Sea Ice News #11

“Steepest slope ever.”

By Steven Goddard

We have been hearing a lot about how the decline in Arctic ice is following the “steepest slope ever.” The point is largely meaningless, but we can have some fun with it. The Bremen Arctic/Antarctic maps are superimposed above, showing that ice in the Antarctic is at a record high and growing at the “steepest slope ever.You will also note that most of the world’s sea ice is located in the Antarctic. But those are inconvenient truths when trying to frighten people into believing that “the polar ice caps are melting.”

There are several favorite lines of defense when trying to rationalize away the record Antarctic ice.

1. It is the Ozone Hole – which is also the fault of evil, American SUV drivers. That is a nice guilt trip, but sadly the Ozone Hole doesn’t form until August and is gone by December. Strike one.

The next one is to point out that some regions of the west side of the tiny Antarctic Peninsula have been warming. Never mind that the Antarctic Peninsula is an active volcanic ridge, and that the waters around it have not shown any significant warming. Strike two.

RSS temperature trends

UAH shows Antarctica cooling slightly over the last 30 years.

The third favorite line of defense is to argue that “we expected Antarctica to warm more slowly because of the mass of the southern oceans.” Nice try – “slower warming” is not the same as “cooling.” Strike three.

(The AGW view of Antarctica is every bit as irrational as FIFA’s stand that not having instant replays somehow helps the referees’ reputations.)

On to the Arctic. First graph is a JAXA comparison of 2006, 2007 and 2010. Note that 2006 and 2007 were nearly identical, until early July. The main difference between 2006 (second highest in the JAXA record) and 2007 (lowest in the JAXA record) was that strong southerly winds compacted and melted the ice in 2007. As you can see below, the summer extent numbers are nearly meaningless before July/August. So far, 2010 is tracking very closely with both 2006 and 2007, and it appears the three will intersect in about a week.

Let’s take a closer look at the mechanisms using the PIPS ice and wind data. If we watch the movement of Arctic ice during the summer, we can see that when the winds blow away from the pole (i.e. from the north) the ice expands. When the wind blows from the south, the ice contracts. Some summers, the winds alternate between north and south, and the ice extent changes less during the summer – like in 2000 below.

Other years, like 2007, the summer winds blew consistently from the south, causing the ice to melt at a faster pace and compress towards the north.

So basically, it is weather (wind) rather than climate which controls the summer minimum. Of course, it is harder to compress and melt thick ice than thin ice – so the thickness of the ice is important. It is too early to determine if 2010 will see winds like 2007, or if summer winds this year will be more like 2006.

No one has demonstrated much skill at forecasting winds six weeks in the future, so it is really anybody’s guess what wil happen this summer. Before August arrives, the pattern should be clear.

The video below shows ice movement near Barrow, AK over the past 10 days.

The winds were blowing strongly and contracting the ice edge until the last few days, when they died down. Over the past two or three days, the ice edge has not moved very much.

Over the last week, almost all of the ice loss in the Arctic has been in the Hudson Bay, as seen in the modified NSIDC image below in red. The Hudson Bay is normally almost ice free in September, so the recent losses are are almost meaningless with respect to the summer minimum.

The modified NSIDCimage below shows ice loss since early April. All of the areas shown in red are normally ice free in September.

The modified NSIDC image below is a comparison of 2010 vs 2007. Areas of red had more ice in 2007. Areas of green have more ice in 2010.

The modified NSIDC image below shows the current deficiencies in red. Again, all of those areas are normally ice free in September, so they don’t tell us much about the summer minimum.

Below is my forecast for the remainder of the summer.

But it all depends on the wind.

From The New York Times, 1969

From the 9th century to the 13th century almost no ice was reported there. This was the period- of Norse colonization of’ Iceland and Greenland. Then, conditions worsened and the Norse colonies declined. After the Little Ice Age of 1650 to 1840 the ice began to vanish near Iceland and had almost disappeared when the trend re versed, disastrously crippling Icelandic fisheries last year.

From The New York Times, 2000

The thick ice that has for ages covered the Arctic Ocean at the pole has turned to water, recent visitors there reported yesterday. At least for the time being, an ice-free patch of ocean about a mile wide has opened at the very top of the world, something that has presumably never before been seen by humans and is more evidence that global warming may be real and already affecting climate. The last time scientists can be certain the pole was awash in water was more than 50 million years ago.

Is it possible that the IPCC is trying to rewrite the history books?


Sponsored IT training links:

Guaranteed success in 350-029 exam with latest 70-290 questions and 642-974 practice test!


Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
300 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Enneagram
June 28, 2010 12:23 pm

Ask Al Baby, being a Nobel laurate, he is supposed to have a wider than an ocean knowledge than us….but with just a 1/64 of an inch deep.

June 28, 2010 12:28 pm

It’s odd the ozone hole follows the sun so much …. something I recall about the balance of UV-A and UV-B causing and destroying the ozone hole, but that’s old science now.
The other thing I never understood is ice floats, and the wind blows floating ice around? When was that discovered.

dbleader61
June 28, 2010 12:28 pm

Excellent analyis Steve. Can expect a lot of comment on the summer BBQ circuit on the 2010 arctic ice situation. Your ice reports provide all the data I need. Super imposing the arctic and antartic ice extent is especially illuminating.
Keep this info coming.

An Inquirer
June 28, 2010 12:29 pm

Two or three months ago, I thought it was rather brave of Gates to forecast the minimum for summer ice to be at the 2007 record level. Last month, I thought it was more than brave — I thought it was reckless — for Steve Goddard to forecast the summer minimum to be close to the top of the six years.
I myself do not venture a forecast. Too much depends upon wind and ocean currents, and we have some vague understanding on the role of soot — but no more than vague. As Steve suggests, we can wait a few weeks to see, rather than getting upset and angry at people with different expectations.

Ray
June 28, 2010 12:32 pm

Just for fun I did the first derivative of the ice extent on the JAXA graph. The rate of decline has passed its peak around the 10th of June… so the decline speed is actually slowing down already.

Douglas DC
June 28, 2010 12:33 pm

All these scary predictions are very similar to a certain “end times” cult that predicted
the end in 1975. There was a local preacher here in my home town that was preaching this to the faithful. They sold their properties, their cars, and went up to the hilltop and
waited-I think it was 2:00 pm, May 12, or something like it. So, the Sun went down
and rose on the 13th, just has it has for Eons,-no second coming, no flying saucers, not
even a Klingon Battle fleet. Oh well.
We are watching the dying of a Cult….
I was hoping for Klingons, by the way….

Casper
June 28, 2010 12:33 pm

Steven,
I will remember your forecast for ice minimum extension. We are living in interesting times.

Henry chance
June 28, 2010 12:36 pm

They could be correct. We only have what, 30 years of data sets?
Drama is a poor substitute for data.
In several centuries, we should have a pattern for what could be consider a normal range of fluctuation.

June 28, 2010 12:57 pm

The videos won’t play for me when viewed in Chrome. Is anyone else having that problem?
Reply: They work fine for me with Chrome. Still using XP. You may need to update your Flash Player. ~ ctm

Enneagram
June 28, 2010 12:58 pm

What if the water cycle is not closed but opened?. During summer time above the pole and due to increased radiation, atmosphere´s oxygen is turned into Ozone (O3), which during winter time and specially when there are proton flares from the sun or increased cosmic rays, as during solar minimums (mainly composed of protons-90%-, which, btw, we must remember are Hydrogen Nucleii), and these react with ozone to produce water 2H+…O3=H2O+O2 and originate the “Ozone Hole” , then snow fall increases ice. So we have an ice cube making machine.

toby
June 28, 2010 12:59 pm

I’m with “An Inquirer”. We need to wait and see in a spirit of scientific curiosity.
Calling strident attention to a prospective record, or trying to decry it before it happens, are both misplaced.

starzmom
June 28, 2010 12:59 pm

Has the New York Times forgotten that there are archives even if they choose not to look at them?

Julienne
June 28, 2010 1:31 pm

Ray says:
June 28, 2010 at 12:32 pm
Just for fun I did the first derivative of the ice extent on the JAXA graph. The rate of decline has passed its peak around the 10th of June… so the decline speed is actually slowing down already.
————————
The first derivative from NSIDC’s data does not show the speed has now slowed (June 1 to June 27):
-0.12163
-0.06582
-0.06406
-0.08711
-0.04721
-0.11067
-0.02197
-0.12449
-0.0832
-0.09121
-0.09059
-0.05856
-0.04369
-0.04009
-0.03826
-0.07863
-0.06003
-0.14218
-0.10832
-0.18452
-0.07408
-0.06356
-0.0751
-0.12348
-0.11984
-0.0923
-0.14786

Editor
June 28, 2010 1:34 pm

As Steve notes, Antarctic Sea Ice Extent continues to increase rapidly and is currently well above average, and significantly exceeds NSIDC’s misleadingly narrow “normal” range:
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_stddev_timeseries.png
Antarctic Sea Ice Area has been trending up and the anomaly now appears to the largest on record, save for the record Antarctic Sea Ice freeze that occurred in 2007 – 2008:
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/seaice.anomaly.antarctic.png
Antarctic Sea Ice Extent trend for the month of May since 1979 also shows the increase, and that the last 3 years represent the only sustained peak in the historical record:
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/s_plot_hires.png
Here is a good visualization/map of the positive Antarctic Sea Ice Extent Anomaly; http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_bm_extent_hires.png
and in the map above there seems to be a lot of extra ice off the coast of Queen Maud Land and to its East;
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_Maud_Land
which also calls into questions claims that recent increases in Antarctic Sea Ice are primarily in the Ross Sea and caused by Ozone or the lack thereof:
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/antarctic_melting.html
In addition to near record Extent and Area, Antarctic Sea Ice Concentration also seems quite high;
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_daily_concentration_hires.png
as compared to 2007, when the previous record high Area and Extent occurred:
http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/S_record_concentration_hires.png
All of this might have something to do with the fact that Ocean temperatures are plummeting and still have a ways to go down;
http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/AMSRE-SST-Global-and-Nino34-thru-June-17-2010.gif
because an El Nino has just ended;
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2010/05/13/r-i-p-el-nino/
and the PDO is now in its 30 year cool phase:
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/04/29/nasa-pdo-flip-to-cool-phase-confirmed-cooler-times-ahead/
I have been considering whether Arctic or Antarctic Sea Ice offers a more accurate proxy of Earth’s current temperature and temperature trend, and I think it’s Antarctic Sea Ice. The primary reason for this conclusion is that large portion an Antarctic Sea Ice melts each year as you can see in this video complements of Mr. Goddard;

thus in a way Antarctic sea ice resets/recalibrates each year, offering more accurate readings as compared to the Arctic sea ice, which suffers from the impact and memory of major non-temperature related events such as occurred in 2007.
Can anyone offer a counterpoint as to why they think Arctic Sea Ice offers a better proxy for Earth’s temperature and/or temperature trend?

Tenuc
June 28, 2010 1:37 pm

Thanks for doing the latest update Steven.
Arctic-ROOS are still tracking almost exactly the 2007 pattern – will be interesting to see where we end up!

Ian W
June 28, 2010 1:37 pm

you ask: “Is it possible that the IPCC is trying to rewrite the history books?”
They would have to read the history before they could rewrite it.
The AGW proponent position seems to be that nothing exists prior to the satellite era except tree rings, ice-cores and other unvalidated proxies.

Tenuc
June 28, 2010 1:38 pm
Pamela Gray
June 28, 2010 1:42 pm

Goodness, some folks really hold this close to the chest. I for one love the discussion and speculation on both sides of the isle. I also don’t care whether or not someone changes their prediction. What is more important to me is that when it happens, the person should offer up an explanation for why his/her prediction did not come true or likely won’t, and why he/she is changing the prediction (IE what parameters were not taken into consideration with the former prediction and what parameters are now being considered in making a new prediction). This openness to learning informs my own learning and understanding. Folks who change their prediction and are absolutely transparent and explanatory about it are of high value to me.
IMO, under those preferred circumstances outlined above, it behooves those of us who have made predictions and have stuck by them but that ended up way off, to post what learnings they gleened from the exercise of predicting something, and being significantly outside the bullseye. I challenge both sides of the debate of be prepared to do that on this blog.

Roald
June 28, 2010 1:44 pm

There’s no doubt that the wind has some influence in the Arctic sea ice extent, but it can’t explain the negative trend:
http://nsidc.org/images/arcticseaicenews/20091005_Figure3.png

Dave
June 28, 2010 2:06 pm

Didn’t I see photos of submarines at an ice free pole in 1958?
Or was that photo taken in 50,000,000 BC?

June 28, 2010 2:09 pm

Julienne
I expect that when the Hudson Bay ice disappears during the next week or so, that the slope will start to drop off.

June 28, 2010 2:11 pm

Tenuc
The pattern so far is similar to 2007. And it is also similar to 2006. Opposite meanings.

Richard M
June 28, 2010 2:13 pm

“So basically, it is weather (wind) rather than climate which controls the summer minimum.”
Sounds pretty much like what I said about a month ago. Go figure.

June 28, 2010 2:17 pm

Roald
There seems to be some control which keeps global sea ice fairly constant.
Rather than coming up with stupid explanations for what is happening in Antarctica, it would be nice if polar researchers would try to come up with a unified theory for this:
http://arctic.atmos.uiuc.edu/cryosphere/IMAGES/global.daily.ice.area.withtrend.jpg

Ray
June 28, 2010 2:22 pm

Julienne says:
June 28, 2010 at 1:31 pm
______________
Look at the change of slope (Y2-Y1)/((X2/X1). Of course (X2/X1) = 1. So it is the difference in ice area between days that I was talking about.

1 2 3 12