WUWT is a finalist in the 2011 "bloggies" awards

I was very surprised to learn today (almost a week later) that WUWT has been nominated for Best Science Blog in the 2011 Bloggies. This is like the Superbowl for bloggers. This nomination was done by a blind vote of some 200 people that got nomination ballots. I’m up there with HuffPo, Wired and many others in this award contest. Who isn’t on it is equally interesting. Please read on for info on how to cast your votes for WUWT and other bloggers.

Here’s the timeline and where to vote:

===============================================================

Saturday, January 1
Nominations open.
Sunday, January 16

10:00 PM EST (UTC-5)

Nominations close.
Wednesday, January 19
200 randomly selected voters receive an invitation to choose the finalists from a list of the most-nominated weblogs in ten random categories.
Monday, January 24

10:00 PM EST

Finalist voting closes. The five (or six for Weblog of the Year) weblogs with the most votes become finalists. I will solve any ties for fifth place.
Tuesday, February 1
Finalists are announced and voting reopens to all to choose the winners.
Sunday, February 20

10:00 PM EST

Voting closes.
Sunday, February 27

8:00 PM EST

Winners are announced and the Weblog of the Year receives a prize of 2,011 US cents (US$20.11).

===============================================================

This weblog award is a little different than the previous one seen on the sidebar (which closed last year because the organizers couldn’t get the system working right)…recall the Climate Audit/Bad Astronomy horserace from 2007 that continued to get votes after the ballots closed, requiring a tie to be called. In 2008 (voting in 2009) WUWT won, but there were other problems. So they closed shop in 2010.

Voting in this contest requires you to give an email address and complete a captcha, so it may be less prone to ballot stuffing.

The voting method is not obvious at first glance, so I’ve summarized it visually for everyone below:

1. Visit http://2011.bloggi.es/ for the main voting page,

or go direct to the Science category with this link: http://2011.bloggi.es/#science

2. Locate the Science category thumbnails:

3. If you want to vote for WUWT, click on the little grey circle in the lower right, and it turns into a checkbox and greys out the other thumbnails. Note the contest rotates the thumbnails for fairness in placement, so it may not look like the image order above.

4. Scroll up/down. Vote for any other blogs you like in any other categories the same way. You don’t have to vote for other blogs, as the system doesn’t require it, but please do. These other bloggers work very hard to deliver a quality product. Reward them if you feel they deserve it.

5. Scroll all the way to the bottom of the page: (note – don’t use cursor keys, it will change your vote!)

6. Complete the captcha by typing the words displayed in your browser (not the ones above), put in a VALID email address. Press the yellow SUBMIT button. Note- you won’t get spammed by doing so. See the fine print under the email box.

7. Wait for an email in your inbox. That email contains a link to verify your vote. If you don’t get it within a half hour, check your spam filter.

8. Click on the link in your email to verify your vote. It will take you to the verification page on the website and you’ll get a success message.

9. Spread the word! Twitter, Facebook, mailing lists, friends, comments on other blogs, and most importantly, if you run a blog, I’d welcome a posting on this topic.

You know that some others who dislike what we do here will try to create anti-vote campaigns as they have done in the past. Success depends on whether there are more people who view WUWT as a science resource versus those that simply want to haul out the hate, and slap on the “denier” label.

10. Remember, while winning is fun, as I tried to teach my son in the recent pinewood derby we did, the way you play the game is just as important. Don’t cheat. Don’t encourage cheating, and simply let the chips fall where they may.

It’s an honor just to be nominated, especially when some other prominent blogs in our circle of influence were not.

Thanks for your consideration – Anthony

UPDATE: Ah, well, what can I say? The childish hatehate has already started over at BoingBoing in comments.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
270 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
February 10, 2011 4:44 pm

Happy to vote for you, done and verified…

peetee
February 10, 2011 10:26 pm

science? There’s science here? Who knew!!!

February 11, 2011 11:18 am

Anthony,
Please don’t “unsticky” this until you absolutely must. Maybe even the day before, or after 😉 the poll closes.
Many of our friends only visit when they can and everyone should be made aware that we have another great opportunity for exposing the idiotologists, the vested and the willfully blind (such as peetee above) and attracting yet more scientists to the debate that some would rather stifle.

charles nelson
February 11, 2011 11:59 am

At the risk of being repetitive…
‘First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then they attack you, then…you win.’ Ghandi.

CMD
February 11, 2011 1:09 pm

Can we take this post off “top of page banner” status? Love the blog, but am tired of the distraction.

John Moore
February 13, 2011 10:18 am

Have voted above but submit button doesn’t respond.
REPLY: Try a different browser, make sure javascript is enabled

jorgekafkazar
February 13, 2011 5:12 pm

Voted but never received verification message. Left a message on the site. Nothing received back. I give up.

Larry Hamlin
February 16, 2011 9:15 am

Congratulations on the nomination Anthony!
I have voted and confirmed. Can’t believe the climate fear drivel on BoingBoing. I’m afraid there is no hope of rational, independent thought ever reaching these folks.

Editor
February 17, 2011 3:15 pm

Despite all their attempts to make this voting one per person (it doesn’t really, its more like one per email, and oh, btw, I got a nice script that can generate a ton of email addresses for me, as can anyone with Gavin’s level of comp-sci competence), and anti-idiotarian (apparently assuming people they dont want to vote will find the process to onerous to go through, you know *THOSE PEOPLE* …)

Bruckner8
February 19, 2011 9:40 am

Done.

dwright
February 19, 2011 11:34 am

done.

SLB
February 19, 2011 12:08 pm

I was looking vote for RC in the best Sci-Fi, but couldn’t seem to find them.
WUWT has my vote, keep up the fine work.

Ian L. McQueen
February 19, 2011 2:07 pm

I added a short comment at BoingBoing Feb 19 at 1805AST. I’ll check later to see if they had the guts to post it.
IanM

February 19, 2011 2:09 pm

voted ‘n verified for WuWT ( over 70,147,529 hits and counting )
regarding The Police-State Bowl:
http://freedominourtime.blogspot.com/2011/02/ave-imperium.html
Defending Freedom

D. Patterson
February 19, 2011 10:05 pm

Made four attempts to vote, but no confirmation e-mails whatsoever were received. It appears we’re all shut out of the voting around here.

ferd berple
February 21, 2011 4:33 pm

“Made four attempts to vote, but no confirmation e-mails whatsoever were received. It appears we’re all shut out of the voting around here.”
Exact same thing happened to me!!!!!!!!!!
I even tried voting in other categories so that I voted for more than just WUWT, no confirmation, not even in the junk email folder.

ferd berple
February 21, 2011 4:39 pm

“I was looking vote for RC in the best Sci-Fi, but couldn’t seem to find them.”
I hear the RC BoreHole has a chance for Best Science. RC itself is this year’s run away winner for Biggest Waste of Time.

Alex
February 26, 2011 5:38 am

I missed the cutoff but good luck . Went to BoingBoing (what kind of name is that, I mean seriously even Silvio Berlusconi came up with better) as you suggested and read all (wait for it) 13 comments. I went to post a comment but realised I wouldn’t have a chance with the following:
Warning: Anonymous messages are held for moderation. This could take a (long) while. Or your comment may not be posted at all. Please consider creating an account and logging in. It’s fast, free, and we don’t spam, ever.
In other words if we don’t agree with what you say……

Niklas
February 27, 2011 5:37 pm

Congratulations 🙂

1 9 10 11