This was the scene yesterday in Copenhagen. As you can see the scene is rather agitated with lots of police action, including use of billy clubs. As of this writing, no pictures or video is available of Lord Monckton’s account below. Hopefully somebody in the crowd will post some. I wish him well. I’ll also be glad when this conference is over. It has shown government at its worst.
From The Viscount Monckton of Brenchley in Copenhagen at the SPPI blog:
Today the gloves came off and the true purpose of the “global warming” scare became nakedly visible. Hugo Chavez, the Socialist president of Venezuela, blamed “global warming” on capitalism – and received a standing ovation from very nearly all of the delegates, lamentably including those from those of the capitalist nations of the West that are on the far Left – and that means too many of them.
Previously Robert Mugabe, dictator of Rhodesia, who had refused to leave office when he had been soundly defeated in a recent election, had also won plaudits at the conference for saying that the West ought to pay him plenty of money in reparation of our supposed “climate debt”.
Inside the conference center, “world leader” after “world leader” got up and postured about the need to Save The Planet, the imperative to do a deal, the necessity to save the small island nations from drowning, etc., etc., etc.
Outside, in the real world, it was snowing, and a foretaste of the Brave New World being cooked up by “world leaders” in their fantasy-land was already evident. Some 20,000 observers from non-governmental organizations – nearly all of them true-believing Green groups funded by taxpayers – had been accredited to the conference.
However, without warning the UN had capriciously decided that all but 300 of them were to be excluded from the conference today, and all but 90 would be excluded on the final day.
Of course, this being the inept UN, no one had bothered to notify those of the NGOs that were not true-believers in the UN’s camp. So Senator Steve Fielding of Australia and I turned up with a few dozen other delegates, to be left standing in the cold for a couple of hours while the UN laboriously worked out what to do with us.
In the end, they decided to turn us away, which they did with an ill grace and in a bad-tempered manner. As soon as the decision was final, the Danish police moved in. One of them began the now familiar technique of manhandling me, in the same fashion as one of his colleagues had done the previous day.
Once again, conscious that a police helicopter with a high-resolution camera was hovering overhead, I thrust my hands into my pockets in accordance with the St. John Ambulance crowd-control training, looked my assailant in the eye and told him, quietly but firmly, to take his hands off me.
He complied, but then decided to have another go. I told him a second time, and he let go a second time. I turned to go and, after I had turned my back, he gave me a mighty shove that flung me to the ground and knocked me out.
I came to some time later (not sure exactly how long), to find my head being cradled by my friends, some of whom were doing their best to keep the police thugs at bay while the volunteer ambulance-men attended to me.
I was picked up and dusted me off. I could not remember where I had left my telephone, which had been in my hand at the time when I was assaulted. I rather fuzzily asked where it was, and one of the police goons shouted, “He alleges he had a mobile phone.”
In fact, the phone was in my coat pocket, where my hand had been at the time of the assault. The ambulance crew led me away and laid me down under a blanket for 20 minutes to get warm, plying me with water and keeping me amused with some colorfully colloquial English that they had learned.
I thanked them for their kindness, left them a donation for their splendid service, and rejoined my friends. A very senior police officer then came up and asked if I was all right. Yes, I said, but no thanks to one of his officers, who had pushed me hard from behind when my back was turned and had sent me flying.
The police chief said that none of his officers would have done such a thing. I said that several witnesses had seen the incident, which I intended to report. I said I had hoped to receive an apology but had not received one, and would include that in my report. The policeman went off looking glum, and with good reason.
To assault an accredited representative of a conference your nation is hosting, and to do it while your own police cameramen are filming from above, and to do it without any provocation except my polite, non-threatening request that I should not be manhandled, is not a career-enhancing move, as that police chief is about to discover to his cost.
Nor does this incident, and far too many like it, reflect the slightest credit on Denmark. We must make reasonable allowance for the fact that the unspeakable security service of the UN, which is universally detested by those at this conference, was ordering the Danish police about. The tension between the alien force and the indigenous men on the ground had grown throughout the conference.
However, the Danish police were far too free with their hands when pushing us around, and that is not acceptable in a free society. But then, Europe is no longer a free society. It is, in effect, a tyranny ruled by the unelected Kommissars of the European Union. That is perhaps one reason why police forces throughout Europe, including that in the UK, have become far more brutal than was once acceptable in their treatment of the citizens they are sworn to serve.
It is exactly this species of tyranny that the UN would like to impose upon the entire planet, in the name of saving us from ourselves – or, as Ugo Chavez would put it, saving us from Western capitalist democracy.
A few weeks ago, at a major conference in New York, I spoke about this tendency towards tyranny with Dr. Vaclav Klaus, the distinguished economist and doughty fighter for freedom and democracy who is President of the Czech Republic.
While we still have one or two statesmen of his caliber, there is hope for Europe and the world. Unfortunately, he refused to come to Copenhagen, telling me that there was no point, now that the lunatics were firmly in control of the asylum.
However, I asked him whether the draft Copenhagen Treaty’s proposal for what amounted to a communistic world government reminded him of the Communism under which he and his country had suffered for so long.
He thought for a moment – as statesmen always do before answering an unusual question – and said, “Maybe it is not brutal. But in all other respects, what it proposes is far too close to Communism for comfort.”
Today, as I lay in the snow with a cut knee, a bruised back, a banged head, a ruined suit, and a written-off coat, I wondered whether the brutality of the New World Order was moving closer than President Klaus – or any of us – had realized.
Sponsored IT training links:
Did passing 70-620 was so easier like this? Subscribe for 642-654 products and guarantee pass JK0-016 on first attempt.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Global warming scientists melt and fall over when confronted about corrupt global warming data. These warming scientists who manipulated data are criminals.
“When Lord Monckton’s questions about a conflict of interest between Dr. Pachauri’s financial interest and position on the IPCC were not adequately answered he stood up and demanded an adequate response
Dr. Pachauri appeared totally unprepared to appropriately answer the questions and ran out of the building immediately after the Q&A session closed without talking to anybody.”
http://www.cfact.org/a/1678/Lord-Christopher-Monckton-questions-IPPC-chairman
What a laugh Obama had to return from the UN global warming summit because of a massive snow storm over Washington. Obama is corrupt and lying just the same as scientists in the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) who’ve manipulated climate data. The irony could not be made up to be more laughable!!
Reuters
OBAMA SAYS BECAUSE OF WEATHER REASONS WILL RETURN TO WASHINGTON BEFORE A FINAL VOTE AT UN SUMMIT
Reuters
“OBAMA SAYS BECAUSE OF WEATHER REASONS WILL RETURN TO WASHINGTON BEFORE A FINAL VOTE AT UN SUMMIT”
E.M.Smith (12:46:59) :
(and also tailbloke)
I would not recommend Lord Monckton to do anything differently than he has done. I especially wouldn’t recommend that he attempt to blend in and work from the inside. That might do for certain people in certain situations, but Lord Monckton’s in-your-face truthfulness is exactly what is needed, in the current situation.
Examine the way Churchill dealt with Hitler, and show me a time Churchill attempted to blend in and work from Hitler’s side. I think you will see Churchill tended to begin nearly all his political discussions with in-your-face bluntness, and only later to retreat towards anything like compromise.
Apparently Churchill was touring Germany before the war, (1934?) (Read “The Last Lion,”) and had a chance to meet Hitler in an informal setting. They were staying overnight in the same hotel, or some such thing. Churchill was wary of being used as a photo-op, (to make Hitler look less threatening to English conservatives,) so perhaps he torpedoed the meeting on purpose. However the way he did it was to ask Hitler’s official, who had dropped by Churchill’s hotel room to feel-out the prospects of a meeting, why Hitler was so down on Jews. No meeting followed. However I think that shows how Churchill made no effort to “blend in,” or “be a mirror.”
I think Lord Monckton is marching to the same drummer. There are times you cannot allow truth to be watered down, because then it isn’t truth any more. I really admire Monckton’s ability to think on his feet, and to refuse to allow conversations to be diverted into sidetracks.
It’s also a bit absurd to give Lord Monckton the advice you give an uninvited protestor, when he was an invited guest of the UN. This situation makes the hosts look really bad, which may well be what Monckton intended.
Let me throw in my two-cents-worth, about how to handle yourself when up against bullies. While it is good to study beforehand, (and it appears both you and Lord Monckton have studied how to behave in a riot,) the actual present-tense situation involves an ability difficult to describe. You need to use your intuition, and you cannot say beforehand what you will do. Afterwards you tend to be amazed by how you disarmed anger or eluded snares, because you have used an ability which is not rehearsed like a speech. I’m not even sure there is a word for it. Fast-talking? Quick-wittedness? Think-on-your-feetedness? Whatever it is, Monckton’s got it.
I recall reading about a reporter who used this ability to survive being captured by rebels in the Belgian Congo in 1960. The rebels tended to shoot whites without asking any questions, but this guy started laughing. The more the rebels glared the more he laughed, asking them questions and jotting things down in his little notebook. After a while a couple of the rebels started to smile, and nudge the other rebels in the shoulder, and pretty soon the whole group was jovial, and the reporter got out of the situation with an amazing interview. However, afterwards, he could not explain why he laughed. He had never read in any book that it was the thing to do. It was just an intuition that sprang into his mind when he desperately needed it.
I believe it is only fair that Robert Mugabe receive fair compensation. I do not feel that 20 trillion dollars is too much for such a distinguished leader. I just think we should pay him in his own now worthless Zimbawa trillion dollar notes…….
Accredited press organizations only at Copenhagen?
‘That brought to mind not only the difficulties I personally had getting into the conference center this week but also problems I ran into immediately with the UNFCCC’s secretariat when I tried to obtain press accreditation as IEEE Spectrum magazine’s editor for energy and the environment. When proper press credentials failed to arrive on request, and I sent an e-mail message of inquiry, the secretariat told me that they did not issue press credentials to publications of “non-governmental organizations” and only accredited press organizations somehow recognized by member governments.’
http://spectrum.ieee.org/blog/energy/renewables/energywise/copenhagen-and-the-uns-ngo-problem
Over the years, the left has always screamed that folks on the right are the purveyors of tyranny & hate. They told all the right was responsible for possible ‘Nazi-like’ governance. We were told people on the right were mean & vicious. Yet when I see how ‘the left’ is now responding to its power in America & around the world, I suspect the world has been the dupe of a system designed to discredit those they see as enemies so the left can assert its global government on all. And woe be it to those who actually voice opposition or any level of dissent. Obama has attacked any & all who may voice an opposition opinion & his administration is rife w/ folks who would gladly shut down the voices of his opposition, so all the people hear is ‘his word’ and no other viewpoint is available.
Some on the right are nuts… but lets be real folks, many on the left are just as nuts & in a number of cases, significantly more vicious!
Amen to that!!
Roy (02:50:14) :
Monkton fills the role of skeptical activist but he spreads himself too thin by introducing too many unfashionable ideas at once.
Too many people pushing too many “fashionable ideas” got us into this mess in the first place.
All the best wishes to Lord Monckton!
Here he is demonstrating that asking a Greenie simple basic questions is allways the best approach;
For a group that is all so ready to leap upon the use of the word “trick” in a scientific paper, you’re very understanding about the use of the word “Rhodesia” by Christopher Monckton.
At least the use of the word “trick” is well-established in scientific literature, especially where mathematics and statistics are concerned.
The use of the word Rhodesia these days is however established in few places where the light still shines.
Next time the anti-climate science PR machine think they’re being so clever fooling people with cherry-picking “tricks” they might want to do some research first so as not to end up with egg on face. . .
and Monckton might want to start doing some schooling as well. He’s degreed only in the classics and journalism, not science at all.
It hasn’t stopped his vocal opinion from foraying into the medical field though when he advocated that all carriers of the AIDS virus be forcibly collected and quarantined for life.
If he has published anything scientifically relevant in the atmospheric climate research realm however, it’s deeply hidden. Oh wait, there was that APS opinion piece. Not peer reviewed, not scientifically examined, and given a quite proper note to that effect. He wasn’t happy with that and claimed he had been edited. If that were the only hurdle to publishing data my research group would not be labouring over the 3rd review of our paper at this moment!
http://climateprogress.org/2008/07/20/irony-gate-viscount-monckton-a-british-peer-says-his-paper-was-peer-reviewed-by-a-scientist-how-droll/
Is allowing hobbyists to dictate public policy a wise move in any nation however. Even Al Gore doesn’t claim to be a scientist.
I don’t understand your last comment Myshele.
You criticise Lord Monckton for trying to influence the debate even though he has not got a science degree yet you appear to support Al Gore and his campaign even though in this respect he is like Monckton?
Jackson is certainly amusing. Of course he fails to use any logic whatsoever to back up his arguments, but then again, his arguments were not logic-based to begin with.
Overall the most amusing comments I have seen in a while… along with the ones bashing Monkton for using the name “Rhodesia” instead of Zimbabwe. I am sure that there are many in the British house of Lords that still refuse to recognize that country as anything other than “Rhodesia”. It was certainly much more prosperous back then. Far from perfect, but then again, it went from far from perfect to absolute hell-hole after Mugabe took over, and you would have to be a REAL racist to not admit that fact.
[snip – sorry just way over the top for this blog -A]
As individuals we also have to walk the walk if we want to talk the talk… small changes = big impacts.
The USA is broke !
Just raised debt ceiling to 12 TRILLION $$$$
Come one and all.
Get get our monopoly money !
We’ll sell you our phoney greenbacks !
SUCKERS !!! HAHAHAHAHA
To you Mychele (17:58:09) :
Your words:
the use of the word “trick” is well-established in scientific
literature, especially where mathematics and statistics are
concerned.”
Please, then tell me , in math, what trick is used in 2+2=4 ?
Please tell me what math tricks were used with the 1st
landing on the moon ? Were their primitive computers loaded
with “tricks” to guide them to the Sea of Tranquility ?
PRESICELY WHERE they were supposed to land ?
a TRICK is A TRICK ! Fudge factors are sometimes necessary
to make up for lack of data on a continuing trend.
But it’s more than apparent that tricks and fudge factors
were grossly misused in all this climate data hoax.
The leaked emails attest to that. Face it. The lid has blown
off of the scam ! Analasis of the parts of the code that were
leaked show HARD numbers where DATA should be to skew the
results in a favorable way. PHONEY OUTCOME !
NOT REASONABLY DEBATABLE ! GARBAGE.
PLUS… the raw data was dumped !!!
Convieniently after a FOIA request !!!!
I damn well gaurantee that the FOIA data is STILL intact.
Frrauds, every one of you “scientists” !!!
Mugabe! and people giving him a round of applause? omg isn’t he a crook, why doesn’t america remove him? isn’t he a human rights abuser on a massive scale?
shame on them
wizzpizz – I’m sure they’d have been delighted to nab Mugabe! Unfortunately, he has “Diplomatic Immunity”!!