Whose Reality is it Anyway?

by charles the moderator

[updated to correct usage of the words rank and reach. The correct graphs were used originally, but I used the wrong word to describe them]

Al Gore’s Climate Reality Project claims 8.6 million views of their presentations during their “24 hours of reality”. Let’s examine that claim.

On Facebook, they had around 66,000 people “accepting” the invitation to attend.

Let’s look at the Alexa stats for traffic rank reach on that day and compare it to a site we have access to more detailed information.

Alexa traffic rank
Alexa traffic rank

Eyeballing, it appears that on 9/15/2011, climaterealityproject.org had between 5 and 6 times as much traffic as wattsupwiththat.com.

Let’s convert Alexa’s traffic rank reach to numbers of people.

quantcast visitor numbers
quantcast visitor numbers

On 9/15/2011 according to quantcast, wattupwiththat.com had 27.9 thousand global visitors. Unfortunately, the climaterealityproject.org doesn’t show up in quantcast, for 9/15/2011, so we will have to estimate.

Being generous with the Alexa rank reach ratio between sites, let’s multiply 27.9 thousand times 6, which gives us about 167,000 global visitors for Al Gore’s big party on 9/15/2001

Now going back to Alexa, here is the fun statistic.

time on site
time on site

The average time on site for climaterealityproject.org is about 3 minutes on 9/15/2011.  So for everyone who stayed for an hour there were maybe 30 or so who left after a minute which is normal for boring video. The distribution can vary, maybe some stayed for for 5 minutes or 10, but it doesn’t look good.

Let’s be generous with this as well and say that 1 in 10 stayed around to watch a significant amount of the program. That means there may have been about 17,000 dedicated viewers (estimating on the high side) of the program worldwide.

Now, maybe I’m totally wrong, maybe the Facebook application put this presentation in peoples’ newsfeeds and they watched inside of Facebook. I didn’t install the Facebook ap so I don’t know if it did that. Can anyone confirm?  Maybe it showed up in Facebook friends’ newsfeeds and that was enough for Gore and company to call it a view, even if it was never played.

Maybe all the users took the alternate path of going directly to Ustream.

Or maybe, just maybe, there’s a little bit of storytelling going on and perhaps the numbers are a wee bit inflated.

Depends on your reality I guess.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

89 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
John from CA
September 22, 2011 11:55 am

John from CA says:
September 22, 2011 at 11:18 am
Could this account for the missing 8M views if the Ustream stats only relate to the website, youtube, and Facebook views?
=========
No dice, Current TV appears to have only broadcast the last hour, but it may help to explain the 1.6M+ counter jump in the last 2 hours.
from Ecollywood
Tune in: On Sept. 15 at 7 p.m. EDT, Current TV will broadcast a climate crisis talk by Al Gore in the last hour of the global event “24 Hours of Reality.”

Current.com will feature the entire live broadcast online.
source: http://www.mnn.com/lifestyle/arts-culture/stories/ecollywood-odds-and-ends-28
Over to you, charles the moderator …

manicbeancounter
September 22, 2011 12:02 pm

How many of the 4.6 million hits were as a result of this website and from other Climate Realist sites?
Only the Climate Reality project would have that information, and Al Gore would be too embarrassed to pass that on.
One thing is pretty certain – this was a very well-funded project. The videos were top-quality in terms of production. It was the content that turned people off very quickly.

John from CA
September 22, 2011 12:35 pm

manicbeancounter says:
September 22, 2011 at 12:02 pm
How many of the 4.6 million hits were as a result of this website and from other Climate Realist sites?
Only the Climate Reality project would have that information, and Al Gore would be too embarrassed to pass that on.
One thing is pretty certain – this was a very well-funded project. The videos were top-quality in terms of production. It was the content that turned people off very quickly.
============
Anthony posted the following related to WUWT outbound clicks to climaterealityproject.org
9/15/2011: 1,555

9/14/2011: 240
source: http://wattsupwiththat.com/2011/09/21/our-own-ctm-is-a-nasty-cruel-man/#comments
I’m not so sure about “Al Gore would be too embarrassed to pass that on.” He founded Current TV and did a great job of showcasing the integrated broadcast business model. Its in his best interest to account for the audience views.
I completely agree, the mechanics of the 24 Hour broadcast are far more interesting than the skewed content and vitriol.

September 22, 2011 6:18 pm

When will Al Gore finally give up promoting his scam? How did he supposedly draw 8.6 million when no one knew about this “event” and no one cares about what he has to say?

Layne
September 23, 2011 11:17 am

Charles, I came here via a link on The Blaze. Nice Work!

Leon Brozyna
September 23, 2011 7:19 pm

Checking the latest Alexa stats for RANK, over a six-month period, WUWT holds steady at approx 17,000, while Mr. Gore’s little project has spiked and faded off the chart.

EZ2C4U2
September 24, 2011 3:32 am

Al is at it again!! The cooking the truth and the data, name calling, and any other factor he can think of in order to promote his agenda which is money.

John from CA
September 24, 2011 12:08 pm

Hey Charles,
Fox picked up the story.
Al Gore’s Online Climate Show Viewed by Millions … or Not?
Published September 23, 2011 | FoxNews.com
Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/scitech/2011/09/23/how-many-people-watched-al-goresclimate-cast/#content#ixzz1YtlBbt2l

John from CA
September 25, 2011 3:12 am

I thought Fox did a good job with the story but failed in one respect.
“Ustream affirmed Climate Reality’s 8.6 million tally Friday night in an email to FoxNews.com.”
What do they mean by “tally”. Ustream views or does it include tweets and possibly page hits from other websites?
I guess we’ll never know.

Dan
September 26, 2011 11:12 am

Rush Limbaugh gets that in one day. What’s the big deal?

Dan
September 26, 2011 11:14 am

And also…someone needs to look and see that the Google Analytics says. But i’m sure that data is more closely guarded than Michael Mann’s
Was it a unique view, or a view? If I had to reload the page 10 times, that’s 10 views – which would be decidedly less impressive.