Heat Wave In Russia – Is It From Global Warming?
Guest Post by Dr. Roger Pielke Senior, University of Colorado
![]()
Image: NASA Earth Observatory. This map shows temperature anomalies for the Russian Federation from July 20–27, 2010, compared to temperatures for the same dates from 2000 to 2008. The anomalies are based on land surface temperatures observed by the Moderate Resolution Imaging Spectroradiometer (MODIS) on NASA’s Terra satellite. Areas with above-average temperatures appear in red and orange, and areas with below-average temperatures appear in shades of blue. Oceans and lakes appear in gray.
There has been considerable discussion of the heat wave in Russia and of the floods in Pakistan and China as to whether these events are from global warming. Examples of this in the media include
Will Russia’s Heat Wave End Its Global-Warming Doubts? By Simon Shuster / Moscow
Climate change whips up floods, fire and ice by Brian Sullivan and Madelene Pearson
The second article starts with the text
CLIMATE change has been blamed for floods that have killed thousands and left millions homeless from Pakistan to North Korea, fires and a heatwave in Russia that have left 5000 dead and disrupted global food markets, and a severe tropical storm threatening Bermuda.
and includes the statements
The weather drew comment from officials and activists at international climate change talks in Bonn.
One US delegate said Russia’s heatwave and the recent floods that have devastated Pakistan are ”consistent with the kind of changes we would expect to see from climate change and they will only get worse unless we act quickly”.
A new article in the Economist
Green View: A taste of things to come
has a more complete discussion for these weather events. Excerpts from the article includes the text
“The immediate cause of the problems is the behaviour of the jet stream, a band of high-level wind that travels east around the world and influences much of the weather below it. Part of the jet stream’s meandering is tied to regular shifts of air towards and away from the pole, called Rossby waves. The Rossby waves set up wiggles in the jet stream, wiggles which, left to themselves, would move westward. Since the jet stream is flowing eastward, though, the net effect of the Rossby waves varies. When the waves are short, they go with the jet’s flow and the resultant wiggling heads downstream to the east. When they are long they go against the flow, and the jet’s wiggling is transmitted upstream to the west. In between, there is a regime in which the waves move neither west nor east, and the weather stays put.”
Part of the straightforwardness of that analysis is that it treats all the previous years equally. When instead Dr van Oldenborgh takes into account that there has been a general warming trend over those past 60 years the heatwave starts to look less improbable—more like the sort of thing you might expect every century. As the warming trend continues in the future, the chances of such events being repeated more frequently will get higher. A single heatwave cannot be said to have been caused by global climate change; but what is known about climate change says such heatwaves are now more probable than they were.
The intensity of this heatwave has been remarkable. It is hotter than at any time in the instrumental record. According to an analysis by Geert Jan van Oldenborgh of the Royal Netherlands Meteorological Institute a straightforward comparison of the temperatures seen this summer with those of the past 60 years suggests that a large patch of Russia is experiencing temperatures which might be expected only once every 400 years or so. Some places within that patch are hotter than might be expected over several millennia.
In a world where greenhouse warming gets stronger, the tropics expand—an effect the beginning of which has already been observed. The paths of the jet streams to the north and south of the tropics will change in response to this. What that means for the interactions between jet streams and Rossby waves that lead to blocking, though, is unclear. Tony Lupo, an atmospheric scientist from the University of Missouri, has been looking at the question with some Russian colleagues. He says their climate modelling provides some reason to believe blocking effects might become more common in a warmer world, but also less forceful.
The attribution of the heat wave to atmospheric blocking this summer is a scientifically sound conclusion. The heat can occur from
- the advection of hot air from lower latitudes on the west side of a warm core anticyclone
- from compressional warming due to sinking air in the troposphere associated with the warm core anticyclone
- from a larger portion of solar insolation going into sensible versus latent surface heating as result of dry soils and stressed vegetation that occurs due to the absence of rainfall associated with the core of these anticyclones
- from added heating of the atmosphere from the absorption of solar insolation by aerosols from forest fires that occur in this dry environment.
[for a discussion of warm core anticyclones, see
Pielke Sr., R.A. 2002: Synoptic Weather Lab Notes. Colorado State University, Department of Atmospheric Science Class Report #1, Final Version, August 20, 2002.]
However, the statements that the tropics have expanded in recent years and the probabilities that such heat waves are becoming more common has not yet convincingly been made.
Indeed we looked at this issue for the heat wave in Europe in 2003 in the paper
Chase, T.N., K. Wolter, R.A. Pielke Sr., and Ichtiaque Rasool, 2006: Was the 2003 European summer heat wave unusual in a global context? Geophys. Res. Lett., 33, L23709, doi:10.1029/2006GL027470
where we found that the 2003 heat anomaly was particularly extreme near the surface (perhaps due to dry soil) but less anomalous in the rest of the troposphere. Our conclusions were confirmed in
Connolley W.M. 2008: Comment on “Was the 2003 European summer heat wave unusual in a global context?” by Thomas N. Chase et al. Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02703, doi:10.1029/2007GL031171.
We updated our analysis in
Chase, T.N., K. Wolter, R.A. Pielke Sr., and Ichtiaque Rasool, 2008: Reply to comment by W.M. Connolley on ‘‘Was the 2003 European summer heat wave unusual in a global context?’’Geophys. Res. Lett., 35, L02704, doi:10.1029/2007GL031574.
In the Chase et al 2008 paper we reported that
Figure 1 updates Chase et al. [2006] through 2006 for 2.0 and 3.0 SD levels and adds to our original conclusion that 2003 was not very unusual in terms of the spatial coverage of extreme depth-averaged temperatures.
and
However, the addition of three additional summers (2004– 2006) to the time series, all of which appear to be relatively warm, now indicates the possible emergence of an upward trend as suggested in previous work [Stott et al., 2004]. For example 2.0 SD warm anomalies now appear to have an upward trend (p = 0.05) though this trend should be viewed with caution because of the small sample size and the dominant effect of data points at the end of the series. The rise in 3.0 SD anomalies comparable to the 2003 heat wave is, however, still insignificant (p = 0.16) and so the increased probability of such extremes with time suggested by Stott et al. [2004] is not yet apparent.
Tom Chase will be updating this analysis through August 2010 in early September when the data becomes available. Then, instead of qualitative claims about an expanding tropics and a greater frequency of heat waves, actual climate data will be available to quantify whether or not the claims made concerning the tropospheric temperature anomalies are robust or not.
We have certainly seen a warm troposphere this year. The July lower tropospheric temperature anomalies were presented in my August 5 2010 post and the global spatial plot is reproduced below

The heat wave in western Russia is clear in the data along with a substantial warm anomaly in eastern Russia and part of China, as are smaller warm anomalies in other locations worldwide. Only Antarctica has a large negative anomaly [although interestingly, Pakistan has a modest below average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly]
This warmth presents an opportunity in the coming months to assess whether this is really related to a long term global warming related effect, or is due to some other aspects of the climate system (perhaps as modified by spatially heterogeneous forcing due to human activity including land use change and aerosols).
If it is a long term global warming signature, than the global average tropospheric warm anomaly will persist when the blocking pattern is removed. If, however, the lower tropospheric temperatures cool to or below their long term average and this heat cannot be found in the oceans, long term global warming cannot be the culprit. I will report on this early in 2011.

Story from the BBC
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/science-environment-10958760
Their results were startling.
During a warm period 6,000 years ago, the Indus was a monster river, more powerful and more prone to flooding than today.
Then, 4,000 years ago, as the climate cooled, a large part of it simply dried up. Deserts appeared whether mighty torrents once flowed.
Professor Clift believes that this failure of the Indus may have triggered the collapse of the great Harappan civilisation.
The city ruins of Mohenjo-daro, a relict of this lost culture, date from the time when the rivers ran dry.
Start Quote
“Monsoon intensity is somewhat sensitive to the surface temperature of the Indian Ocean”
End Quote
Professor Martin Gibling
Dalhousie University
I read once that some people from the Chamber of Commerce were in Russia doing whatever it is that they do, and they were trying to explain the concept of a Volunteer Fire Dept. The Russians thought that was the silliest idea they had ever heard, the story goes. To “volunteer” time, and “work for free?” Insane.
Perhaps that was just one town. Maybe the story was “overplayed.” I don’t know; it just popped into my head.
So why does CO2 only heat up a little spot in Russia and not the whole globe? I mean it does heat up the air everywhere doesn’t it?
It’s was worse than we thought. Here is a look back at the top world’s worst natural disasters in history along with dates and the number of deaths. No mention of AGW.
66 of the world’s worst natural disasters going back 900 years.
http://across.co.nz/WorldsWorstDisasters.html
Ten worst floods in history
http://library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/flooding/tenworst.shtml
Five worst forest fires (maybe some lit by man?)
http://library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/forestfires/index.shtml
Ten worst hurricanes
http://library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/hurricanes/index.shtml
Ten worst tornadoes
http://library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/tornadoes/tenworst.shtml
——————
And just for fun:
Without drought we would not be here!!!! A geologic perspective.
http://library.thinkquest.org/C003603/english/droughts/index.shtml
The russian heat wave, the european heat wave in 2003, the floods in China, the cold wave during winter (in both hemisphere), are consistent with the fast mode atmospheric circulation according to Marcel Leroux Theory.
Remember, according to DMI, arctic temperatures are cold this summer…
Ouchchen got it! Indeed!
My 2 cents… If I recall correctly, the same thing happened in 2000 when we were coming out of solar minimum, just not as strongly on the scale, as compared to this time.
There was the changing radiation from the increase in output from the sun and the same volcanic eruption (on a lesser scale)…
Global Volcanism Program | Eyjafjallajökull | Summary
http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/volcano.cfm?vnum=1702-02=
An intrusion beneath the south flank from July-December 1999 was accompanied by increased seismic activity and was constrained by tilt measurements, GPS-geodesy and InSAR.
We had the reflective sulfur in the NH stratosphere from the volcano eruptions during the ramp down of solar cycle 22 (which weren’t nearly as big as the ramp down of cycle 23) which had dissipated and dropped down when Eyjafjallajökull eruption loaded the NH troposphere with volcanic ash, gasses and water vapor.
From what I’ve learned, ash aerosol absorbs Ultraviolet, among other things. Ultraviolet radiation is on the increase at times now as this solar cycle is trying to ramp up, same as it was in 2000 after the 1999 eruption of Eyjafjallajökull.
The southern USA is warming up quite nicely also. But head north and you encounter sharp temperature gradients from hot to cold as one would expect after a long, deep solar minimum following a group of larger high altitude eruptions in 2008-2009.
I suspect that’s what’s going on over there. A high level of ash particulate makes clouds and heavy rains in places, sorry all you GCR believers, but its an established fact.
CHAITEN Southern Chile 2008 May 2 4
OKMOK Aleutian Islands 2008 Jul 12 4?
KASATOCHI Aleutian Islands 2008 Aug 7 4
REDOUBT Southwestern Alaska 2009 Mar 22 4
SARYCHEV PEAK Kuril Islands 2009 Jun 11 4
http://www.volcano.si.edu/world/largeeruptions.cfm
There’s nothing unnatural going on here, its just happening on a grander scale than usual this time around because the players involved are also grander.
With regard to the instructive post by ‘Oakwood’ it really is so very simple to check and verify just how regular the stationary hotspots over Russia occur and just how widespread the peat and brush fires were in the historical record.
The obvious holes in the reasoning and theories put forward are little short of amazing, no research into the Russian archives and no peat bog coring histories have been looked at or even tried to verify the written record. Taking simple peat bog core samples will tell anyone who cares to look in great detail all the facts and stats.
The saddest thing about this episode is the utter lack of disciplined scientific method, the narrow perspectives and the refusal to look at the issue in anything other than a very limited way.
Its almost as if the MSM have chosen to listen exclusively to scientists who have made their minds up before gathering all or even any of the evidence needed to reach a balanced and well thought out conclusion. The evidence is waiting to be discovered and the historical record is waiting to be examined but it seems those investigating have already made up their minds in the style of “we dont need no stinking evidence”!
Very sad indeed and an indictment of the modern scientific standards or lack thereof and I would have expected more from Roger Pielke senior and his university, very lazy and poor article IMHO starting out with a predetermined conclusion and then filtering out or excluding unwanted or contradictory evidence. Sorry but that is not science as I understand the term, it is simply narrative building and narrative support.
1[x]64: incredible heat wave in Russian land causes massive crop failure
1[x]65: chronicles wrote: ‘the sun was like blood, and it was spotted black, and mist covered everything. Half a summer heat and drought were great, forests, bogs and lands burning, rivers thinned, some dried out completely (sic!), and there was scare, and terror and great sorrow among all the people’. In fact, heat waves battered land form 1[x]63 through 1[x]68. The latter year was so hot that mist covered land for three months, and fishes in water bodies would die.
1[x]71: even greater drought visited Russia; All the land was covered with smoke from burning peat bogs and forests. People ‘could not see each other as far as 1 sazhen’ (approx 7 feet). Bears, wolves and foxes sought shelter in cities.
1[x]74: chronicle says ‘not a single drop of rain fell throughout entire summer’. Drought was followed by epidemies among people and livestock.
Now, don’t you tell me we have a bad weather nowdays… %)
Btw., who could guess what digit is hidden behind the [x] symbol, and how much did oil cost?
Stephen Wilde says:
August 14, 2010 at 2:41 am
The only change since then is the level of solar activity and I have been proposing for some time that lower solar activity leads to a more negative polar oscillation with stronger polar high pressure cells and jets pushed equatorward.
Hi Steve, in the north that may be true, but down here in the south we are experiencing the most positive phase of the Antarctic Oscillation since records began in 1979. This helps a La Nina phase to grow but is in direct opposition to what’s happening in the Arctic.
Having said that there are big incursions of Antarctic air venturing into Sth America this winter, the normal climate models are not playing the game.
Stephen Wilde says:
August 14, 2010 at 2:41 am
==========================
Stephen, I think you are 100% right
It should be called the Moscow heat wave. Much of Russia has been below normal.
“One US delegate said Russia’s heatwave and the recent floods that have devastated Pakistan are ”consistent with the kind of changes we would expect to see from climate change and they will only get worse unless we act quickly”.”
Well, we know what happens when we act quickly.
The last time we tried that, a lot of Wall St. Bankers got very rich at the expense of million of jobs and homeowners.
Nyet.
The NASA Earth Observatory image shows “global warming” to be rather selective. Would someone care to explain a mechanism of increased CO2 that could create this selective behavior? (or perhaps the CIA is behind it).
When I was a li’l kid in 50’s, Dad bought me a translation of a Russian book entitled “Changing Our Planet”. Of course, there was a load of ideology about how the Siberian rivers will be turned sothward to water the Asian deserts etc., but related to the Big Changes there was also a lot of information about various natural disasters in Russia, that would be averted by the future clever engineering of the Nature.
However, I still remember reading about terrible droughts in the past,burning forests and crops and bringing famine in the otherwise fertile chernozem regions around Volga, just as it happens now. A dry hot wind was mentioned named “sukhovyey” that dried leaves on the trees before your eyes. Even winds carrying black soil instead of rain were observed. I was quite happy that I did not live there, as such extreme weather conditions did not occur in the central Europe due to Atlantic influence.
So this situation in Russia is definitely nothing entirely new.
Heat Wave In Russia – Is It From Global Warming?
Guest Post by Dr. Roger Pielke Senior, University of Colorado
Thank You Dr. Pielke.
_________________________
Ref – oakwood says:
August 14, 2010 at 1:32 am
“In a recent Guardian article relating to the Russia fires, there was an interesting post by Trofim, indicating the fires a not all unusual…”
Thank you! These brief entries tell more in a few words than Mann-kind does in a whole book.
_____________________
Ref – Icarus says:
August 14, 2010 at 3:37 am
“Extreme weather events are part of a probability distribution –… we don’t have to wait for lots more extreme weather events to come along before we can say that the probability of such events has increased – we can see that the whole probability distribution has shifted and conclude with confidence that the extremes are changing too.”
Tealeaves decay over time. Same for probabilities. At this point in human development, ‘Probability’ distribution is only good for short timeframes. Mann-kind would be better off forcasting climate in 5 Year Packages. In so many ways we’re still looking at the shadows on the back of the cave wall and guessing very poorly about the ‘what it is’ that causing them.
____________________
Ref -NeilT says:
August 14, 2010 at 4:00 am
“How frequent does it have to get to catch your attention? Every other week? By then the biosphere won’t support humans at all. How does that help anything?”
I have a feeling that AGW would then not be a problem. But here, now? I’m just trying to stay cool – it’s going to 101-102 today. (111-112 if you use that humidity thing) I have a feeling that Mother Nature could support us if there were 5 billion less of us, heck, maybe she could do it if we were back down around 50K. Not to worry! Even dinosaurs die off sometimes; why should we complain?
Again, the Alarmists make fools of themselves. The current warm-core anticyclone has its genesis in the mid-latitudes, and not the tropics. Something similiar is occuring over North America. These are called blocks, or blocking highs. The physics are quite simple. Once a blocking high establishes itself, large areas of adiabatic warming occur. When these blocks are located over land, the effects are even more pronounced. Droughts, and extensive heatwaves occur. When these blocks persist, the air becomes stagnant. In areas up and downstream, high level cyclones pull cool air equatorward. The Jetstream also shifts equatorward. It is not unusual for areas either up or down stream of a block to see the opposite (unusually cold or wet weather patterns).
So heat 150 years ago and floods 150 years ago were not caused by CO2 and now they are?
Thanks Oakwood.
Hey, is there any way to get historical perspective on extreme weather events like this onto the Our Climate App? I heard you guys run it 🙂
I am guessing that cooler ocean temps not only moves the jet stream around but also slows the jet stream down thus reducing the amount of water vapor and precipitable cloud/pressure systems that ride that stream and fall as moisture on land. A faster jet stream keeps the weather more variable so that hot and cold spells are short. When the jet stream is slow, our naturally arid land (compared to the oceans) are allowed to dry out, resulting in prolonged hot temps during the warm season, and frigid temps during the cold season. Wonder what the water vapor index has been that allowed Russia’s peat to dry out? Wouldn’t be CO2 related, because that causes more water vapor to rise from the oceans.
The jet stream appears quite weak at the moment.
http://squall.sfsu.edu/gif/jetstream_norhem_00.gif
Notice that the lack of water vapor in Russia is exactly where the heat wave is, so CO2 can’t be the driver here. If this keeps up, fall will be marked by early frigid temperatures. What below average precip there is will fall as snow, and lakes and rivers will freeze hard. It will not be a pleasant winter in Russia. And the monsoons that caused Pakistan and Southern China to flood could turn into nasty cold winter weather there as well, with much of their usually rainy weather turned into rare blizzards.
http://www.ssec.wisc.edu/data/comp/wv/LATEST_WV.gif
Steven, your nose is growing. Most of Russia is having a heatwave. A heatwave with temperatures 10 – 18 degC higher than average.
About 1/3 of Russia is experiencing temperatures 1-3 DegC lower than normal.
Stop trying to pedal something which isn’t true.
Scarlet Pumpernickel
Yes CO2 does heat up the whole planet. That’s why 2010 is hotter than both 1998 and 2005 for the first half of the year (globally). We’ll just have to see how the “whole planet” fares for the rest of the year.
Oh and for the record, Russia, Germany, the Netherlands, the easter seaboroard of the US, Australia, Pakistan, the whole of the middle east and India have all recorded heatwaves this year. Russia, Pakistan, several states in the US and several countries in the Middle East have also recorded record all time record high temperatures this year.
Geoff Sharp said:
“Hi Steve, in the north that may be true, but down here in the south we are experiencing the most positive phase of the Antarctic Oscillation since records began in 1979. This helps a La Nina phase to grow but is in direct opposition to what’s happening in the Arctic.”
Thanks Geoff but I’ve noticed that and consider it to be a short term effect of the recent El Nino which has more power in the southern hemisphere and so gives a harder push poleward than in the north.
As you then point out the Antarctic incursions of cold air towards the equator show the effect of the quiet sun pushing back.
Longer term and separating out the ENSO effect I believe my account still holds.
It’s a matter of balancing oceanic and solar effects globally with the two hemispheres responding a bit differently due to the different land/ocean proportions.
The anecdotes from people of note in their time, from Oakwood, is a lovely counter to the alarmist non-science. The more we look at weather the more we understand the world’s past; the more we understand and know about the past the less beievable the catastrophists become.
85 5th grade scientists say the fires are not caused by CO2. Fires are caused by a combustible, an ignition source and O2 and create heat and CO2.
Let Joe Romm know that fires increase CO2. This smoke is not from automotive exhaust.
How much of this Russian even remained on the European side of the Ural mountains?