UCAR: Roof white out helps UHI

I find it humorous thatUCAR had to resort to modeling to prove something that can be measured empirically. But then again this is UCAR, and they have a big computer at their NCAR office. Painting roofs white would probably help cool NOAA weather stations that are positioned on rooftops, like this one on the roof of the Santa Ana fire station in southern California, with surroundings that look a lot like the photo provided with the press release shown below. – Anthony

Santa Ana Station looking North.  Click for a larger image

Computer model demonstrates that white roofs may successfully cool cities

January 28, 2010

BOULDER—Painting the roofs of buildings white has the potential to significantly cool cities and mitigate some impacts of global warming, a new study indicates. The new NCAR-led research suggests there may be merit to an idea advanced by U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu that white roofs can be an important tool to help society adjust to climate change.

But the study team, led by scientists at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR), cautions that there are still many hurdles between the concept and actual use of white roofs to counteract rising temperatures.

painting white roofs

A construction crew works on a white roof in Washington, D.C. (©American Geophysical Union, photo by Maria-José Viñas. Reproduction permitted with credit.)

“Our research demonstrates that white roofs, at least in theory, can be an effective method for reducing urban heat,” says NCAR scientist Keith Oleson, the lead author of the study. “It remains to be seen if it’s actually feasible for cities to paint their roofs white, but the idea certainly warrants further investigation.”

The study is slated for publication later this winter in Geophysical Research Letters. It was funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor.

Cities are particularly vulnerable to climate change because they are warmer than outlying rural areas. Asphalt roads, tar roofs, and other artificial surfaces absorb heat from the Sun, creating an urban heat island effect that can raise temperatures on average by 2-5 degrees Fahrenheit (about 1-3 degrees Celsius) or more compared to rural areas. White roofs would reflect some of that heat back into space and cool temperatures, much as wearing a white shirt on a sunny day can be cooler than wearing a dark shirt.

The study team used a newly developed computer model to simulate the amount of solar radiation that is absorbed or reflected by urban surfaces. The model simulations, which provide scientists with an idealized view of different types of cities around the world, indicate that, if every roof were entirely painted white, the urban heat island effect could be reduced by 33 percent. This would cool the world’s cities by an average of about 0.7 degrees F, with the cooling influence particularly pronounced during the day, especially in summer.

The authors emphasize that their research should be viewed as a hypothetical look at typical city landscapes rather than the actual rooftops of any one city. In the real world, the cooling impact might be somewhat less because dust and weathering would cause the white paint to darken over time and parts of roofs would remain unpainted because of openings such as heating and cooling vents.

Keith Oleson

Keith Oleson. (©UCAR, photo by David Hosansky.)

In addition, white roofs would have the effect of cooling temperatures within buildings. As a result, depending on the local climate, the amount of energy used for space heating and air conditioning could change, which could affect both outside air temperatures and the consumption of fossil fuels such as oil and coal that are associated with global warming. Depending on whether air conditioning or heating is affected more, this could either magnify or partially offset the impact of the roofs.

“It’s not as simple as just painting roofs white and cooling off a city,” Oleson says.

More cooling for certain cities

The research indicated that some cities would benefit more than others from white roofs, depending on such factors as:

  • Roof density. Cities where roofs make up more of the urban surface area would cool more.
  • Construction. Roofs that allow large amounts of heat from the Sun to penetrate the interior of a building (as can happen with metal roofs and little insulation) are less effective in cooling outside temperatures when painted white.
  • Location. White roofs tend to have a larger impact in relatively warm climates that receive strong, year-round sunlight.

While the model did not have enough detail to capture individual cities, it did show the change in temperatures in larger metropolitan regions. The New York area, for example, would cool in summer afternoons by almost 2 degrees Fahrenheit.

A new technique

The study team used a new computer model, developed by Oleson and colleagues, that is designed to assess the impacts of a changing climate on urban populations and explore options for countering rising temperatures. This urban canyon model simulates temperature changes in city landscapes, capturing such factors as the influence of roofs, walls, streets, and green spaces on local temperatures. Oleson has successfully linked it to a computer simulation of worldwide climate, the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model, thereby enabling researchers to study the interactions between global climate change and urban areas.

The new model does not yet have the power to replicate the architecture and design of specific cities. Instead, the research team created abstractions of cities in the model, using classes of population density, urban design, and building construction. Oleson and his colleagues plan to continue refining the model to provide more information for policymakers concerned about protecting urban populations from the risks associated with heat waves and other changes in climate.

“It’s critical to understand how climate change will affect vulnerable urban areas, which are home to most of the world’s population,” says NCAR scientist Gordon Bonan, a co-author of the study.

About the article

Title:

The Effects of White Roofs on Urban Temperature in a Global Climate Model

Authors:

Keith Olson, Gordon Bonan, Johannes Feddema

Publication:

Geophysical Research Letters

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

130 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Eggsuckindog
February 8, 2010 4:45 pm

Sounds like a complete reversal of the paper they just wrote saying the UHI didn’t exist – this study says 5 -7* – I guess that means your right

Douglas DC
February 8, 2010 4:48 pm

I have a dark brown Metal roof in NE Oregon-normally snowy. It doesn’t help much but the place is an oven without A/c-maybe there will be a Fed Grant…
I am being cynical BTW..

February 8, 2010 4:54 pm

“Ed Reid (13:46:33) :
It is refreshing to learn the UHI still exists; and, that its magnitude is still significant. Who knew!”
Heresy! Phil Jones and some other guy proved UHI is minimal a decade ago using data they can’t find anymore (the very best sort of data I might add) . So the science is settled, OK…No more deviations. White roofs can make no difference to the settled science of there being no such thing as UHI.
So there.

February 8, 2010 5:18 pm

Here’s a consideration.
White things generally don’t absorb much energy, but neither do they radiate as much. Black absorbs a lot, and radiates a lot.
A black roof in a northern climate will give you a warmer attic when the sun shines, but will cool more quickly when the sun is low, clouded over, or down at night, and up north you have less sun than the other conditions. So net, you are losing more than you gain. That makes white roofs preferable up north, too.
Here in Houston, they’re pushing what they call radiant barriers for energy savings. Basically, they just paint the underside of the roof with aluminum paint, which doesn’t radiate as much heat down to the ceiling joists. In winter it reflects heat back down. White roofs would work here, too, but mildew would turn them black in a couple years.

Jan
February 8, 2010 5:43 pm

It brings in mind a question is the NCAR receiving a funding from the white paint producers or it does this so important research just due to mere incapacity of the supervisors to recognize this falsifies their no-UHI preaching.

Pascvaks
February 8, 2010 5:47 pm

The Nobel Prizes (and the money) that they gave Obama, Pachman and Gore need to go to the folks who invent white tar and asphalt.
If we put mirrors on everything would that help too?

Brute
February 8, 2010 6:01 pm

I thought the “official position” of the Eco-Chondriacs is that the UHI didn’t exist?
(Or, at the very least, that it’s inconsequential.)

Brute
February 8, 2010 6:03 pm

Was the paint that they used “eco-friendly”?
Just sayin……………

RockyRoad
February 8, 2010 6:28 pm

Carbon-less tar and asphalt should be white.
Oops.

Gilbert
February 8, 2010 6:34 pm

We need more shovels.
Might help with the snow removal too…..

Pamela Gray
February 8, 2010 6:35 pm

A white roof would take care of the great horned owl problem I have. They sit on the roof of my house waiting for the bats to fly outa the attic. Which means I have white owl poop on my roof. My roof is black.
On the up side, owl pellets are worth money! Specially the big ones. So I guess my spotted roof is worth it. Besides, the weath…I mean…climate cleans off my roof every rainy season.

Anand Rajan KD
February 8, 2010 7:03 pm

Andrew:
A different version
(1) Make up menacing climate stories running into thousands of pages
(2) Go around saying – the science is settled
(3) Get caught by bloggers
(4) Admit sheepishly that errors were made
(5) Ask for more grants to uncover the real science.
(6) Smile

February 8, 2010 7:13 pm

I find it offensive that ordinary people hold down sometimes arduous, dangerous or boring jobs so that they pay taxes so that the likes of Keith Oleson can hold down cushy jobs (in air conditioned offices with nice government guaranteed pensions at the end of their careers) doing fatuous research that would be better contracted out to a local high school science class.

February 8, 2010 8:36 pm

I see you are all having fun with this proposal. So here is my contribution. The real purpose for this research is to justify hiring an army of people for the “green jobs corps” to paint roofs. Originally they probably considered using first sided mirrors on the roofs for high reflectivity but the computer simulation showed that the efficiency of creating IR was higher because emissivity of silver is higher than titanium oxide. Cost was not an issue. Also I heard there is rumor that the carbon traders are planning to sell coal dust to coat the snow in Washington so it will melt faster. But first they need a grant to prove that this idea will work!

RockyRoad
February 8, 2010 8:55 pm

Coal dust to melt snow? Won’t pass! Why? You’d have to give carbon credit.
Time for bed.

EH
February 8, 2010 9:39 pm

Oh, thank God they have a “newly developed computer model”!!!!!
Gets back to the first question I posed 4-5 years ago when AGW hype grabbed us by the throat: HOW DO ‘THEY’ MEASURE THE EARTH’S TEMPERATURE?
Next question, HOW DO ‘THEY’ ISOLATE CAUSE(S) OF CLIMATE CHANGE?
Neither question answered!!! It’s hard to believe that every article still starts with the false assumption that CO2 OR SOMETHING is causing climate change, which omnipotent MAN must do something about.
I’ve enjoyed SO much research published here and elsewhere in my search to understand. My conclusions: 1 – those who research the natural sciences should continue their pursuits to discover answers to endless questions about the natural world, and 2 – the AGW NONSENSE must stop.

RonPE
February 8, 2010 10:50 pm

There are two separate issues here.
First, the ‘Paint everything white’ recommendation does nothing for the property owner’s energy bill. You are just donating the paint to have a ‘nano’ effect on your community and an ‘atto’ effect on ‘the EARTH’.
Second, regardless of the roof color, the insulation amount drives the reduction of heat transfer. Dark or light color has negligible effect in any warm or cold climate region.

3x2
February 8, 2010 11:06 pm

Wouldn’t it be much cheaper just to take thermometers from the roofs and site them properly?
Temperatures down (about 1-3 degrees Celsius) – AGW problem solved.

February 9, 2010 12:27 am

I have written in a previous article that whilst I don’t buy the co2 hypothesis man is undoubtedly having a localised effect on the climate. This was most notably in the form of UHI.
This effect was noticed as far back as Ancient Rome and caused citizens to petition Emperor Nero to ‘make streets narrow and buildings high’ to help mitigate it. Pliny noted that Beech trees no longer grew in the city due to the additional heat. Rome had around one and a half million inhabitants and stretched for some 70 miles end to end.
So UHI can be a problem in certain areas, but also arguably a boon in others. For example, in many Northern European latitudes, cities are overall a degree or two warmer due to UHI which helps plants to keep growing and generally makes the local environment more comfortable in winter.
However, in more consistently hot countries the additional warmth is likely to be detrimental overall. The beneficial effects of painting buildings white in such environments was recognised centuries ago and can be seen in many towns and cities in such countries as Spain and Greece.
So where UHI is a problem painting buildings white seems a reasonable solution to a local problem. Where UHI is a benefit it would be pointless.
Tonyb

E.M.Smith
Editor
February 9, 2010 3:38 am

This has been known for about 50 years that I know of…
Results 1 – 10 of about 78,000 for silver roof coating
and that was one of the SMALLER hits on google. Folks have been developing silver roof coatings for decades to keep buildings cool. Drive through any industrial park and look at all the silver roofs…
Talk about trying to solve a solved problem…

Wayne
February 9, 2010 5:16 am

” Oak Ridge National Laboratory wrote a computer program that calculates energy savings under different scenarios. In northern cities like Chicago, the dark roof surfaces actually save money because of the heat gain during winter ”
Arnold:
I hope this national lab roof color research opinion/conclusion reaches DOE Chief Dr. Steve Chu, it is embarrassing to hear roof white rational again from his mouth again in the public.
And I totally understand now why he bought up AGW propaganda so faithfully, think of this as an experimental physicist with Nobel Prize Crown, he should have the most critical oppinion to any numerical modeling without experimental proof, however, as a director of LBNL, how could he say NO to one of his own department’s climate modeling work and not to fight research fund for them, it is just a matter of conflict of interest

Beth Cooper
February 9, 2010 6:17 am

These are the mines, titanium and lime,
That extracted the pigments
To make the paint
That went on the house that Jack built.
These are the factories, emitting the fumes,
That processed the pigments
To make the paint
That went on the house that Jack built.
Here’s the albido the white roof creates
To offset the warming
From factories and mines
To make the paint
That went on the house that Jack built…..

Ken Harvey
February 9, 2010 7:07 am

Can I have a nice new computer and some funding to research my theory that painting igloos black could save the Inuits some some heating costs and cut down on CO2 at the same time?

Some Guy
February 9, 2010 10:03 am

I’d paint my roof white if it would save me a noticeable amount on my air conditioning costs. No government mandate necessary.

George E. Smith
February 9, 2010 2:54 pm

That man Chu is a real genius.
Who would have guessed that a little dab of white paint, could stop global warming in its tracks.
Way back in 1977, I had a flat roof home, that was nice black tar paper; and being flat as well, it leaked like a sieve.
So we added a partial second storey to the house, and then converted the remaining flat roof areas to a slight angle to get rid of the standing water, and get rid of the leaks.
Just to be ornery, we also had the roof gooped white, and then spread a bunch of small white crushed rock, to break up water run-off, and increase the total surface area a bit, while making it white instead of black. The foam insulation under the tar paper, also helped, and the heating bills just vanished almost.
I never imagined in 1977, that I was doing something of Nobel Prize Physics merit; I thought it was just common sense.