Oh, I found some comedy gold posted on the NASA website What on Earth is That?

It features a talk by NASA GISS warmist Gavin Schmidt, who apparently took a trip to understand that all important metric of the Arctic climate; polar bears. A video of his talk follows. Apparently, Martha Stewart came along for the ride and made a festive thermometer cozy for Gavin.
Gosh, how did he tear himself away from his taxpayer funded blogging duties at Real Climate while he’s still got hundreds of climate reporting stations in Australia that haven’t been updated since 1992 in the GISTEMP database? Good thing he has his priorities straight.
Somebody at NASA writes on that blog:
You just can’t go wrong with a title to a talk like that. The clip below is from an hour-long talk that Gavin Schmidt gave to colleagues at GISS about his visit to Churchill, a tiny town in Canada that’s known as the polar bear capitol of the world. Yes, Martha Stewart came along as well. The talk doesn’t start until about 1:48, and Schmidt’s interview with Stewart starts at 48:18
And here’s the video:
This note is on the video, presumably from Gavin. This video says it has had 35 views so far, so I expect WUWT readers will make up the bulk of the viewership.
Title: Polar bears, Martha Stewart and me
Abstract:
Polar bears are frequently poster children for climate change issues, but until recently I had very little idea of the details of threat posed by continuing Arctic change on their life-cycle. In this presentation I’ll share what I learned on a recent trip along with some other, perhaps more recognisable, New Yorkers, to Churchill, Manitoba
“Polar Bear Capital of the World”!
And, here’s Gavin’s slide show in PDF form:
http://www.giss.nasa.gov/meetings/lunch/2011a/20110209-Gavin_Schmidt.pdf
UPDATE: For those of you that would like some peer reviewed science to help de-gavinify your friends that fear “global warming” will bring on the demise of the polar bear, here’s this from commenter “Jimbo” who writes:
It seems to me that Polar Bears are more robust than previously thought.
and…
This is the perfect thread to show how vulnerable Polar Bears are.
Estimating the Energetic Contribution of Polar Bear (Ursus maritimus) Summer Diets to the Total Energy Budget
The analysis indicated that it is possible for polar bears to maintain their body mass while on shore by feeding on arctic charr and seal blubber. Polar bears of body masses up to 280 kg could gain sufficient energy from blueberries to match the daily energy loss.
http://www.asmjournals.org/doi/abs/10.1644/08-MAMM-A-103R2.1
We describe an observation of a polar bear cub on its mother’s back while the mother was swimming among ice floes in Svalbard, Norwegian Arctic.
http://www.springerlink.com/content/8051204vu73l320w/
Also:
and…
Polar Bears Thrive While Arctic Warms Up!
A survey of the animals’ numbers in Canada’s eastern Arctic has revealed that they are thriving, not declining, because of mankind’s interference in the environment.
In the Davis Strait area, a 140,000-square kilometre region, the polar bear population has grown from 850 in the mid-1980s to 2,100 today.
Polar bears are distributed throughout the Arctic in 19 populations, comprising an estimated total of 20 000–25 000 bears (Marine Mammal Commission, 2006).
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Was this trip on our nickel or his??
Darn shame he didn’t go hug one during his visit.
I don’t get it. Am I supposed to hate on Schmidt?
You could add one more caption: Martha Stewart ” Hmmm—-Dinner”
Jim: “Was this trip on our nickel or his??”
Does it matter? He gets all his nickels from the taxpayers anyway.
Only watched the beginning to see how Gav looks like. Why does he mention Martha Stewart? Did he ask her how it was in the locker?
What do you think? The “enlightened” are above the rules that apply to peons like you and me. So naturally it was on our nickel.
It seems to me that Polar Bears are more robust than previously thought.
Polar Bear numbers increasing since the 1950s – blame global warming.
I blame the increase on an increased ban on hunting.
Martha was rug shopping.
Thank you!
So that is Gavin Schmidt? Amazing what you can get about a person who is giving a talk.
I will now watch the rest, later, the Gavin Schmidt, you say? The all knowing, convincing, I know how to save the world Gavin Schmidt, you say? Well isn’t that interesting!
I will watch the rest later…
Old but good study on the Bears of Churchill here;
http://www.john-daly.com/p-bears/index.htm
Population is stable.
Maybe they were there for the hunt?
http://www.heniklakeadventures.com/Polar-Bear-Hunts.page
This is the perfect thread to show how vulnerable Polar Bears are.
Polar Bears are doomed I tells ya.
I’m suprised skeptic bloggers did not report ICCC6. Ron Bailey at Reason did. [Tips&Notes takes forever to load].
http://reason.com/archives/2011/07/05/luckewarmers-denialists-and-ot
I was in Churchill August 2009. The polar bears were hanging around, waiting for the ice to form over the Churchill River; when the ice is thick enough, the snows are deep enough for the bears to walk to where they want to go. It is a wonderful example of how nature uses a natural process to time another (the bears could swim the distance any time they wanted.) In the meantime it can be spooky wandering along the side streets, and people who can drive with rifles in their trucks.
The bear trap is used to grab bears that become too interested in people. During the wait the bears basically do not eat. Small dogs and slim people are safe as the bears get enough protein but need fat; to the southeast of Churchill husky sled dogs are staked out in polar-bear-land without problems. It is rare that people get et, but it does happen, which then causes the demise of Sir Bear. The bear being slung beneath a helicopter is probably a problem bear that was put in the “bear jail”. The bear jail is a concrete structure with tiny windows and nothing in it. For a couple of months the bear is there and only gets ice. No food. No people. Nothing. The problem bear learns that this is a very bad place to be. When the other bears have left, the problem bear is sedated, slung and dropped off up the trail with its brothers and sisters. Suitably impressed with human involvement, problem bears remain being bears but stop being problems. As for the PETA people, they don’t know about the starvation thing, mostly because they wouldn’t understand what real wild animals are like and how they have to be treated.
The locals know that there are far more polar bears than there used to be. Locally the primary reason is that in the 1940s through the 1960s Churchill was an important Defence Early Warming station for the American Air Force. Before the Commie nukes could fall on Washington, they had to fly over Churchill where they would be targeted and, it was hoped, detonated early, perhaps over Ottawa, Canada, but certainly before the US capital. During that time there were a many troops there, all armed with M1s, whose job it was to keep the tarmac, base and visiting VIPs safe from enemy infiltration and the jaws of white bears. Generals, colonels and the upper staff officers on tours or junkets used to go out on polar bear shoots (not really a hunt) and come back on the C140s with their trophies. Of course this was all off-the-record, but when you are dealing with polar bears vs armed warriors, only one has the tale to tell. And one reason they had the polar bear population around was the large, open garbage dump between the base and the town. The dump doesn’t exist any more, but even after the base was decommissioned it did. So you could always find the polar bears, if you wanted. They still sleep inside the fuselage of a downed cargo plane on the outskirts of Churchill, but they are just hanging around, stomachs growling these days (and waiting for tourists to check out the wreck. That one and the ship rusting to pieces further south, in the Bay shallows.)
Churchill is a poster child of various things. In the museum you can see how the temperatures have risen drastically … up to 1982. Then the record stops. It didn’t get much warmer after that. The eco-ist warmer comes and gets in the big-wheeled trucks when the ice is thick enough and is amazed at the numbers of polar bears. They are everywhere!, especially on the 100m wide trail that they use and have used for millenia that the tour operators know about. While I was there some of these overpaid, underthinkers and his male-impressed bride told me that they had seen 6! 6! bears that day. The town was flooded with polar bears! If they saw 6! 6! there must be HUNDREDS out there.
Fact is, polar bears are bored and a little annoyed at being followed. So they wander. During my time there I got to know the conservation officer and a truck rental guy who helps him load bears when needed into the backs of trucks to go to the Polar Bear Jail. There was only one bear in town. It wandered a bit. Just after the eco-6! 6! couple left, I heard the polar bear alert horn go off and then, a few minutes later, the sound of a tranq-firing gun going off. Sir Bear was now prisoner August-01, and was denied bail. You could suntan (except for the mosquitos) in Churchill once more.
The Inuit and the Dene who live in Churchill have been saying for years that there are more ‘bears now than in their childhood, and with good reason. And them’s good huntin’, at least from a permit point of view (think $50,000/bear, with 75% restricted to American hunters). You won’t find one of God’s Natural Men (or Women) saying the polar bear is endangered. Skinnier, yes, as the ice goes away early. The Hudson Bay polar bears get south of Churchill when the ice they ride drifts south as it melts, so they come onshore. Hard to hunt seals when you are onshore, but guess where seals go when the ice is out? Close to shore, don’t ya know. Seems to work out. The worst thing for polar bears in Hudson Bay would be ice that didn’t break off and drift south. They don’t plan to go south; melting ice does that thinking for them.
Churchill and the ecoist warmist is such a good mix that every business in Churchill will tell you how difficult it is for the polar bears now and how you MUST come and stay and go on tours because, you know, your children won’t have any polar bears to see. Reservations are recommended during high season, bring your BankCard for unexpected purchases or expenses, please. Check out the abandoned base but never do so without a guide (actually, this part is true: there are so many nooks and crannies for a bear to hide in you might as well wish to visit the Haunted House where they actually carve up the occassional visitor).
What a place, what a time. Not that the polar bears care. They don’t like each other, anyway, it’s just that all polar paths lead to Churchill, so that’s where the gang end up. The bears and those awful guys in NorthFace jackets (wolf fur around the collar), their damn cameras and the Tundra buggy they park in the middle of the road.
Boy, does he ever wave his hands a lot…..force of habit?
Oh noes!
Polar Bears Thrive While Arctic Warms Up! [Polar Bear numbers
From Jo Nova: The alter egos of John Clarke and Bryan Dawe(1) “The Everything Tax — a tin pot raffle with no prize”
(1) John Clarke and Bryan Dawe a clever satirist duo that appear on the ABC (the ABC is the Australian public broadcaster, ideologically extreme left, similar to the BBC, no chance that such heresy would be aired there even as satire)
Jim says:
July 8, 2011 at 4:51 pm
I think we all know the answer to that question.
The look on people’s faces when I tell them that polar bears are not only NOT endagered, but they are so abundant that many remote northern villages have a serious problem with them, they look at me like I’m nuts. I’m not sure whether or not they are listening when I explain to them that polar bears have survived previous interglacials that were warmer than the current (that is, warmer according to the paleoclimatic proxy “data”). Similarly, they look at me in total disbelief when I state that it is quite common for polar bears to swim nonstop for many miles. I’m such a heretic…
I have dial up. Don’t ask. I have tired to send a number of tips but often give up. Why not have tips and notes made up of 10 pages? When each page has 100 comments it turnes to the next page. Just a suggestion. ;O)
Eric Gisin says:
July 8, 2011 at 5:29 pm
……[Tips&Notes takes forever to load].
Experienced the same problem Eric. My little steam driven PC seems to get lost somewhere along the way and give up.
Correction:
“I have tired to send…”
“I have tried to send…”
maybe not. ;>)
Anthony, how did you get his number? LMAO!!!
I have just been informed that Gavin Schmidt was part of one of our misdirected export campaigns. Please accept the apologies of this humble UK citizen.
Whilst we must accept a degree of responsibility, we also claim a degree of mitigation due to the failure of your indigenous North American carnivores.
This man could bore the legs off a billiard table. Nothing you couldn’t learn flicking through a 20yo copy of NatGeo at a dentists office.