I was very surprised to learn today (almost a week later) that WUWT has been nominated for Best Science Blog in the 2011 Bloggies. This is like the Superbowl for bloggers. This nomination was done by a blind vote of some 200 people that got nomination ballots. I’m up there with HuffPo, Wired and many others in this award contest. Who isn’t on it is equally interesting. Please read on for info on how to cast your votes for WUWT and other bloggers.
Here’s the timeline and where to vote:
===============================================================
10:00 PM EST (UTC-5)
10:00 PM EST
10:00 PM EST
8:00 PM EST
===============================================================
This weblog award is a little different than the previous one seen on the sidebar (which closed last year because the organizers couldn’t get the system working right)…recall the Climate Audit/Bad Astronomy horserace from 2007 that continued to get votes after the ballots closed, requiring a tie to be called. In 2008 (voting in 2009) WUWT won, but there were other problems. So they closed shop in 2010.
Voting in this contest requires you to give an email address and complete a captcha, so it may be less prone to ballot stuffing.
The voting method is not obvious at first glance, so I’ve summarized it visually for everyone below:
1. Visit http://2011.bloggi.es/ for the main voting page,
or go direct to the Science category with this link: http://2011.bloggi.es/#science
2. Locate the Science category thumbnails:
3. If you want to vote for WUWT, click on the little grey circle in the lower right, and it turns into a checkbox and greys out the other thumbnails. Note the contest rotates the thumbnails for fairness in placement, so it may not look like the image order above.
4. Scroll up/down. Vote for any other blogs you like in any other categories the same way. You don’t have to vote for other blogs, as the system doesn’t require it, but please do. These other bloggers work very hard to deliver a quality product. Reward them if you feel they deserve it.
5. Scroll all the way to the bottom of the page: (note – don’t use cursor keys, it will change your vote!)
6. Complete the captcha by typing the words displayed in your browser (not the ones above), put in a VALID email address. Press the yellow SUBMIT button. Note- you won’t get spammed by doing so. See the fine print under the email box.
7. Wait for an email in your inbox. That email contains a link to verify your vote. If you don’t get it within a half hour, check your spam filter.
8. Click on the link in your email to verify your vote. It will take you to the verification page on the website and you’ll get a success message.
9. Spread the word! Twitter, Facebook, mailing lists, friends, comments on other blogs, and most importantly, if you run a blog, I’d welcome a posting on this topic.
You know that some others who dislike what we do here will try to create anti-vote campaigns as they have done in the past. Success depends on whether there are more people who view WUWT as a science resource versus those that simply want to haul out the hate, and slap on the “denier” label.
10. Remember, while winning is fun, as I tried to teach my son in the recent pinewood derby we did, the way you play the game is just as important. Don’t cheat. Don’t encourage cheating, and simply let the chips fall where they may.
It’s an honor just to be nominated, especially when some other prominent blogs in our circle of influence were not.
Thanks for your consideration – Anthony
UPDATE: Ah, well, what can I say? The childish hatehate has already started over at BoingBoing in comments.
Voted, verified, danced a little jig. Good luck WUWT.
You already have my vote. Keep up the good work!
Another verified vote in, this morning. Thanks for your suggestion to take a look around the other nominated sites, Anthony, which was why I waited so long – some of them had me laughing out loud and led me to vote for them, too. I shall be checking them out in future, when I’m in ‘relaxation’ mode.
About those scrolling problems (using Firefox / XP in my case) – I found that if you click on the background of the page, after making your selection, it doesn’t then mess up your voting choice and you can (if you must) use the arrow keys to scroll the page. Agree it’s a weird bit of coding though.
So, now we all sit and wait. Good luck!
Voted & verified, from Sweden with love…
I contemplated using Mike’s Nature trick on my vote, but in then I realised that the hockey stick will be self evident. Keep up the great work Anthony, from the soggy end of the La Nina, Aus.
Voting accomplished.Was Realclimate even dissed from the best religious blog nominations.Not their year.Shame.
This kind of contest is very near to the democratic centralism – this is how the communist countries defined democracy .
Everybody has indeed the right to vote and the freedom to vote .
There is just this little bug that people can only vote for a list that the communist mafia bosses decided among themselves.
Then it is fully natural that a free election gives a democratic result that 99,9% vote for the Mafia.
Same thing here – all political blogs were selected (by whom and how?) between far left and left.
The forgone conclusion of the contest is that the best political blog is leftish – 100% of the voters will have freely voted for a leftish blog …
Also the best religious blog will be atheistic with a crushing majority of 100% .
I wondered some time ago about a “representative” poll commented on all major french media and according to which the personality preferred by the French was Mr X.Y .
Now Mr X.Y is an uneducated moron who has been genetically favoured with an ability to play tenis. He has also a big mouth , almost as big as Al Gore , and likes to open it often to give his uninformed opinion about anything to worshipping media.
In short Mr X.Y is a useless parasit with an IQ of an oyster .
I wondered how such a parasit could finish “preferred” personality of 60 million of people so I had a look at the poll .
As expected it was the democratic centralism at work again – the journalists have preselected exclusively showbiz , media and sport people .
And that’s how the “preferred” personality turned out to be necessarily an uneducated parasite .
Anthony somebody at the contest site is being deported to Siberia as we speak (if he is lucky) or 6 feet under (if he is not) because he let WUWT through the selection process 🙂
Anthony, you got my vote. Thank you again for the Herculean effort you have made these last few years. You may have saved the planet. Literally.
Voted and confirmed, you are a daily routine for me. mostly just lurk but sometimes give opinion. Great job, this is the best teaching/learning science blog on the web bar none.
Bill Derryberry
Congrats, vote cast and confirmed.
My vote has been cast.
Voted, confirmed.
Have the other spurned sites, like R.C. brought in their lawyers yet?
Seriously, after Drudge, to see if we are still alive, I go to WUWT. Keep up the great work.
TomVonk says:
February 8, 2011 at 3:18 am
You said a mouthful of truth.
We all know if it were an open ballot, WUWT would have won outright. The political sites were a joke. What’s with the gay etc. category? Where are the guns & hunting sites or the historical sites? Why is Puffington’s Ghost everywhere? Shows their huge biases, right off the bat just with the topics, never mind the choices.
For them to allow WUWT to creep in, they must have seen the elephant in the corner of the room.
Anthony, I tried to vote but could not – there were square boxes near the nominees, not round ones, and when I tried to click on the square, nothing happened! Any suggestions?
Thanks and good luck!
REPLY:
1. Make sure your browser is updated to a current version, make sure it isn’t an off-brand like Safari, which breaks on most anything
2. Make sure you have Javascript installed and enabled
3. Make sure you have Flash installed and enabled
4. Make sure your security settings aren’t so high that it prevents a full page load
5. If you don’t want to do this on your main browser, try downloading and installing another temporarily.
Anthony
You have my vote and it has been verified.
Well done Anthony. Voted instantly and verified without any trouble. Incidentally, I have used Linux and Firefox for years and years (as everyone who loves freedom should) and I had no trouble at all. Simply followed your lucid explanation of what needed to be done.
Voted. Verification takes awhile, but done.
Good luck Anthony.
Done and I’ve asked my friends to do the same.
Pointman
Your ballot has been verified. Check back on Sunday, February 27 to see the winners!
Good luck to WUWT
Congratulations, Anthony. Voted. No issues.
Makes me smile to think how steamed Joe Romm must be.
Good luck, Anthony!
Walt says:
February 8, 2011 at 6:01 pm
Congratulations, Anthony. Voted. No issues.
Makes me smile to think how steamed Joe Romm must be.
====================================================
Baghdad Romm
Voted and immediately verified. Not sure what the point is because your counter rather says it all. Okay, so no reason not to go for the $20.11. That reminds me…time to go to the tip jar again.
One more vote for WUWT. Thanks for the voting instructions. You made it simple. Good luck.
Jim
Best of luck! (And sux be to Boing!)