Swiss ETH: Glaciers melted in the 1940's faster than today

From ETH Zurich: The stupefying pace of glacier melt in the 1940s

http://www.ethlife.ethz.ch/archive_articles/091214_gletscherschwund_su/091214_gornergletscher_L2.jpg?hires
In the 1940s, the glaciers were melting at a faster pace than today. An image of the Gorner glacier. (Image: Matthias Huss / ETH Zurich)

The most recent studies by researchers at ETH Zurich show that in the 1940s Swiss glaciers were melting at an even-faster pace than at present. This is despite the fact that the temperatures in the 20th century were lower than in this century. Researchers see the main reason for this as the lower level of aerosol pollution in the atmosphere.

In Switzerland, the increase in snow in wintertime and the glacier melt in summertime have been measured at measurement points at around 3,000 metres above sea level – on the Clariden Firn, the Great Aletsch glacier and the Silvretta glacier – without interruption for almost 100 years. As part of his doctoral work, Matthias Huss used this unique range of measurements to examine how climate change in the last century affected the glaciers. The work was carried out under the supervision of Martin Funk, professor and head of the Department for Glaciology at the Laboratory for Hydraulics, Hydrology and Glaciology (‘VAW’) at ETH Zurich, who is also co-author of the study.

A glaciologist on the way to work on the Silvretta glacier (Image: Matthias Huss / ETH Zurich)

A glaciologist on the way to work on the Silvretta glacier (Image: Matthias Huss / ETH Zurich) (more pictures)

Solar radiation as the decisive factor

In its work, the research team took into account the solar radiation measured on the Earth’s surface in Davos since 1934. Studies over the past two decades have shown that solar radiation varies substantially due to aerosols and clouds, and this is assumed to influence climate fluctuations. Recent years have seen the emergence of the terms ‘global dimming’ and ‘global brightening’ to describe these phenomena of reduced and increased solar radiation respectively. These two effects are currently the subject of more and more scientific research, in particular by ETH Zurich, as experts feel that they should be taken into account in the climate models (see ETH Life dated July 9, 2009)

The new study, published in the journal ‘Geophysical Research Letters’, confirms this requirement. This is because, taking into account the data recorded for the level of solar radiation, the scientists made a surprising discovery: in the 1940s and in the summer of 1947 especially, the glaciers lost the most ice since measurements commenced in 1914. This is in spite of the fact that temperatures were lower than in the past two decades. “The surprising thing is that this paradox can be explained relatively easily with radiation”, says Huss, who was recently appointed to the post of senior lecturer at the Department of Geosciences at the University of Fribourg in Switzerland.

On the basis of their calculations, the researchers have concluded that the high level of short-wave radiation in the summer months is responsible for the fast pace of glacier melt. In the 1940s, the level was 8% higher than the long-term average and 18 Watts per square metres above the levels of the past ten years. Calculated over the entire decade of the 1940s, this resulted in 4% more snow and ice melt compared with the past ten years.

Furthermore, the below-average melt rates at the measurement points during periods in which the glacier snouts were even advancing correlate with a phase of global dimming, between the 1950s and the 1980s.

Less snow fall and longer melt periods

The researchers arrived at their findings by calculating the daily melt rates with the aid of climate data and a temperature index model, based on the half-yearly measurements on the glaciers since 1914. These results were then compared with the long-term measurements of solar radiation in Davos.

Huss points out that the strong glacier melt in the 1940s puts into question the assumption that the rate of glacier decline in recent years “has never been seen before”. “Nevertheless”, says the glaciologist, “this should not lead people to conclude that the current period of global warming is not really as big of a problem for the glaciers as previously assumed”. This is because it is not only the pace at which the Alpine glaciers are currently melting that is unusual, but the fact that this sharp decline has been unabated for 25 years now. Another aspect to consider – and this is evidenced by the researchers’ findings – is that temperature-based opposing mechanisms came into play around 30 years ago. These have led to a 12% decrease in the amount of precipitation that falls as snow as a percentage of total precipitation, accompanied by an increase of around one month in the length of the melt period ever since this time. Scientists warn that these effects could soon be matched by the lower level of solar radiation we have today compared with the 1940s.

Reference

Huss M, Funk M & Ohmura A: Strong Alpine glacier melt in the 1940s due to enhanced solar radiation. Geophysical Research Letters (2009), 36, L23501, doi:10.1029/2009GL040789

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

140 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Steven Frost
January 3, 2010 12:16 am

Going on denying what you know is true with these false stories… I will pray for you 🙁
REPLY: False? Doubtful. Tell it to ETH Zurich research, the source of this story, see what they tell you, then report back. – A

January 3, 2010 12:16 am

That’s pretty interesting! Of course, the paper has two parts: the very statements about the super-catastrophically rapid Alpine warming in the 1940s (because we have a catastrophically rapid Alpine warming today) and hints about the causes.
The explanations of melting for various glaciers across the world seem very diverse. I wonder to what extent this diversity of causes is real, and to what extent it shows that the people are just randomly guessing. In particular, I doubt that all these Alpine observations can be attributed to the Sun.

Michael
January 3, 2010 12:19 am

This helps put things into perspective.
Weather History: January 3: Record Warm, Cold, Snowstorm/Blizzard, Ice, Tornadoes & High Winds
http://www.examiner.com/x-4645-Wilmington-Weather-Examiner~y2010m1d2-Weather-History-January-3-Record-Warm-Cold-SnowstormBlizzard-Ice-Tornadoes–High-Wind

January 3, 2010 12:44 am

…it is not only the pace at which the Alpine glaciers are currently melting that is unusual, but the fact that this sharp decline has been unabated for 25 years now.
Dang. Still *another* decline to hide…

Mapou
January 3, 2010 12:50 am

OT. Unusually cold weather in nothern China. Heavy snow brings Beijing to standstill:
http://news.yahoo.com/s/nm/20100103/ts_nm/us_china_weather

January 3, 2010 12:51 am

I smell the old gambit: “In our neck of the woods, things are not fitting the AGW pattern. But in every other neck of the woods, we believe they are… so we will explain our findings in those terms… and anyway, our grant money depends on us supporting AGW…”

January 3, 2010 12:51 am

Rate of Swiss glacier growth/melt, based on data from Swiss glacier monitoring network is here:
http://www.letka13.sk/~jurinko/swiss_glaciers_vs_AMO.gif
This is in spite of the fact that temperatures were lower than in the past two decades.
Not true, since homogenization of Swiss temperatures doubled their increase vs raw data.
http://noconsensus.wordpress.com/2009/12/15/swiss-homogenization/
Temperatures in 40ties were almost as high as today.

January 3, 2010 1:04 am

Steven Frost (00:16:44) :
You could always burn a few witches, it did not help in the past, but if it makes you feel better.

Dave Johnson
January 3, 2010 1:07 am

Steven Frost (00:16:44) :
Going on denying what you know is true with these false stories… I will pray for you 🙁
A rather ironic surname methinks;-)

January 3, 2010 1:07 am

Hide the decline……

January 3, 2010 1:25 am

Judging by the summer and winter temperatures of the south Greenland, probably true for Greenland too.
http://www.vukcevic.talktalk.net/Sth_Greenland.gif

Dr A Burns
January 3, 2010 1:45 am

“but the fact that this sharp decline has been unabated for 25 years now.”
I wonder how well the rate of decline matches Briffa 1998 results for declining temperatures after the 1940’s ?

Mark Fawcett
January 3, 2010 1:55 am

Robert van der Veeke (01:04:09) :
Steven Frost (00:16:44) :
You could always burn a few witches, it did not help in the past, but if it makes you feel better

CROWD: Burn! Burn her!
BEDEMIR: Quiet, quiet. Quiet! There are ways of telling whether she is a witch.
CROWD: Are there? What are they?
BEDEMIR: Tell me, what do you do with witches?
VILLAGER #2: Burn!
CROWD: Burn, burn them up!
BEDEMIR: And what do you burn apart from witches?
VILLAGER #1: More witches!
VILLAGER #2: Wood!
BEDEMIR: So, why do witches burn?
[pause]
VILLAGER #3: B–… ’cause they’re made of wood…?
BEDEMIR: Good!
CROWD: Oh yeah, yeah…
BEDEMIR: So, how do we tell whether she is made of wood?
VILLAGER #1: Build a bridge out of her.
BEDEMIR: Aah, but can you not also build bridges out of stone?
VILLAGER #2: Oh, yeah.
BEDEMIR: Does wood sink in water?
VILLAGER #1: No, no.
VILLAGER #2: It floats! It floats!
VILLAGER #1: Throw her into the pond!
CROWD: The pond!
BEDEMIR: What also floats in water?
VILLAGER #1: Bread!
VILLAGER #2: Apples!
VILLAGER #3: Very small rocks!
VILLAGER #1: Cider!
VILLAGER #2: Great gravy!
VILLAGER #1: Cherries!
VILLAGER #2: Mud!
VILLAGER #3: Churches — churches!
VILLAGER #2: Lead — lead!
ARTHUR: A duck.
CROWD: Oooh.
BEDEMIR: Exactly! So, logically…,
VILLAGER #1: If… she.. weighs the same as a duck, she’s made of wood.
BEDEMIR: And therefore–?
VILLAGER #1: A witch!
CROWD: A witch!
BEDEMIR: We shall use my larger scales!
[yelling]
BEDEMIR: Right, remove the supports!
[whop]
[creak]
CROWD: A witch! A witch!
WITCH: It’s a fair cop.
CROWD: Burn her! Burn! [yelling]
BEDEMIR: Who are you who are so wise in the ways of science?
Cheers
Mark

stephen richards
January 3, 2010 2:05 am

Steven Frost
I hope your idol is stronger than the rest cos he perhaps could stop all the global warming and let us drive our SUV and live with much reduced tax.
If he isn’t then please don’t waste your time praying for me it won’t help.

P Gosselin
January 3, 2010 2:05 am

With all this GW talk, I must say I never enjoyed shovelling snow as much as today. We got 8″ here in the northern plains of Germany, the most people can remember getting in a long time. I shovelled snow 4 hours (I did the whole damn street) and enjoyed every second of it.
Back to the Alps,
I don’t put much stock in single reports.
But if we find more reports from different locations around the globe in the 1940s, then maybe we can start to put a picture together. The 1922 Arctic melting report was quite interesting, I admit.

Bulldust
January 3, 2010 2:10 am

Speaking of ice… slightly OT, but the Dutch are getting excited with all the weather (not climate) of late because there is a chance that the Elfstedentocht could go ahead this month. This is a rare occurrence requiring cold weather to freeze canals so that the (almost) 200km race can go ahead:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Elfstedentocht
They are predicting -15 Celsius lows in the coming week:
http://www.schaatsen-kopen.nl/category/elfstedentocht-2010/
The main issue will be clearing the snow off the ice to get a better surface for skating. I note the following article talking about the upcoming weather and the notably quiet sun of late:
http://www.stichtingmilieunet.nl/andersbekekenblog/klimaat/klimaatnieuws-grote-kans-op-elfstedentocht.html
My Dutch is a tad rusty but I am sure Babel or the like can come to the rescue

January 3, 2010 2:13 am

>>Steven Frost (00:16:44) :
>>Going on denying what you know is true with these
>>false stories… I will pray for you 🙁
Pray, no doubt, the Great God of Global Warming (genuflect, genuflect).
Or perhaps to his prophet, Great Gore (peace be upon him). The prophet who was illiterate (scientifically) but yet managed to transcribe the great wisdom of Convenient Truths. This is surely one of god’s signs.
.

Simon le Rosbif
January 3, 2010 2:15 am

Steven Frost.
If any AGW sceptic changes their mind to your point of view, it won’t be your prayers that do it, it’ll be because of hard evidence.

Jimbo
January 3, 2010 2:19 am

Steven Frost (00:16:44) :

“Going on denying what you know is true with these false stories… I will pray for you :(“

Oh, do you mean stories like the polar bear numbers are up since the 1950s?
ttp://www.polarbearsinternational.org/ask-the-experts/population/
Do you mean stories like glacial melt due as much to soot as to warming?
http://www.nasa.gov/topics/earth/features/himalayan-soot.html
Do you mean stories like in 2009 Arctic ice thicker than expected?
http://www.awi.de/en/news/press_releases/detail/item/research_aircraft_polar_5_finishes_arctic_expedition_unique_measurement_flights_in_the_central_arc/?cHash=e36036fcb4
Do you mean stories like The UN IPCC warning that Himalayan glaciers could melt to a fifth of current levels by 2035 is wildly inaccurate?
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/8387737.stm
I could go on and on you know. Please learn to chill out Mr. Frost, which should be quite easy at the moment. Bbbbrrrrrr :o)

Steven Frost
January 3, 2010 2:20 am

[sorry, too rude to let through. ~ctm]
And after a little research it appears that Steven Frost, Robert Soros, and Aimee Gardens are the same troll.
Consider yourself banned.

Kiminori Itoh
January 3, 2010 2:20 am

Juraj V. (00:51:58) :
Thank you, Juraj V. The graph you cited is very beautiful; the relation between the glacier and AMO is quite clear.

Jimbo
January 3, 2010 2:21 am

Missing link for polar bear numbers are up is below.
http://www.polarbearsinternational.org/ask-the-experts/population/

January 3, 2010 2:37 am

Its a bit to early to call for a eleven-city ride in the Netherlands, if the predictions are right we are still talking about 2 weeks minimum before this skating event can be held.
But if it does, than the country will come to a standstill 😀

tallbloke
January 3, 2010 2:40 am

“temperature-based opposing mechanisms came into play around 30 years ago. These have led to a 12% decrease in the amount of precipitation that falls as snow as a percentage of total precipitation, accompanied by an increase of around one month in the length of the melt period ever since this time. Scientists warn that these effects could soon be matched by the lower level of solar radiation we have today compared with the 1940s.”
A nicely ambivalent final paragraph… 🙂

Sandy
January 3, 2010 2:44 am

So their homogenised temperature model ‘proves’ temperatures were higher in the 90s than the 40s.
Data proves that the glaciers melted faster in the forties.
So in the 40s the sun’s radiation delivered more ice-melting energy without raising air temperatures….
The whole premise here is a crock of ctm-bane!!

1 2 3 6