WUWT is a finalist in the 2011 "bloggies" awards

I was very surprised to learn today (almost a week later) that WUWT has been nominated for Best Science Blog in the 2011 Bloggies. This is like the Superbowl for bloggers. This nomination was done by a blind vote of some 200 people that got nomination ballots. I’m up there with HuffPo, Wired and many others in this award contest. Who isn’t on it is equally interesting. Please read on for info on how to cast your votes for WUWT and other bloggers.

Here’s the timeline and where to vote:

===============================================================

Saturday, January 1
Nominations open.
Sunday, January 16

10:00 PM EST (UTC-5)

Nominations close.
Wednesday, January 19
200 randomly selected voters receive an invitation to choose the finalists from a list of the most-nominated weblogs in ten random categories.
Monday, January 24

10:00 PM EST

Finalist voting closes. The five (or six for Weblog of the Year) weblogs with the most votes become finalists. I will solve any ties for fifth place.
Tuesday, February 1
Finalists are announced and voting reopens to all to choose the winners.
Sunday, February 20

10:00 PM EST

Voting closes.
Sunday, February 27

8:00 PM EST

Winners are announced and the Weblog of the Year receives a prize of 2,011 US cents (US$20.11).

===============================================================

This weblog award is a little different than the previous one seen on the sidebar (which closed last year because the organizers couldn’t get the system working right)…recall the Climate Audit/Bad Astronomy horserace from 2007 that continued to get votes after the ballots closed, requiring a tie to be called. In 2008 (voting in 2009) WUWT won, but there were other problems. So they closed shop in 2010.

Voting in this contest requires you to give an email address and complete a captcha, so it may be less prone to ballot stuffing.

The voting method is not obvious at first glance, so I’ve summarized it visually for everyone below:

1. Visit http://2011.bloggi.es/ for the main voting page,

or go direct to the Science category with this link: http://2011.bloggi.es/#science

2. Locate the Science category thumbnails:

3. If you want to vote for WUWT, click on the little grey circle in the lower right, and it turns into a checkbox and greys out the other thumbnails. Note the contest rotates the thumbnails for fairness in placement, so it may not look like the image order above.

4. Scroll up/down. Vote for any other blogs you like in any other categories the same way. You don’t have to vote for other blogs, as the system doesn’t require it, but please do. These other bloggers work very hard to deliver a quality product. Reward them if you feel they deserve it.

5. Scroll all the way to the bottom of the page: (note – don’t use cursor keys, it will change your vote!)

6. Complete the captcha by typing the words displayed in your browser (not the ones above), put in a VALID email address. Press the yellow SUBMIT button. Note- you won’t get spammed by doing so. See the fine print under the email box.

7. Wait for an email in your inbox. That email contains a link to verify your vote. If you don’t get it within a half hour, check your spam filter.

8. Click on the link in your email to verify your vote. It will take you to the verification page on the website and you’ll get a success message.

9. Spread the word! Twitter, Facebook, mailing lists, friends, comments on other blogs, and most importantly, if you run a blog, I’d welcome a posting on this topic.

You know that some others who dislike what we do here will try to create anti-vote campaigns as they have done in the past. Success depends on whether there are more people who view WUWT as a science resource versus those that simply want to haul out the hate, and slap on the “denier” label.

10. Remember, while winning is fun, as I tried to teach my son in the recent pinewood derby we did, the way you play the game is just as important. Don’t cheat. Don’t encourage cheating, and simply let the chips fall where they may.

It’s an honor just to be nominated, especially when some other prominent blogs in our circle of influence were not.

Thanks for your consideration – Anthony

UPDATE: Ah, well, what can I say? The childish hatehate has already started over at BoingBoing in comments.

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
270 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Lance
February 7, 2011 11:40 am

Re-submitted and the confirmation came up straight away this time.
Congrats Anthony on this nomination by the way.

Zeke the Sneak
February 7, 2011 11:47 am

It seems to me that Anthony Watts is doing this the hard way. Why don’t I just pay him the $20.11 to post this story about important technological advances in understanding the weather:
“Arid regions are influencing their weather using electrical technology.
According to a recent press release, the United Arab Emirates successfully caused rain to fall by making use of negative ion generators. Approximately 50 rainstorms fell in the driest months, during which time weather forecasters did not predict any rain at all.” Steven Smith
http://www.arabianbusiness.com/abu-dhabi-backed-scientists-create-fake-rainstorms-in-11m-project-371038.html

Editor
February 7, 2011 11:55 am

All five of Bloggie’s political weblog nominees are on the left:
The Huffington Post
Crooks and Liars
Wonkette
Politico
PunditMom
Closest to center is the occasionally objective Politico (with only NINE JournoList members).
Don’t know how that could happen if they are honest brokers.

DBD
February 7, 2011 11:58 am

Done – good luck to WUWT and all involved!!

Dave
February 7, 2011 12:56 pm

Done… and I passed it on. Good luck Anthony

Patsplace
February 7, 2011 1:20 pm

I used XP & Firefox. Confirmation was within a minute.

Deborah
February 7, 2011 2:13 pm

My vote’s in for you! Good luck!

February 7, 2011 2:47 pm

Done. Good luck Anthony.

mikemUK
February 7, 2011 2:48 pm

My vote for WUWT and all your sterling work; and the hope that the final result will break down a few more “settled” walls!
Mike M.

Chris Smith
February 7, 2011 2:58 pm

Did it using internet explorer, their submit button did not work on my Chrome.

don penman
February 7, 2011 3:12 pm

Voted for WUWT good luck Anthony.

Flask
February 7, 2011 3:55 pm

Jim Barker says:
February 6, 2011 at 1:37 pm

You got my vote. Good luck!
So very many blogs that were unfamiliar. Is there a way to find these blogs, or blogs within certain categories, without prior knowledge?

You just have to click on the rectangular icon behind the little round ballot point; it sends you to that blog. I found that out by clicking on the WUWT icon and got sent to this familiar site, so I had to go back and vote properly. I didn’t recognize any other sites except Wired, and so had a look at a few of them. I will browse a bit more, and if there are any that I add to my favorite list then I might vote for them.
“Never really done this kinda thing before”

Chris F
February 7, 2011 5:07 pm

Done, with pleasure.

North of 43 and south of 44
February 7, 2011 5:09 pm

+1

February 7, 2011 5:34 pm

In the bag, man.
Voted using Opera 11.01 as the browser, a yahoo.com e-mail address and the e-mail arrived in the normal inbox within seconds …
.

Sean Peake
February 7, 2011 5:50 pm

Done and confirmed.

halfacow
February 7, 2011 6:36 pm

How did this site even get nominated, this is not a ‘science’ blog, it is merely a one-trick pony gossip and slander site.
REPLY: Typical nonsubstantiative response from a typical coward hiding behind a bogus email address, if you you have something to say to the blog owner, have the courage to put your name to it -Anthony

Resourceguy
February 7, 2011 6:46 pm

I can learn more at this site in 10minutes than from days of researching anywhere else. Thank you

halfacow
February 7, 2011 7:09 pm

The email address works fine Anthony. I used to the same address to vote in these awards (for a site that actually publishes a wide variety of science articles). For the record, my real name is Paul. Good Luck in the awards, which are incidentally nothing more than a popularity contest as opposed to a measure of material quality.

February 7, 2011 7:44 pm

I got my confirmation e-mail — but it was tentatively labeled spam, and might have ended up in my junk box if the sensitivity were set a little higher.
Be sure you get your confirmation e-mail and click the link!

Noelene
February 7, 2011 7:48 pm

Done and verified.Good luck Anthony and mods.

John Whitman
February 7, 2011 8:36 pm

halfacow says:
February 7, 2011 at 7:09 pm

“””The email address works fine Anthony. I used to the same address to vote in these awards (for a site that actually publishes a wide variety of science articles). For the record, my real name is Paul. Good Luck in the awards, which are incidentally nothing more than a popularity contest as opposed to a measure of material quality””” {note: bold emphasis is not by halfacow, it is mine}

———-
Paul Halfacow,
Thanks for your full name?
I would regard the science blog award voting basis to be more qualitatively substantive than that last USA presidential election; which was a real popularity contest with lack of material quality presented by the victorious candidate.
John the USA citizen

Werner Brozek
February 7, 2011 9:53 pm

“vigilantfish says:
February 6, 2011 at 12:55 pm
This site is so important, and it would be nice to be able to compensate you and your wonderful moderators for all you do.”
Anthony, I agree 100% with the above. I have been looking in vain for a response. Please do not be shy about it. We want you to have more family time and not burn out.
P.S. Right now, the only place I see a “donate” is for the surfacestations project. GISS had an all time November record in 2010. Has the team checked out whether there was a huge toy making factory working overtime at the north pole in November and whether or not GISS had a thermometer in the chimney? (Josh, can you express this better?)

Hilary Ostrov (aka hro001)
February 7, 2011 10:11 pm

Voted and verified.
Good luck, Anthony, guest posters and mods.
I do believe that the tide has turned … and I doubt that it would have happened (so much faster than we thought?!) without your dedication and hard work.

Richard deSousa
February 7, 2011 10:44 pm

Voted for WUWT and verified. I also logged on to BoingBoing and said I voted for WUWT. A pox on BoingBoing and their progeny!