A new month, new year, new decade, and a new record

Not much to say, except “thanks”. The graph tells the story.

Happy New Year to all!

The climate data they don't want you to find — free, to your inbox.
Join readers who get 5–8 new articles daily — no algorithms, no shadow bans.
0 0 votes
Article Rating
210 Comments
DN
January 1, 2010 3:11 am

Gah! Hide the incline!
In all seriousness, Anthony, WUWT has become the essential site for anyone interested in a broad-spectrum, unbiased and delightfully cheeky look at science in general, and climate science in particular.
Well done, sir, and keep at it. And happy 2010 to you and yours!

January 1, 2010 3:22 am

Awesome, dude. You sure that’s not the Yamal data?

January 1, 2010 3:24 am

or maybe just part of a normal historical cycle…..

Staffan Lindström
January 1, 2010 3:28 am

photon without a Higgs… Dublin, IRELAND/ERIE late May 1978… 12-year or so paper boy in
street: Connolley [??…]: “Aldo Moro dead… read all about it…” I was there… Also
end or better beginning of end of COOL period…Now we fear beginning of another cool period or… Until yesterday how many of you knew that Espoo was
the second biggest city of Finland?? AND that the Helsinki area is almost 1,5 million people compared to us in greater Stockholm area 2.0 million…Next
subject to study: Urban areas fastly growing close to seas or big lakes…
And Geoffrey Alder: I’ve read somewhere on the net that 10 YEARS ago,
you had a rare New Year’s Day snowfall somewhere in the mountains…??!!
Can you confirm that…only weather…??…event?

January 1, 2010 3:33 am

Yes, Happy new year. (Why not celebrate by naming your very own number at the Gazillion Project?)
A new decade? Obviously. we can make an arbitrary beginning of a ten-year period anywhere we like, and any day of the year is the the tenth anniversary of the day ten years ago, but do we normally start counting things by starting at zero? I tried this with my sons, by asking them to count to ten: both started at 1 and finished at 10, rather than starting at 0 and finishing at 9.
Last year was certainly the tenth year of the 2000s but this year is the last year of the first decade of the twenty-first century.

Feedback
January 1, 2010 3:34 am

Unprecedented.
Happy New Year!

January 1, 2010 3:38 am

Happy 2010, everyone!

January 1, 2010 3:49 am

Some potential advertisers might be impressed by this chart.
Maybe Accuweather, or some other purveyor of meteorological products or services.
WUWT consumer segment comprising (guessing):
– generally male
– quite well educated, practical
– median age 48
– finicky, cautious buyers,
– who demand quality, and proof thereof
– not impulse buyers
– not trend buyers
Compare to RealClimate segment
– generally male
– overly educated, elite
– median age 48
– impulse buyers
– don’t question quality,
– never complain, no matter how bad the product
– trend buyers, suckers – will believe anything salesman says
HAPPY NEW YEAR!

Capn Jack
January 1, 2010 3:53 am

They just dont teach Quizzinaire any more. No one knows what a whole number is.
Back in the day there were great Primary math and science tools. Awesome teaching tools. There were awesome toys mechano, before leggo. You learnt science on two levels the person and the science.
But CEOs and a faux business model with no Key Result Areas and carers and lurvers, decided because they could write a sentence they knew math and science.
The lurvers and the carers with hands in everyone’s wallet came.

January 1, 2010 3:55 am

Ask yourself:
Which of the above segments would rely on forecasts from Accuweather, and which would rely on the MetOffice?

January 1, 2010 4:05 am

Mike Atkins (03:08:09) :
Sorry to be picky, but is it a new decade?
————–
Well you could go for the Cuban model that held it’s Millennium celebrations a year after everyone else 😉

January 1, 2010 4:10 am

Anthony, et al, Happy 2010 and beyond!
In a strange way, the last few weeks were like watching a vampire movie, where the slayer happens upon the coffin early in the morning. He takes all day – driving the wooden stake into the heart of the beast, not by one or two heavy hits, but by hundreds of little taps… and it ROCKED!

Allan M
January 1, 2010 4:21 am

I, also, radiate New Year Greetings, and many thanks, to you all.
(Not only do you publish the facts, you even include my more ridiculous comments.)
Like I said earlier, 100,000,000 by December? Here’s hoping I’m a pessimist.

James Hansen
January 1, 2010 4:24 am

Is this not proof (at least to a confidence of 90%) that the popularity of this site is the main driver of climate change in the last few years? I see a clear correlation, and that’s enough for me.

Nick de Cusa
January 1, 2010 4:26 am

Thank you so much Mr Watts and the team. May 2010 be sweet to you.

Craigo
January 1, 2010 4:27 am

Thanks Anthony and mods. 2009 will certainly be a year to remember!
Congratulations on a job well done and “keeping the bastards honest” (Australian political expression).
PS Alexa shows visits to RC on the decline http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/realclimate.org – I wonder if they can “hide the decline” with another “trick”.

Capn Jack
January 1, 2010 4:27 am

As the Lord of the Elephants said,
Hannibal Hamilcar Barca. He said Veni Vidi Wicki wicki.
On Wikipedia, they get Hamilcar Barca mixed up with Hannibal Lecter Because they type and dont study History.
Everyone knows that Hannibal Lecter was really Elvis Presley hiding out from Priscilla.
That’s history.
A mob of unqualified clowns tried to change history.

Allan M
January 1, 2010 4:27 am

Dane in Victoria (00:55:31) :
Sorry to inform you though, the new millennium started on the first of January 2001, in spite of the hype that surrounded the previous year. The first day of the second decade will be the 1st of January 2011.
Thou pedant! (and why not?)
But don’t tell us until after we’ve finished the Single Malt.

John from MN
January 1, 2010 4:30 am

A Hockey Stick with Facts to back up the definitive Shape…………….What a concept. Peer Reviewed as well!………..4,888,140 times it was Peer Reviewed. just last month……..Congrats Anthony for bringing the Elitist left -wing Warmers to their knees……..They deserve what you and other sites that question their Science (at least they try and pass it off as Science) give them. Why? Because they have no INTEGRITY and with-out integrity what you have is a pile of dung,not science in the least……Lies and Political scare mongering works well until the masses catch on……Carry-on, but please never begin with the un-truths and sensationalisms, or you too will fall from your acomplishments. Take the upper Road with open Truth and INTEGRITY………..Happy New Year!……………..John…..

Phil Jones
January 1, 2010 4:33 am

Of course no one is questioning the clear correlation between the popularity of WUWT and world surface temps – and no one is questioning the obvious implication that WUWT popularity is the main driver of climate. But we have a divergence problem now. Observed temps have remained static (or cooled slightly) for several years, and WUWT popularity is skyrocketing.
I can’t explain that, and it’s a travesty that I can’t.

View from the Solent
January 1, 2010 4:58 am

To Anthony and the foot soldiers (do you mods ever sleep?) who bring this to us – a happy, successful and prosperous New Year.

Roger Knights
January 1, 2010 4:59 am

Mike Atkins (03:08:09) :
Sorry to be picky, but is it a new decade?

In popular parlance it’s the teens.

Felicity B
January 1, 2010 5:02 am

Thank you guys so much.
My knowledge of science is (to be kind) scant but with only one noted exception, I fall squarely into P Gosselin’s segment categorisations:
– generally male (decidedly female)
– quite well educated, practical
– median age 48
– finicky, cautious buyers,
– who demand quality, and proof thereof
– not impulse buyers
– not trend buyers
Thanks to a very practical chemical engineering father, who taught us to question, question, question, I didn’t simply buy into the AGW meme when results seemed to give it the lie. When I make environmentally friendly decisions and implement them it will be because I can see the economic benefits (economics major here) and not because of any scare tactics which are thrust at me.
Until I stumbled across WUWT I felt like I was drowning in a sea of either too technical or overly simplistic explanations which did not satisfy me.
I’ve found a home here and pop in every day for my ‘fix’. Joe Bastardi’s http://www.AccuWeather.com is another favourite. Thank you from a warm and wet South Africa.

January 1, 2010 5:05 am

Happy New Year to you.
I was looking back at some of my comments at Climate Audit and came across the name “Anthony Watts” in the comment section. You have come a long way baby! And you owe a lot of it to Robert Lewis Stevenson. 🙂
More and better in the coming years.

January 1, 2010 5:06 am

And the same to all my sceptic and believer friends.