This was the scene yesterday in Copenhagen. As you can see the scene is rather agitated with lots of police action, including use of billy clubs. As of this writing, no pictures or video is available of Lord Monckton’s account below. Hopefully somebody in the crowd will post some. I wish him well. I’ll also be glad when this conference is over. It has shown government at its worst.
From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Copenhagen at the SPPI blog:
Today the gloves came off and the true purpose of the “global warming” scare became nakedly visible. Hugo Chavez, the Socialist president of Venezuela, blamed “global warming” on capitalism – and received a standing ovation from very nearly all of the delegates, lamentably including those from those of the capitalist nations of the West that are on the far Left – and that means too many of them.
Previously Robert Mugabe, dictator of Rhodesia, who had refused to leave office when he had been soundly defeated in a recent election, had also won plaudits at the conference for saying that the West ought to pay him plenty of money in reparation of our supposed “climate debt”.
Inside the conference center, “world leader” after “world leader” got up and postured about the need to Save The Planet, the imperative to do a deal, the necessity to save the small island nations from drowning, etc., etc., etc.
Outside, in the real world, it was snowing, and a foretaste of the Brave New World being cooked up by “world leaders” in their fantasy-land was already evident. Some 20,000 observers from non-governmental organizations – nearly all of them true-believing Green groups funded by taxpayers – had been accredited to the conference.
However, without warning the UN had capriciously decided that all but 300 of them were to be excluded from the conference today, and all but 90 would be excluded on the final day.
Of course, this being the inept UN, no one had bothered to notify those of the NGOs that were not true-believers in the UN’s camp. So Senator Steve Fielding of Australia and I turned up with a few dozen other delegates, to be left standing in the cold for a couple of hours while the UN laboriously worked out what to do with us.
In the end, they decided to turn us away, which they did with an ill grace and in a bad-tempered manner. As soon as the decision was final, the Danish police moved in. One of them began the now familiar technique of manhandling me, in the same fashion as one of his colleagues had done the previous day.
Once again, conscious that a police helicopter with a high-resolution camera was hovering overhead, I thrust my hands into my pockets in accordance with the St. John Ambulance crowd-control training, looked my assailant in the eye and told him, quietly but firmly, to take his hands off me.
He complied, but then decided to have another go. I told him a second time, and he let go a second time. I turned to go and, after I had turned my back, he gave me a mighty shove that flung me to the ground and knocked me out.
I came to some time later (not sure exactly how long), to find my head being cradled by my friends, some of whom were doing their best to keep the police thugs at bay while the volunteer ambulance-men attended to me.
I was picked up and dusted me off. I could not remember where I had left my telephone, which had been in my hand at the time when I was assaulted. I rather fuzzily asked where it was, and one of the police goons shouted, “He alleges he had a mobile phone.”
In fact, the phone was in my coat pocket, where my hand had been at the time of the assault. The ambulance crew led me away and laid me down under a blanket for 20 minutes to get warm, plying me with water and keeping me amused with some colorfully colloquial English that they had learned.
I thanked them for their kindness, left them a donation for their splendid service, and rejoined my friends. A very senior police officer then came up and asked if I was all right. Yes, I said, but no thanks to one of his officers, who had pushed me hard from behind when my back was turned and had sent me flying.
The police chief said that none of his officers would have done such a thing. I said that several witnesses had seen the incident, which I intended to report. I said I had hoped to receive an apology but had not received one, and would include that in my report. The policeman went off looking glum, and with good reason.
To assault an accredited representative of a conference your nation is hosting, and to do it while your own police cameramen are filming from above, and to do it without any provocation except my polite, non-threatening request that I should not be manhandled, is not a career-enhancing move, as that police chief is about to discover to his cost.
Nor does this incident, and far too many like it, reflect the slightest credit on Denmark. We must make reasonable allowance for the fact that the unspeakable security service of the UN, which is universally detested by those at this conference, was ordering the Danish police about. The tension between the alien force and the indigenous men on the ground had grown throughout the conference.
However, the Danish police were far too free with their hands when pushing us around, and that is not acceptable in a free society. But then, Europe is no longer a free society. It is, in effect, a tyranny ruled by the unelected Kommissars of the European Union. That is perhaps one reason why police forces throughout Europe, including that in the UK, have become far more brutal than was once acceptable in their treatment of the citizens they are sworn to serve.
It is exactly this species of tyranny that the UN would like to impose upon the entire planet, in the name of saving us from ourselves – or, as Ugo Chavez would put it, saving us from Western capitalist democracy.
A few weeks ago, at a major conference in New York, I spoke about this tendency towards tyranny with Dr. Vaclav Klaus, the distinguished economist and doughty fighter for freedom and democracy who is President of the Czech Republic.
While we still have one or two statesmen of his caliber, there is hope for Europe and the world. Unfortunately, he refused to come to Copenhagen, telling me that there was no point, now that the lunatics were firmly in control of the asylum.
However, I asked him whether the draft Copenhagen Treaty’s proposal for what amounted to a communistic world government reminded him of the Communism under which he and his country had suffered for so long.
He thought for a moment – as statesmen always do before answering an unusual question – and said, “Maybe it is not brutal. But in all other respects, what it proposes is far too close to Communism for comfort.”
Today, as I lay in the snow with a cut knee, a bruised back, a banged head, a ruined suit, and a written-off coat, I wondered whether the brutality of the New World Order was moving closer than President Klaus – or any of us – had realized.
Sponsored IT training links:
Did passing 70-620 was so easier like this? Subscribe for 642-654 products and guarantee pass JK0-016 on first attempt.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Someone forgot to take their meds.
@Jackon:
So…you really dont have any objections to police states as long as their brutality enforces your ideology. Is that pretty fair to assume?
“enlightened” “progressive” “socially moral”
Yep, that’s you guys alright.
@ur momisugly Alexander Feht (19:52:45) : Remember Kipling?
Yes, and Orwell as well.
1984 has been a very long year. Will it ever end?
Monckton’s use of “doughty fighter for freedom and democracy” to describe Klaus applies to himself as well. Being a Yank, I’m not normally partial to British lords, but for Monckton, I make exception.
Hunter (19:05:42) :
“Who still refers to Zimbabwe as Rhodesia? Only racists who are severely divorced from reality. Not much point reading on when you realised the author is of that ilk.”
Divorced from reality? You have any idea who Mugabe is, and what he has done to Rhodesia, the prior “breadbasket of the world”? Know where this one of the poorest countries in the world corrupt, murdering marxist dictator is planning to retire?
Lightning bolts of anger are coming out my eyes right now.
Hang tight team…we are dealing with a new fascist (and communist) world state (they, in the end, are all the same).
Recuperate well, Lord Monckton.
Incidents like this do nothing but strengthen and galvanize chaps like you thats for sure….and for a whole helluva lot more of us across the globe.
They think their reign is beginning.
It is over, and they know it, so they are getting desperate.
We will prevail.
GRRRR.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
Is this “Jackson” posting THE Lisa Perez Jackson heading of the Environment Protection Agency (EPA) of the United States?
If so, citizens, it’s high time to purge D.C.
What… The police attacked the burly and imposing figure of Lord Monckton?
Jeez how big and brave of them. They must’ve looked fear in the face and girded their loins for that mighty battle….. Bloody cowardly thugs.
Hope there is some footage of this shameful attack on an old man, so that we may bear witness to the tyranny that now replaces freedom.
Jackson (19:51:43)
As I see it, Jackson has one of three objectives. (1) He meant his comment to be sarcasm. (2) He wants to stir up anti-AGW emotion so he/she submits a comment so outrageous it can’t help but anger skeptics–possibly to action. (3) He/She expressed his/her true feelings. If (1), he did a poor job. To be effective, sarcasm must be recognizable as sarcasm by the audience. If (2), I don’t believe his/her “means” justify the “end”. If (3), he/she is not very bright because his/her rant did way more harm than good to his/her cause. If I were handicapping his/her intent, I’d give it 10%-30%-60%.
Moderator–I didn’t review my post “Reed Coray (20:53:06)” very well. I used “he” sometimes and “he/she” at other times. Please remove that post and replace it with this one.
Jackson (19:51:43)
As I see it, Jackson has one of three objectives. (1) He/She meant his/her comment to be sarcasm. (2) He/She wants to stir up anti-AGW emotion so he/she submits a comment so outrageous it can’t help but anger skeptics–possibly to action. (3) He/She expressed his/her true feelings. If (1), he/she did a poor job. To be effective, sarcasm must be recognizable as sarcasm by the audience. If (2), I don’t believe his/her “means” justify the “end”. If (3), he/she is not very bright because his/her rant did way more harm than good to his/her cause. If I were handicapping his/her intent, I’d give it 10%-30%-60%.
Jackson (19:51:43) : …. Thank you Jackson, for briefly lifting the AGW rock so that we may observe the foul little creatures that reside beneath…
You certainly are an unappealing, vicious little being aren’t you.
How refreshing Dr. Vaclav Klaus, President of Czech Republic:
He thought for a moment – as statesmen always do before answering an unusual question – and said, “Maybe it is not brutal. But in all other respects, what it proposes is far too close to Communism for comfort.”
If only other world leaders could be as thoughtful and courageous.
LOL!
1. I have Ph.D. in physics — but that would be arguing from authority (a logical fallacy) so I did not cite.
2. There is no means to an end — just wanting to celebrate a bit! Some fine organic wine is open.
3. And, btw… “handicapping” uses odds not percentages. A fine example of skeptics maths.
I do not doubt the sincerity of real scientists who test and refine CC data, but I resent the intrusion of lay people who castigate the life, work, honesty, and motives of hundreds and thousands of dedicated scientists..
It is you all who bring on the hate. I feel very sorry for you all, but the world needs serious people.
[REPLY – You are the erstwhile RW trolling under a fake name and email address. Therefore you self-accreditation is not credible. ~ Evan]
[FURTHER REPLY – I am in error. Same php as RW, but not likely to be him.]
Are you all referring to This Robert Mugabe, who resides in Zimbabwe presiding over the ruined economy of the country that was once the food basket of Africa.
Like his constituents he is doing it tough check out his hovel here;
http://www.newzimbabwe.com/pages/palace13.12328.html
He is just the sort of deserving cause we should be contributing billions of dollars in assistance to help his poor country racked by climate change (or should that be political change), which seems to have coincided with his coming to power.
If you think the treatment of Lord Monckton was reminiscent of jack boots in Europe during the 1930’s & 40’s, just wait a bit longer, we will get a real taste of what these folk have in store for us.
This might be what is ultimately being planned! take a look at the George guide stones in Elbert county.
http://www.radioliberty.com/stones.htm
Fadingfast said:
Monckton’s use of “doughty fighter for freedom and democracy” to describe Klaus applies to himself as well. Being a Yank, I’m not normally partial to British lords, but for Monckton, I make exception.
Hey…. we owe the Lords for the Magna Carta Libertatum, and don’t forget Lord Acton. I would gladly trade my rights as “Citizen Monty” for the original rights of Englishmen. That is what the revolution was about anyway. Many of the Lords did not want the revolution. I will now have a dram in Lord Monckton’s honor. Klaus as well, and Newton, and Galileo, and Anthony and all of you exept Mugabe and Jackson.
Good SHOW Sir.
I’m a Yank too but know from whence I came.
Monty
Jackson (19:51:43)
Well done jackson, that single rant of yours has shown all the many people sitting on the fence which way to fall. The quite, polite, extremely well educated Monkton will/is winning these people over by the droves. Keep up the good work Jackson, we couldnt do it without you and yours!
Jackson (19:51:43) :
Just try…..”Jackson”….whoever the hell you are [he/she needs to make himself/herself known in this debate] or he/she is a coward of the greatest kind.
Try and stop us. You will not succeed.
Chris
Norfolk, VA, USA
[REPLY – “Jackson” is just our old, er, “friend” RW posting under an assumed nomen. ~ Evan]
[FURTHER REPLY – I am in error. Same php as RW, but not likely to be him.]
Jackson
No other names? Just the one? Not brave enough to put your full name to the delusional drivel you have posted here?
Mods: thanks for letting jackson/rw’s post stand. It will help wake a few people up to what kind of person is an agw cheerleader.
Lord Monckton, I am absolutely in awe of your recounting. There is and can never be any excuse for this sort of thing (well, the whole COP15 fiasco, but I was referring to the jackbooted thug’s action). I sincerely wish you full recovery and justice.
Oh yes, this is a foretaste. The battle is just beginning.
Why is this Jackson character so excited? Copenhagen was/is a debacle. It was meant to be theater and that’s what it was. An agreement on pledges, with no real specifics, was a forgone conclusion and predicted weeks ago. Does this guy watch the movie “Hoosiers” a dozen times and still cheer when they win the big game each time? There was no way they were going to let COP-15 go by without something they could take home and wave and say “peace in our time” ala Chamberlain.
But something did come out of Copenhagen that the AGW lackeys did not account for. Support for AGW is dropping like a rock in the US. Rasmussen just completed a survey and AGW believers are down to 34% and those who feel it is natural are at 50%. Welcome to the minority, Jackson. The “consensus” of Americans disagree with you. Or do you deny the overwhelming statistical data contained in that poll? On second thought, don’t answer. The debate is over on that poll as of ten minutes ago. Sorry you missed it, but you can write up a paper with your objections and I will certainly and fairly review its content. Trust me….
http://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/current_events/environment_energy/energy_update
And it would appear that Jackson’s ruse has been discovered based on Evan’s edit to his post above. Tsk, tsk, tsk.
[REPLY – You are the erstwhile RW trolling under a fake name and email address. Therefore you self-accreditation is not credible. ~ Evan]
Sorry. Don’t know an RW actually. Your intel is incorrect.
Of course, one has to use an annonimizer when dealing with you people. You just proved the point. And who would provide their work email to people who post redacted stolen emails.
My statements stand for themselves — no self validation or authority needed. I am the voice of the future.
I greatly delight that you probably won’t have the courage to post this reply.
[REPLY – The php number never lies. Besides, anyone who ever read any of RW’s posts could hardly fail to note the resemblence. Busted. ~ Evan]
[FURTHER REPLY – I am in error. Same php as RW, but not likely to be him.]
I think you are all misreading our poor Jackson, his post was obviously a cry for help.
My Global CAGW Fanboy model projections prove a correlation between adolescent onset and immature, rude behavior. With 95% certainty I can project that when he grows up and starts paying the taxes he is currently such a fan of he will recognize how ridiculous his comments in this thread were. There is also a 5% chance he will move into “academia” (please note the lack of reference to real science or anything remotely productive with the term academia) and continue to rant and rave and not contribute anything to society other than trying to convince impresionable young minds to follow his “revolutionary” thinking
This research has all been peer reviewed by people older and more mature than me or Jackson and represents the consensus view. There is no valid debate, just ranting and waving of hands by people who refuse to accept this fundamenta truth of science
OOOOHHHHHHH!!!!! Jackson has a PHD. in PHYSICS! Wow, are you ever a condescending ass!
I feel sorry for you in terms that are beyond our arrogance to understand. Arguing from authority would imply that you have authority, and by claiming authority you confirm you have none. Your continued reference to “lay people” is offensive. It reflects the ivory tower arrogance of the “team” as exposed in Climategate. You have little else than that left as the end is nigh.
Jackson drinking ‘organic’ wine is punishment enough, I think we can relax. On that topic a case of decent Claret is a common present for a friend with an injury with loss of blood. I don’t think I could afford anything decent enough for Lord Monckton but is there any chance of starting a collection?
‘Jackson’
My statements stand for themselves — no self validation or authority needed. I am the voice of the future.
Oh Gawd!