Arctic Sea Ice about to hit 'normal' – what will the news say?

Forecasting The NSIDC News

By Steven Goddard and Anthony Watts

Barring an about face by nature or adjustments, it appears that for the first time since 2001, Arctic Sea ice will hit the “normal” line as defined by the National Snow and Ice Data Center (NSIDC) for this time of year.

NSIDC puts out an article about once a month called the Sea Ice News.  It generally highlights any bad news they can find about the disappearance of Arctic ice.  Last month’s news led with this sentence.

In February, Arctic sea ice extent continued to track below the average, and near the levels observed for February 2007.

But March brought good news for the Polar Bears, and bad news for the Catlin Expedition and any others looking for bad news.  Instead of ice extent declining through March like it usually does, it continued to increase through the month and is now at the high (so far) for the year.

If it keeps this trend unabated, in a day or two it will likely cross the “normal” line.

Source: NSIDC North Series

The Danish Meteorological Institute shows Arctic ice extent at the highest level in their six year record.

Source: DMI Ice Extent

The Norwegians (NORSEX) show Arctic ice area above the 30 year mean.

Source: NORSEX Ice Area

And the NORSEX Ice Extent is not far behind, within 1 standard deviation, and similar to NSIDC’s presentation. Note that is hit normal last year, but later.

Source: NORSEX Ice Extent

And JAXA, using the more advanced AMSR-E sensor platform on the AQUA satellite, shows a similar uptick now intersecting the 2003 data line.

Source: IARC-JAXA

WUWT asked NSIDC scientist Dr. Walt Meir about this event to which he responded via email:

It’s a good question about the last time we’ve been above average. It was May 2001. April-May is the period when you’re starting to get into the peak of the melt season for the regions outside of the Arctic Ocean (Bering Sea, Hudson Bay) and the extent tends to have lower  variability compared to other parts of the year as that thinner ice  tends to go about the same time of year due to the solar heating. Even  last year, we came fairly close to the average in early May.

He also mused about a cause:

Basically, it is due primarily to a lot more ice in the Bering Sea, as is evident in the images. The Bering ice is controlled largely by local winds, temperatures are not as important (though of course it still need to be at or at least near freezing to have ice an area for any length of time). We’ve seen a lot of northerly winds this winter in the Bering, particularly the last couple of weeks.

As we’ve been saying on WUWT for quite some time, wind seems to be a more powerful factor in recent sea ice declines than temperature. Recent studies agree.

See: Winds are Dominant Cause of Greenland and West Antarctic Ice Sheet Losses and also NASA Sees Arctic Ocean Circulation Do an About-Face

You can watch wind patterns in this time lapse animation, note how the ice has been pushed by winds and flowing down the east coast of Greenland:

Animation of Arctic sea-ice being pushed by wind patterns - CLICK IMAGE TO VIEW ANIMATION- Above image is not part of original story, but included to demonstrate the issue. Note that the animation is large, about 7 MB and may take awhile to load on your computer. It is worth the wait Source: National Snow and Ice Data Center

Dr. Meier also wrote:

This has very little implication for what will happen this summer, or  for the long-term trends, since the Bering Sea ice is thin and will melt completely well before the peak summer season.

There’s certainly no reason to disagree with the idea that much of the Bering Sea ice will melt this summer, it happens every year and has for millenia. But with a strong negative Arctic Oscillation this year, and a change in the wind, it is yet to be determined if Arctic Sea ice minimum for 2010 is anomalously low, and/or delayed from the usual time.

In 2009, WUWT noted it on September 15th: Arctic sea ice melt appears to have turned the corner for 2009

Dr. Mark Serreze of NSIDC offered some hopeful commentary in a press release back on October 6th 2009, but still pushes that “ice free summer” meme:

“It’s nice to see a little recovery over the past couple of years, but there’s no reason to think that we’re headed back to conditions seen in the 1970s,” said NSIDC Director Mark Serreze, also a professor in CU-Boulder’s geography department. “We still expect to see ice-free summers sometime in the next few decades.”

Remember this 2007 prediction from The Naval Postgraduate School?

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/7139797.stm

==============================

Arctic summers ice-free ‘by 2013’

By Jonathan Amos

Science reporter, BBC News, San Francisco

Arctic summer melting in 2007 set new records

Scientists in the US have presented one of the most dramatic forecasts yet for the disappearance of Arctic sea ice.

Their latest modelling studies indicate northern polar waters could be ice-free in summers within just 5-6 years.

Professor Wieslaw Maslowski told an American Geophysical Union meeting that previous projections had underestimated the processes now driving ice loss.

Summer melting this year reduced the ice cover to 4.13 million sq km, the smallest ever extent in modern times.

Remarkably, this stunning low point was not even incorporated into the model runs of Professor Maslowski and his team, which used data sets from 1979 to 2004 to constrain their future projections.

In the end, it will just melt away quite suddenly
Professor Peter Wadhams

“Our projection of 2013 for the removal of ice in summer is not accounting for the last two minima, in 2005 and 2007,” the researcher from the Naval Postgraduate School, Monterey, California, explained to the BBC.”So given that fact, you can argue that may be our projection of 2013 is already too conservative.”

========================================

Joe Romm wrote up a clever piece last year on this subject:

Exclusive: New NSIDC director Serreze explains the “death spiral” of Arctic ice, brushes off the “breathtaking ignorance” of blogs like WattsUpWithThat

June 5, 2009

I interviewed by email Dr. Mark Serreze, recently named director of The National Snow and Ice Data Center.  Partly I wanted him to explain his “death spiral” metaphor for Arctic ice

So now that Arctic ice has returned to normal extent and area, we eagerly await the explanation from the experts about how that fits into the “death spiral” theory.  Richard Feynman famously said “Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts.”

Time will tell. 2010 is looking promising for sea ice recovery again. After all, who wouldn’t want the Arctic Sea ice to recover? WUWT is predicting a recovery again this year, which we started mentioning as a prediction last fall.

So given what we know today, what will NSIDC highlight in their April Sea Ice News?

And even more importantly, will the MSM cover it like they do the ‘terrible’ minimums?

NOTE: The poll code got messed up, duplicating an entry, press REFRESH if you see a double entry. -A

Forecasting The NSIDC News

NSIDC puts out an article about once a month called the Sea Ice News.  It generally highlights any bad news they can find about the disappearance of Arctic ice.  Last month’s news led with this sentence.

In February, Arctic sea ice extent continued to track below the average, and near the levels observed for February 2007.

But March brought good news for the Polar Bears, and bad news for the Catlin Expedition and any others looking for bad news.  Instead of ice extent declining through March like it usually does, it continued to increase through the month and is now at the high (so far) for the year.

http://nsidc.org/data/seaice_index/images/daily_images/N_stddev_timeseries.png

The Danish Meteorological Institute shows Arctic ice extent at the highest level in their six year record.

DMI Ice Extent

The Norwegians (NORSEX) show Arctic ice area above the 30 year mean.

NORSEX Ice Area

Joe Romm wrote up a clever piece last year on this subject:

Exclusive: New NSIDC director Serreze explains the “death spiral” of Arctic ice, brushes off the “breathtaking ignorance” of blogs like WattsUpWithThat

June 5, 2009

I interviewed by email Dr. Mark Serreze, recently named director of The National Snow and Ice Data Center.  Partly I wanted him to explain his “death spiral” metaphor for Arctic ice

So now that Arctic ice has returned to normal extent and area, I eagerly await the explanation from the experts about how that fits into the “death spiral” theory.  Richard Feynman famously said “Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts.”

So what will NSIDC highlight in their April Sea Ice News?

  • The increase in both ice extent and quantity of multi-year ice

  • The long-term downwards linear trend line

  • The lack of 4+ year old ice


Sponsored IT training links:

Get free resources including 642-972 tutorial and 1z0-048 dumps questions for guaranteed success in JN0-532 exam.


Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
382 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Carbone
March 31, 2010 3:09 pm
David Segesta
March 31, 2010 3:11 pm

“Arctic Sea Ice about to hit ‘normal’ – what will the news say?”
They’ll say it’s our fault.

Alexej Buergin
March 31, 2010 3:13 pm

Does anyone know the answers?
1) Were the results of Polar 5 ever published?
2) Will there be a Polar 6?
3) Will there be a 2010 competition of the professionals about arctic sea ice?

kwik
March 31, 2010 3:16 pm

R. Gates (13:50:54) :
“I find it funny that AGW skeptics get all excited from a few weeks of upswing in the arctic sea ice, while all the while they’ll ignore nearly a decade of downswing…very revealing.”
Yes, and what does it reveal, Mr. Gates? That we are happy with life and prosperity, and you like to be Doom’ed?

Editor
March 31, 2010 3:17 pm

Here’s the NSIDC’s maximum and minimum press releases for the last 7 years. I await their forthcoming press release with bated breath:
December 7, 2002 – Arctic Sea Ice Shrinking, Greenland ice sheet melting, according to study
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20021207_seaice.html
8 December 2003 – Arctic Sea Ice Low, Second Year in a Row
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20031208_minimum.html
4 October 2004 – Arctic Sea Ice Decline Continues
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20041004_decline.html
18 March 2005 – Arctic Ice Decline in Summer and Winter
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20050318_arcdec.html
28 September 2005 – Sea Ice Decline Intensifies
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20050928_trendscontinue.html
5 April 2006 – Winter Sea Ice Fails to Recover, Down to Record Low
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20060404_winterrecovery.html
3 October 2006 – Arctic Sea Ice Shrinks as Temperatures Rise
http://nsidc.org/news/press/2006_seaiceminimum/20061003_pressrelease.html
4 April 2007 – Arctic Sea Ice Narrowly Misses Wintertime Record Low
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20070403_winterrecovery.html
1 October 2007 – Arctic Sea Ice Shatters All Previous Record Lows
http://nsidc.org/news/press/2007_seaiceminimum/20071001_pressrelease.html
April 7, 2008 – Arctic sea ice extent at maximum below average, thin
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2008/040708.html
2 October 2008 – Arctic Sea Ice Down to Second-Lowest Extent; Likely Record-Low Volume
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20081002_seaice_pressrelease.html
March 30, 2009 – Annual maximum ice extent confirmed – This year’s maximum was the fifth lowest in the satellite record.
http://nsidc.org/arcticseaicenews/2009/033009.html
6 October 2009 – Arctic sea ice extent remains low; 2009 sees third-lowest mark
http://nsidc.org/news/press/20091005_minimumpr.html
Let me help, “Arctic Sea Ice Narrowly Misses 13th Lowest Extent Ever, Likely Record-Low Volume of 4th Year Ice, Trend Indicates Ice Free Arctic Still Likely…” Can I get me one of those government grants now?

Jimbo
March 31, 2010 3:18 pm

Lovelock: ‘We can’t save the planet’
Professor James Lovelock, the scientist who developed Gaia theory, has said it is too late to try and save the planet.
The man who achieved global fame for his theory that the whole earth is a single organism now believes that we can only hope that the earth will take care of itself in the face of completely unpredictable climate change.
Interviewed by Today presenter John Humphrys, videos of which you can see below, he said that while the earth’s future was utterly uncertain, mankind was not aware it had “pulled the trigger” on global warming as it built its civilizations.

Meanwhile Arctic sea ice extent is in recovery, Antarctic ice doing nicely, the Earth has witnessed higher levels of CO2 in the past.
“utterly uncertain” – “mankind was not aware it had “pulled the trigger””
What a crock!

Jimbo
March 31, 2010 3:19 pm

Lovelock: ‘We can’t save the planet’
Professor James Lovelock, the scientist who developed Gaia theory, has said it is too late to try and save the planet.
The man who achieved global fame for his theory that the whole earth is a single organism now believes that we can only hope that the earth will take care of itself in the face of completely unpredictable climate change.
Interviewed by Today presenter John Humphrys, videos of which you can see below, he said that while the earth’s future was utterly uncertain, mankind was not aware it had “pulled the trigger” on global warming as it built its civilizations.

Meanwhile Arctic sea ice extent is in recovery, Antarctic ice doing nicely, the Earth has witnessed higher levels of CO2 in the past.
“utterly uncertain” – “mankind was not aware it had “pulled the trigger””
http://news.bbc.co.uk/today/hi/today/newsid_8594000/8594561.stm
What a crock!

jorgekafkazar
March 31, 2010 3:20 pm

R. Gates (13:50:54) : “I find it funny that AGW skeptics get all excited from a few weeks of upswing in the arctic sea ice, while all the while they’ll ignore nearly a decade of downswing…very revealing.”
Except there have been more than a few weeks of upswing. More like years, now. I find it very funny that AGW faithful get excited about a few years of downswing in Arctic ice, and have to resort to making up terms like “flippy-floppy” and “rotten” ice. Very revealing.
“this is a most interesting spring, and should be a very interesting summer as well…”
I agree, Mr. Gates!

RockyRoad
March 31, 2010 3:25 pm

That is an excellent paper by Lubos Motl referenced above by DirkH. While it’s a bit intense mathematically, let me summarize his findings (chime in if I’m wrong):
The bottom line (and why AGW is dead) involves what they call a “black body”, which gives off 100% of the heat it contains. But if the curves they’re using over at the IPCC to support AGW exceeds those imposed by a “black body”, then their calculations are impossible (because Earth is less than a black body), and their theory is bogus. That’s the bottom line to his argument, which is very eloquently demonstrated.
Or another way of saying it, a “black body”, being the perfect emitter, puts the limits around what is possible. The earth and every planet falls within these theoretical limits. However, the curves used by the IPCC in their calculations fall outside those limits. Rather a difficult thing to justify (it would require that our earth be “blacker” than a “black body”).
The article by Lubos is the most convincing argument I’ve seen yet that the IPCC and their theory of global warming is bogus. And it is sufficiently straight forward that almost any scientist can see why they’re in error.
And while the link was given above, here it is again:
http://motls.blogspot.com/2010/03/black-body-limits-climate-sensitivity.html

RockyRoad
March 31, 2010 3:34 pm

Lovelock’s Uncertainty Principle?
“utterly uncertain” – “mankind was not aware it had “pulled the trigger””
Ok… Now let me get this straight. Here’s a guy who is “utterly uncertain”… meaning completly clueless and demonstrably demented, and he’s convinced mankind has “pulled the trigger”? The trigger to what? Add when and where was this “trigger” pulled?
Who on earth pays these guys to come up with such patently unintelligible gobbledygook??

Carbon Dioxide
March 31, 2010 3:37 pm

Snow and an ice storm in Northern Ireland yesterday and today. 100.000 homes effect by power outages caused by ice bringing down power cables. The Glenshane pass across the Sperrin Mountains closed last night due to snow, (and my car is now iced up and will need a bump start to get it running tomorrow.
On the plus side, the fence I put up yesterday survived last night’s 80mph windy ice storm.

Jimbo
March 31, 2010 3:43 pm

R. Gates (13:50:54)
I find it funny that AGW skeptics get all excited from a few weeks of upswing in the arctic sea ice, while all the while they’ll ignore nearly a decade of downswing…very revealing.

According to AGW climate scientists climate is 30 years +. In 2007 we had record loss of Arctic ice, caused mostly by wind and currents (since satellite data – 1979) and warmists were “excited” about the loss and it was trumpeted around the globe as a sign of global warming – “worse than we thought.”
Have you ever thought that the “downswing” might be part of natural variability which we have had since climate change began billions of years ago?
Arctic ice loss is nothing new and much of it occured while we were still in the stone age without SUVs. Read and learn:
Arctic ice melting is nothing unusual
http://www.ngu.no/en-gb/Aktuelt/2008/Less-ice-in-the-Arctic-Ocean-6000-7000-years-ago/
http://www.navsource.org/archives/08/08578.htm
http://www.icue.com/portal/site/iCue/flatview/?cuecard=41751
http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/RS_Arctic.htm
http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1078291/
http://co2science.org/articles/V12/N32/C2.php
http://www.usgs.gov/newsroom/article.asp?ID=2372
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2008/03/16/you-ask-i-provide-november-2nd-1922-arctic-ocean-getting-warm-seals-vanish-and-icebergs-melt/
NASA says at least 45% melting since 1976 is most probably due to aerosols (soot)
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/warming_aerosols_prt.htm
Arctic temperatures stable since 1958
If an increased-CO2-greenhouse-forcing was causing global warming as the IPCC models predict, the fingerprint would be most apparent in the summer arctic temperatures (when there is sunlight 24 hours a day to produce a greenhouse effect-there is no sunlight in the arctic during winter). Since CO2 has steadily climbed since 1958, yet arctic summer temperatures have not changed, CO2 is obviously not a major player in arctic temperatures.
Please go to the DMI website yourself and look at all the graphs from 1958-2009 and you will find absolutely no increasing trend in arctic summer temperature,
http://ocean.dmi.dk/arctic/meant80n.uk.php

DirkH
March 31, 2010 3:45 pm

“RockyRoad (15:25:24) :
That is an excellent paper by Lubos Motl referenced above by DirkH. ”
The honor goes to
Ivan Janković (12:55:11)
– i was just delighted by Lubos’ rage…

Tim McHenry
March 31, 2010 3:45 pm

“After all, who wouldn’t want the Arctic Sea ice to recover?”
Well…, why do we NOT want it to melt? Isn’t warmer better? I like warmth myself and see no problem with a warmer Canada and a warmer Northern Europe. It’s this whole idea that warmth is bad that gets me. We could be somewhat warmer than we are and it not cause much of a problem.

TerrySkinner
March 31, 2010 3:49 pm

Remember postings two or three months ago about cold in places like Florida killing fish in the sea? Well that is presumably the water that is now reaching the Arctic via the Gulf stream. I know it all gets mixed up but if the gulf stream is slightly cooler than usual at the moment then the transport of tropical heat to the Arctic must be diminished.
I don’t see anywhere in between the Gulf and the Arctic where the sea would have regained heat on the way. On the contrary a cold Europe and a cold N. America suggests a cold North Atlantic this winter.
And if something similar has happened in the Pacific then less heat flowing north = more ice and a delayed melt season.
Amateur prognosticating I know but it makes sense to me.

Ben D
March 31, 2010 3:55 pm

Why doesn’t the average go from 1979 to 2009, why stop at 2000 why not add 9 more years of data?? for an average don’t you have to add every year…averages go up and down… that’s why they are averages

Peter of Sydney
March 31, 2010 3:55 pm

So what will be said if the US some time in the near future is covered with snow during summer? If that ever happened and the AGW alarmists still claim we shouldn’t be confusing weather with climate, it will be time to arrest them for deliberate fraud, and that should include Obama.

Jim Clarke
March 31, 2010 3:56 pm

“It’s nice to see a little recovery over the past couple of years, but there’s no reason to think that we’re headed back to conditions seen in the 1970s,” said NSIDC Director Mark Serreze”
Mr. Serreze has apparently never heard of the Pacific Decadal Oscillation, which takes about 60 years to complete an oscillation. Since Northern Hemisphere temperature trends tracked perfectly with the PDO throughout the 20th century, it might tell a real scientist that something similar would take place in the 21st Century. Conditions seen in the 1970s are actually quite likely by the 2030s, according to standard scientific reasoning.

Steve Goddard
March 31, 2010 4:04 pm

“Why doesn’t the average go from 1979 to 2009?”
Because the climate became irreversibly perverted by CO2 after 2000, so all numbers are meaningless after that date.

Mann O Mann
March 31, 2010 4:08 pm

Here is the bad news that will be plucked from hitting “normal”.
It is a Young Ice Anomaly and the young ice that is there is ill mannered, being that it is young.

Amino Acids in Meteorites
March 31, 2010 4:13 pm

Dr. Mark Serreze of NSIDC “It’s nice to see a little recovery over the past couple of years, but there’s no reason to think that we’re headed back to conditions seen in the 1970s,”
…………………………………………………………………………………………..
It’s ok that he said that. I don’t expect someone that works for the government to be very smart.

DirkH
March 31, 2010 4:14 pm

“Steve Goddard (15:09:35) :
OT – Romm is now declaring that weather is climate after all.
http://climateprogress.org/2010/03/31/northeast-hit-by-record-global-warming-type-deluge-rainfall-flooding/

Steve on that blog:
“Steven Goddard says:
[…]
Also, how is your Arctic “Death Spiral” coming along?”
He didn’t ban you?

March 31, 2010 4:18 pm

Dave Wendt (15:04:16) :
. . . Over the years I’ve viewed numerous projections of the Arctic sea ice disappearing. These public pronouncements are always couched in tones that suggest that the prospect of this occurring should fill us all with immense foreboding. Being somewhat puzzled by this, I’ve been moved to inquire on quite a number of occasions as to what is the exact nature of the catastrophe that will eventuate if this does happen. The only semi cogent response I’ve ever received, in fact the only response, suggested that the increased amount of open water would lead to increased absorption of solar insolation fueling further global warming. . . Could you provide for me a link to some kind of data that suggests that this increased absorption of solar energy is actually occurring? It would be most helpful in allowing me to understand what all the excitement is about.

Can’t provide a link, but as far as I can tell, the persistent hysteria over the melting of Arctic sea ice goes back to the alarmist prediction that, according to their hypothesis, the Arctic would suffer from ‘global warming’ first, and so it’s a ‘canary in the coal mine’, as RGates put it in another thread.
In the popular mind, of course, the fear is that the ice would permanently disappear, not just for a few weeks in summer. But aside from actually fulfilling an AGW prediction (they need one, don’t they?), I cannot fathom either what possible disadvantage that would have for humanity. Surely a balmy sea route across the North Pole, long-sought since the discovery of the New World, would be a boon for commerce. The adorable polar bears might have to shed their white coats in order to kill rabbits instead of seals, but the seals would be happy.
/Mr Lynn

Amino Acids in Meteorites
March 31, 2010 4:19 pm

Richard Feynman famously said “Science is the belief in the ignorance of the experts.”
…………………………………………………………………………………………………
LOL!! 😛
Perfect for the global warming alarmists!

Amino Acids in Meteorites
March 31, 2010 4:26 pm

Mr. Romm,
A tree is known by its fruits. WUWT has a good track record for accuracy of predictions not only Anthony’s predictions but in those he chooses to have as guest post-ers here, like Steven Goddard, Joe Bastardi, etc.
How are the fruits of that ‘death spiral’ working out? Just askin.

1 4 5 6 7 8 16