The grass is greener on the ethanol model side

From the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign

Switch from corn to grass would raise ethanol output, cut emissions

CHAMPAIGN, Ill. — Growing perennial grasses on the least productive farmland now used for corn ethanol production in the U.S. would result in higher overall corn yields, more ethanol output per acre and better groundwater quality, researchers report in a new study. The switch would also slash emissions of two potent greenhouse gases: carbon dioxide and nitrous oxide.

The study used a computer model of plant growth and soil chemistry to compare the ecological effects of growing corn (Zea mays L.); miscanthus (Miscanthus x giganteus), a sterile hybrid grass used in bioenergy production in Western Europe; and switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.), which is native to the U.S.

The analysis found that switching 30 percent of the least productive corn acres to miscanthus offered the most ecological advantages.

“If cellulosic feedstocks (such as miscanthus) were planted on cropland that is currently used for ethanol production in the U.S., we could achieve more ethanol (plus 82 percent) and grain for food (plus 4 percent), while reducing nitrogen leaching (minus 15 to 22 percent) and greenhouse gas emissions (minus 29 percent to 473 percent),” the researchers wrote in their report, published in the journal Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment.

“Globally, agriculture contributes about 14 percent of the greenhouse gases that are causing global warming to the atmosphere,” said University of Illinois plant biology and Energy Biosciences Institute (EBI) professor Evan DeLucia, who led the study with EBI feedstock analyst Sarah Davis. “The whole Midwest has been, since the advent of modern agriculture, a source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere.”

IMAGE:Experimental plots in Urbana, Illinois, include corn, switchgrass and miscanthus in side-by-side trials.Click here for more information.

“According to our model, just by making this replacement you convert that whole area from a source of greenhouse gases to the atmosphere to a sink for greenhouse gases from the atmosphere,” DeLucia said.

Miscanthus grows in thick stands up to 13 feet tall in test plots in Illinois. It does well on marginal land without being fertilized, so using it as a biofuel feedstock instead of corn would eliminate a major source of air and water pollution, Davis said. Nitrous oxide, a byproduct of the fertilizers used on cornfields, “is actually a more potent greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide,” she said.

“Both switchgrass and miscanthus are perennial grasses, which means that you don’t have to till every year, you don’t have to plant every year, so there’s much less soil disturbance happening than with corn,” Davis said. “And because the root system remains in place year after year, there’s more carbon going into the soil.”

Several hurdles remain before the transition from corn to cellulosic ethanol production can occur on a commercial scale, the researchers said. Converting the sugars in corn to ethanol is easier than releasing the energy locked in plant stems and leaves.

Currently, one commercial-scale lignocellulose biorefinery is under construction in the U.S. – in Florida, the researchers said, and other facilities are in the planning stages. More research must be done to increase the efficiency of the process, the researchers said.

“We know that these grasses are enormously productive; we know the agronomy works; we know the ecology works,” DeLucia said. “So the next step is to break down the economic barriers by making an efficient conversion chain from lignocellulosics to ethanol.”

DeLucia said most scientists in the field expect this to be achieved within a decade.

###

DeLucia is an affiliate of the Institute for Genomic Biology at Illinois. The BP-funded Energy Biosciences Institute funded this study.

The paper, “Impact of Second-Generation Biofuel Agriculture on Greenhouse Gas Emissions in the Corn-Growing Regions of the U.S.,” is available online or from the U. of I. News Bureau.

================================================================

Oh gosh it’s funded by BIG OIL, quick ignore it!

 

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
54 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
pofarmer
July 13, 2011 5:27 pm

Continuois corn is very good at building organic matter.

M2Cents
July 13, 2011 6:41 pm

Cellulose to alcohol conversion has been only 10 years away since the late 1960’s. Also cheap solar, wind, and a hydrogen based economy.
These studies would be a lot more believable if they had input from agronomists and engineers. At least they would not keep making the same dumb errors.

John T
July 14, 2011 6:01 am

Just a couple notes:
Another benefit, if done properly, is that soil erosion is still an issue, even with modern low/no till and other techniques to minimize it. Switching high erosion areas and creating buffers with grass could be extremely beneficial.
The other note is that corn, and other crops, are a huge CO2 sink even now. How many billions of metric tons of plant material are harvested every year? And what do you think is the origin of a large fraction of that mass? CO2. I lost track of the article that showed the huge, negative carbon footprint of farming.

starzmom
July 14, 2011 1:09 pm

Just a guess, but I bet the most marginal land for corn is also water deficient. If switchgrass needs more water, it just might be a non-starter in places that are also marginal for corn.