From the American Chemical Society, a call for science superheros. I suppose this means the Goreacle is not in the running.
Remedies for science’s shortage of superheroes
DENVER, Aug. 28, 2011 — One of the most serious personnel shortages in the global science and engineering workforce — numbering more than 20 million in the United States alone — involves a scarcity of real-life versions of Superman, Superwoman and other superheroes and superheroines with charm, charisma, people skills and communication skills.
That’s the premise behind an unusual symposium occurring here today at the 242nd National Meeting & Exposition of the American Chemical Society (ACS), the world largest scientific society. Entitled “Empowering Tomorrow’s Science Super Heroes,” it opens a discussion on how to give scientists a touch of the panache of the stock comic book and Hollywood characters who worked for the public good.
“We are seeking ways to equip scientists to better communicate and connect with the rest of society,” said Donna J. Nelson, Ph.D., an organizer of the session. It is among events at the meeting, which includes more than 7,500 scientific presentations, initiated by Nancy B. Jackson, Ph.D., ACS president. “The well-equipped superhero and superheroine has the communications skills to explain their work and the wonder and importance of science in an understandable way,” Nelson explained. “They have an awareness of public policy, how science connects with societal issues and even the ability to use a bit of humor.”
Nelson, who is with the University of Oklahoma and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), said those skills add up to super-hero-level leaders who can inspire students, build public support for science and engage in key public policy decisions. Three of her models for science superheroes are the late Richard E. Smaley, Ph.D.; Harold Kroto, Ph.D.; and Robert F. Curl, Ph.D., who shared the 2005 Nobel Prize in Chemistry. “All three have been great organizers and leaders with superb social skills and just the kind of people to get kids interested in a career in science,” Nelson said.
Nelson also praised the Ig Nobel Prize, a parody of the Nobel Prizes, presented each year just before the real Nobels, but for 10 unusual or trivial “achievements” in scientific research. The self- proclaimed aim of the prizes is to “first make people laugh, and then make them think.”
In addition to a presentation on the Ig Nobel Prize, the superheroes event will include speakers from NOVA’s public scientific information outreach, science cafes, science festivals and other projects that accomplish the superhero mission.
Presentations in the superheroes symposium with summaries of the presentations include:
- Science outreach: Demonstrating the value of science. Jennifer Larese, NOVA Outreach Coordinator. As individuals, people learn in slightly different manners and at different rates of speed. As informal science educators, scientists have a unique opportunity to use a variety of formats, experiences and media to engage and excite their audiences. Today there are countless new electronic media tools being created, almost daily. This presentation will briefly cover science outreach as a transmedia opportunity to connect with the public.
- Infusing moving media into instruction. Janet English, Instructor, El Toro High School, Mission Viejo, Calif. The main job for movie and TV superheroes is to save the world, and this is why many consider scientists superheroes. There are numerous ways that chemists and other scientists can affect children’s learning and help promote a love of science. The media also can play a pivotal role in students’ learning, and teachers can discuss how the media is used (or not used) in a thought-provoking way in the classroom. Scientists also can contribute to improving the mass media and how they can be role models for children.
- Creative engagement at science cafes. John Cohen., M.D., University of Colorado School of Medicine, Department of Immunology, Denver. A Café Scientifique brings a scientist to talk directly with the public in pleasant relaxed surroundings. PowerPoint is banned to encourage dialog, rather than a lecture. There is no moderator, so the conversation finds its correct level without imposed dumbing-down. Speakers frequently say that talking at the Café Sci was one of the best experiences of their career. So do audiences and organizers.
- Here come the Science Festivals! Kishore Hari, Director, Bay Area Science Festival. There are many ways that science festivals are raising awareness about a tremendous grassroots movement to celebrate and elevate science. Science festivals hope to rally whole communities to celebrate science as alive and local. Festivals aim to inspire youth to consider science studies and careers, and adults to cultivate a life-long interest in science and technology.
- The Ig Nobel Prize: Never dull, never boring awards in chemistry. Marc Abrahams, Editor, Annals of Improbable Research. The Ig Nobel Prizes honor achievements that first make people laugh, then make them think. Every year since 1991, 10 new prizes have been awarded in chemistry, physics and other fields. The winners journey to Harvard University for the gala ceremony in which genuine Nobel laureates shake their hands and hand them their prizes. The “Igs” have spawned live shows worldwide and video features. They celebrate the unusual, honor the imaginative — and spur people’s interest in science, medicine and technology.
The American Chemical Society is a non-profit organization chartered by the U.S. Congress. With more than 163,000 members, ACS is the world’s largest scientific society and a global leader in providing access to chemistry-related research through its multiple databases, peer-reviewed journals and scientific conferences. Its main offices are in Washington, D.C., and Columbus, Ohio.
=================================================================
I think Josh’s take on Joe Romm as Super Chicken is a good start. Just put a “S” in a crest on him and you’re done.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

Maybe they should bring back real chemistry sets.
I’m still upset about Friday Funny – science safety run amok
Anyone remember the DuPont Chemical Magic Show before the word “chemical” became a four letter word? Even Science News Magazine uses “molecule” where chemical is a better fit.
That’s an especially sore point. When I was a kid I used to fantasize that if I ingested the exact right number of molecules of some chemical I’d develop my own set of superpowers. Hey, made as much sense as a bite from a radioactive spider.
Idiots. They can’t even name a science super-hero.
Reed Richards, leader of the Fantastic Four?
Hello? Earth to climate boffins.
Beam me up, Scotty. There’s no intelligent life here.
What they’re really looking for is a real-life Victor Von Doom a.k.a. Dr. Doom the genius inventor who also appeared in Marvel Comics as an enemy of The Fantastic Four.
Teh climate boffins already got the “doom” part down pat and they’re good at invention like “water vapor amplification”. All they’re really missing is the genius part.
Enter Dilbert:
http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/30000/0000/600/30603/30603.strip.zoom.gif
http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/30000/0000/600/30604/30604.strip.zoom.gif
http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/30000/0000/600/30605/30605.strip.zoom.gif
http://dilbert.com/dyn/str_strip/000000000/00000000/0000000/000000/30000/0000/600/30606/30606.strip.zoom.gif
I see a word missing from the ACS article. Probably just an oversight. TRUTH.
Hmm, all of a sudden they see a need for science to become more popular in the eyes of the public. I wonder what that need could be.
It’s a bird! It’s a plane! It’s SUPERGREENIE! Faster than a speeding press release. More powerful than a sewage plant upwind. Able to leap the decline in a single bound …
…about a tremendous grassroots movement…
Grass roots? Someone needs a dictionary.
For someone without integrity those with it just look superhuman. But those with integrity are just normal human.
Personal Note: I was disappointed to learn that the ACS was chartered by a government body. Politics?
John
They are simply looking for someone who can lie convincingly.
And with a straight face.
The self- proclaimed aim of the prizes is to “first make people laugh, and then make them think.
These days, “. . . make them think.” is generally a euphemism for injected leftist political commentary. Which was is the reason I stopped subscribing to JIR many years ago.
So what does “Chartered by the US Congress” mean, exactly?
I was enjoying myself as a certified senior salt in an elective course on short narratives by Hispanic writers on a Semester at Sea summer session: one day the very pleasant professor asked a slouching girl in the front row an easy question which she refused to answer. When the professor looked a little sad the student said aggressively—”Look, I am a chemistry major, I don’t have to do this stuff” to the amazement of all the adults in the room but not, apparently, to most of the younger students. Would this attitude have anything to do with the ACS’ felt need for ‘superheroes’?
Recent history has several science ‘superheroes’ that effectively connected with the public and had important sciencey or technology things to contribute.
Einstein, Feynman, Cousteau, Heddy Lamarr, Edison
Then there are those who are effective public speakers, but have a list of erroneous contributions, or no significant contributions.
Paul Ehrlich, Carl Sagan, John Holdren, David Suzuki
I can nominate three such men, all chemical engineers, all personal acquaintances and friends. The photo at the link below is from a dinner meeting of the American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Los Angeles Chapter, on May 27, 2011 in Los Angeles, California. Each of us spoke that night about our respective patents or patent pending, and experience with the US patent process.
see http://tinypic.com/r/2cwkklj/7
From left to right, Peter A. Nick, Hatem Harraz, Arthur Krugler, and Roger Sowell.
Pete Nick is co-inventor on a US utility patent 7,452,392 on a waste-to-energy process, whereby a city’s garbage is converted to syngas and from there to electricity. There are four other co-inventors on the patent. Their patented process diverts the garbage from landfills, and qualifies as a “green” process because all emissions are from bio-waste. They are seeking investors to build their first plant. It also can process bio-waste such as hazardous biomedical waste from hospitals and laboratories.
Hatem Harraz has a patent pending, which is nearly ready to issue, on a novel form of cellulose. His invention is a form of non-crystalline cellulose that can be converted to bio-ethanol. Or, it can be eaten as food. This invention is huge,with world-wide implications. His process takes waste plant matter, such as corn stalks or shrubbery trimmings, and converts it to ethanol for fuel, or for a food additive. The food is suitable for humans or herbivorous animals such as cattle.
Art Krugler is a prolific inventor, with three patents from the 1970s and several more pending. He is a world-class expert in geothermal power plants, vortex separation systems, and bio-diesel processes. Art is also 86 years young! And, he still works a full day every day.
The fourth guy is some attorney-chemical engineer that took up space. I have filed one US utility patent application several years ago that was denied due to substantially similar prior art. I also performed patent searches on dozens of other ideas for others and myself, and advise clients on various aspects of their intellectual property portfolios.
Many chemical engineers are also members of American Chemical Society.
Perhaps this applies to science. In engineering, we need common sense and practical skills. When I had to hire people, I got kids right out of college. From good schools. Good theory, good attitude, zero experience. I thought lab courses were supposed to teach at least a little of that. Took six months to a year before any useful output. This was 20 years ago. I didn’t need superperson, just someone who could produce. Today it doesn’t matter as much, we’ve farmed out all design to the Indian subcontinent. With most managers totally hostile to engineering. (at least that has been my experience.) I had a good run, but I wouldn’t direct a young person to engineering today. Well, perhaps software, but we called that ‘programming’, not engineering. (full disclosure: I started as a programmer in ’67)
This is a real sore point with me. I don’t object to a formal education but often a formal education teaches you to only think in one way and is hard for a creative person to conform to. Professional standards are designed to eliminate those who don’t meet this rigid idea of what a good professional should be. If they want to improved their ranks they need to evaluate people on their abilities instead of selecting only people who can get through their educational maze. The best example of this would be Thomas Edison,. He would have never made it into any of the professional societies but he is responsible for much of our modern life.
Don’t these people realize that superheroes are make-believe?
Perhaps this is all a reaction to the general dumbing down of America. With the Chinese now submitting more patents and graduating far more scientists and engineers, anything to spark some interest in the sciences for Americans should be welcomed.
In climate science, there are several superheroes. Most recently and maybe most important are Svensmark and Kirkby. Their science is rock solid and they explain it in a way that makes it clear to the ordinary person. In addition, they show the humility demanded by science. Now that is the stuff of superheroes.
Some that have been around longer are Roger Pielke, Sr., (No snub to Pielke, Jr., but I have not kept up with him) Willis Eschenbach, Dr, Roy Spencer and some others.
What we should call those who claim to practice their science through the use of supercomputers only and who cannot explain or will not explain their science to the ordinary person or the ordinary Phd? Whatever we call them, there is a long list. I know how we should describe them. They are self-destructively arrogant or they are liars.
Dena says:
August 28, 2011 at 1:47 pm
“This is a real sore point with me. I don’t object to a formal education but often a formal education teaches you to only think in one way and is hard for a creative person to conform to.”
Very true. There are some people who do not travel the beaten path. However, if you can get into a first rate graduate school, you might find that your problems are solved. How do you do that without an undergraduate degree? Take a course taught by a professor of the graduate school that is open to graduates and undergraduates. Sometimes you do not have to graduate to be accepted to graduate school.
@Jeff Alberts All dreams are make-believe until someone makes them real – that’s what we need real-life superheroes for, scientific or otherwise. Why do football players, wrestlers and golfers get more respect than prominent scientists in North American society?
Gates: why don’t you pack your belongings and move to Beijing where you can keep Maurice Strong company?
to give scientists a touch of the panache of the stock comic book and Hollywood characters who worked for the public good
=============================================
we are handing out way too many liberal arts degrees…………………….
I can think of quite a few comic Supers in the science game. Lex Luthor used to be a fine mad scientist until he turned into an entrepreneur. Dr. Solar was one of the good guys. And Dr. Manhattan? Somewhere in the middle of the triangle with good, evil, and indifferent at its vertices.
The only comic Mad Scientist I’d want in the neighborhood is Dr. Atomic. http://www.toonopedia.com/dratomic.htm