Who are the Climate Fools? – Climate Fools Day Recap

Guest post by Barry Woods, London.

According to the newspapers a ‘cabal of sceptics’ and ‘dinosaurs’ descended on London on Climate Fools Day. I actually attended the Climate Fools Day meeting in the House of Commons on 27th October 2010, unlike the mainstream media who stayed away.

In the UK, a few politicians are just realizing that in 5 years time (around the time of the next election) about one third of the UK power stations will be FORCED to close to meet strict new European Union Pollution (CO2 emissions) rules.

One of these politicians is Graham Stringer MP, he is on the Science and Technology Committee in the House of Commons, his concern is for the poor. It is perhaps now dawning on some other backbench MP’s that ‘keeping the lights’ on, may be more important than ‘saving the planet’ in 50 – 100 years time, to the majority of general public that actually vote for them.

So who are the Climate Fools?

According to Climate Sense they were the 620 UK Members of Parliament from across all political parties that in 2008 voted for the Climate Change Act that committed the UK to 80% reductions in CO2 emissions by 2050. The UK was the first country in the world and remains the only country to commit to this level of reductions, which has had massive implications to energy policy and investment in energy production in the UK.

Only 4 MP’s voted against the Act, only one MP Peter Lilley queried the costs:

Neither Parliament nor most of the media bothered to discuss the cost of one of the most immense projects ever adopted in this country”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7746126.stm

As the bill was passed, it was brought to the attention of the House of Commons that for the first time in over 73 years snow was falling in October in London.

Thus, on the 2nd anniversary of the 2008 Climate Change Act, there were two events in the UK Houses of Parliament that were of interest to ‘climate sceptics’, ‘climate heretics’, ‘lukewarmers’ ‘climate deniers’ and ‘climate dinosaurs’ alike. Climate Fools Day and the Science & Technology Select Committee (including Graham Stringer MP) were interviewing Acton, Davies and Sir Muir Russell about some of the discrepancies of the various UK Climategate inquiries.

According to Jens Robdrup, the founder of Climate Sense and the Reverend Philip Foster, the intention of Climate Fools Day (sponsored by Graham Stringer MP, Sammy Wilson MP) was the launch of a campaign to lobby the politicians with the intent to repeal the Climate Change Act.

As no single UK politician, at the time of voting or since has ANY real idea of how to actually achieve the UK and EU targets for CO2 emissions.

The Climate Sense group is made up of Copenhagen Climate Challenge,

http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/

, Weather Action http://www.weatheraction.com

and the Campaign Against Carbon Capitalism

,who previously sent the Copenhagen Challenge to the UN and recently to Prince Charles on the behalf of climate sceptics. The challenge asked the UN and the Prince, who has accused sceptics of “peddling pseudo science”, to prove climate change is happening and is signed by 166 scientists. (including Anthony Watts, Bob Carter, Vincent Gray, Richard Lindzen, Nils-Axel Morner, Ian Plimer, Fred Singer and David Bellamy)

http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64

My thoughts of the Climate Fools Meeting

It was a small enthusiastic, slightly eccentric looking meeting of about 70 people – aimed at persuading MP’s of the folly of the Climate Change Act, (they needed a bigger room than originally planned) Graham Stringer was not there, still busy with the outcome of the morning’s select committee meeting, but according to the Telegraph and the organizers he is now a climate sceptic MP.

Graham Capper: Copenhagen Climate Challenge – acted as the chair

Jens Robdrup: Founder of Climate Sense

Discussed Denmark’s experience with Green Wind farm technology, spoke first describing the Danish experience with wind farms. Talking about the highest energy bills in Europe, massive costs, subsidies and failure of energy policy and that all the promised green jobs seemed to have been created in China.

Revd Philip Foster – Climate Sense – A retired English vicar.

He is author of “While the Earth Endures: Creation Cosmology and Climate Change”

(he is also the UK publisher of – Climategate: the CRUtape Letters)

He spoke enthusiastically and confidently about the earth’s previous climate, and how current temperatures were neither unprecedented nor dangerous. He had read the morning headlines

Guardian: Cabal of climate sceptics to descend on UK parliament

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/oct/25/climate-fools-day-sceptics-parliament

Telegraph: Climate sceptics launch campaign to overturn green targets

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/8088204/Climate-sceptics-launch-campaign-to-overturn-green-targets.html

Telegraph: “These guys are a remnant group of dinosaurs trying to argue something while frankly the public and political debate has moved on.” from Bob Ward, Policy and Communicatios Director, Grantham Institute.

Revd Philip Foster started with

Fellow dinosaurs, deniars, flat-earthers we are here today to encourage the Member’s of Parliament to repeal the Climate Change Act”.

He spoke well and confidentally, I imagine 30 years in the pulpit gives very good public speaking skills. He talked about past climate, demonstrating that the climate today was neither unprecedented or a concern.

Revd Philip Foster finished with:

Belief and Trust is for GOD, Scepticism is for Scientists

Piers Corbyn: astrophysicist, founder and director of Weather Action long range forecasting

Piers spoke about how the Sun drove the earth’s weather and climate not CO2, he gave a good presentation in front of a receptive audience. He receives a very bad press from the CAGW http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/sep/21/climate-sceptics-evidence-gullible ‘consensus’ media as he is all to easily described by them as a ‘climate denying’ eccentric scientist, (with appropriate hair) but the fact is Weather Action http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv.asp?p=wact5

seems to outperform the ‘warmist’ UK Met Office medium and long term weather forecasting, the UK Met Office no longer actively promotes their seasonal forecasts, such was the public and press laughter at their recent ‘barbecue summer’ and ‘wet and mild’ winter predictions.

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/3/5/met-office-to-scrap-seasonal-forecasts.html

Piers demonstrated in his presentation that the IPCC computer model predictions/scenarios for temperatures were higher than actual temperatures in the 21st century.

Peter Gill: Physicist

He described how CO2 has had a bad press, neither toxic nor a pollutant. He covered issues like different definitions of CO2 ‘residence time’, actual amounts of anthropogenic CO2 vs biomass and oceans. The fact that the IPCC have a preference for low ice core figures for the amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere, against over 90,000 historic direct measurements of percentages of CO2 in the atmosphere.

One interesting point of discussion was if the IPCC’s definition of CO2 residence time was correct, where had all the anthropogenic CO2 gone. He argues that the “variability of emissions and absorption by natural processes exceeds current anthropogenic emissions.”

Christopher Booker: Veteran Sunday Telegraph Columnist

(author: The Real Global Warming Scandal)

Spoke against the burdensome costs of renewables, including wind farms and solar in the UK and the Costs of the Climate Change Bill, 18.4 billion a year until 2050. He also spoke about the coming Energy gap in the UK, due to the coming closure (2015) of power stations due to the EU CO2 Emissions regulations.

His articles below best describe his presentation.

Renewables will add £880 a year to bills

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8068402/Renewables-will-add-880-a-year-to-bills.html

The Thanet wind farm will milk us for billions

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8025148/The-Thanet-wind-farm-will-milk-us-of-billions.html

Britain’s Energy Policy is in crisis

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8010926/Britains-energy-policy-is-in-crisis.html

Christopher Booker went into a detailed analysis about the craziness and vast cost and subsidies of the dash to wind farm technologies in the UK. He gave a convincing case that the dash to green technology would be ruinous for the UK economy. His fellow journalist James Delingpole, summarized the costs of the Climate Change act, in his Climate Fools Day blog article.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100060540/happy-climate-fools-day

Sammy Wilson (DUP MP): Former Northern Ireland Environment Minister

Sammy was the MP that sponsored the meeting, and thanked everyone for attending.

He told some anecdotes of his time as Environment minister in Northern Ireland, including his experience when he refused to allow the now notorious ‘Bedtime Stories’ TV Ad, to be shown in Northern Ireland, this was withdrawn in the rest of the UK following 900 complaints to ASA (they stopped accepting complaints after 900)http://www.asa.org.uk/Complaints-and-ASA-action/Adjudications/2010/3/Department-of-Energy-and-Climate-Change/TF_ADJ_48225.aspx

ACTONCO2 “Bedtime Stories” TV advertisement, October 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&hl=en-GB&v=w62gsctP2gc

This TV ad was part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s, £6 million campaign – Act On CO2, which in the run up to Copenhagen, features a small child being told a bedtime story about the CO2 monster, including drowning cartoon puppies.

I know nothing about Northern Ireland politicians, but I applaud him for that act of political rebellion. Sammy also said he refused to sign up pledges on emission cuts in Northern Ireland, for the very pragmatic political reason, that he would be criticized for failing to meet the pledge, as no one had any idea how to practically achieve them. He explained this with a smile, which probably explains why he is no longer the NI Environment Minister. Sammy came across as a friendly lively Member of Parliament, who I think the backbench MP’s may start to listen to.

John O Sullivan: Climate Realists

Gave a short speech and presented a $10,000 cheque to Piers Corbyn, from a US publisher Stairway Press ( US publisher of A J Montford’s – The Hockey Stick Illusion) They had chosen the Climate Fools Day to present the inaugural Ernst-Georg Beck Award, this was not directly a part of Climate Fools Day, see Climate Realists for the detail.

Dr Ian Strangeways: expert in meteorological thermometry

In the final minutes, reiterated the basic greenhouse physics of a doubling of CO2 levels ( ie an increase of 1.0C + or – 0.5C, his main interest is instrumentation, error skewing results in the temperature data sets and issues like thermometer shrinkage causing an increase in readings over time in the historic datasets.

Both Piers Corbyn and Peter Gill gave their presentations at a Climate Fools Day conference at Imperial College the following day, with the BBC’s Roger Harrabin attending.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/30/climate_fools_day/print.html

How was Climate Fools day perceived in Parliament?

The meeting had run out of time for a Q & A session, though a hearty debate continued in the corridors of parliament, before a large group went off to the nearest pub.

Two of the invited Members of Parliament failed to turn up, possibly these more prominent MP’s in the declared ‘green’ coalition government had been scared away from associating with sceptics and dinosaurs, because of the newspapers articles written prior to the meeting.

The meeting and presentation (slides, presentation skills, budget) were not a patch on the extremely well funded lobby groups like Greenpeace, WWF, that can afford in-house and external green PR professionals, which in the past means politicians will have dismissed them as amateurs, whilst of course the contradictory mantra of a well funded Climate Change fossil fuel deniers meme is rolled out at every opportunity.

If any passing MP’s or journalist were brave enough to look inside they perhaps might have chuckled and thought what were this group doing (average age 55 – to be kind) and perhaps have dismissed then as ’climate dinosaurs’.

A year ago, I might have thought the same about a retired mining engineer with a blog and a certain retired US TV weatherman’s website. Then On 20th Of November of last year, I followed a link from a UK motoring forum, to Watts Up and then had a read of Harry_read_me.txt for myself.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=205&t=775382&mid=990&i=0&nmt=Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations&mid=990

It has been reported that UK Energy Ministers only have meetings with Energy Companies lobbying for subsidies, and the environment groups like Greenpeace, WWF, Friends of the Erath, Oxfam, Christian Aid, etc (tip – Bishop Hill)

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/10/29/ministerial-meetings.html

The organizers of Climate Fools day intend to hold further meetings at the House of Commons, to explain to the MPs about a sceptical point of view. It may take a while for the leaderships of the political parties to move outside of the protective ‘green’ lobbying bubble that they have inhabited for a decade. I do believe that backbench MPs will start to listen to ‘Climate Sense’ as the economic consequence of the Climate Change act are becoming clear.

Climate Change (man made) in the Political context of the UK

One year ago, pre Copenhagen, the Labour Party had been in power for 13 years, the leadership of all UK political parties were convinced about climate change, the Climate Change Act had been passed. The European Union was pressing for ever wider ties between nation states and carbon taxation was considered a good means to raise an EU tax. The EU was trying to lead the world in unilateral emissions cuts and is berating the United States of America and other nations for failing in this area.

The Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the Minister for the Department of Energy and Climate Change, Ed Milliband used rhetoric such as:

Flat Earther, Sceptics, Climate Deniers, Anti science and worryingly Climate Saboteurs.

Gordon Brown went to Copenhagen saying ’50 days to save the planet’.

A year on from Copenhagen – There is a new UK government, a Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government, that finds that it actually has to do something soon, not a convenient decade or 2 away.  There are now a few sceptical politicians, so as the age of austerity, massive UK budget deficit, the realities of the energy gap hit home, more politicians may start to take notice of these sceptical colleagues.

Over 6 million people in the UK are defined already as suffering from fuel poverty,

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fuel-bills-blamed-for-50-rise-in-winter-deaths-1826917.html the dash to immature green technologies underwritten by massive subsidies will push energy bills for these poor and vulnerable people ever higher.

Or perhaps the populations of the developing countries will reject catastrophic (man made) climate change. Rev Philip Foster spoke that the governments in the developing world saw that the West would look after their own interests at Copenhagen, the poor of those countries already knew they would never have actually seen any of the Western money anyway. It would have just disappeared into developing countries governmental elites pockets or absorbed into the NGO’s

I personally would love the super rich Al Gore to have a debate, about the effects of Climate Change Legislation on millions of the world’s poorest people, with someone like the Rev. Philip Foster. He worked with the poor as a teacher in Africa in the 70’s and keeps in contact with former pupils from Africa (one now a Professor of Geography) he is equally concerned for the UK poor and for the untold millions of the world’s poorest in developing nations who will be denied cheap energy and held in poverty, for the romantic environmentalist notion of ‘saving the planet’ for future generations, whilst ignoring the reality now for the poor.

Some MP’s like Graham Stringer, who are now in political opposition to a declared ‘green’ coalition government are now concerned by the future implications of the Climate Change Act on the poorest most vulnerable members of their constituencies and in UK society and perhaps finally they will take a harder look at the science and at the lobbying of the environmentalist advocacy groups. .

As a ‘Climate Cynic’, I imagine that quite soon the short term concern of being re-elected will force his fellow politicians to re-look at IPCC consensus climate change and address these concerns.

Links:

A Public Climate Fools debate held at Imperial College.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/30/climate_fools_day/print.html

Climate Realists have some articles and photographs of the day, and their own perspective of Climate Fools Day, at the links below. (a full video will follow, according to Piers Corbyn)

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6553

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6552

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6551

Who are the Climate Fools? – Climate Fools Day

 

 

According to the newspapers a ‘cabal of sceptics’ and ‘dinosaurs’ descended on London on Climate Fools Day. I actually attended the Climate Fools Day meeting in the House of Commons on 27th October 2010, unlike the mainstream media who stayed away.

 

In the UK, a few politicians are just realizing that in 5 years time (around the time of the next election) about one third of the UK power stations will be FORCED to close to meet strict new European Union Pollution (CO2 emissions) rules.

 

One of these politicians is Graham Stringer MP, he is on the Science and Technology Committee in the House of Commons, his concern is for the poor. It is perhaps now dawning on some other backbench MP’s that ‘keeping the lights’ on, may be more important than ‘saving the planet’ in 50 – 100 years time, to the majority of general public that actually vote for them.

 

So who are the Climate Fools?

 

According to Climate Sense they were the 620 UK Members of Parliament from across all political parties that in 2008 voted for the Climate Change Act that committed the UK to 80% reductions in CO2 emissions by 2050. The UK was the first country in the world and remains the only country to commit to this level of reductions, which has had massive implications to energy policy and investment in energy production in the UK.

 

Only 4 MP’s voted against the Act, only one MP Peter Lilley queried the costs:

 

Neither Parliament nor most of the media bothered to discuss the cost of one of the most immense projects ever adopted in this country”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7746126.stm

 

As the bill was passed, it was brought to the attention of the House of Commons that for the first time in over 73 years snow was falling in October in London.

 

Thus, on the 2nd anniversary of the 2008 Climate Change Act, there were two events in the UK Houses of Parliament that were of interest to ‘climate sceptics’, ‘climate heretics’, ‘lukewarmers’ ‘climate deniers’ and ‘climate dinosaurs’ alike. Climate Fools Day and the Science & Technology Select Committee (including Graham Stringer MP) were interviewing Acton, Davies and Sir Muir Russell about some of the discrepancies of the various UK Climategate inquiries.

 

According to Jens Robdrup, the founder of Climate Sense and the Reverend Philip Foster, the intention of Climate Fools Day (sponsored by Graham Stringer MP, Sammy Wilson MP) was the launch of a campaign to lobby the politicians with the intent to repeal the Climate Change Act.

 

As no single UK politician, at the time of voting or since has ANY real idea of how to actually achieve the UK and EU targets for CO2 emissions.

 

The Climate Sense group is made up of Copenhagen Climate Challenge,

http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/

, Weather Action http://www.weatheraction.com

and the Campaign Against Carbon Capitalism

,who previously sent the Copenhagen Challenge to the UN and recently to Prince Charles on the behalf of climate sceptics. The challenge asked the UN and the Prince, who has accused sceptics of “peddling pseudo science”, to prove climate change is happening and is signed by 166 scientists. (including Anthony Watts, Bob Carter, Vincent Gray, Richard Lindzen, Nils-Axel Morner, Ian Plimer, Fred Singer and David Bellamy)

http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64

 

My thoughts of the Climate Fools Meeting

 

It was a small enthusiastic, slightly eccentric looking meeting of about 70 people – aimed at persuading MP’s of the folly of the Climate Change Act, (they needed a bigger room than originally planned) Graham Stringer was not there, still busy with the outcome of the morning’s select committee meeting, but according to the Telegraph and the organizers he is now a climate sceptic MP.

 

Graham Capper: Copenhagen Climate Challenge – acted as the chair

 

Jens Robdrup: Founder of Climate Sense

 

Discussed Denmark’s experience with Green Wind farm technology, spoke first describing the Danish experience with wind farms. Talking about the highest energy bills in Europe, massive costs, subsidies and failure of energy policy and that all the promised green jobs seemed to have been created in China.

 

Revd Philip Foster – Climate Sense – A retired English vicar.

 

He is author of “While the Earth Endures: Creation Cosmology and Climate Change”

(he is also the UK publisher of – Climategate: the CRUtape Letters)

 

He spoke enthusiastically and confidently about the earth’s previous climate, and how current temperatures were neither unprecedented nor dangerous. He had read the morning headlines

 

Guardian: Cabal of climate sceptics to descend on UK parliament

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/oct/25/climate-fools-day-sceptics-parliament

Telegraph: Climate sceptics launch campaign to overturn green targets

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/8088204/Climate-sceptics-launch-campaign-to-overturn-green-targets.html

(with a photo of a smoking chmimmney stack)

Telegraph: “These guys are a remnant group of dinosaurs trying to argue something while frankly the public and political debate has moved on.” from Bob Ward, Policy and Communicatios Director, Grantham Institute.

Revd Philip Foster started with

Fellow dinosaurs, deniars, flat-earthers we are here today to encourage the Member’s of Parliament to repeal the Climate Change Act”.

He spoke well and confidentally, I imagine 30 years in the pulpit gives very good public speaking skills. He talked about past climate, demonstrating that the climate today was neither unprecedented or a concern.

Revd Philip Foster finished with:

Belief and Trust is for GOD, Scepticism is for Scientists

Piers Corbyn: astrophysicist, founder and director of Weather Action long range forecasting

 

Piers spoke about how the Sun drove the earth’s weather and climate not CO2, he gave a good presentation in front of a receptive audience. He receives a very bad press from the CAGW http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/sep/21/climate-sceptics-evidence-gullible ‘consensus’ media as he is all to easily described by them as a ‘climate denying’ eccentric scientist, (with appropriate hair) but the fact is Weather Action http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv.asp?p=wact5

seems to outperform the ‘warmist’ UK Met Office medium and long term weather forecasting, the UK Met Office no longer actively promotes their seasonal forecasts, such was the public and press laughter at their recent ‘barbecue summer’ and ‘wet and mild’ winter predictions.

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/3/5/met-office-to-scrap-seasonal-forecasts.html

Piers demonstrated in his presentation that the IPCC computer model predictions/scenarios for temperatures were higher than actual temperatures in the 21st century.

 

Peter Gill: Physicist

 

He described how CO2 has had a bad press, neither toxic nor a pollutant. He covered issues like different definitions of CO2 ‘residence time’, actual amounts of anthropogenic CO2 vs biomass and oceans. The fact that the IPCC have a preference for low ice core figures for the amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere, against over 90,000 historic direct measurements of percentages of CO2 in the atmosphere.

One interesting point of discussion was if the IPCC’s definition of CO2 residence time was correct, where had all the anthropogenic CO2 gone. He argues that the “variability of emissions and absorption by natural processes exceeds current anthropogenic emissions.”

Christopher Booker: Veteran Sunday Telegraph Columnist

(author: The Real Global Warming Scandal)

 

Spoke against the burdensome costs of renewables, including wind farms and solar in the UK and the Costs of the Climate Change Bill, 18.4 billion a year until 2050. He also spoke about the coming Energy gap in the UK, due to the coming closure (2015) of power stations due to the EU CO2 Emissions regulations.

 

His articles below best describe his presentation.

 

Renewables will add £880 a year to bills

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8068402/Renewables-will-add-880-a-year-to-bills.html

 

The Thanet wind farm will milk us for billions

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8025148/The-Thanet-wind-farm-will-milk-us-of-billions.html

 

Britain’s Energy Policy is in crisis

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8010926/Britains-energy-policy-is-in-crisis.html

 

Christopher Booker went into a detailed analysis about the craziness and vast cost and subsidies of the dash to wind farm technologies in the UK. He gave a convincing case that the dash to green technology would be ruinous for the UK economy. His fellow journalist James Delingpole, summarized the costs of the Climate Change act, in his Climate Fools Day blog article.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100060540/happy-climate-fools-day

 

 

Sammy Wilson (DUP MP): Former Northern Ireland Environment Minister

 

Sammy was the MP that sponsored the meeting, and thanked everyone for attending.

He told some anecdotes of his time as Environment minister in Northern Ireland, including his experience when he refused to allow the now notorious ‘Bedtime Stories’ TV Ad, to be shown in Northern Ireland, this was withdrawn in the rest of the UK following 900 complaints to ASA (they stopped accepting complaints after 900)http://www.asa.org.uk/Complaints-and-ASA-action/Adjudications/2010/3/Department-of-Energy-and-Climate-Change/TF_ADJ_48225.aspx

 

ACTONCO2 “Bedtime Stories” TV advertisement, October 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&hl=en-GB&v=w62gsctP2gc

 

This TV ad was part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s, £6 million campaign – Act On CO2, which in the run up to Copenhagen, features a small child being told a bedtime story about the CO2 monster, including drowning cartoon puppies.

 

I know nothing about Northern Ireland politicians, but I applaud him for that act of political rebellion. Sammy also said he refused to sign up pledges on emission cuts in Northern Ireland, for the very pragmatic political reason, that he would be criticized for failing to meet the pledge, as no one had any idea how to practically achieve them. He explained this with a smile, which probably explains why he is no longer the NI Environment Minister. Sammy came across as a friendly lively Member of Parliament, who I think the backbench MP’s may start to listen to.

 

John O Sullivan: Climate Realists

Gave a short speech and presented a $10,000 cheque to Piers Corbyn, from a US publisher Stairway Press ( US publisher of A J Montford’s – The Hockey Stick Illusion) They had chosen the Climate Fools Day to present the inaugural Ernst-Georg Beck Award, this was not directly a part of Climate Fools Day, see Climate Realists for the detail.

Dr Ian Strangeways: expert in meteorological thermometry

In the final minutes, reiterated the basic greenhouse physics of a doubling of CO2 levels ( ie an increase of 1.0C + or – 0.5C, his main interest is instrumentation, error skewing results in the temperature data sets and issues like thermometer shrinkage causing an increase in readings over time in the historic datasets.

 

Both Piers Corbyn and Peter Gill gave their presentations at a Climate Fools Day conference at Imperial College the following day, with the BBC’s Roger Harrabin attending.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/30/climate_fools_day/print.html

 

How was Climate Fools day perceived in Parliament?

The meeting had run out of time for a Q & A session, though a hearty debate continued in the corridors of parliament, before a large group went off to the nearest pub.

 

Two of the invited Members of Parliament failed to turn up, possibly these more prominent MP’s in the declared ‘green’ coalition government had been scared away from associating with sceptics and dinosaurs, because of the newspapers articles written prior to the meeting.

 

The meeting and presentation (slides, presentation skills, budget) were not a patch on the extremely well funded lobby groups like Greenpeace, WWF, that can afford in-house and external green PR professionals, which in the past means politicians will have dismissed them as amateurs, whilst of course the contradictory mantra of a well funded Climate Change fossil fuel deniers meme is rolled out at every opportunity.

 

If any passing MP’s or journalist were brave enough to look inside they perhaps might have chuckled and thought what were this group doing (average age 55 – to be kind) and perhaps have dismissed then as ’climate dinosaurs’.

 

A year ago, I might have thought the same about a retired mining engineer with a blog and a certain retired US TV weatherman’s website. Then On 20th Of November of last year, I followed a link from a UK motoring forum, to Watts Up and then had a read of Harry_read_me.txt for myself.

 

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=205&t=775382&mid=990&i=0&nmt=Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations&mid=990

 

It has been reported that UK Energy Ministers only have meetings with Energy Companies lobbying for subsidies, and the environment groups like Greenpeace, WWF, Friends of the Erath, Oxfam, Christian Aid, etc (tip – Bishop Hill)

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/10/29/ministerial-meetings.html

 

The organizers of Climate Fools day intend to hold further meetings at the House of Commons, to explain to the MPs about a sceptical point of view. It may take a while for the leaderships of the political parties to move outside of the protective ‘green’ lobbying bubble that they have inhabited for a decade. I do believe that backbench MPs will start to listen to ‘Climate Sense’ as the economic consequence of the Climate Change act are becoming clear.

 

Climate Change (man made) in the Political context of the UK

 

One year ago, pre Copenhagen, the Labour Party had been in power for 13 years, the leadership of all UK political parties were convinced about climate change, the Climate Change Act had been passed. The European Union was pressing for ever wider ties between nation states and carbon taxation was considered a good means to raise an EU tax. The EU was trying to lead the world in unilateral emissions cuts and is berating the United States of America and other nations for failing in this area.

 

The Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the Minister for the Department of Energy and Climate Change, Ed Milliband used rhetoric such as:

 

Flat Earther, Sceptics, Climate Deniers, Anti science and worryingly Climate Saboteurs.

 

Gordon Brown went to Copenhagen saying ’50 days to save the planet’.

 

A year on from Copenhagen – There is a new UK government, a Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government, that finds that it actually has to do something soon, not a convenient decade or 2 away.  There are now a few sceptical politicians, so as the age of austerity, massive UK budget deficit, the realities of the energy gap hit home, more politicians may start to take notice of these sceptical colleagues.

 

Over 6 million people in the UK are defined already as suffering from fuel poverty,

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fuel-bills-blamed-for-50-rise-in-winter-deaths-1826917.html the dash to immature green technologies underwritten by massive subsidies will push energy bills for these poor and vulnerable people ever higher.

 

 

Or perhaps the populations of the developing countries will reject catastrophic (man made) climate change. Rev Philip Foster spoke that the governments in the developing world saw that the West would look after their own interests at Copenhagen, the poor of those countries already knew they would never have actually seen any of the Western money anyway. It would have just disappeared into developing countries governmental elites pockets or absorbed into the NGO’s

 

I personally would love the super rich Al Gore to have a debate, about the effects of Climate Change Legislation on millions of the world’s poorest people, with someone like the Rev. Philip Foster. He worked with the poor as a teacher in Africa in the 70’s and keeps in contact with former pupils from Africa (one now a Professor of Geography) he is equally concerned for the UK poor and for the untold millions of the world’s poorest in developing nations who will be denied cheap energy and held in poverty, for the romantic environmentalist notion of ‘saving the planet’ for future generations, whilst ignoring the reality now for the poor.

 

Some MP’s like Graham Stringer, who are now in political opposition to a declared ‘green’ coalition government are now concerned by the future implications of the Climate Change Act on the poorest most vulnerable members of their constituencies and in UK society and perhaps finally they will take a harder look at the science and at the lobbying of the environmentalist advocacy groups. .

 

As a ‘Climate Cynic’, I imagine that quite soon the short term concern of being re-elected will force his fellow politicians to re-look at IPCC consensus climate change and address these concerns.

 

Links:

 

A Public Climate Fools debate held at Imperial College.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/30/climate_fools_day/print.html

 

 

Climate Realists have some articles and photographs of the day, and their own perspective of Climate Fools Day, at the links below. (a full video will follow, according to Piers Corbyn)

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6553

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6552

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6551

Who are the Climate Fools? – Climate Fools Day

According to the newspapers a ‘cabal of sceptics’ and ‘dinosaurs’ descended on London on Climate Fools Day. I actually attended the Climate Fools Day meeting in the House of Commons on 27th October 2010, unlike the mainstream media who stayed away.

In the UK, a few politicians are just realizing that in 5 years time (around the time of the next election) about one third of the UK power stations will be FORCED to close to meet strict new European Union Pollution (CO2 emissions) rules.

One of these politicians is Graham Stringer MP, he is on the Science and Technology Committee in the House of Commons, his concern is for the poor. It is perhaps now dawning on some other backbench MP’s that ‘keeping the lights’ on, may be more important than ‘saving the planet’ in 50 – 100 years time, to the majority of general public that actually vote for them.

So who are the Climate Fools?

According to Climate Sense they were the 620 UK Members of Parliament from across all political parties that in 2008 voted for the Climate Change Act that committed the UK to 80% reductions in CO2 emissions by 2050. The UK was the first country in the world and remains the only country to commit to this level of reductions, which has had massive implications to energy policy and investment in energy production in the UK.

Only 4 MP’s voted against the Act, only one MP Peter Lilley queried the costs:

Neither Parliament nor most of the media bothered to discuss the cost of one of the most immense projects ever adopted in this country”

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/7746126.stm

As the bill was passed, it was brought to the attention of the House of Commons that for the first time in over 73 years snow was falling in October in London.

Thus, on the 2nd anniversary of the 2008 Climate Change Act, there were two events in the UK Houses of Parliament that were of interest to ‘climate sceptics’, ‘climate heretics’, ‘lukewarmers’ ‘climate deniers’ and ‘climate dinosaurs’ alike. Climate Fools Day and the Science & Technology Select Committee (including Graham Stringer MP) were interviewing Acton, Davies and Sir Muir Russell about some of the discrepancies of the various UK Climategate inquiries.

According to Jens Robdrup, the founder of Climate Sense and the Reverend Philip Foster, the intention of Climate Fools Day (sponsored by Graham Stringer MP, Sammy Wilson MP) was the launch of a campaign to lobby the politicians with the intent to repeal the Climate Change Act.

As no single UK politician, at the time of voting or since has ANY real idea of how to actually achieve the UK and EU targets for CO2 emissions.

The Climate Sense group is made up of Copenhagen Climate Challenge,

http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/

, Weather Action http://www.weatheraction.com

and the Campaign Against Carbon Capitalism

,who previously sent the Copenhagen Challenge to the UN and recently to Prince Charles on the behalf of climate sceptics. The challenge asked the UN and the Prince, who has accused sceptics of “peddling pseudo science”, to prove climate change is happening and is signed by 166 scientists. (including Anthony Watts, Bob Carter, Vincent Gray, Richard Lindzen, Nils-Axel Morner, Ian Plimer, Fred Singer and David Bellamy)

http://www.copenhagenclimatechallenge.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=64

My thoughts of the Climate Fools Meeting

It was a small enthusiastic, slightly eccentric looking meeting of about 70 people – aimed at persuading MP’s of the folly of the Climate Change Act, (they needed a bigger room than originally planned) Graham Stringer was not there, still busy with the outcome of the morning’s select committee meeting, but according to the Telegraph and the organizers he is now a climate sceptic MP.

Graham Capper: Copenhagen Climate Challenge – acted as the chair

Jens Robdrup: Founder of Climate Sense

Discussed Denmark’s experience with Green Wind farm technology, spoke first describing the Danish experience with wind farms. Talking about the highest energy bills in Europe, massive costs, subsidies and failure of energy policy and that all the promised green jobs seemed to have been created in China.

Revd Philip Foster – Climate Sense – A retired English vicar.

He is author of “While the Earth Endures: Creation Cosmology and Climate Change”

(he is also the UK publisher of – Climategate: the CRUtape Letters)

He spoke enthusiastically and confidently about the earth’s previous climate, and how current temperatures were neither unprecedented nor dangerous. He had read the morning headlines

Guardian: Cabal of climate sceptics to descend on UK parliament

http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/blog/2010/oct/25/climate-fools-day-sceptics-parliament

Telegraph: Climate sceptics launch campaign to overturn green targets

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/earth/earthnews/8088204/Climate-sceptics-launch-campaign-to-overturn-green-targets.html

(with a photo of a smoking chmimmney stack)

Telegraph: “These guys are a remnant group of dinosaurs trying to argue something while frankly the public and political debate has moved on.” from Bob Ward, Policy and Communicatios Director, Grantham Institute.

Revd Philip Foster started with

Fellow dinosaurs, deniars, flat-earthers we are here today to encourage the Member’s of Parliament to repeal the Climate Change Act”.

He spoke well and confidentally, I imagine 30 years in the pulpit gives very good public speaking skills. He talked about past climate, demonstrating that the climate today was neither unprecedented or a concern.

Revd Philip Foster finished with:

Belief and Trust is for GOD, Scepticism is for Scientists

Piers Corbyn: astrophysicist, founder and director of Weather Action long range forecasting

Piers spoke about how the Sun drove the earth’s weather and climate not CO2, he gave a good presentation in front of a receptive audience. He receives a very bad press from the CAGW http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/georgemonbiot/2010/sep/21/climate-sceptics-evidence-gullible ‘consensus’ media as he is all to easily described by them as a ‘climate denying’ eccentric scientist, (with appropriate hair) but the fact is Weather Action http://www.weatheraction.com/pages/pv.asp?p=wact5

seems to outperform the ‘warmist’ UK Met Office medium and long term weather forecasting, the UK Met Office no longer actively promotes their seasonal forecasts, such was the public and press laughter at their recent ‘barbecue summer’ and ‘wet and mild’ winter predictions.

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/3/5/met-office-to-scrap-seasonal-forecasts.html

Piers demonstrated in his presentation that the IPCC computer model predictions/scenarios for temperatures were higher than actual temperatures in the 21st century.

Peter Gill: Physicist

He described how CO2 has had a bad press, neither toxic nor a pollutant. He covered issues like different definitions of CO2 ‘residence time’, actual amounts of anthropogenic CO2 vs biomass and oceans. The fact that the IPCC have a preference for low ice core figures for the amounts of CO2 in the atmosphere, against over 90,000 historic direct measurements of percentages of CO2 in the atmosphere.

One interesting point of discussion was if the IPCC’s definition of CO2 residence time was correct, where had all the anthropogenic CO2 gone. He argues that the “variability of emissions and absorption by natural processes exceeds current anthropogenic emissions.”

Christopher Booker: Veteran Sunday Telegraph Columnist

(author: The Real Global Warming Scandal)

Spoke against the burdensome costs of renewables, including wind farms and solar in the UK and the Costs of the Climate Change Bill, 18.4 billion a year until 2050. He also spoke about the coming Energy gap in the UK, due to the coming closure (2015) of power stations due to the EU CO2 Emissions regulations.

His articles below best describe his presentation.

Renewables will add £880 a year to bills

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8068402/Renewables-will-add-880-a-year-to-bills.html

The Thanet wind farm will milk us for billions

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8025148/The-Thanet-wind-farm-will-milk-us-of-billions.html

Britain’s Energy Policy is in crisis

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/comment/columnists/christopherbooker/8010926/Britains-energy-policy-is-in-crisis.html

Christopher Booker went into a detailed analysis about the craziness and vast cost and subsidies of the dash to wind farm technologies in the UK. He gave a convincing case that the dash to green technology would be ruinous for the UK economy. His fellow journalist James Delingpole, summarized the costs of the Climate Change act, in his Climate Fools Day blog article.

http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/news/jamesdelingpole/100060540/happy-climate-fools-day

Sammy Wilson (DUP MP): Former Northern Ireland Environment Minister

Sammy was the MP that sponsored the meeting, and thanked everyone for attending.

He told some anecdotes of his time as Environment minister in Northern Ireland, including his experience when he refused to allow the now notorious ‘Bedtime Stories’ TV Ad, to be shown in Northern Ireland, this was withdrawn in the rest of the UK following 900 complaints to ASA (they stopped accepting complaints after 900)http://www.asa.org.uk/Complaints-and-ASA-action/Adjudications/2010/3/Department-of-Energy-and-Climate-Change/TF_ADJ_48225.aspx

ACTONCO2 “Bedtime Stories” TV advertisement, October 2009

http://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&hl=en-GB&v=w62gsctP2gc

This TV ad was part of the Department of Energy and Climate Change’s, £6 million campaign – Act On CO2, which in the run up to Copenhagen, features a small child being told a bedtime story about the CO2 monster, including drowning cartoon puppies.

I know nothing about Northern Ireland politicians, but I applaud him for that act of political rebellion. Sammy also said he refused to sign up pledges on emission cuts in Northern Ireland, for the very pragmatic political reason, that he would be criticized for failing to meet the pledge, as no one had any idea how to practically achieve them. He explained this with a smile, which probably explains why he is no longer the NI Environment Minister. Sammy came across as a friendly lively Member of Parliament, who I think the backbench MP’s may start to listen to.

John O Sullivan: Climate Realists

Gave a short speech and presented a $10,000 cheque to Piers Corbyn, from a US publisher Stairway Press ( US publisher of A J Montford’s – The Hockey Stick Illusion) They had chosen the Climate Fools Day to present the inaugural Ernst-Georg Beck Award, this was not directly a part of Climate Fools Day, see Climate Realists for the detail.

Dr Ian Strangeways: expert in meteorological thermometry

In the final minutes, reiterated the basic greenhouse physics of a doubling of CO2 levels ( ie an increase of 1.0C + or – 0.5C, his main interest is instrumentation, error skewing results in the temperature data sets and issues like thermometer shrinkage causing an increase in readings over time in the historic datasets.

Both Piers Corbyn and Peter Gill gave their presentations at a Climate Fools Day conference at Imperial College the following day, with the BBC’s Roger Harrabin attending.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/30/climate_fools_day/print.html

How was Climate Fools day perceived in Parliament?

The meeting had run out of time for a Q & A session, though a hearty debate continued in the corridors of parliament, before a large group went off to the nearest pub.

Two of the invited Members of Parliament failed to turn up, possibly these more prominent MP’s in the declared ‘green’ coalition government had been scared away from associating with sceptics and dinosaurs, because of the newspapers articles written prior to the meeting.

The meeting and presentation (slides, presentation skills, budget) were not a patch on the extremely well funded lobby groups like Greenpeace, WWF, that can afford in-house and external green PR professionals, which in the past means politicians will have dismissed them as amateurs, whilst of course the contradictory mantra of a well funded Climate Change fossil fuel deniers meme is rolled out at every opportunity.

If any passing MP’s or journalist were brave enough to look inside they perhaps might have chuckled and thought what were this group doing (average age 55 – to be kind) and perhaps have dismissed then as ’climate dinosaurs’.

A year ago, I might have thought the same about a retired mining engineer with a blog and a certain retired US TV weatherman’s website. Then On 20th Of November of last year, I followed a link from a UK motoring forum, to Watts Up and then had a read of Harry_read_me.txt for myself.

http://www.pistonheads.com/gassing/topic.asp?h=0&f=205&t=775382&mid=990&i=0&nmt=Climate Cat out of the Bag? Potentially dynamite revelations&mid=990

It has been reported that UK Energy Ministers only have meetings with Energy Companies lobbying for subsidies, and the environment groups like Greenpeace, WWF, Friends of the Erath, Oxfam, Christian Aid, etc (tip – Bishop Hill)

http://bishophill.squarespace.com/blog/2010/10/29/ministerial-meetings.html

The organizers of Climate Fools day intend to hold further meetings at the House of Commons, to explain to the MPs about a sceptical point of view. It may take a while for the leaderships of the political parties to move outside of the protective ‘green’ lobbying bubble that they have inhabited for a decade. I do believe that backbench MPs will start to listen to ‘Climate Sense’ as the economic consequence of the Climate Change act are becoming clear.

Climate Change (man made) in the Political context of the UK

One year ago, pre Copenhagen, the Labour Party had been in power for 13 years, the leadership of all UK political parties were convinced about climate change, the Climate Change Act had been passed. The European Union was pressing for ever wider ties between nation states and carbon taxation was considered a good means to raise an EU tax. The EU was trying to lead the world in unilateral emissions cuts and is berating the United States of America and other nations for failing in this area.

The Prime Minister Gordon Brown and the Minister for the Department of Energy and Climate Change, Ed Milliband used rhetoric such as:

Flat Earther, Sceptics, Climate Deniers, Anti science and worryingly Climate Saboteurs.

Gordon Brown went to Copenhagen saying ’50 days to save the planet’.

A year on from Copenhagen – There is a new UK government, a Conservative and Liberal Democrat coalition government, that finds that it actually has to do something soon, not a convenient decade or 2 away.  There are now a few sceptical politicians, so as the age of austerity, massive UK budget deficit, the realities of the energy gap hit home, more politicians may start to take notice of these sceptical colleagues.

Over 6 million people in the UK are defined already as suffering from fuel poverty,

http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/home-news/fuel-bills-blamed-for-50-rise-in-winter-deaths-1826917.html the dash to immature green technologies underwritten by massive subsidies will push energy bills for these poor and vulnerable people ever higher.

Or perhaps the populations of the developing countries will reject catastrophic (man made) climate change. Rev Philip Foster spoke that the governments in the developing world saw that the West would look after their own interests at Copenhagen, the poor of those countries already knew they would never have actually seen any of the Western money anyway. It would have just disappeared into developing countries governmental elites pockets or absorbed into the NGO’s

I personally would love the super rich Al Gore to have a debate, about the effects of Climate Change Legislation on millions of the world’s poorest people, with someone like the Rev. Philip Foster. He worked with the poor as a teacher in Africa in the 70’s and keeps in contact with former pupils from Africa (one now a Professor of Geography) he is equally concerned for the UK poor and for the untold millions of the world’s poorest in developing nations who will be denied cheap energy and held in poverty, for the romantic environmentalist notion of ‘saving the planet’ for future generations, whilst ignoring the reality now for the poor.

Some MP’s like Graham Stringer, who are now in political opposition to a declared ‘green’ coalition government are now concerned by the future implications of the Climate Change Act on the poorest most vulnerable members of their constituencies and in UK society and perhaps finally they will take a harder look at the science and at the lobbying of the environmentalist advocacy groups. .

As a ‘Climate Cynic’, I imagine that quite soon the short term concern of being re-elected will force his fellow politicians to re-look at IPCC consensus climate change and address these concerns.

Links:

A Public Climate Fools debate held at Imperial College.

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2009/10/30/climate_fools_day/print.html

Climate Realists have some articles and photographs of the day, and their own perspective of Climate Fools Day, at the links below. (a full video will follow, according to Piers Corbyn)

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6553

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6552

http://climaterealists.com/?id=6551

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
74 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
November 2, 2010 8:30 am

Is anyone among Climate Fools capable of stopping or prohibiting a Volcano to erupt?
Monday 1st November 2010
Grimsvotn Volcano, Iceland
A possible eruption has begun at Grimsvotn volcano, Iceland. A flood has started in Gigja in south-east Iceland. The disturbance occurred under the Vatnajokull glacier near Grimsvotn Volcano on Sunday afternoon. There was an increase in flow of water by 30 cm but other rivers running from the glacier are dry. The flood may take 4-5 days to reach maximum. On Sunday the volume of water in Gigja was 130 cubic metres per second, and electrolyte levels double that of normal. Grimsvotn is the most active volcano in Iceland.

http://www.volcanolive.com/news.html

RogerT
November 2, 2010 8:46 am

Toland
I guess those Scottish politicos will follow the example of the rather scurrilous song “The Good Ship Venus”:
“The first mate’s name was Carter
By heck he was a f@rter
When the wind wouldn’t blow
And the ship wouldn’t go
Carter the f@rter would start ‘er”
🙂

Larry
November 2, 2010 9:04 am

This always depended on an ever larger flow of money to keep everybody pointing in the same direction. I just hope that when europe realises how weak our democracies has become to be taken over so easily by such tall tales they strip the EU back to the bare minimum of benefit to its citizens rather than its beaurocrats. There is hardly an institution left on the world stage with any credibility. Pretty much all of them have been selling not only the same problem but the same muppet solution – whatever their expertise is supposed to be. In my view this and the financial crisis are interlinked, the west is heading to insolvency and this is going to be a roller coaster ride.
Maybe there is a bigger point, however. Agriculture freed up people for the industrial revolution. Potentially we now have too many people to be actively employed in industry and agriculture combined. I don’t believe in Malthusian overpopulation, but Moore’s law pretty well shows you can’t just throw resources into advancement. Maybe the human race needs a new challenge – something to keep busy all those idle hands. Space exploration perhaps – something that really would leave a legacy and provide new tools if ever there were a real crisis.

November 2, 2010 9:13 am

Hi Barry
In 1970’s following the 3 day working week and the rota power cuts , were followed by increased birth rate.

November 2, 2010 9:17 am

Hi Barry
Many thanks for posting this article at WUWT, you have helped us to promote this event use in the future.
If there are people wishing to use the name “Climate Fools Day” to drop me a line at ClimateRealists.com, and I will change the heading to promote your event etc.
Gabriel

Alan the Brit
November 2, 2010 9:17 am

The scientific debate has never to my knowledge “moved on”. The politics did for sure. Not the scientific debate, that’s still raging. First of all you send in the sleepers, people who are carefully put forward as this candidate or that candidate for public service, who have your sympathies at heart, they could be scientists, political advisors, people in authority, etc, gradually taking over everywhere political influence can be exercised, any place of authority. Give them money, lots of money, because everyone wants to please their paymasters. The objective, as all good card carrying green socialists will tell you, (who learned from Goebbels so well), is to advance the “political debate” on as quickly as possible, to create a state of fear with a scare story, so that the proletariate will look to you for salvation, shout down your oponents with ridicule, insults & derision, perform a complete character assassination upon them, before your lies & deceptions are discovered, by then of course it’s all too late. They have the power, the money, the control, they have the lot! Tax at will!

Evan Jones
Editor
November 2, 2010 9:24 am

Today the US, and particularly Californians have a chance of reversing the trend, and setting an example to the rest of the world.
But no pressure!

kwik
November 2, 2010 9:24 am

You ask “Who are the Climate Fools?”
I think its easy to answer that.
Anyone who believe a single word that Al Gore says, is a Climate Fool.
Just look at this;
http://translate.google.com/translate?js=n&prev=_t&hl=en&ie=UTF-8&layout=2&eotf=1&sl=sv&tl=en&u=http%3A%2F%2Fgt.expressen.se%2Fnyheter%2F1.2189001%2Fhar-gore-al-pa-tomgang

CRS, Dr.P.H.
November 2, 2010 9:28 am

Well, it doesn’t appear that the investment community have joined the “Climate Fools” club! Here’s some news about the wind-farm industry:
http://www.marketwatch.com/story/first-wind-scraps-ipo-after-price-cut-2010-10-28
*sputter, sputter*

Cold Englishman
November 2, 2010 9:29 am

LabMunkey says:
November 2, 2010 at 6:34 am
Finally- is anyone here following the uk-offshore wind turbine foundation fiasco?? The FOI reports are in and it doesn’t look good for the turbines…..

Yes, as an experienced engineering surveyor, I’d say they have little experience with the vibro loads on these offshore turbines. Having watched hundreds of vibro piles in my time, I’d say we’ll be seeing a few fall over.

November 2, 2010 9:30 am

Vuk etc. says:
November 2, 2010 at 9:13 am
As Dr.”S” would say: That’s only a correlation….only numerology 🙂
However if population increases while power production decreases…troubles ahead will increase and some heads will suddenly decrease, being abruptly separated from its bodies, as it has happened several times in the past……Buy more popcorn! 🙂

Douglas DC
November 2, 2010 9:34 am

Here in Oregon,USA California’s mini-me-we have the possibility of re-electing our old greenie Governor, Kitzhaber , D-Retread, who wants to blow up dams and tear down Coal plants.
No Nukes, either. This man has “Hayduke Lives:” and “Earth First” on his bumper
stickers. Nice to see some sanity somewhere…

November 2, 2010 9:45 am

What we were anticipating here at WUWT: Finally a Computer Model/Game has arrived for everyone to emulate Post Normal Climate “Scientists”:
Fate of the World is a global strategy game that puts our future in your hands. Decide how the world will respond to rising temperatures, heaving populations, dwindling resources, crumbling ecosystems and brave opportunities.
Now there will be a lot of competitors to J.”Trains”H or “Mann-made” Climate Changes:
http://www.fateoftheworld.net/

oldgifford
November 2, 2010 10:01 am

The implications for the UK are analysed at this blog
http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/paulhudson/
Paul is a weather presenter and climate correspondent for BBC Look North in Yorkshire and Lincolnshire. However the BBC rarely give prominence to his website which sheds a critical eye on the climate change claims.

November 2, 2010 10:11 am

Anthony
After importing a word doc into WordPress, I would select all of the text and hit the “remove all formatting” button. Then it becomes a lot easier.
You can still select the rest of the document you missed and do this.
I’d do it but I don’t have the privileges.

Djozar
November 2, 2010 10:27 am

I’m breathlessly awaiting all these “sustainable” energy sources. Maybe Cameron will provide a tree we can all plug into for our energy, as well as gardens with an endless supply of fruit and vegetarian protein. And we’ll get minature flying dragons to get around.
When are these people going to get into the real world? Energy isn’t free or sustainable. Even slaves were worked to death in ancient times instead of being sustained. large animals with teeth and claws aren’t cuddly, and humans evolved to eating meat for a reason.
The only Green movement I’m awaiting is St. Patricks’ day. Don’t like it, move to California; one or two more homeless won’t make a difference.

old44
November 2, 2010 10:38 am

End the climate debate now. Close the 30% of power stations for 6 weeks and then hold a referendum to ask the people if they wish to continue with this madness.

Dave N
November 2, 2010 10:53 am

Britain clearly has Lurgi:
“Greenslade:
Following the dramatic disclosure in Parliament, Dr. Ned Seagoon has been put in full charge of the Anti-Lurgi Campaign.
Moriarty:
…You will need to order 4 million E Flat trombones.
Seagoon:
That’s going to cost something isn’t it?
Moriarty:
Cost! Cost! Lives are at stake, man!
Seagoon:
Yes.
Grytpype:
If you can save Britain from Lurgi the government won’t mind the expenditure.”

Stuart Harmon
November 2, 2010 10:59 am

Posted at Channel 4 1st Nov 2010
Once upon a time a long time ago in a place called London Dr John Snow discovered that cholera was caused by polluted water after an outbreak in Central London. Basil Jet designed one of the greatest engineering projects of the time to take sewage out to sea.
Over the years environmental concerns were addressed throughout the uk whether it be in the work place, asbestos and dust in the mines or the pollution of the seas and water courses.
This did not go far enough and Greenpeace and Friends of the Earth were founded in the 1970’s and in fact raised many issues of concern which were relevant to everyone whatever political persuasion.
Then a problem occurred, a virus spread through the environmental movement the virus known as Superhomos complexus. (Superman complex). This virus affected the central nervous system, whereby normally rational people were overcome with the urge to save the planet, save the whale.
The virus is still virulent but many people are now totally immune to it’s effects albeit there are many who still believe deeply that the world is doomed in 10, 20, 30 or whatever number they make up and so they must fly around the world staying in expensive hotels to save the planet?

Barry Sheridan
November 2, 2010 11:09 am

I doubt Mr Cameron and his coalition have seriously thought about keeping the lights on, if they did they would not have asked Chris Huhne to oversee the country’s energy needs. It would seem as if the political classes here are obsessed with playing games whose logical outcome is to reduce us all to penury and starvation. Still, should it happen we might get warm, for a while at least, burning our ineffectual parliament down.

Northern Exposure
November 2, 2010 11:13 am

Allow me to take this opportunity to express my sincere condolences and heartfelt sympathies to our fellow brothers and sisters across the pond in the UK.
I strongly suggest you gather up your neighbours with axes and chainsaws in hand, and head out to the forests for a “lumberjack party” to start stock piling your new source of heat… You won’t be able to afford to warm your tootsies in front of the heat register anymore.
If that’s not enough, I hear there’s this big ol’ building on Buckingham Palace Road that stocks plenty of firewood…

David A. Evans
November 2, 2010 11:19 am

old44 says:
November 2, 2010 at 10:38 am

End the climate debate now. Close the 30% of power stations for 6 weeks and then hold a referendum to ask the people if they wish to continue with this madness.

In the UK, just let those clowns that tried to shut the station just outside Nottingham close down Drax & the other station about 2 miles away down. Then Ferrybridge, That’s about 9Gw gone. Remember, we’re so marginal here that a single failure during a time when stations are offline for maintenance can drive us over the cliff.
Then wait for the backlash!
DaveE.

Alan Bates
November 2, 2010 11:21 am

Re: Query about FOI request on wind turbine foundations (first raised here by LabMunkey)
I know nothing about this but there is the result of a freedom of information request dated 27 Oct 2010 at:
http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/48432/response/122951/attach/3/EIR%20response%2010%202104%20wind%20turbine%20foundations%2027%2010%202010.pdf
The FOI response is a list of e:mails on the subject. I am in no position to comment on the significance (or otherwise). The e:mails include a link to an article in the (London) Times in April 2010:
“Hundreds of offshore wind turbines could be suffering from a design flaw that makes them sink into the sea”
http://business.timesonline.co.uk/tol/business/industry_sectors/natural_resources/article7096654.ece

DCC
November 2, 2010 11:28 am

The challenge asked the UN and the Prince, who has accused sceptics of “peddling pseudo science”, to prove climate change is happening and is signed by 166 scientists. (including Anthony Watts, …

Surely that’s a misquotation. Anthony is very unlikely to ask for that proof. The issues are causality and, perhaps, magnitude.