Uh oh, "…organized and deeply committed environmental activism has long been an important part of the UNFCCC process…"

http://www.greenpeace.org/international/Global/international/publications/greenpeace/2011/GPI_Annual_Report_2010.pdf
Page 20 In 2010, our supporters gave more than ever. Worldwide, Greenpeace raised over €226
million – an increase of more than 15% on 2009
http://www.worldwildlife.org/who/financialinfo/2010fundingandfinancialoverview.html Page 1
Operating revenue totaled $224.2 million, a 1.3% increase over FY09. This represents increases from all income sources, with the exception of foundations, and reflects decreased use of payouts from reserves..
http://www.bbb.org/charity-reviews/national/environment/natural-resources-defense-council-in-new-york-ny-129 Page 1
Financial
The following information is based on NRDC’s audited financial statements – consolidated for the fiscal year ended June 30, 2010.
Source of Funds
Membership and indvidual contributions 66,748,642
Foundation grants 17,604,616
Investment return 9,415,575
Awarded attorneys fees 5,397,481
Membership and individual contributions – NRDC Action Fund 5,114,826
Bequests 4,267,156
In-kind contributions 2,075,738
Other 1,869,081
Government grants 576,466
Total Income $113,069,581
These 3 groups earned $500 Million in 2010. Quite a bit short of $1.8B

“I don’t think people yet realize the extent to which UNELECTED bureaucrats are responsible for creating the regulations under which they live and work.”
And to that add the constitutional force that international agreements have in most jurisdictions. There is a widely adopted legal doctrine that decrees that in a conflict between national law and treaty clauses , the treaties prevail. Uber legislation via the back door.

Seeing what I read in and from the second round of Climategate e-mails, it is time – HIGH TIME – for the United States to withdraw funding from IPCC and its lackey scientific agencies and call for the abolition of IPCC as a central, coordinating body. IPCC far oversteps the proper boundaries of an international agency and continues to act consistently with the (wrong) goal of forcing the governments of the world to make policies that are against their respective national interests. The U.S. government, if IPCC is not abolished, should threaten to withdraw all funding contributions to the UN and should kick the UN out of New York.
But understandably, it will take a presidential election in 2012 to accomplish that. I plan on raising this issue where I can with Republican candidates.

Geo [November 26, 2011 at 8:22 pm] says:
“I wonder if our friend, FOIA would consider dropping an email/day for the next few years or so from the encrypted file…..Kinda like Chinese water torture!! It would certainly keep our friends constantly on their toes, and provide a unique way of getting some attention driven to this ‘travesty’….no way media sources could ignore such a tact.”

Oh I like that idea!
The archive all.7z contains 220,246 files (+readme).
He could release 1 per day for 603.41 years
He could release 10 per day for 60.34 years
He could release 100 per day for 6.03 years
This however just might violate a Geneva Convention, not to mention our own Eight Amendment: ‘Cruel and Unusual Punishment’. 😉

#
#
Nik says:
November 27, 2011 at 12:35 am
“I don’t think people yet realize the extent to which UNELECTED bureaucrats are responsible for creating the regulations under which they live and work.”
And to that add the constitutional force that international agreements have in most jurisdictions. There is a widely adopted legal doctrine that decrees that in a conflict between national law and treaty clauses , the treaties prevail. Uber legislation via the back door.
_______________________________
In the USA we can thank the Dulles “boys” (John Foster Dulles ~ Head of the CIA & Allen Dulles) for that bit of propaganda. Teach it to a couple of generations and even the Judges will start believing it.

On April 11, 1952, Secretary of State, John Foster Dulles (cfr), speaking before the American Bar Association in Louisville, Kentucky said…

“Treaties make international law and also they make domestic law. Under our Constitution, treaties become the supreme law of the land…. Treaty law can override the Constitution. Treaties, for example, …can cut across the rights given the people by their constitutional Bill of Rights.”

…”This [Supreme] Court has regularly and uniformly recognized the supremacy of the Constitution over a treaty.” – Reid v. Covert, October 1956, 354 U.S. 1, at pg 17
….The Reid Court (U.S. Supreme Court) held in their Opinion that,

“… No agreement with a foreign nation can confer power on the Congress, or any other branch of government, which is free from the restraints of the Constitution. Article VI, the Supremacy clause of the Constitution declares, “This Constitution and the Laws of the United States which shall be made in pursuance thereof; and all the Treaties made, or which shall be made, under the Authority of the United States, shall be the supreme law of the land…’
“There is nothing in this language which intimates that treaties and laws enacted pursuant to them do not have to comply with the provisions of the Constitution nor is there anything in the debates which accompanied the drafting and ratification which even suggest such a result…
“It would be manifestly contrary to the objectives of those who created the Constitution, as well as those who were responsible for the Bill of Rights – let alone alien to our entire constitutional history and tradition – to construe Article VI as permitting the United States to exercise power UNDER an international agreement, without observing constitutional prohibitions. (See: Elliot’s Debates 1836 ed. – pgs 500-519).
“In effect, such construction would permit amendment of that document in a manner not sanctioned by Article V. The prohibitions of the Constitution were designed to apply to all branches of the National Government and they cannot be nullified by the Executive or by the Executive and Senate combined

http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/staterights/treaties.htm

Originally presented for an Honors Class, “Dilemmas of War and Peace,” at New Mexico State University: [Council on Foreign Relations] 24 references – http://www.conspiracyarchive.com/NWO/Council_Foreign_Relations.htm
Treaties in action: [the reference is “dicey” but the happenings are real. I just do not want to spend 1/2 the morning digging out better references that this Pop Piece] http://www.rense.com/political/offlimits.htm
A better but one-sided reference.
http://www.paydirtusa.com/Information_Repository/Information/Laws/New_World_Gold_Mine_Near_Yellowstone.html

Josualdo says:
November 26, 2011 at 2:06 pm
TheGoodLocust says: November 26, 2011 at 1:48 pm […]
2) Banning CFC’s – their patents had run out and they’d developed far more expensive alternatives. This move put cheap albuterol inhalers out of reach for asthma suffers who live in poverty.
Oh! I remember that’s how the ozone hole scare came about! It’s been some time… I wonder who came up with the DDT ban idea, certainly someone with “better” insecticides.
___________________________
Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring is given the public “Credit” but from my own experience as an insider during the news media’s maligning feeding frenzy over another chemical, I am sure there is some one BIG behind the book pulling the strings.
If a book is not “Approved” it does not get published. “Secrets of the Federal Reserve” by Mullen is one example and the destruction of the actual printing plates in the case of “Banking, Currency, and the Money Trust” and “Why is Your Country at War?” by US Congressman Charles August Lindbergh Sr. are others. How many more never saw the light of day we will never know.
http://rachelwaswrong.org/malaria-legacy/

Scarface says:
November 26, 2011 at 2:46 pm
Dave says:
November 26, 2011 at 2:32 pm
“Ah, Climategate II, the gift that keeps giving…”
Very true, but the silence about it in the MSM is unreal. Are they in shock or not impressed?
Or…. in denial?
_____________________________________
Take a look at WHO owns the MSM.

JP Morgan: Our next big media player?
If U.S. Bankruptcy Judge Kevin Carey today approves Tribune Co.’s reorganization plan, enabling it to emerge from Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection, New York-based banking giant JP Morgan Chase will become a significant media player, owning more television stations than any major network and becoming America’s second largest newspaper publisher.,,,, http://www.newsandtech.com/dougs_page/article_f3a45be0-4717-11df-aace-001cc4c03286.html

NBC Universal

Comcast Corporation (Nasdaq: CMCSA, CMCSK) and General Electric (NYSE: GE) yesterday closed their transaction to create a joint venture, NBCUniversal, LLC….
Morgan Stanley served as lead financial advisor to Comcast with UBS and BofA Merrill Lynch acting as co-advisors. Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP and Willkie Farr & Gallagher LLP served as Comcast’s legal advisors. J.P. Morgan was lead financial advisor to GE with Goldman Sachs and Citi acting as co-advisors.

It is instructive to look at who sits on the boards of directors and where they have ties….
OH, and do not forget advertising dollars. Monsanto used that threat to get Derry Brownfield tossed of the station he used to co-own. R.I.P. Derry Brownfield – The family Farmer’s best friend http://deadlinelive.info/2011/03/14/r-i-p-derry-brownfield-the-family-farmers-best-friend-and-monsantos-foe/
DARN we keep losing the good ones.

crosspatch says:
November 26, 2011 at 11:01 pm
Sad part is that I feel we are all preaching to the choir here, and the converted don’t need this information so much as the average people do…..
________________________________
I know what you mean. It is very frustrating.
However Anthony has a big readership world wide and even better, stuff written here gets “Lifted” and posted to other blogs. We even see stuff from here rewritten and used by professional journalists.
Sometimes we as individuals can use the stuff we find here to coax individuals to a more moderate stance. The Occupy Wall Street crowd has awoken to the bankers fractional reserve game. These e-mails can then help them make the connection between the Banks and the CAGW scam. The African Land grab is turning into a real sore point and Al Gore’s hind end is waving in the breeze with that one esp given Friday Mukamperezida’s death by burning.
The old saying is “a Conservative is a Liberal that got mugged” Getting CONNED and made a fool of is even worse than a simple mugging. So this applies to the rank and file “liberals” who became members of Willi Münzenberg ‘Innocents’ Clubs’ They really have no idea of who is behind the Activists groups they join, but will become livid when they realise IF you can pry their eyes open.
In one tiny back page article in the Wall Street Journal (April 1994??) Papers in the Kremlin showed that not only were Activist groups here in the USA funded by the KGB but they were actually RUN by KGB agents. I did not clip and save the article because I thought it would become front page news. That was before I wised up to how the world is really run and who actually runs it.
http://www.heretical.com/miscella/munzen.html
Oh, and I think Occupy Wall Street was “Organized” as an Astroturf movement to counter the TEA Party. The message about the Federal Reserve Banks was just too strong and had to be countered, especially before the 2012 elections.
The confused liberals now have a group they can cling to and go back to sleep comforted that a “Protest” will cure all and they do not have to align themselves with the conservative camp.
(I am not a member of the Tea Party BTW)

john says:
November 27, 2011 at 6:47 am
E-mail 0036 Re: Rockefeller (they appear to have been privy to or mentioned in other e-mails and fund McKibben)…
______________________________
Yes lift up a rock and you find a banking family under it.
This type of “Education” is nothing new (I really wish I could find a better source than this dodgy website I quote below.)
NORMAN DODD: video (I can not view tit myself)
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=8605813744843314322

‘Rewriting History’
http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/rewriting_history.htm
…In 1954, a special Congressional Committee investigated the interlocking web of tax-exempt foundations to see what impact their grants were having on the American psyche. The Committee stumbled onto the fact that some of these groups had embarked upon a gigantic project to rewrite American history and incorporate it into new school text books.
Norman Dodd, the committee’s research director found, in the archives of the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace the following remarkable statement of purpose:

The only way to maintain control of the population was to obtain control of education in the U.S. They realized this was a prodigious task so they approached the Rockefeller Foundation with the suggestion that they go in tandem and that portion of education which could be considered as domestically oriented be taken over by the Rockefeller Foundation and that portion which was oriented to International matters be taken over by the Carnegie Endowment.

The Rockefeller Foundation agreed to take on the domestic portion of the task. The purpose of all this interest in history, was of course to rewrite it. Dodd explained:

They decided that the success of this program lay in the manner in which American history was to be presented. They then approached four of the then most-prominent historians — such as Mary and Charles Beard — with the suggestion that they alter the manner in which they were accustomed to presenting the subject. They [were] turned down flat, so…they decided they [had] to build a coterie of historians of their own selection.

The Guggenheim Foundation agreed to award fellowships to historians recommended by the Carnegie Endowment. Gradually, through the 1920’s, they assembled a group of twenty promising young academics, and took them to London. There they briefed them on what was expected of them when they became professors of American history. That twenty were the nucleus of what was eventually to become the American Historical Association…..

DirkH says:
“here are, of course tutorials on the Internet if you feel the need to start another one and get your snout in the trough.
http://www.rag.org.au/anyonecan/anyonecan.htm
”
And way down that page we find:
“Donations or sponsorship from companies. As well as cash donations these might include gifts for prizes, raffles, or the use of equipment. Sponsorship and donations can be found in the most unusual places, as well as through the usual places. Look amongst companies that may benefit from your campaign, but be scrupulous about the companies you receive money from!
Government grants. You may be able to get a grant to undertake your project. Or the group may be able to contract for government-instigated research which is in their field of expertise.”
Like making stuff up for the IPCC.

Oh, Jeff Id posted this upthread a little. I pointed it out a few days ago, too. Its from Dr. Viner, which makes the idea that these guys could possibly find any confirmation biases laughable at best.