Fighting ice at the nano level – a promise for improved safety

This is a really neat discovery. As we all know, ice is a big killer and safety hazard, especially on airplanes. This new material prevents supercooled droplets from freezing, sticking, and accumulating.- Anthony

From Harvard: Breaking the ice before it begins

Nanostructured materials repel water droplets before they have a chance to freeze

Sequential images of ice layer removal from hydrophilic Al, fluorinated hydrophobic Si, and microstructured fluorinated Si (SHS). Note the supercooled droplet bounces right off without sticking.

Cambridge, Mass., November 12, 2010 – Engineers from Harvard University have designed and demonstrated ice-free nanostructured materials that literally repel water droplets before they even have the chance to freeze.

The finding, reported online in ACS Nano on November 9th, could lead to a new way to keep airplane wings, buildings, powerlines, and even entire highways free of ice during the worst winter weather. Moreover, integrating anti-ice technology right into a material is more efficient and sustainable than conventional solutions like chemical sprays, salt, and heating.

A team led by Joanna Aizenberg, Amy Smith Berylson Professor of Materials Science at the Harvard School of Engineering and Applied Sciences (SEAS) and a Core Member of the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard, focused on preventing rather than fighting ice buildup.

“We wanted to take a completely different tact and design materials that inherently prevent ice formation by repelling the water droplets,” says Aizenberg. “From past studies, we also realized that the formation of ice is not a static event. The crucial approach was to investigate the entire dynamic process of how droplets impact and freeze on a supercooled surface.”

For initial inspiration, the researchers turned to some elegant solutions seen in nature. For example, mosquitos can defog their eyes, and water striders can keep their legs dry thanks to an array of tiny bristles that repel droplets by reducing the surface area each one encounters.

“Freezing starts with droplets colliding with a surface,” explains Aizenberg. “But very little is known about what happens when droplets hit surfaces at low temperatures.”

To gain a detailed understanding of the process, the researchers watched high-speed videos of supercooled droplets hitting surfaces that were modeled after those found in nature. They saw that when a cold droplet hits the nanostructured surface, it first spreads out, but then the process runs in reverse: the droplet retracts to a spherical shape and bounces back off the surface before ever having a chance to freeze.

By contrast, on a smooth surface without the structured properties, a droplet remains spread out and eventually freezes.

“We fabricated surfaces with various geometries and feature sizes—bristles, blades, and interconnected patterns such as honeycombs and bricks—to test and understand parameters critical for optimization,” says Lidiya Mishchenko, a graduate student in Aizenberg’s lab and first author of the paper.

The use of such precisely engineered materials enabled the researchers to model the dynamic behavior of impacting droplets at an amazing level of detail, leading them to create a better design for ice-preventing materials.

Another important benefit of testing a wide variety of structures, Mishchenko adds, was that it allowed the team to optimize for pressure-stability. They discovered that the structures composed of interconnected patterns were ideally suited for stable, liquid-repelling surfaces that can withstand high-impact droplet collisions, such as those encountered in driving rain or by planes in flight.

The nanostructured materials prevent the formation of ice even down to temperatures as low as 󈞅 to 󈞊 degrees Celsius. Below that, due to the reduced contact area that prevents the droplets from fully wetting the surface, any ice that forms does not adhere well and is much easier to remove than the stubborn sheets that can form on flat surfaces.

“We see this approach as a radical and much needed shift in anti-ice technologies,” says Aizenberg. “The concept of friction-free surfaces that deflect supercooled water droplets before ice nucleation can even occur is more than just a theory or a proof-of-principle experiments. We have begun to test this promising technology in real-world settings to provide a comprehensive framework for optimizing these robust ice-free surfaces for a wide range of applications, each of which may have a specific set of performance requirements.”

In comparison with traditional ice prevention or removal methods like salting or heating, the nanostructured materials approach is efficient, non-toxic, and environmentally friendly. Further, when chemicals are used to de-ice a plane, for example, they can be washed away into the environment and their disposal must be carefully monitored. Similarly, salt on roads can lead to corrosion and run-off problems in local water sources.

The researchers anticipate that with their improved understanding of the ice forming process, a new type of coating integrated directly into a variety of materials could soon be developed and commercialized.

###

In addition to Aizenberg, who is also the Susan S. and Kenneth L. Wallach Professor at the Radcliffe Institute for Advanced Study and a Professor of Chemistry and Chemical Biology at Harvard, and Mishchenko, the co-authors of the paper included Benjamin Hatton and Vaibhav Bahadur, both at SEAS and Wyss, and Ashley Taylor and Tom Krupenkin, both at the University of Wisconsin-Madison.

The researchers acknowledge L. Stirling and A. Grinthal for their valuable contribution and funding from DARPA (Award Number HR0011-08-C-0114); the Wyss Institute for Biologically Inspired Engineering at Harvard University; and the U.S. Department of Homeland Security (DHS) Scholarship and Fellowship Program.

=======================================================

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

61 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
kim
November 14, 2010 1:11 pm

Any dependency on electrical charge, or is that something completely irrelevant?
==========

PaulH
November 14, 2010 1:21 pm

“The concept of friction-free surfaces that deflect supercooled water droplets before ice nucleation can even occur is more than just a theory or a proof-of-principle experiments.”
Pretty cool stuff, but I don’t think I like the idea of friction-free highways. That’s what they’re trying to prevent, right? 😉

Richard Sharpe
November 14, 2010 1:22 pm

“We wanted to take a completely different tact and design materials that inherently prevent ice formation by repelling the water droplets,” says Aizenberg.

It might be tactless of me to point out that the word that should have been used is “tack,” and derives from the days of sailing ships, but I guess I will.

Billy Liar
November 14, 2010 1:22 pm

Now that’s useful!
low as 󈞅 to 󈞊 degrees Celsius
What are the temperatures?

Douglas DC
November 14, 2010 1:28 pm

Don’t have time to comment much now but as one who has fought that natural ice factory- the Cascades of Oregon and Washington, and the Blue mountains of NE
Oregon (which is in my opinion as bad,under certain conditions,) in various twin
Cessna and Piper shaped ice sculptures, this is a big deal…

November 14, 2010 1:48 pm

Most fascinating. I think we northerners can find a host of applications for nano level textures.

Michael
November 14, 2010 1:48 pm

The use of this wing material has real world applications because the risk of flying planes with ice on the wings can be quantified. A certain amount of too much ice on the wings will bring a plane down and kill people. That a measurable quantity in volume of ice can be measured and tested to be the maximum a plane can handle under various conditions before it falls from the sky and kills people is measurable.
The amount of money to be spent on a preventative device for air planes may be justified in places like Alaska but would be ridiculous spending the money on planes that only fly in the Caribbean.
Quantifying the dangers of CO2 causing catastrophic global warming to justify spending 1 trillion dollars a year in the carbon trading market has not been done. Before I spend that kind of money on mitigating the risk, first the risk has to be assessed quantitatively.
We know if we do not inspect and change the brakes on passenger trains ever, we know the train will crash eventually. And we know the odds of the train crashing go up each year that goes by without the proper maintenance. These measurements have been made, the risks assesed and money is allocated accordingly to mitigate the risk.
Before I spend one trillion dollars on mitigating the risk of man made climate change, I will have the measurable quantifiable assessment of that said risk first, or you ain’t getting that trillion dollars for your imagined problem and your global government scheme. Cause that’s all it is at this point. Period.

Rhoda R
November 14, 2010 2:00 pm

Interesting and potentially life saving. I’d rather see public funds spent supporting this type of scientific climate research rather than the dross its been wasted on in the recent past.

jack morrow
November 14, 2010 2:14 pm

Seems like a good thing-but, what is the cost and how do you re-configure the airline fleets now? The best part about this is maybe it will cut down on the pre-takeoff deicing procedures that really slow down traffic at major airports.

November 14, 2010 2:28 pm

“…could lead to a new way to keep airplane wings, buildings, powerlines, and even ENTIRE HIGHWAYS free of ice during the worst winter weather.”
Say…
“The concept of FRICTION-FREE surfaces that deflect supercooled water droplets…”
…what?

PJB
November 14, 2010 2:35 pm

A more common and well-known super-hydrophobic surface…..lotus leaf.
The micro-structure of the leaf surface causes water to be repelled beyond the normal angle provided by surface tension considerations alone. The result? The leaf stays dry and the water beads up and rolls off.
Some, “waterproof” textiles are already taking advantage of this nanopportunity.

Richard Sharpe
November 14, 2010 2:45 pm

Michael says says November 14, 2010 at 1:48 pm

The use of this wing material has real world applications because the risk of flying planes with ice on the wings can be quantified. A certain amount of too much ice on the wings will bring a plane down and kill people.

So, is that one lot of too much ice, or two lots of two much ice, or what?

Editor
November 14, 2010 2:58 pm

B-52 says:
November 14, 2010 at 2:28 pm

“…could lead to a new way to keep airplane wings, buildings, powerlines, and even ENTIRE HIGHWAYS free of ice during the worst winter weather.”
Say…
“The concept of FRICTION-FREE surfaces that deflect supercooled water droplets…”
…what?

Just keep your tires dry and you’ll be all set. 🙂

DCC
November 14, 2010 3:09 pm

temperatures as low as –25 to –30 degrees Celsius.

Roger Knights
November 14, 2010 3:24 pm

Cool!

R. de Haan
November 14, 2010 3:44 pm

Old cow?

CodeTech
November 14, 2010 3:49 pm

I love this stuff 😀
Reminds me of the first few years I had Rain-X… I took every opportunity to drive in precipitation, marveling at the way water and ice just flew off the windshield. (Rain-X is a long chain polymer developed for jet aircraft windscreens).

November 14, 2010 3:49 pm

Hah! Now that would save those electricity-generating windmills under icing conditions, wouldn’t it?
Don’t ask me if that’s worth it.

R. de Haan
November 14, 2010 4:01 pm

BASF already has a line of paints on the market that claim similar properties.
This paint is also applied for the coating of wind mill blades and cars.
http://www.basf.com/group/pressrelease/P-08-053

u.k.(us)
November 14, 2010 4:03 pm

An airfoil placed in a super-cooled wind tunnel, coated with these nanos, and misted with water, shedding ice would convince me.
Otherwise, call me skeptical. 🙂

Gary P
November 14, 2010 4:10 pm

Can I get this stuff on the inner fenders of my car so I quite dragging all this snow sludge into my garage all winter?

Retired Engineer
November 14, 2010 4:18 pm

Cost and durability have yet to be shown, but promising. A friction reducing film for sailboats, “riblets”, worked so well that the IOC banned it from Olympic competition.
If it a) really works and b) could be applied as a film to existing surfaces, companies like 3M would gobble it up.
Good Science for a change.

kadaka (KD Knoebel)
November 14, 2010 4:50 pm

What could possibly go wrong?
From: PaulH on November 14, 2010 at 1:21 pm:

Pretty cool stuff, but I don’t think I like the idea of friction-free highways. That’s what they’re trying to prevent, right? 😉

I read years ago they could easily make tires that would last 100,000 miles or more. Except they’d be so hard the braking distances would be several times longer.
I’ve been driving more than long enough to appreciate having all the traction I can get. Sometimes I have needed all of it!

Speed
November 14, 2010 4:51 pm

jack morrow, ” … maybe it will cut down on the pre-takeoff deicing procedures that really slow down traffic at major airports.”
There are two types of aircraft ice (and snow) contamination. First is precipitation that freezes (freezing rain) accumulates (snow) or forms (frost) on surfaces while the aircraft is on the ground. This can kill lift and requires pre-takeoff deicing procedures. For the material under discussion to work against this type of contamination it would have to be applied to most surfaces of the aircraft. It would not help with snow or frost (the most common causes of pre-takeoff de-icing).
The second is ice build-up (freezing rain) on leading edges, windshields, radomes etc in flight. This type of contamination can happen very quickly, deform aerodynamic surfaces and add weight to the aircraft converting it from an aerodynamic wonder into a powered rock. Current solutions include avoidance, inflatable boots, “weeping wing” (de-ice fluid is forced out of the leading edges through millions of tiny holes) and heated surfaces. None are free. All add weight.
NASA Glenn Research is studying this using an icing wind tunnel and a DHC-6 Twin Otter in the lee of the Great Lakes — where winters produce plenty of ice.

1 2 3