As I said yesterday, one of our jobs this year is to wipe the complacent smiles off the smug faces of the lobbyists, “experts”, “scientists”, politicians and activists pushing AGW.
This is why I am so glad to report that Michael Mann – creator of the incredible Hockey Stick curve and one of the scientists most heavily implicated in the Climategate scandal – is about to get a very nasty shock. When he turns up to work on Monday, he’ll find that all 27 of his colleagues at the Earth System Science Center at Penn State University have received a rather tempting email inviting them to blow the whistle on anyone they know who may have been fraudulently misusing federal grant funds for climate research.
Under US law, regardless of whether or not a prosecution results, the whistleblower stands to make very large sums of money: it is based on a percentage of the total government funds which have been misused, in this case perhaps as much as $50 million. (Hat tip: John O’Sullivan of the wonderful new campaigning site www.climategate.com)
Here’s that email in full:
Hi,
Greetings and best wishes for a prosperous New Year.
National Search
After the recent whistleblower revelations of emails between climate researchers and data from the University of East Anglia’s Climate Research Unit, there are on-going investigations into potential fraudulent use of grant funds in Climate Research in the US. I am assisting interested parties who may have details of fraud in climate research to make contact with the proper authorities, and to share in the rewards paid when the funds are recovered.
Whistleblower Rewards Program
The federal government has established vigorous programs to identify and prosecute fraudulent grant applications and administration. The US Department of Justice (DOJ) administers the False Claims Act. It allows rewards for those who come forward with details of grant fraud to share in the recovery of federal funds. This reward can be as much as 30% of the total amount reclaimed. The program is almost completely reliant on insiders to report their knowledge of the fraud in their institutions.
Attorney Literally “Wrote the Book” on Fraud Recovery Lawsuits
Joel Hesch, Esq., of Hesch and Associates, literally wrote the book on how to report federal fraud. He has an extensive background in representing whistleblowers in all types of federal funding fraud cases, including Educational/ Research Grant Fraud. According to Mr Hesch: “Many institutions receive grants, whether for research or educational purposes. When they lie to get the grant or keep the grant or if they use the funds for purposes outside the grant, they are liable under the DOJ program. There have been many grant cases brought by whistleblowers. ”
If you know of anyone who might have details about fraudulent statements or actions by recipients of federal grant funds for climate research, please have them contact me immediately at the below email or cell phone. Alternatively, they may also contact Mr Hersch directly, and let him know that they were referred by me. All communications are completely confidential. They may want to consider using a third party email service (Yahoo, Hotmail, or other) instead of work email to communicate.
30% of $50 million is more than $12 million. Ask your friends to do the right thing, and be rewarded for doing it.
Our country, and in fact, the entire world is counting on someone to stand up and tell the truth about climate research. The effects of moving forward with taxes and policies based on fraudulent science could potentially cripple the US economy and cost lives and jobs for generations.
Look forward to hearing from you.
All the best
Kent Clizbe
Happy New Year, Climategaters.
Read original story here with comments.

M. Simon (12:10:06) :
“My understanding is that the results from Svensmark’s CERN experiments are not due out until 2013 or there abouts. Please explain how the results can be shown to be in error if the results are not available?”
Mister Connor is obviously a climate ‘scientist’ and does not need experimental results.
DirkH (08:22:50) :
Cool down photon. (Open a window! ROTFL!)
Yes, it is cold outside.
I thought Conner would have replies for me when I got home from work.
None.
photon without a Higgs (06:22:17) :
Connor (00:09:48) :
I asked what it would mean if Anthony Watts was on Fox News?
What would it mean if New Scientist are published by whoever they are published by?
Fox News is incredibly biased, which was the insinuation being made by whoever made that post I was replying to.
I’m just holding a mirror up to the deniers, showing you what you look like to the sane people in the world.
M. Simon – the link is there, go back and look for it, Benestad is asking for code from work already published. Scafetta won’t provide it, therefore it MUST be a conspiracy that definitively PROVES that all solar/cosmic ray theories must be fraudulent and corrupt.
I’m just applying the same logic you people use.
A C Osborn (09:13:00) :
Conner, you shot yourself in the Foot ( or mouth) with the link to RealClimate.
You obviously didn’t notice the
“selected sources of code and data”
i.e. only those that they can afford to show, not “ALL”
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Kind of like the portion of data that CRU can’t release because they don’t actually own it?
photon without a Higgs (06:26:58) :
You are making claims that aren’t clear. What is you are trying to say? Come out and say it clearly. But It looks like you’re trying to create some kind of conspiracy.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
Oh the irony!
Go and do a search on this page alone for th word “conspiracy”
My t-shirt 2 cents: “climate modeler: Have goal posts, will move them.
I was expecting something like this from the other side. How many times have we called them on some b.s. only to have them turn around and claim the same thing is being done to them. I howled when I saw that J. Hansen was claiming that he was being muzzled. Now they want the code released. The spin is incredible. Connor apparently has not been alive long enough to have seen even one weather cycle and now I will ask him the all important question. What kind of world do you want to see, Connor? Where do you see mankind in 5, 10 20, years?
Did a search for the word conspiracy and it comes up 6 times. 2 out of those 6 were first uttered by Connor, and 2 were quoting what Connor had said. So 4 out of the 6 times were focused in and around Connor. Troll?
Johnhayte (12:17:16) :
re: J. Peden
??????? I didn’t realize that there is a stunningly similar country called America on Mars . . .
Hayte, the only clue I get regarding the intent of your comment is your name. Do I need anything else?
Connor:
Kind of like the portion of data that CRU can’t release because they don’t actually own it?
No complete data release = No Science.
Connor (19:37:44) :
“Fox News is incredibly biased, which was the insinuation being made by…”
>>>
How funny, Connor thinks the only place you can get any decent news or fresh reporting on cable is bias, but I’m sure he feels RC is perfectly centered in its approach to AGW coverage. It seems lately like RC has been over here checking out the audience and trying to divert a bit of traffic. Is it just me or do some of you smell some distress in the AGW air ?
Maybe it’s just rotten air ?
How funny, Connor thinks the only place you can get any decent news or fresh reporting on cable is bias, but I’m sure he feels RC is perfectly centered in its approach to AGW coverage.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
How funny, the person I was originally responding to think NS is biased, but I’m sure he feels that Fox News is perfectly centred in it’s approach to AGW coverage.
You people a a buch of whackjobs
Calling us whackjobs doesn’t get you off the hook from answering the questions posed to you. Is that all you got?
“”” Mark (04:08:36) :
I know how much you guys like evidence. So is there any actual evidence of a CRU whistleblower or is it all just wishful thinking? “””
Well Mark, all you have to do is go to the site where the evidence relating to the alleged hackers is posted, along with an essaay on wishful thinking, and there you will find in a plain brown wrapper, the file on all the whistle blowers.
See; no wishful thinkin just hard evidence.
You people a a buch of whackjobs
As for me, Connor, I accept your surrender without animosity. But I would advise you going forward to try to at least consider the possibility that the people who usually inform you are not credible and maybe not even trustworthy. You are probably young enough that taking a look at things for yourself from now on with an eye toward being sceptical about everything, until you yourself are reasonably satisfied about what is the most likely or “true”, will be of great benefit to you for the rest of your life.