On this July 4th, thank "climate disruption" for saving the USA in 1814

The President's House.
The White House ruins after the conflagration of August 24, 1814. Watercolor by George Munger, displayed at the White House - Image via Wikipedia - click on the image to find out what the s-shape is.

This is a little known story about how a tornado saved the United States from the British in the War of 1812 as they started to burn Washington, DC. Just having come from there for ICCC6, and this being Independence Day, I thought this story would be appropriate. Back then, they called it an “act of God”, if it happened today, we’d have the alarmosphere squawking that it was “climate disruption” caused by CO2. Enjoy the story – Anthony

The Tornado and the Burning of Washington, August 25, 1814

This is an excerpt from the book Washington Weather

During the summer of 1814, British warships sailed into the Chesapeake Bay and headed towards Washington. The warships sailed up the Patuxent River and anchored at Benedict, Maryland on August 19,1814. Over 4,500 British soldiers landed and marched towards Washington. The British mission was to capture Washington and seek revenge for the burning of their British Capitol in Canada, for which they held the United States responsible. A force of 7,000 Americans was hastily assembled near the Potomac River to defend Washington. During the afternoon of August 24, in 100°F heat, the two armies clashed.

The British Army quickly routed the less disciplined American volunteers, mostly due to a series of American blunders and a new British rocket that did little damage, but unnerved the raw American troops with a very loud, shrill noise. President Madison and Secretary of State Monroe, who had led a group of officials to watch the battle, were almost captured in the confusion. It was noted that the 100°F temperatures added to everyone’s discomfort.

After the battle, the British Army marched quickly into Washington while American soldiers, United States government officials, and residents fled the city. There were no officials left in Washington from whom the British could seek terms of surrender. The British admiral ate dinner in the White House, then gave the order to set fire to Washington. Within hours, the White House, the Capitol, and many other public buildings and residences were burning.

On the morning of August 25, Washington was still burning. Throughout the morning and early afternoon, the British soldiers continued to set fires and destroy ammunition supplies and defenses around the city. As the soldiers spread fire and destruction throughout the city, the early afternoon sky began to darken and lightning and thunder signaled the approach of a thunderstorm. As the storm neared the city, the winds began to increase dramatically and then built into a “frightening roar.” A severe thunderstorm was bearing down on Washington, and with it was a tornado.

The tornado tore through the center of Washington and directly into the British occupation. Buildings were lifted off of their foundations and dashed to bits. Other buildings were blown down or lost their roofs. Feather beds were sucked out of homes and scattered about. Trees were uprooted, fences were blown down, and the heavy chain bridge across the Potomac River was buckled and rendered useless. A few British cannons were picked up by the winds and thrown through the air. The collapsing buildings and flying debris killed several British soldiers. Many of the soldiers did not have time to take cover from the winds and they laid face down in the streets. One account describes how a British officer on horseback did not dismount and the winds slammed both horse and rider violently to the ground.

The winds subsided quickly, but the rain fell in torrents for two hours. (There may have been a second thunderstorm that followed quickly after the first thunderstorm.)  Fortunately, the heavy rain quenched most of the flames and prevented Washington from continuing to burn. After the storm, the British Army regrouped on Capitol Hill, still a bit shaken by the harsh weather.

They decided to leave the city that evening. As the British troops were preparing to leave, a conversation was noted between the British Admiral and a Washington lady regarding the storm:  The admiral exclaimed, “Great God, Madam! Is this the kind of storm to which you are accustomed in this infernal country?” The lady answered, “No, Sir, this is a special interposition of Providence to drive our enemies from our city.” The admiral replied, “Not so Madam. It is rather to aid your enemies in the destruction of your city.”

The United States Capitol after the burning of...
The United States Capitol after the burning of Washington, D.C. in the War of 1812. Watercolor and ink depiction from 1814, restored. Image via Wikipedia

Hours later, the British forces left Washington and returned to their ships on the Patuxent River. The journey back was made difficult by the numerous downed trees that lay across the roads. The war ships that lay waiting for the British force had also encountered the fierce storm. Wind and waves had lashed at the ships and many had damaged riggings. Two vessels had broken free from their moorings and were blown ashore.

President Madison and other government officials returned to Washington and began the difficult process of setting up government in a city devastated by fire and wind. Never again would the British Army return to the city, and only rarely would Washington suffer damaging tornadoes.

===============================================================

The 26 hour occupation of Washington DC

I found this short description on Wikipedia interesting:

Less than a day after the attack began, a sudden tornado passed through part of the city, killing British troops and American civilians alike, tossing cannons, and putting out most of the fires.This forced the British troops to return to their ships, many of which were badly damaged by the storm, and so the actual occupation of Washington lasted about 26 hours.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

71 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
July 4, 2011 11:34 pm

I note that on this page with this story is an ad by Google for the very sceptic AGW group, I think not, the Woodland Trust.

jason
July 4, 2011 11:46 pm

Let’s remember a lot of us who read WUWT are British Anthony. We would perhaps suggest Washington got what it deserved as its soldiers burnt Toronto and was a rebelling colony.

Scottish Sceptic
July 4, 2011 11:53 pm

AlanG says: July 4, 2011 at 10:34 pm
Nowadays we Brits would probably be cheered. Tea (party) anyone? Anyway, Washington was only a village then. Still is, populated by village idiots.
I was surprised when I looked at the trigger point for the US war of independence to find that is seems to stem from a series of jury trials in which US juries asserted their right not to convict under what they saw as unjust English laws. The result was that there was an attempt to move trials to England … bypassing the proper exercise of justice through jury trial in the US.
Compared to this, the Boston tea party was merely a side show … the equivalent of a student prank.
The other interesting thing is that whereas the US was effectively founded on the right of a jury to ignore the law and follow their conscience, the modern “MONARCHY/OLIGARCHY” in washington (President/politicians & judges) now try to pretend that there is no right of the ordinary citizen on a jury to refuse to convict under unjust laws.

Rhoda Ramirez
July 5, 2011 12:00 am

Jasons, while I agree that the invasion of Canada at the beginning of the War of 1812 was probably unwise, we were NOT a colony of anyone’s, and especially not England’s, at that point!

July 5, 2011 12:03 am

Great comments folks. “The closer I get to being history, the more I enjoy it.”
It could have been a firestorm. The lifting action of a fire can suction in moist air from the surrounding area, resulting in serious weather.
We had amazing pyrocumulus clouds here in southern California in our last major wildfire, they looked like mushroom clouds from a nuclear explosion. It’s a slightly different phenomena, hydrogen in the brush (composed of natural hydrocarbons) combine with oxygen (from the air) to make H2O, which condenses to make clouds.
dT

The Ghost Of Big Jim Cooley
July 5, 2011 12:52 am

It’s fascinating to think what would have happened had we turned a different corner.
If Britain hadn’t of lost (what is now the US), obviously world events – and the world now – would be vastly different. The First World War would probably still of happened (given the events that led up to it), but I don’t think WWII would have. If we had held on to the US then Britain’s empire may well have been far too strong for Hitler to even contemplate his disasterous campaign. Our attempt at appeasment would never had been made anyway, and Germany would have been threatened with annhilation, so the ‘war’ would have started earlier than 1939. WWII shaped the entire world into what it is now, so even we, writing here, wouldn’t now be doing so!
Fascinating.

Blade
July 5, 2011 12:53 am

Anthony, thanks very much for this post.
I have somehow managed to live an entire lifetime without ever hearing about the hurricane and tornado that I can recall. Then, a couple of years ago there was a multi-part special on the War of 1812 aired on the History Channel (uggh! but this was very well done). It gets re-aired from time-to-time and is well worth the effort to watch.
There was definite mention of the hurricane and tornado which I would characterize as being described as pivotal. Maybe the episodes are on YouTube, so let’s check … found it!

First Invasion: The War of 1812
Parts: 12345678910

As luck would have it someone has already isolated the part concerning the capitol fire, hurricane and tornado. This URL is skipped to 2:10 into this segment for the specific details …

One final note, since this is on YouTube, on some of the segments you will find comments from snot-nosed little children in dire need of an *sskicking. For some reason that scene from Unforgiven comes to mind. You know the scene, when Little Bill tears English Bob a new one for bad-mouthing the USA on the Fourth of July 😉
Happy Independence Day everyone.

Roger Longstaff
July 5, 2011 1:13 am

I really must get some specs. At first sight I read this as ” …..the British started to burn Washington, DC, just having come from there for ICCC6

jason
July 5, 2011 1:48 am

Rhoda, you are correct, I was half awake and thinking of the AWI ! My main point is WUWT is international, so I am uncomfortable with Anthony being so nationalistic at times, let’s stick to climate rather than posting about showing the stars and stripes and bashing the Brits?

R Jones
July 5, 2011 1:51 am

I thought that although it was a “British” expeditionary force it was the Newfoundland Regiment that set fire to the White House.

Francis White
July 5, 2011 2:38 am

The White House was blackened by the smoke and to cover the soot and charring they whitewashed it. Which is how it became a white house and maybe how the Government discovered the merits of “white-washing”.

Frank K.
July 5, 2011 3:02 am

Doug in Seattle says:
July 4, 2011 at 8:41 pm
“I too had heard this was a hurricane rather than a tornado.”
Whoa! Hold on there!! Everyone knows that hurricanes and tornadoes were virtually non-existent in the 19th century before man started burning fossil fuels!
/cagw

Caleb
July 5, 2011 4:04 am

..“Many of the soldiers … laid face down in the streets.” The past tense of the intransitive verb to lie is lay, not laid.
American slang: “layed;” “To get screwed.” Usually but not always proceded by the word “got.” There should be a comma after with word “layed.” These soldiers were not the only ones who got screwed in Washington, but usually it isn’t by a tornado.
Any time yooz guys gotta question ’bout proppa English, juz ask me ‘n’ I’ll set yoo straight.

RockyRoad
July 5, 2011 4:20 am

See, see? If the British hadn’t torched the city, thereby creating a huge CO2 cell, the rain and tornado (obvious climate disruption products) never would have happened. Obvious cause and effect, ladies and gentlemen.
/sarc off.

Caleb
July 5, 2011 4:20 am

RE: Martin Brumby says:
July 4, 2011 at 11:02 pm
Got a chuckle out of the addition of “loose cannon” to things-caused-by-global-warming.
The phrase “loose cannon” came from the cannons on a ship breaking loose during a storm, and rolling around the deck smashing things and sailors. Only in Washington would you have loose cannon on the streets.

Pull My Finger
July 5, 2011 5:26 am

Interesting note on 4th of July weather. My newspaper in central PA noted the average high on July 4 is 80F. I’ve been alive for 42 July 4ths and there is no way in hell the avg high temp is 80. I don’t recall sitting for fireworks at 9pm thinking, “gee, it’s a little cool tonight”.
As to Washington in the summer… good call by the founders, no one wants to be in Washington in the summer, especially in pre AC days. A fine way to insure limited federal government.

John Silver
July 5, 2011 5:56 am

Yeah, but on whose side was this kamikaze?
Interesting that an American acknowledges that the Americans burned the Canadian capital first.

observa
July 5, 2011 7:19 am

If Canberra is anything to go by, for a moment there I got all excited thinking the Brits were about to do you all a great and lasting favour. It seems climate change has an awful lot to answer for, even way back then.

July 5, 2011 7:19 am

I believe that the “hurricane” was a strong front generating thunderstorms and at least one large tornado. Very few hurricanes pass through in just a few hours. It may be that in 1814 all strong storms were referred to as hurricanes. Ed Boyle

Frank K.
July 5, 2011 7:24 am

By the way…the point of my sarcastic posts above is that if this event had happened in 2011 versus 1814, is there any doubt that the 100 deg F heat and the hurricane/tornado event would both have been attributed to AGW by the MSM and the climate elites?

James Sexton
July 5, 2011 7:25 am

jason says:
July 5, 2011 at 1:48 am
Rhoda, you are correct, I was half awake and thinking of the AWI ! My main point is WUWT is international, so I am uncomfortable with Anthony being so nationalistic at times, let’s stick to climate rather than posting about showing the stars and stripes and bashing the Brits?
======================================================================
Nonsense. It’s history. There isn’t any “bashing” of Brits in this story. It is simply a re-telling of history, something of which this world is in desperate need. Anthony is proud of his nation and heritage. This is something to be encouraged in all cases. It is possible to recollect past events without disparaging, or reflecting upon peoples of current time. In my view, it is impossible to celebrate the birth of this nation without also celebrating the heritage bequeathed to us by our British ancestors, in terms of both lineage and ideas.
It is interesting to note, one of the greatest of British politicians would note at one time, “If I were an American, as I am an Englishman, while a foreign troop was landed in my country, I never would lay down my arms never never never!———-The Rt. Hon. William Pitt, The Younger
But none could express the thought I’m trying to convey as well as Samuel Adams, “We boast of our freedom, and we have your example for it. We talk the language we have always heard you speak.”——— Samuel Adams to his fellow Englishmen across the Atlantic.
So, we can see, that while we once were adversaries, even then, we weren’t without great considerations towards one another. Even then, while citizens from both sides were giving their life’s blood for their respective country, it was obvious to all, our bonds and kinship are interminable.
Now, I’ll get back to listening to my favorite Johnny Horton song……………….. 😉

Richard
July 5, 2011 7:27 am

And China burning coal is saving the World.
“Global warming lull down to China’s coal growth” – Richard Black BBC News
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-14002264

observa
July 5, 2011 7:37 am

Mind you, ‘Gaia manifesting itself with a brain and a nervous system’ (according to our esteemed Climate Change Commisioner who knows intimately about such things) apparently works in mysterious ways-
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2003_Canberra_bushfires

Ian L. McQueen
July 5, 2011 7:53 am

I really appreciate WUWT for the variety of topics that it covers. The OT excursions are educational. And so I will add my bit to the comment posted by Scottish Sceptic:
“I was surprised when I looked at the trigger point for the US war of independence to find that is seems to stem from a series of jury trials in which US juries asserted their right not to convict under what they saw as unjust English laws. The result was that there was an attempt to move trials to England … bypassing the proper exercise of justice through jury trial in the US.”
came across very interesting information on the origins of the Revolutionary War in a book about 19th century Japanese history (!). The author of the book pointed out that by the 1770s, all the good farm land in the Colonies had been taken (Washington was the biggest landowner, IIRC) and there was none available for the younger generation. The landless set their eyes on the “Indian Lands” that the British were keeping settlers out of (excuse the grammar) in their effort to observe treaties between the British and the Indians to limit European settlement to the 13 Colonies. According to this history writer, the War of Independence was, in effect, based on a future large land grab.
The fighting between the British and the colonists ended in 1783, but the peace treaty wasn’t signed for two more years because (according once more to my source) the British held out for that length of time for the new U.S. gopvernment to observe the Indian treaties. Eventually they gave up and the colonists were free to invade the Indian lands. And so goes history.
I would welcome confirmation or contradiction of this fascinating view of U.S. history. As a sidenote, when I visited Monticello some years back I made this observation to the tour guide. She was rather flustered, apparently never having heard this version of American history, but one person in the crowd called out agreement with what I said. (And to their credit, no one else in the crowd booed.)
IanM

eco-geek
July 5, 2011 8:15 am

Thesis: If the Americans had actually won the War of Independence then there would be no such thing as Anthropogenic Global Warming.
Discuss!