Australia’s east coast
A group of leading marine scientists has discovered that sharks on Australia’s east coast display a mysterious tendency to interbreed, challenging several accepted scientific theories regarding shark behaviour.
In a joint-UQ research project, scientists have discovered widespread hybridisation in the wild between two shark species commonly caught in Australia’s east coast shark fisheries.
The Australian black tip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) and the common black tip shark (C. limbatus) have overlapping distributions along the northern and eastern Australian coastline.
Using both genetic testing and body measurements, 57 hybrid animals were identified from five locations, spanning 2000km from northern NSW to far northern Queensland. Although closely related, the two species grow to different maximum sizes and are genetically distinct.
Dr Jennifer Ovenden, an expert in genetics of fisheries species and a member of the scientific team said this was the first discovery of sharks hybridising and it flagged a warning that other closely related shark and ray species around the world may be doing the same thing.
“Wild hybrids are usually hard to find, so detecting hybrids and their offspring is extraordinary,” Dr Ovenden said.
“To find 57 hybrids along 2000km of coastline is unprecedented.
“Hybridisation could enable the sharks to adapt to environmental change as the smaller Australian black tip currently favours tropical waters in the north.
“While the larger common black tip is more abundant in sub-tropical and temperate waters along the south-eastern Australian coastline.”
Scientists from The University of Queensland, James Cook University’s Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre, the Queensland Department of Employment, Economic Development and Innovation and the New South Wales Department of Primary Industries are now investigating the full extent of the hybrid zone and are attempting to measure hybrid fitness.
The research, co-funded by the Fisheries Research and Development Corporation, identified a mismatch between species identification using mitochondrial DNA sequence and species identification using morphological characters (length at sexual maturity, length at birth and number of vertebrae).
A nuclear DNA marker (inherited from both parents) was sequenced to confirm the hybrid status.
Dr Colin Simpfendorfer from James Cook University’s Fishing and Fisheries Research Centre said black tip sharks were one of the most studied species in tropical Australia.
“The results of this research show that we still have a lot to learn about these important ocean predators,” he said.
Media: Dr Jess Morgan on 0419 676 977.
###
Important point: the press release DOES NOT contain the words “global warming” nor “climate change”.
I suspect this was the trigger for the reporter jumping the shark:
“Hybridisation could enable the sharks to adapt to environmental change as the smaller Australian black tip currently favours tropical waters in the north.
“While the larger common black tip is more abundant in sub-tropical and temperate waters along the south-eastern Australian coastline.”
So “environmental change” gets morphed into a “global warming” headline, when clearly, environmental change could be any number of things; pollution, changes in food supply, overfishing, competition, any of these (and others we don’t know about) could be factors…but “global warming” is automatically looked upon as the culprit. WUWT?
So, lets look at temperature. I asked Bob Tisdale to supply some sea temperature maps and graphs for the area. First the current available SST for Australia:
So much for the idea that the water is cooler to the southeast, and least in November. The waters of the south appear to be warming faster according to this anomaly map.
Here’s the last thirty years of sea surface temperatures from the area:
Less discerning reporters would immediately go A-Ha! The smoking gun, sea surface temperatures went up. Yes they did, and the trend is 0.135 °C/decade, and the trend line suggests Australian coastal sea temperature has increased by 0.45°C over thirty years.
But, in the last ten years (denoted by the span of the blue line) the temperatures have been pretty much flat.
Consider these points then:
1. Would you believe that one of the oldest creatures on Earth, which have managed to survive 500 million years over all sorts of temperature global temperature swings far greater, is sensitive to SST changes of 0.15 degree per decade enough to go on a panic breeding frenzy to save itself?

2. Since these “hybrid” sharks are a recent observation, it stands to reason they didn’t exist 20 years ago, maybe even 10 years ago. In this paper, the maximum lifespan of the Australian black tip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) is given:
The greatest recorded ages for C. tilstoni were 12 years for females and 8 years for males…
Davenport, S.; Stevens, J.D. (1988). “Age and growth of two commercially imported sharks (Carcharhinus tilstoni and C. sorrah) from Northern Australia”. Australian Journal of Marine and Freshwater Research 39 (4): 417–433.
So clearly, this new hybrid is a recent decadal scale development, and the last ten years of temperature in the area have been essentially flat. Connecting this with “global warming” doesn’t wash.
3. Ok, back to the “speculation” part of the headline:
Ovenden speculated that the two species began mating in response to environmental change, as the hybrid blacktips are able to travel further south to cooler waters than the Australian blacktips. The team is looking into climate change and human fishing, among other potential triggers.
It seems the Blacktip Shark isn’t confined in range at all, as this 2010 paper shows (bolding mine):
Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification
Boomer, J.J., Peddemors, V. and Stow, A.J., 2010. Genetic data show that Carcharhinus tilstoni is not confined to the tropics, highlighting the importance of a multifaceted approach to species identification. Journal of Fish Biology, 77:1165–1172.
Summary
Sharks are prone to human-induced impacts, including fishing, habitat destruction and pollution. Therefore, effective conservation and management requires knowledge of species distributions. Despite the size and notoriety of sharks, distributions of some species remain uncertain due to limited opportunities for observation or difficulties with species identification.
One of the most difficult groups of sharks to identify correctly is the ‘blacktip sharks’. This group of whaler sharks are harvested in substantial numbers along the Australian east coast, including NSW, yet little is known of their distribution and resultant potential portion of the commercial shark catch.
The NSW Shark Meshing Program (SMP) research has collected genetic samples from most sharks caught for many years. Analysis of these samples to determine proportions of each species caught in the shark nets yielded the surprising discovery that the tropical Australian blacktip shark (Carcharhinus tilstoni) was regularly represented. Approximately one-third of the ‘blacktip sharks’ previously assigned to the common blacktip (C. limbatus) were identified as Australian blacktip sharks. This discovery extends the range of this tropical species over 1000km southwards into temperate waters off Sydney.
===============================
Wikipedia even has this helpful map of the range of Carcharhinus tilsoni
![Carcharhinus_tilsoni_distmap[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/carcharhinus_tilsoni_distmap1.png?resize=497%2C230&quality=75)


![20apffq[1]](http://wattsupwiththat.files.wordpress.com/2012/01/20apffq1.png?resize=384%2C328&quality=75)

“To find 57 hybrids along 2000km of coastline is unprecedented.”
How long has anyone been looking?
What’s unprecedented; finding 57 hybrids along 2000km of coastline or finding hybrids?
Just a quick observation. The SST anomalies of hybrid shark-infested water graph looks a lot like the atmospheric temperature graph from UHA. Could there be a correlation? Yah.
I think you are being much too simplistic in your debunking. When we say global warming is happening, we don’t just mean that temperatures are rising, since the current rise is within natural bounds. Rather, there is an ongoing process of CO2 causing the planet to keep in more heat and the planet warms over decades and even centuries. So even if temperatures have stabilized in the last decade, global warming is still happening, and it will be much warmer in the future. These sharks have adapted to this global warming, and are positioning themselves for a warmer world of the future.
Sharks are known to be very intelligent creatures. Particularly in Australia, the home country of golfer Greg Norman, who was nicknamed The Shark.
I look forward to the researchers placing a rebuttal notice in prominent news outlets regarding the words the did not say (global warming, climate change, etc).
“The results of this research show that we still have a lot to learn about these important ocean predators,” he said. More funds, please.
@Leopold Danze Morgan January 4, 2012 at 1:18 am
“For example there are some people who can’t reproduce with some other people, but we’re all still the same species.”
Could you elaborate?
Interspecies cloning is widespread in plants – the rose family is a good example. It is not necessarily used because a hybrid is sterile, but to propagate a desirable individual plant as a commercial variety. The technique is so commonplace in plants that it seems hardly worth mention, and the term is mostly applied to work on animals (including humans), where there is interspecies cloning perpetrated – legally and illegally – in labs all over the world.
“Ovenden speculated that the two species began mating in response to environmental change, as the hybrid blacktips are able to travel further south to cooler waters than the Australian blacktips. The team is looking into climate change and human fishing, among other potential triggers.”
This statement doesn’t make any sense. If the reason the sharks are hybridizing is because of “climate change” (warming waters), why would Australian blacktips want to mate with the common blacktips whose natural habitat is cooler waters?
The “Business Insider” article was no better. “According to lead researcher Jess Morgan, the hybridization might be a sign that the animals are adapting to rising temperature levels as a result of climate change.” “While the Australian black-tip lives in tropical waters, the new breed was found in cooler waters 2,000 kilometers down the coast. In essence, interbreeding has allowed the shark to survive in temperate waters.”
Again, if the problem is climate change (warming), why would the sharks interbreed so they could survive in temperate waters?
The logic (or illogic) seems to be that the tropical waters are getting too hot, so the sharks must interbreed so they can cool off. However, it seems to me, if I were a shark and found the waters were getting too warm where I currently lived, I’d simply swim a little further south until I found waters more to my liking. Why go through all the trouble of interbreeding just so I can survive in cool temperate waters when, if CAGW is to be believed, those temperate waters will soon become tropical?!
Shark = flake = fish and chips. No matter what breed they are they all taste pretty bloody good to me.
So an overlap in population causes hybrids?
Who would have thought that would happen in Australia?
You might also be equally gob smacked (or not) at the ‘hybrid’ dingos which have been crossbreading with domestic dogs for teh past 100 years or so, but of course that hasn’t got anything to do with AGW now does it?
I particularly love the headline saying “another scary sign that global warming is real”. That hysteria worked for a few years. Now Joe Public just skims the headline, realises it’s only more climate change BS, and moves on to a more interesting story, like Lindsay Lohan’s playboy pics (males), or Jennifer Aniston’s latest heartbreak (females). The actress bumph, straight from the PR agent’s office, is more “real” than the climate change freak-show. And every new “scary” headline just pushes the public further away. So come on WWF and Greenpeace, keep the scary headlines coming …
And new hybrids are supposed to be bad in general or bad only when sharks are involved?
Oh dear. Isn’t there some trivial pursuit data dredged up from somewhere about the difference in DNA between men & women is infinitessimal? Hardly surprising as all foetus are inherently female as men have nipples. Isn’t there the same said about DNA for humans & apes, etc? All goes back to the hole in the ozone layer, just because we found it how do we not know it hasn’t always been there? Genetically we must have some shark genes in us all somewhere!
Patrick Davis…
Biased reporting does not make people dumb, believing biased reporting does.
I heard this story on the 6 O’clock ABC Evening News Program. It sounded absurd, but Diane Sawyer read it as though there was no doubt about it at all. Somebody was pimping this story. It would be interesting to find out exactly who it was.
“Species” is a human attempt at classification. It is not infallible !!!
Basically if two “species” are capable of interbreeding and can matched pairs of chomosones, (as these sharks obviously can) then a fertile offspring “may” be possible. A horse and a donkey are physically capable of interbreeding, but have a chomosone mismatch, and the offspring is therefore infertile.
In the case of these sharks, a probable ‘better’ definition might be that they are similar sub-species, since they are obviously able to interbreed.
An interesting article on the problems of interbreeding.
http://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2002/12/1217_021226_tvinterbreeding.html
While the news coverage was definitely a case of unfounded warmist rubbish, I’d like to point out that the northern waters of Australia are definitely much warmer than the southern waters, pretty much on a year round basis.
I think the map you have included of sea temps is a temperature anomaly map, which shouws you how the temperature at any point compares with the average temperature at that same location. It is not comparing northern temps to southern temps.
You never see these idiots getting excited over the existence of mules…
If carbon dioxide isn’t a worry, nitrous oxide could not possibly offer any threat… right?
As we all know, climate change is a conspiracy cooked up by charlatans – but if it weren’t, we should be worrying about nitrogen, writes Steve Jones.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/science/steve-jones/8989117/If-carbon-dioxide-isnt-a-worry-nitrous-oxide-could-not-possibly-offer-any-threat…-right.html
I don’t see how hard this is. it is just another name change. Global Warming -> Climate Change -> Changes in the Enviroment -> Changes in the Air -> Changes.
Why don’t we all mind our own business. If animals can interbreed, let them do it, it has to be a natural occurrence or it wouldn’t work. Our arrogance in making arbitrary divisions as to species, leads to upset (of some people) when said species don’t adhere to The Rules. Look at the panic over red-headed ducks and white-headed ducks inter-breeding Kill/cull the redheads to save the whiteheads! Species are sacrosant! No. they aren’t, it’s just an accounting convenience.
Anthea
Meanwhile, another AGW “icon” bites bullets:
“Just as Ottawa is drawing up polar bear management plans”.
“N.W.T. ups price paid for polar bear pelts to $1,750 as demand for the fur rises”
“The Northwest Territories is offering hunters a $1,750 advance for polar bear pelts, up from $400 last year.”
http://news.nationalpost.com/2012/01/03/n-w-t-ups-price-paid-for-polar-bear-pelts-to-1750-as-demand-for-the-fur-rises/
“Hybridisation could enable the sharks to adapt to environmental change as the smaller Australian black tip currently favours tropical waters in the north.”
Interesting, seems to imply it could be ‘good for the species’, one of those non-scientific ways of thinking that people find it hard to avoid. Hybridization between related species is very common when they overlap. Eastern and Pale-headed Rosellas, for example, hybridize where they overlap in distribution in southern Queensland and this has been known for many years. Nothing at all to do with climate change as far as I can see.
If two individuals are able to breed and the offspring are fertile then, by definition, they are the same species.
So these sharks are actually the same species and this illustrates a problem in biology. In the quest to put on display the diversity and fecundity of life biologists have invented millions of species without any rigorous test to see if they’re really different species or members of the same species who for one reason or another are not known to interbreed. It’s also deeply connected with environmental whackos. You see, if something happens so that one of these shark breeds were to disappear, the environmental whackos could claim that another species was lost. Or if there were a few of those sharks left they could be placed on the endangered species list.
If we didn’t know better there would be a thousand different species of dogs, for instance. Or under the loose definition commonly used today Eskimos would be a different species from Jamaicans. It’s ridiculous and is what happens when science is compromised by rent seekers and political agendas.
Polar bears have been at it for millennia:
http://www.ucl.ac.uk/mace-lab/publications/articles/2011/polar-curr-biol-2011.pdf
That was in the good old days when we had proper climate change.
If the two sub-species are so closely related genetically, I can’t believe they just started straying now. I think it is a matter of not really caring in the past but now even sharks get caught in the media spotlight when inter-bedroom gymnastics are engaged in. The media, all of it, has sunken to the three most important attention grabbers at one time loved only by the Enquirer. Sex, blood, and climate Armageddon. Not even aliens compete with that anymore.
The article is an example of real science turned into junk science. The Queensland press release stated what had been observed. The news stories then turned it into junk science. I looked for indications the hybrids were mules, but found none. That is an important question to answer. If they are mules, then this may be the first OBSERVED incident, but not the first incident as it may be a common cyclical thing when El Nino and La Nina get running as they have over the past 10 years. But since they hybrids are mules, when things calm down, the mules die out, and they hybrids disappear.
These are questions that they real scientists at Queensland are probably asking and investigating. However, the junk science of the media hysteria will not allow such questions to be put forward since they have nothing to do with the agenda, and indeed, may negatively impact their junk science.