This three frame animation of THEMIS/ASI images shows auroras colliding on Feb. 29, 2008.
Credit: Toshi Nishimura/UCLA
A network of cameras deployed around the Arctic in support of NASA’s THEMIS mission has made a startling discovery about the Northern Lights. Sometimes, vast curtains of aurora borealis collide, producing spectacular outbursts of light. Movies of the phenomenon were unveiled at the Fall Meeting of the American Geophysical Union today in San Francisco.
“Our jaws dropped when we saw the movies for the first time,” said space scientist Larry Lyons of the University of California-Los Angeles (UCLA), a member of the team that made the discovery. “These outbursts are telling us something very fundamental about the nature of auroras.”
The collisions occur on such a vast scale that isolated observers on Earth — with limited fields of view — had never noticed them before. It took a network of sensitive cameras spread across thousands of miles to get the big picture.
NASA and the Canadian Space Agency created such a network for THEMIS, short for “Time History of Events and Macroscale Interactions during Substorms.” THEMIS consists of five identical probes launched in 2006 to solve a long-standing mystery: Why do auroras occasionally erupt in an explosion of light called a substorm?
Twenty all-sky imagers (ASIs) were deployed across the Alaskan and Canadian Arctic to photograph auroras from below while the spacecraft sampled charged particles and electromagnetic fields from above. Together, the on-ground cameras and spacecraft would see the action from both sides and be able to piece together cause and effect-or so researchers hoped. It seems to have worked.
The breakthrough came earlier this year when UCLA researcher Toshi Nishimura assembled continent-wide movies from the individual ASI cameras. “It can be a little tricky,” Nishimura said. “Each camera has its own local weather and lighting conditions, and the auroras are different distances from each camera. I’ve got to account for these factors for six or more cameras simultaneously to make a coherent, large-scale movie.”
The first movie he showed Lyons was a pair of auroras crashing together in Dec. 2007. “It was like nothing I had seen before,” Lyons recalled. “Over the next several days, we surveyed more events. Our excitement mounted as we became convinced that the collisions were happening over and over.”
Twenty all-sky imagers (ASIs) were deployed by researchers from the University of California Berkeley, the University of Calgary, and the University of Alaska in support of the THEMIS mission. This map shows their locations and field of view.
Credit: THEMIS/UC Berkeley.
› Larger Image The explosions of light, they believe, are a sign of something dramatic happening in the space around Earth-specifically, in Earth’s “plasma tail.” Millions of kilometers long and pointed away from the sun, the plasma tail is made of charged particles captured mainly from the solar wind. Sometimes called the “plasma sheet,” the tail is held together by Earth’s magnetic field.
The same magnetic field that holds the tail together also connects it to Earth’s polar regions. Because of this connection, watching the dance of Northern Lights can reveal much about what’s happening in the plasma tail.
THEMIS project scientist Dave Sibeck of NASA’s Goddard Space Flight Center, Greenbelt, Md. said, “By putting together data from ground-based cameras, ground-based radar, and the THEMIS spacecraft, we now have a nearly complete picture of what causes explosive auroral substorms.”
Lyons and Nishimura have identified a common sequence of events. It begins with a broad curtain of slow-moving auroras and a smaller knot of fast-moving auroras, initially far apart. The slow curtain quietly hangs in place, almost immobile, when the speedy knot rushes in from the north. The auroras collide and an eruption of light ensues.
How does this sequence connect to events in the plasma tail? Lyons believes the fast-moving knot is associated with a stream of relatively lightweight plasma jetting through the tail. The stream gets started in the outer regions of the plasma tail and moves rapidly inward toward Earth. The fast knot of auroras moves in synch with this stream.
The five spacecraft of THEMIS were built to answer fundamental questions about auroras.Credit: NASA/Goddard Space Flight Center Conceptual Image Lab
› Larger Image Meanwhile, the broad curtain of auroras is connected to the stationary inner boundary of the plasma tail and fueled by plasma instabilities there. When the lightweight stream reaches the inner boundary of the plasma tail, there is an eruption of plasma waves and instabilities. This collision of plasma is mirrored by a collision of auroras over the poles.
National Science Foundation-funded radars located in Poker Flat, Alaska, and Sondrestrom, Greenland, confirm this basic picture. They have detected echoes of material rushing through Earth’s upper atmosphere just before the auroras collide and erupt. The five THEMIS spacecraft also agree. Last winter, they were able to fly through the plasma tail and confirm the existence of lightweight flows rushing toward Earth.
Dr. Tony Phillips
Heliosphysics News Team
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
[snip] Be polite. ~dbs, mod.
Typical of NASA to spend millions of dollar to find out something that has been know for 100 years. Maybe if they bothered to look at the work of Kristian Birkeland they would have saved the time and outrageous cost of this mission. Birkeland no only physically charted the aurora he actually proved experimentally, with his ‘terrella’ experiments 100 years ago, that it is caused by ELECTRICITY in space. Something NASA and orthodox astronomy cannot countenance because it will shatter everything they have falsely believed about the nature of space and the universe – “the universe is driven by electricity NOT gravity”. This gravity only dogma is as moribund their belief in global warming.
Get the fact here:
http://www.thunderbolts.info
so the [snip- offensive, don’t do it. RT – mod] has it all wrong then !?
Paulmwho (04:34:16) :
> something that has been know for 100 years.
The issue is not whether aurorae are electrical phenomena, the issue is the interaction between pieces of aurorae. Your link goes to a home page that make no mention of that interaction. If you took the time to provide a relevant link it might be worth my time to read it.
My question is do Auroras have any influence on the weather? Why did the guys jaws drop? Was it just because the display was more spectacular than they had ever seen or was there any deeper significance?
Think you’ll enjoy this picture,
http://farm5.static.flickr.com/4022/4256793548_f004a0fc8a_o.jpg
it’s from the CBC, http://www.cbc.ca/photogallery/news/2874/ (picture 11 or 12..)
“AdderW (05:11:05) :
so the [snip] has it all wrong then !?”
That wasn’t funny, even if Hawking (i suppose you mean him) should be wrong about black holes.
This is useful visual discovery as it gives the observer a more complete image of how these electrical phenomena interact with the earth’s hemispheres. The recent discovery of connected birkeland currents from the sun to the earth was equally just as interesting.
@Paulmwho – “that it is caused by ELECTRICITY in space”
A little knowledge can be a dangerous thing. There is no one thing that can be specifically describe as ‘ELECTRICITY.’ Even my professors at University were shy at trying to provide a simple explanation for this catch-all term we call electricity.
I will give you this, however – the complex nature charged particles and its manifestation in complex plasmas in space is a woefully understood science and its this lack of knowledge that frightens many to include the possibilty that ‘electricity’ as you put it is a more profound force in cosmology. That said we must keep an open mind in all directions as to the nature of nature itself.
Over geoligical time life seems deterimined to starve itself of carbon. I would prefer if we are going to be stupid that at least we could store CO2 in a manner that it is recoverable
sorry wrong thread
Paulmwho (04:34:16) : Time to change has come. That universe “De la Belle Epoque”, or more sarcastically, that “Flintstones Universe”, which considers particles as little stones, or pebbles, denies , for example, the principal characteristic of a proton to be what it is: the nucleus of an element known as hydrogen, and when that nucleus encounters the oxidized form of oxygen called ozone (commonly obtained by an electric arc-as those called AURORAS-) , water, yes water, is the product of such a chemical marriage.
That dynamic and live interchange of charges pervades nature around us, making possible our own lives.
Paulmwho (04:34:16) :
Get the fact here:
http://www.thunderbolts.info
This is kind of pseudo-science we don’t need here, and BTW, Birkeland was completely wrong: the electric currents are produced in the Earth’s environment by changing magnetic fields [and do not come from the Sun, the Galaxy, or the Universe at large].
I remember standing outside on the patio in Edmonton somethime around that night, certainly one of the more amazing nights of Northern Lights that I have seen at that low latuitudes…
Paulmwho 04:34:16
I read about the electric universe too and for a layman it is easier to understand by far than the black hole,dark matter, big bang stuff. But, there is no real proof that is the theory of everything either. It probably is more complicated than anything that man can come up with at present,kinda like the climate.
I for one am just going to sit back and watch and read with great interest all the new theories and developments and this site is where I start.
I like that they set up a network of cameras to perform some science. Since 1988 when the AGW concern started has any agency set up a similar network of high quality thermometers in rural locations? By high quality I mean continuous electronically recorded and by rural I mean locations that are in fact guaranteed to be free of UHI, US national parks, arctic, etc.
In the (very cold) decade (70’s) I lived in Edmonton we were treated to spectacular auroras.
This is really interesting.
How does this phenomenon correlate with or influence the weather here on Earth?
It’s interesting that the magnetic field can stretch that far and still have a flow of returning particles detectable.
I wonder how the auroras factor into the Space Weather Calculations of Peirs Corbyn? (http://pathstoknowledge.net/2009/12/28/long-term-weather-forecasting-with-piers-corbyn)
Oh as an aside, from what I understand from the slobbering guy in the wheelchair and from those not in the wheelchair the universe is driven by the four fundamental forces which interact in different ways. Plasma is part of that as is electricity and magnetic fields and gravity. To say that “the universe is driven” by any one of these forces seems to be a bit silly and beyond simplistic besides you’d have to define what you mean by driven. In fact, no driver has been identified. [:)]
jack morrow (07:06:06) :
Paulmwho 04:34:16
I read about the electric universe too and for a layman it is easier to understand by far than the black hole,dark matter, big bang stuff.
That is the allure of pseudo-science. Real science is often hard and takes work to understand. It is a lot simpler to believe that angels push the planets around in their orbits, than all that gravitational field, inverse-square laws, curved space-time, etc. stuff.
The farthest from reality the hardest to comprehend.
Leif Svalgaard,
“This is kind of pseudo-science we don’t need here, and BTW, Birkeland was completely wrong: the electric currents are produced in the Earth’s environment by changing magnetic fields [and do not come from the Sun, the Galaxy, or the Universe at large].”
When you and the rest of the “conventional physics” scientists can explain the recent observations of the comet missions we might have reason to believe your pronouncement. Until then we will continue to look to “pseudo-science” for explanations.
The on-going SURPRISES in solar observations, especially the shape and interactions of the heliosphere should be a wake up call to you and the rest of the solar community!!! If your science can make no valid predictions it is WRONG!!!
How has computing the orbits of the Voyagers been going for y
Ah, science for science’s sake. No AGW angle, (apparently) no practical applications, just seeing exactly what is happening in our world so we may understand it better. How I have missed it!
And science with pretty pictures! Bonus!
For the Eastern part of Europe and the Northern part of Asia, it’s too bad that the Auroras didn’t manage to crash before November 1917. 😉
If you don’t know, it’s the ship used by Lenin to start the communist revolution in Russia.
PWL,
“To say that “the universe is driven” by any one of these forces seems to be a bit silly and beyond simplistic besides you’d have to define what you mean by driven. In fact, no driver has been identified. [:)]”
In fact conventional science HAS identified the primary driver as GRAVITY!! It is why they HAVE to postulate imaginary things like black holes, dark matter, dark energy to explain observations that they could not predict and can not explain!!!
With only the gravity explanation the distribution of matter, fast rotating pulsars, CBR, X and Gamma rays, galaxies themselves… are not possible as observed. So we get a never ending series of fantasies to fill the gaps and which prevent real advances in our understanding of the universe.
The FLATEARTHERS ALWAYS END UP IN CHARGE!!! Scientific advance is done by the lunatic fringe who are not wedded to conventional ideas and theories taught in institutions of propaganda and status quo. Why is that?? Because most of the Lunatic fringe ARE nuts. The rest of us can not tell who is and isn’t nuts until the conventional science has nearly caught up with them!!
Most of what we see as scientific advance is technical achievement and engineering on top of the actual Science. A logical incremental application of those scientific theories that were considered nuts by the Science Community a few decades back!!
Looking back through history, every time there was a real advance in our understanding, there were all those conventional types who COULD NOT ADMIT THEY WERE WRONG AND WORKED TO PREVENT THE ADVANCE FROM BEING ACCEPTED!!!
http://www.livescience.com/space/091211-bts-Saturn-Titan-weather.html
“Every morning I download and process that data to determine the amount of cloud cover on Titan. The result is that I get a daily weather report for Titan.”
The whole story linked to is interesting, but the part that made me go ‘huh?’ was this statement. They can get daily cloud cover for Titan from only a few sample points?
Nevermind on the above comment, I see in the pictures how they are doing it. Why can’t they do that with Earth?
kuhnkat (09:08:17) : edit
“Looking back through history, every time there was a real advance in our understanding, there were all those conventional types who COULD NOT ADMIT THEY WERE WRONG AND WORKED TO PREVENT THE ADVANCE FROM BEING ACCEPTED!!!”
And yet the same sort of people who promote electric universe, iron sun, etc also tend to buy into debunked ideas like steady state universe, infinite size/age universe, hollow earth, Nibiru, etc etc.
Just as correlation does not equal causation, being nuts doesn’t automatically make you right.