From Oregon State University College of Forestry some news that some people who want to blame pine beetle outbreaks on global warming won’t like. It seems there is a benefit.

“Albedo effect” in forests can cause added warming, bonus cooling
CORVALLIS, Ore. – Wildfire, insect outbreaks and hurricanes destroy huge amounts of forest every year and increase the amount of carbon dioxide entering the atmosphere, but scientists are now learning more about another force that can significantly affect their climate impact.
Researchers conclude in a new study that the albedo effect, which controls the amount of energy reflected back into space, is important in the climatic significance of several types of major forest disturbances.
In some cases – mostly in boreal forests with significant snow cover – increases in reflectivity can provide cooling. If the area disturbed by fire or insects is large, this cooling can substantially offset the increase in global warming that would otherwise be caused by these forest disturbances and the release of greenhouse gases. In other cases where the ground itself is unusually dark, albedo decreases can magnify concerns about warming.
Wildfires are not the only disturbance that significantly alters surface albedo, this study concluded. Insect outbreaks and defoliation by hurricanes can also change surface reflectivity, with effects on climate as great as those caused by carbon dioxide release from the disturbed area.
“On a global scale, warming caused by increased carbon dioxide still trumps everything else,” said Beverly Law, a professor in the Department of Forest Ecosystems and Society at Oregon State University. “On a smaller or local scale, however, changes in albedo can be fairly important, especially in areas with significant amounts of snow, such as high latitudes or higher elevations.”
Albedo is a measure of radiation reflected by a surface, in this case the surface of the planet. Lighter colors such as snow reflect more light and heat back into space than the dark colors of a full forest and tree canopy.
“This decreased absorption of heat by the land surface is a local atmospheric cooling effect,” said Tom O’Halloran, a recent postdoctoral research at OSU who is now with the Department of Environmental Studies at Sweet Briar College. “This was clear in one case we studied of trees killed by mountain pine beetles in British Columbia.
“In areas with substantial snow cover, we found that canopy removal due to either fire or insect attack increased reflected radiation and approximately offset the warming that would be caused by increased release of carbon dioxide,” O’Halloran said. “However, we haven’t been able to measure the full impact from the current beetle outbreak, which could take decades to complete.”
This complex phenomenon would be much less in lower latitudes or areas without snow for much of the year, the researchers said. It relates primarily to boreal or colder mid-latitude forests, such as the Canadian insect outbreak over 374,000 square kilometers of forest.
“The impacts of insects on forest carbon dynamics and resulting changes in albedo are generally ignored in large-scale modeling,” Law said.
The study also found that forest disturbance does not always cause an albedo increase. When Hurricane Wilma in 2005 partially defoliated more than 2,400 square kilometers of a mangrove forest in the Florida Everglades, it exposed an underlying land surface darker than the previous forest canopy. In that case, an albedo decrease effectively doubled the warming impact of released carbon dioxide.
All of the forces studied in this research – fire, insect attack and hurricanes – are expected to increase in severity, frequency or extent under climate change scenarios, the scientists said. In the United States alone, these events affect 20,000 to 40,000 square kilometers of forest a year. If Earth system models are to be accurate, this makes it important to more accurately incorporate changes in albedo.
Globally, forest disturbances are a major factor in the carbon cycle and greenhouse gas warming. They can instantly switch forests from carbon sinks into carbon sources for two decades or more. In cold regions where forest recovery is slower, albedo increases can persist for 100 years.
This research was published in Global Change Biology, a professional journal. It was supported by the U.S. Department of Energy, and used data from both the AmeriFlux Network and NASA MODIS sensor on the Terra satellite.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
“On a global scale, warming caused by increased carbon dioxide still trumps everything else,”
Excellent. Sounds like we can safely ignore everything else as well.
I saw the word ALBEDO and thought great an article that is examining what I consider a poorly researched subject which I believe could have significant implications to discredit CAGW to be let down by a group of tree doctors who have no idea what they are talking about except that it will take them years before they can confirm it. Did you get the hint, more time needs more money, hint hint hint.
The key words in this very limited study are those that describe impacts as being important in only a very small area. In reality pine beetles are devastating huge areas of the boreal forests in the entire Northern Hemisphere. As a consequence, vast amounts of stored up CO2 are being released into the atmosphere and this release will continue as rotting of the tree persists, and in the event of wildfire, will accelerate further.None of these are trivial events.
It’s interesting that nobody here has commented on the fact that the pine beetle problem itself is an indication of higher winter temperatures. I have read that the massive outbreak is due in large part to the fact that the beetle population is no longer kept in check by sharp winter freezes.
Had a nice trip to Western Canada in June this year and asked a ranger why so many trees were brown. His answer was that the pine beetle was at work and that was the result of a lack of forest fires. Indians burned down selective parts of forests until the 1800’s, mainly to attract game into the cleared land, where fresh herbs, grass and trees were growing. That renewed the forests all around. The pine beetle mainly attacks mature overaged trees and not the young trees. This is nowadays a huge problem in national parks, where no clearing is done…
These infestations are a result of two things. One issue is the fact that many forests are not managed and are too dense. Too many genetically marginal trees are there. Secondly, fire suppression has resulted in way too much deadfall – classic beetle hatching conditions.
RE: thedudeabides says:
October 20, 2011 at 9:40 am
It’s interesting that nobody here has commented on the fact that the pine beetle problem itself is an indication of higher winter temperatures. I have read that the massive outbreak is due in large part to the fact that the beetle population is no longer kept in check by sharp winter freezes.
====================================
That’s an urban legend. Look at the life cycle of a beetle. Beetles are not even in adult form during winter, in any four season climate!
Pine Beetle cycles occur every 30 to 40 years. This is nothing new. It happens with regularity.
To connect the forrests ravaged by PB cycles to global warming is a useless exercise.
USFS was fighting spruce bud worm in the early sixties. they were hand spraying with a mixture of diesel fuel and DDT. this was applied by several crews of 30-40 men in the courdelane forest.
didn’t seem to help much.
C