Fighting ice at the nano level – a promise for improved safety

This is a really neat discovery. As we all know, ice is a big killer and safety hazard, especially on airplanes. This new material prevents supercooled droplets from freezing, sticking, and accumulating.- Anthony

From Harvard: Breaking the ice before it begins

Nanostructured materials repel water droplets before they have a chance to freeze

Sequential images of ice layer removal from hydrophilic Al, fluorinated hydrophobic Si, and microstructured fluorinated Si (SHS). Note the supercooled droplet bounces right off without sticking.

Cambridge, Mass., November 12, 2010 – Engineers from Harvard University have designed and demonstrated ice-free nanostructured materials that literally repel water droplets before they even have the chance to freeze.

The finding, reported online in ACS Nano on November 9th, could lead to a new way to keep airplane wings, buildings, powerlines, and even entire highways free of ice during the worst winter weather. Moreover, integrating anti-ice technology right into a material is more efficient and sustainable than conventional solutions like chemical sprays, salt, and heating.

A team led by Joanna Aizenberg, Amy Smith Berylson Professor of Materials Science at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) and a Core Member of the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard, focused on preventing rather than fighting ice buildup.

“We wanted to take a completely different tact and design materials that inherently prevent ice formation by repelling the water droplets,” says Aizenberg. “From past studies, we also realized that the formation of ice is not a static event. The crucial approach was to investigate the entire dynamic process of how droplets impact and freeze on a supercooled surface.”

For initial inspiration, the researchers turned to some elegant solutions seen in nature. For example, mosquitos can defog their eyes, and water striders can keep their legs dry thanks to an array of tiny bristles that repel droplets by reducing the surface area each one encounters.

“Freezing starts with droplets colliding with a surface,” explains Aizenberg. “But very little is known about what happens when droplets hit surfaces at low temperatures.”

To gain a detailed understanding of the process, the researchers watched high-speed videos of supercooled droplets hitting surfaces that were modeled after those found in nature. They saw that when a cold droplet hits the nanostructured surface, it first spreads out, but then the process runs in reverse: the droplet retracts to a spherical shape and bounces back off the surface before ever having a chance to freeze.

By contrast, on a smooth surface without the structured properties, a droplet remains spread out and eventually freezes.

“We fabricated surfaces with various geometries and feature sizes—bristles, blades, and interconnected patterns such as honeycombs and bricks—to test and understand parameters critical for optimization,” says Lidiya Mishchenko, a graduate student in Aizenberg’s lab and first author of the paper.

The use of such precisely engineered materials enabled the researchers to model the dynamic behavior of impacting droplets at an amazing level of detail, leading them to create a better design for ice-preventing materials.

Another important benefit of testing a wide variety of structures, Mishchenko adds, was that it allowed the team to optimize for pressure-stability. They discovered that the structures composed of interconnected patterns were ideally suited for stable, liquid-repelling surfaces that can withstand high-impact droplet collisions, such as those encountered in driving rain or by planes in flight.

The nanostructured materials prevent the formation of ice even down to temperatures as low as 󈞅 to 󈞊 degrees Celsius. Below that, due to the reduced contact area that prevents the droplets from fully wetting the surface, any ice that forms does not adhere well and is much easier to remove than the stubborn sheets that can form on flat surfaces.

“We see this approach as a radical and much needed shift in anti-ice technologies,” says Aizenberg. “The concept of friction-free surfaces that deflect supercooled water droplets before ice nucleation can even occur is more than just a theory or a proof-of-principle experiments. We have begun to test this promising technology in real-world settings to provide a comprehensive framework for optimizing these robust ice-free surfaces for a wide range of applications, each of which may have a specific set of performance requirements.”

In comparison with traditional ice prevention or removal methods like salting or heating, the nanostructured materials approach is efficient, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly. Further, when chemicals are used to de-ice a plane, for example, they can be washed away into the environment and their disposal must be carefully monitored. Similarly, salt on roads can lead to corrosion and run-off problems in local water sources.

The researchers anticipate that with their improved understanding of the ice forming process, a new type of coating integrated directly into a variety of materials could soon be developed and commercialized.

###

In addition to Aizenberg, who is also the Susan S. and Kenneth L. Wallach Professor at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study and a Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard, and Mishchenko, the co-authors of the paper included Benjamin Hatton and Vaibhav Bahadur, both at SEAS and Wyss, and Ashley Taylor and Tom Krupenkin, both at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The researchers acknowledge L. Stirling and A. Grinthal for their valuable contribution and funding from DARPA (Award Number HR0011-08-C-0114); the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University; and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Scholarship and Fellowship Program.

=======================================================

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
61 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kadaka (KD Knoebel)
November 14, 2010 4:52 pm

Am I the only one who’s looking at these microscopic nano-engineered surfaces, and thinking all those tiny “pits” will get filled up with microscopic dust particles, they will prove highly resistant to cleaning, even scrubbing won’t work?
They will fill up so far, stop shedding water as effectively, they can only be cleaned to where they shed off the liquid cleaning solutions. Once deployed, effectiveness will decline to a level they will stubbornly stay at, becoming less effective as the tiny structures are worn away. Scrubbing won’t work, bristles can’t get into the pits, and scrubbing will wear away the tiny structures quicker.
Anyone else thinking that’s possible?

Rational Debate
November 14, 2010 5:05 pm

re post by:

B-52 says:
November 14, 2010 at 2:28 pm
“…could lead to a new way to keep airplane wings, buildings, powerlines, and even ENTIRE HIGHWAYS free of ice during the worst winter weather.”
Say…
“The concept of FRICTION-FREE surfaces that deflect supercooled water droplets…”
…what?

I may turn out wrong here, but suspect that ‘friction free’ on the micro-scale of water droplets doesn’t necessarily mean friction free or anything like that on the macro-scale of car tires to highway surface…. also suspect, however, that finding a way to incorporate it at a reasonable price that is also durable enough to hold up to the beating a road surface takes may be quite another issue. Would be nice tho!
Regardless, very cool article and information! Good science at work.

Greg Goodknight
November 14, 2010 5:23 pm

To those of you who think icing is a problem only for flight in Alaska, you are sorely mistaken. Icing is a regular problem even in California in the wintertime, and I recall one freak day in early August near Watt’s place that had some IFR aircraft as low as 11000′ needing lower altitudes to get out of it.
A new Cirrus aircraft with deice capability had a horrible crash a few years ago when its pilot decided to brave a winter Pineapple Express storm to fly from Reno to Napa. Planes plummet when loaded with ice; in that flight, deploying the parachute was not the answer as it broke the airplane in two. Even jet transports don’t have perfect deice capability, but what they do have is the power to get out of it before it becomes a problem
I live a few miles southeast of Chico, and in the winter I often can’t fly under instruments to land at my local airport because of icing.
*IF* (and this is a big *if*) this results in practical anti-ice products for private or commercial aircraft, it will be a very big deal.

Jim
November 14, 2010 5:34 pm

Gary P says:
Can I get this stuff on the inner fenders of my car so I quite dragging all this snow sludge into my garage all winter?

I like the way you think!

savethesharks
November 14, 2010 5:48 pm

Scientific discovery the way it should be! And this technology could be in major demand in the coming years…..
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA

R. de Haan
November 14, 2010 5:55 pm

kadaka (KD Knoebel) says:
November 14, 2010 at 4:52 pm
“Am I the only one who’s looking at these microscopic nano-engineered surfaces, and thinking all those tiny “pits” will get filled up with microscopic dust particles, they will prove highly resistant to cleaning, even scrubbing won’t work?
They will fill up so far, stop shedding water as effectively, they can only be cleaned to where they shed off the liquid cleaning solutions. Once deployed, effectiveness will decline to a level they will stubbornly stay at, becoming less effective as the tiny structures are worn away. Scrubbing won’t work, bristles can’t get into the pits, and scrubbing will wear away the tiny structures quicker.
Anyone else thinking that’s possible?”
At the car forums there are complaints about the nano car paint coatings losing their
properties after a period of about 9 months.
The shark skin foil developed by 3M that was going to reduce drag from air foils and fuselages had a similar problem of “dirtying up”.
Anyhow, they are testing the new product and we will see what the result will be.

walt man
November 14, 2010 5:59 pm

Hydrophobic Coating
Vellox Kit – TIN of 450ml 11,78EUR
Vellox Hydrophobic Coating was developed in 1983 by Vellox Corporation of Massachusetts USA, as a coating for Radomes for use by the U.S. Military. Since that time the product has been accepted world wide for use on Radar Dishes and Radomes, for Military and Civil Communication Coating.
Problems with Your Satellite Dish and the weather?
No picture if it rains or snows?
Best picture with Vellox.
Water and snow pearling from your dish like on a hot cooking plate.
http://www.wieser-electronic.de/catalog/product_info.php?products_id=64545&language=en

Douglas DC
November 14, 2010 6:13 pm

I have about 4500 hours of Instrument time. about 1/3 is flight training, (Instructor
time mainly) The rest Air Taxi, Commuter, and Freight/Mail. A lot of that over the
West Coast of the US, and some in Alaska. Worst airframe icing is, surprisingly not
Alaska, but the Cascades-that includes northern CA. I fell into Chico, too, one night on
a Freight run in a 402 Cessna. Worked for Northstar out of Redding for a while.
Picked up a load of rime at 12,000 ft. and had a heck of a time getting down until I could clear traffic and the Sierras.-This was out of Reno. Flew a lot out of Sea-Tac
-the key was getting Altitude westbound over the Sound, then east after getting over most of the upslope icing that is common as a NorPac cold front blasts over the mountains. Another form of Icing that is common-Freezing rain, Portland/Troutdale
The Columbia basin in Washington-very common back n the 60’s and 70’s. BTW
I predict that is problem-freezing rain is going to be a big problem with wind
turbines…
I wish them well in this process, there has been many many efforts at figihting
icing in aviation, this appears to be a breakthrough..

Neil
November 14, 2010 6:17 pm

Hang on… scientists doing actual research by figuring out what they don’t know, takinf high-speed photographs of the event in question and working from there?
That’s not science. Science is building a computer model and ignoring messy stuff such as real world data.
I don’t know what this methodology is, but it would sure be cool if it caught on!

Jose Suro
November 14, 2010 6:18 pm

Now that sounds like good science for a change. What are the costs though?

Will Nelson
November 14, 2010 6:23 pm

The ice on the plane in the picture is rime, accumulated from butting into supercooled water droplets. The movie shows warm water (+20C) hitting a cold surface. Apples and oranges. The question is, will supercooled water bounce off a surface before it has time to freeze?

Ian W
November 14, 2010 6:58 pm

Strangely one of the more important areas to stop icing is the propeller blades. There have been several crashes where the propeller blades iced up and ‘stalled’ leaving the iced up aircraft with reduced lift from its wings and no, or worse, asymmetric thrust .

Myron Mesecke
November 14, 2010 7:25 pm

“Similarly, salt on roads can lead to corrosion …”
Toyota might be interested in this technology after that rusting frame problem they had on all those Tacoma pickups.

Pointman
November 14, 2010 7:35 pm

To repeat a plug I did on an earlier topic and in the interest of focussing people’s minds on Cancun, I’ll plug it again. A link I think worth watching through the week.
I may just be me but there seems to be a reporting blackout on the upcoming Cancun climate conference. The only site I can find addressing this void seems to be
http://ourmaninsichuan.wordpress.com/
which is running a Cancun week of blogs.
Pointman

Ronald Van Wegen
November 14, 2010 7:36 pm

According to the photograph caption the “… rubber boot had been employed prior to landing”. Times must be pretty tough for rubber boots these days – especially after landing!

Douglas DC
November 14, 2010 8:31 pm

Pneumatic rubber boots have been around since the 1930’s Douglas’ DC-2,then 3’s
brought them into wide spread use, developed by Goodyear, this concept is still quite common. Rime ice isn’t as bad as clear with boots, as there a point where you have to make a decision with clear- hit the boots, and take the nice, clean aerodynamic but heavy. shape pop the leading edge boots, and get a nice,sharp spoiler, this has happened to me. Rime is rougher on propellers and air intakes, Props are usually heated, as are windshields. Modern Airliners, including turboprops, can have “Hot wings” heated by jet bleed air, or as my old 1950’s vintage Douglas Airliners I flew as Airtanker(Retardant) aircraft they actually had gas fired wing heat. This is still around some, but I can’t be specific. Propeller heat is usually electric,btw.
One Technology that I was around some was Alcohol for both wings and props.
I knew a Hawker Siddley 700 business jet driver who had pour (sob) a liquor
cabinet (blubber) full of single malt (WAAAH!) scotch, during a rough trip into
Billings Montana….

pat
November 14, 2010 9:27 pm

Believe me, this will make the Warmists unhappy. Some silly argument about water vapor will arise. One thing that Warmists cannot stand is real science.

Mark.R
November 14, 2010 9:46 pm

How does it work when it snowing?.

Eric Anderson
November 14, 2010 10:48 pm

This is great stuff. Nature already has design solutions for many engineering challenges, and the effort to reverse engineer nature’s designs is an exploding field that has, and will continue, to yield numerous exciting discoveries. Observations, engineering (with real math and materials), testing, and then real-world applications. Applied science at its best — quite a contrast to much of what passes under the name of “science.”

Neil Jones
November 14, 2010 11:36 pm

Could stop icing on the dreaded wind turbine too.

November 14, 2010 11:50 pm

Back in olden times, the Boeing 727’s had squirt-on rain repellent called ‘Rain-Boe’ that you dispensed only when the windscreen was wet because it otherwise dried to an impermeable haze they had buff out with polishing compound. Worked great, but it apparently caused penguins to get skin cancer from ozone holes, so they banned it. Messed up a few white shirts afterward leaning out the cockpit window to rub Rain-X on the windscreen (on the ground).
Boeing 777’s have hydrophobic windscreens, which we were forbidden to Rain-X. They sort of worked, but not as well as Rain-X, and nowhere close to Rain-Boe.
Triple-7 also had ice sensors and automatic bleed air deicing. Deluxe compared to my light twin days trying to gauge if I had thick enough ice on the rubber boots so it would break off cleanly, rather than what happened to the plane in the picture, where he cycled the boots too soon and ended up with ice strips adhering to the boots.
For the past several years I couldn’t find Rain-X at Wal-Mart. I guessed the EPA got to it as they do to all good sensible things, but recently Rain-X has reappeared. I stocked up, and have a cache sitting next to my cache of tungsten light bulbs.

Daniel H
November 15, 2010 1:13 am

@Pointman

It may just be me but there seems to be a reporting blackout on the upcoming Cancun climate conference.

Yeah, it’s just you.

John Marshall
November 15, 2010 2:58 am

Back in 1962 when I started to train as a Royal Air Force navigator, way before GPS, we were told how dangerous ice buildup on an airframe was and why it formed. Water droplets at height can be super-cooled, ie. liquid below normal freezing point, and any disturbance will cause instant freezing. A cold airframe hitting these droplets causes instant ice to form on the leading edges of all sections. The normal anti-icing systems were usually enough to cope but not always. The sound of large ice chunks breaking off the propellers and hitting the airframe was sometimes a worry.
Ice buildup causes lack of lift and eventually a crash if the icing problem is not resolved.

Metryq
November 15, 2010 4:39 am

Owls are especially silent as they glide in on their prey due to microstructures on their wings. I wonder if a new nano material will make planes and boats (and subs?) more stealthy and slip through air/water with less drag?

November 15, 2010 5:33 am

Just don’t let the Wind turbine manufacturers know about this!
Still, why not? They won’t use it as they are now taken up with the manufacture of ‘stealth’ turbines. As turbines upset radar, some bright spark came up with this idea. Production is now up and running – official!
Just one slight problem that does not seem to have occurred to them. If they are invisible to radar then aircraft will not see them either, nor will shipping see them when negotiating around these wind farms out at sea in a fog!
Wasn’t it the Ravenous Bugbladder Beast of Traal that was so stupid that it assumed that if you couldn’t see it, then it couldn’t see you?