Quite a lot of interest continues in the files from CRU that were leaked/hacked and placed on a Russian FTP server. Quite a number of other websites have been things with them ranging from commentary to evaluation of validity. With over 1000 emails, it is a bit of a task to wade through.
The Internet is an amazing place. Now there’s a website that has put all of the emails into a searchable database with a web engine interface.
The screencap below shows the engine at http://www.anelegantchaos.org/cru/
I have no idea who put this together, but it does seem to work quite well. For example, typing in the keyword “moron” yields an interesting email. So does typing in the name of a prominent climate “bulldog”.
Interesting stuff.
NOTE: Link updated to new website on 1/23/10
Funny! all this going on in cyberspace and yet I have read nothing of it in my daily paper, heard nothing on radio and it has not been mentioned on television. Has the media in Australia decided that global climate is a non event after all? yet our political parties are still arguing about how severely we should cut back carbon dioxide production. When is someone going to announce that the war is over?
steven mosher (15:40:39) :
Absolutely correct steve. I have looked at most o the emails and the only ones that are actionable as far as my knowledge of FOI goes are those that are focused on suppressing data and code, and subverting FOI.
Free the Data! Free the Code!
Research Unit e-mails, and because there are potential legal issues connected with publishing this material,
Riiiiight Richard. 100 of blogs have posted this — it’s now public info so no legal problem (not to mention the logistical problem of prosecuting literlally hundreds of blogs who have published this information.
I’m sure his reluctance to cross in to legalities has nothing to do witht he fact he is shown in the emails to be the AGW fakers personal BBC butt boy.
If there are more docs to dump, what do you wanna bet there are exchanges of Rich offering just short of [snip]
Are there any lawyers here?
Can they give an opinion if a criminal or civil case case can be filed for willful deception, or something along those lines?
Has some such case been filed against Al Gore?
Wow. The marketing guys have taken ownership of the scandal and are giving it a positive warmist spin. No quotes there, nothing to show them in a bad light. I’m a little shocked at how fast they’ve spun this.
Here’s your opportunity:
Watts doesn’t hide anything, neither does McEntyre. Only people with something to hide, hide things. It’s really that simple.
[Response: I’ll take you seriously when either of them opens up their Inbox for everyone to look at. – gavin]
[Reply: I see the inbox. Gavin is wrong. Well under one in a hundred comments are moderated out, and those for violating site policy, never for simply disagreeing. ~dbstealey, moderator.]
Richard Sharpe (18:33:09) :
Bill Illis (17:02:18) : said:
Does anyone have a secure system/setup and want to take a chance on the offer made above by Nic (16:21:44) :
There could be more.
1073 emails with one being the same as one already reported on: 1077829152.txt
So, it might not contain anything new.
Same here. Dropped it into a lead-lined Virtual PC box and unpacked it. Same size as the one from from the Russian server, same number of files, same file names and the contents appear the same. So far, nothing banging on the box to get out. Letting MrT examine it.
>Shurley Knot (17:26:53) :
>From: Ben Santer
>To: Smithg
>Subject: Re: data request
>Date: Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:33:53 -0800
>Reply-to santer1@xxx
Santer again. As a government employee – he has no expectation of privacy, expecially in an email with the public. He sounds like a jerk – wait, he probably is!!!
Richard,
Yes. Al Gore has been taken to court for willful deception. In fact, this is why he is in jail right now.
xTxEx
Anthony,
What’s up with Climate Audit? Can’t get through! Please update Us!
For the last few hours now!
Regards,
Denny
“Notice on Richard Black’s blog at the BBC, at the bottom of article entitled: Copenhagen Countdown: 17 days …
Update 2309: Because comments were posted quoting excerpts apparently from the hacked Climate Research Unit e-mails, and because there are potential legal issues connected with publishing this material, we have temporarily removed all comments until we can ensure that watertight oversight is in place.”
Instead i guess leaks from Governments, Firms or Political Parties that don’t toe the BBC line are fair…
What the hell? I searched “New World” for giggles.. and they’ve been sent this email..
From: Earth Government
Subject: Press release from Earth Government and April Newsletter
Date: Thu, 27 Mar 2003 16:05:07 -0800
Press release from Earth Government and April Newsletter
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
This Press release from Earth Government is found at
[1]http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov/HNewsPR05.htm
Formation of Earth Government for the good of all
March 27th, 2003
To all Peoples of the Earth,
Earth has long been waiting for a truly global governing body based on universal values,
human rights, global concepts and democracy. Earth Government might as well be created now,
there is no longer any reason to wait. We are the Earth Community, and we will form the
Earth Government. Earth management is a priority and is a duty by every responsible person.
A democratically elected Earth Government will now be formed, and we want you to reflect on
future effects of such an event on the history of humanity. Certainly one will expect
extraordinary changes: a reorganizing of human activities all over the planet;
participation by all societies on the planet in solving local and global problems; new
alliances forming; north meeting with south (eradication of poverty will be the price to
pay to get votes from the south) in order to gather more votes within the newly created
Earth Government to satisfy power struggles between European, Asian and Western countries;
adoption of democratic principles, human and Earth rights, global concepts, and universal
values by every human being; expansion of consciousness; gathering and coordinating of
forces to resolve social and political problems in a peaceful way (no more conflicts or
wars); gathering and coordinating of forces (technologies, scientific research, exploration
work, human resources, etc.) to resolve global problems such as global climate,
environment, availability of resources, poverty, employment, etc. Thousands more changes!
Let your heart and mind reflect on ‘the good’ of a democratically elected Earth Government.
Everyone is part of Earth Community by birth and therefore everyone has a right to vote.
Everyone should be given a chance to vote. Decisions will be made democratically.
Earth Government is proposing that:
a) different nations may require different political systems at different times
b) a democratic system is not a “must have it” to be a responsible member nation of the
Earth Government
c) all democracies are to be upgraded, or improved upon, to be a responsible member nation
of the Earth Government. The Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of the Earth
Government are the newly added requirements to all democratic systems of the world.
In today’s Earth Government it is important for our survival to cooperate globally on
several aspects such as peace, security, pollution in the air, water and land, drug trade,
shelving the war industry, keeping the world healthy, enforcing global justice for all,
eradicating poverty worldwide, replacing the Universal Declaration of Human Rights by the
Scale of Human and Earth Rights, and entrenching the Charter of Earth Government as a way
of life for the good of all.
Earth needs urgently a world system of governance. The United Nations fail to satisfy the
needs of the people of the 21st Century. It has never improved upon the old ways and
thinking of the middle of the 20th Century. Its voting system no longer satisfy the 6.157
billion people on Earth. The challenges are different and require a world organization up
for dealing with the needs of all these people.
During the past several years, the Earth Government has been pleading the United Nations
leaders to make changes in the UN organizational structure and ways of doing things. There
has been an urgent need for fundamental changes in the United Nations organization. The
decision of the United States Government to invade the Middle East nations and Afghanistan
has shown to be a result of this incapacity for changes on the part of the United Nations.
A lack of leadership at the United Nations is a major threat to the security of the world.
The world wants a true democratic world organization. The UN is not!
The most fundamental requirement of a world organization is a democratic system of voting.
Democracy must be a priority. The right that the greatest number of people has by virtue of
its number (50% plus one) is a human right. It should be respected. The actual UN system of
voting is undemocratic, unfair and noone likes it. It does not work! Earth Government has
proposed a voting system based on democracy.
Of the 190 Member States of the United Nations, it takes only one of the five permanent
members to overthrow any decision or proposal during a meeting. This means 1/189 or 0.5% of
the membership is more powerful than the remaining 99.5%. If that is not a dictature, what
is it? It does not say much about democracy at the UN. More like a dictature of the five
permanent members. In the Preamble of the Charter of the United Nations, it says “WE THE
PEOPLES OF THE UNITED NATIONS ” but in fact it should say “WE THE FIVE PERMANENT MEMBERS”.
The voting system for Earth Government is very simple and practical. One representative per
million people. If all countries in the world had decided now to participate with this
process we would have today 6,114 elected representatives to form Earth Government. They
would form the Legislative body of Earth Government. They could actually all stay home to
govern or from some place in their communities. Today communications are more than good
enough to allow voting and discussing issues, etc. through the Internet and video
conferencing. That would cut cost of governing down to a minimum, at least administrative
costs. The Executive body would also govern in this way to cut cost down to a minimum.
Ministers can administer their Ministries from where they live if they wish to. There will
be a place for the Headquarters. We will show that it costs very little to administer Earth
Government, and that we can achieve immense results. There is no limit to the good the
Earth Government can achieve in the world. Think! What can do a unified 6.114 billion
people determined to make things work to keep Earth healthy?
For the first time in human history, and the first time this millennium, humanity has
proposed a benchmark:
* formation of Earth Government
* formation of global ministries in all important aspects of our lives
* the Scale of Human and Earth Rights as a replacement to the Universal Declaration of
Human Rights
* an evolved Democracy based on the Scale of Human and Earth Rights and the Charter of
the Earth Government
* a central organization for Earth management, the restoration of the planet and Earth
governance: the Global Community Assessment Centre (GCAC)
* the Earth Court of Justice to deal with all aspects of the Governance and Mangement of
the Earth
* a new impetus given to the way of doing business and trade
* more new, diversified (geographical, economical, political, social, business,
religious) symbiotical relationships between nations, communities, businesses, for the
good and well-being of all
* the event and formation of the human family and the Soul of Humanity
* proposal to reform the United Nations, the World Trade Organization, the World Bank,
the IMF, NAFTA, FTAA, and to centralize them under Earth Government, and these
organizations will be asked to pay a global tax to be administered by Earth Government
* the Peace Movement of the Earth Government and shelving of the war industry from
humanity
* a global regulatory framework for capitals and corporations that emphasizes global
corporate ethics, corporate social responsibility, protection of human and Earth rights,
the environment, community and family aspects, safe working conditions, fair wages and
sustainable consumption aspects
* the ruling by the Earth Court of Justice of the abolishment of the debt of the poor or
developing nations as it is really a form of global tax to be paid annually by the rich
or industrialized nations to the developing nations
* establishing freshwater and clean air as primordial human rights
The political system of an individual country does not have to be a democracy. Political
rights of a country belong to that country alone. Democracy is not to be enforced by anyone
and to anyone or to any community. Every community can and should choose the political
system of their choice with the understanding of the importance of such a right on the
Scale of Human and Earth Rights. On the other hand, representatives to Earth Government
must be elected democratically in every part of the world. An individual country may have
any political system at home but the government of that country will have to ensure (and
allow verification by Earth Government) that representatives to Earth Government have been
elected democratically. This way, every person in the world can claim the birth right of
electing a democratic government to manage Earth: the rights to vote and elect
representatives to form the Earth Government.
In order to elect representatives to Earth Government it is proposed the following:
A. Each individual government in the world will administer the election of
representatives to Earth Government with an NGO and/or members of Earth Government be
allowed to verify all aspects of the process to the satisfaction of all parties
involved.
B. Representatives be elected every five years to form a new Earth Government.
C. It is proposed here that there will be one elected representative per 1,000,000
people. A population of 100 million people will elect 100 representatives. This process
will create a feeling of belonging and participating to the affairs of the Earth
Community and Earth Government.
D. A typical community of a million people does not have to be bounded by a geographical
or political border. It can be a million people living in many different locations all
over the world. The Global Community is thus more fluid and dynamic. We need to let go
the archaic ways of seeing a community as the street where I live and contained by a
border. Many conflicts and wars will be avoided by seeing ourselves as people with a
heart, a mind and a Soul, and as part of a community with the same.
E. Earth population is now 6.114 billion people. If all representatives had been elected
this year there would be 6,114 representatives to form Earth Government. They would be
the Legislative elected body of Earth Government. They would participate in some ways in
choosing the Executive and Judiciary bodies of Earth Government.
Humanity has now a Vision of the Earth in the years to come and a sense of direction.
May the DIVINE WILL come into our lives and show us the way.
May our higher purpose in life bring us closer to the Soul of Humanity and God.
Germain Dufour, President
Earth Community Organization (ECO) and Earth Government
___________________________________________________________________________________________
The Newsletter can be found at the following location:
April 2003 Newsletter
[2]http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov/NewsA.htm
There are no costs in reading our Newsletters
([3]http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov/EarthGovernment.htm).
The Table of Contents of the Newsletter is shown here.
Table of Contents
1.0 President’s Message
2.0 Letter to the Prime Minister of Canada, Jean Chretien, concerning Peace in the
Middle East
3.0 Letter to the American and British Peoples concerning the invasion of the Middle
East
4.0 Letter to all Canadians concerning the total and global embargo on all US products,
all goods and services
5.0 Letter to the Moslem and the Arab Peoples
6.0 Letter to Jiang Zemin and Zhu Rongji of China, and to the Chinese People
7.0 Letter to the United Nations
8.0 Articles
A) How women matter in decreasing world population
B) The energy we need
C) Mining the impacts
D) Symbiotical relationship of religion and global life-support systems
E) Celebration of Life Day
F) The hidden agenda: China
G) Earth Government now a priority
H) The splitting of America into separate independent states living at peace for the
good of all
I) The war industry: the modern evil at work in the Middle East
J) Earth security
K) Earth governance
L) The Earth Court of Justice holds the people of the U.S.A. and Britain as criminals
M) Foundation for the new world order, Earth Government
Improved Democracy, Nonviolence, and Peace
Respect and Care for the Global Community of Life
Ecological Integrity
Social and Economic Justice
A new symbiotical relationship between that of spirituality and the
protection of the global life-support systems
Scale of Human and Earth Right
Earth Court of Justice
Charter of Earth Government
May the DIVINE WILL come into our lives and show us the way.
May our higher purpose in life bring us closer to the Soul of Humanity and God.
Germain Dufour, President
[4]Earth Community Organization (ECO) and [5]Earth Government
Website of the Earth Community Organization and of Earth Government
[6]http://www.telusplanet.net/public/gdufour/
[7]http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov
Email addresses
[8]gdufour@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
[9]gdufour@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
[10]earthgov@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
References
1. http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov/HNewsPR05.htm
2. http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov/NewsA.htm
3. http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov/EarthGovernment.htm
4. http://www.telusplanet.net/public/gdufour/
5. http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov
6. http://www.telusplanet.net/public/gdufour/
7. http://members.shaw.ca/earthgov
8. mailto:gdufour@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
9. mailto:gdufour@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
10. mailto:earthgov@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
“I wasn’t able to stop some
comments being put in by Lindzen, but Tom has a paper as does Myles which are
enough to ignore his and the Douglass papers.
Cheers
Phil”
Gameover
Tim (18:20:10) :
“Now if the the search word or phrase could be ‘cached’or highlighted (Google style) THAT would be a big help in searching.”
In Firefox, just use “control F” and type the searched word.
I use Firefox, thanks,Tim.
All Your Emails Are Belong To Us
I havn’t checked the files much, but there’s a map (file ianh-greenpeace-ships) with the positions and routes of Greenpeace ship(s) in the Pacific Ocean, and I see Greenpeace mail adresses in dozens of e-mails about climate meetings or negotiations.
Also, when they recieved money for research they discussed to not employ anyone because of lack of time.
What was the money sent 10K at the time? Is there a plot thicken, or am I just…
Wat (19:21:46) :
“Perhaps the most significant revelation is the way they seek to manipulate the peer-review process and then disingenuously use that to dismiss skeptical analyses out of hand.”
To me, this is one of more interesting questions that will arise in the near term. Will the climate and science journals still permit Jones, Santer, Mann, et al. to continue publishing and (more importantly) reviewing papers for them? If they continue like nothing’s happened, then they are perceived as being blind and complicit to the obvious manipulation of the peer-review process. If they ban them, then they risk a backlash from their friends and colleagues. And what do the journal editors say to those scientists who’ve been besmirched by these guys, and/or who have had their papers rejected for what appear to be political reasons? It will be interesting to watch this unfold…
Now we know who is responsible for any missing climate data. It’s Eric Olthwaite:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yd3tHN_DoY8 (at 42 seconds).
I have forwarded this issue to a few friends working in domestic newspapers, however, with practically no positive response so far. One journalist wrote back to me that covering this in Japanese media might blemish the interest of the country. For the moment I am deeply disappointed at their awkward footwork…….
Poptech,
One of the originals: click
wow, searched the word “quiet” and I can not believe what I read. I’m not sure if the whole thing is like that or I just got a fluke word…
A couple of years ago, a post from a BBC reporter circulated.
He was looking into allegations that people who did not conform
to the AGW orthodoxy were subject to professional victimization.
The details recently revealed may see this story being revived.
Another comment, do not expect this to lead to the fall of the AGW
Berlin Wall. There are plenty of people in Climate Science not involved
in this. But, a number of people who have been very trusting of the
people involved with these emails will now realise that they have not
been getting advice in good faith. The implications of that will
reveal itself more slowly, but they will inevtiably occur.
http://www.anelegantchaos.org/cru/emails.php?eid=321&filename=1054756929.txt
“Confidentially I now need a hard and if required extensive case for rejecting – to support Dave Stahle’s and really as soon as you can.”
“I got a paper to review (submitted to the Journal of Agricultural, Biological, and Environmental Sciences), written by a Korean guy and someone from Berkeley, that claims that the method of reconstruction that we use in dendroclimatology (reverse regression) is wrong, biased, lousy, horrible, etc. They use your Tornetrask recon as the main whipping boy. I have a file that you gave me in 1993 that comes from your 1992 paper. Below is part of that file. Is this the right one? Also, is it possible to resurrect the column headings? I would like to play with it in an effort to refute their claims.
If published as is, this paper could really do some damage. It is also an ugly paper to review because it is rather mathematical, with a lot of Box-Jenkins stuff in it. It won’t be easy to dismiss out of hand as the math appears to be correct theoretically, but it suffers from the classic problem of pointing out theoretical deficiencies, without showing that their improved inverse regression method is actually better in a practical sense. So they do lots of monte carlo stuff that shows the superiority of their method and the deficiencies of our way of doing things, but NEVER actually show how their method would change the Tornetrask reconstruction from what you produced.
Your assistance here is greatly appreciated. Otherwise, I will let Tornetrask sink into the melting permafrost of northern Sweden (just kidding of course).”
Peer review at it’s finest! Steve Mc has gotta be dancing, it’s all down to the dendro’s, and he’s cut them to pieces already, and they know it. And RC, for all their “open” comments allowed today, still snipped me when I pointed this e-mail out.
Shurley Knot, how about you run down the connection between the special olympics, the kennedy family, lobotomies and consensus. Let me know how you make out.
I wrote a little program to fish out Email addresses in the From/To/Cc mail header lines. It needs a little work, it gets a bit confused by commas inside quoted names.
Scanning the list, I noticed three old Emails with “Daly.” They’re worth reading, he seems to have been a classy guy, at least until MBH98 came out. I’m sorry I didn’t get involved with this sordid field until after Daly’s death. Excerpts from those, plus one more:
http://www.anelegantchaos.org/cru/emails.php?eid=6&filename=839635440.txt
From: John Daly
To: n.nicholls@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: Re: Climatic warming in Tasmania
Date: Fri, 09 Aug 1996 20:04:00 +1100
Cc: Ed Cook , NNU-NB@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, k.briffa@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, Mike Barbetti , zetterberg@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, rjf@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Dear Neville,
You mentioned to me some time ago that in your view, the 11-year solar cycle did not influence temperature. There have been numerous attempts by academics to establish a correlation, but each has been shot down on some ground or other. I remember Barrie Pittock was especially dismissive of attempts to correlate solar cycle with temperature.
Have you tried this approach?
Load “Mathematica” into your PC and run the following set of instructions –
http://www.anelegantchaos.org/cru/emails.php?eid=196&filename=970663670.txt
From: John Daly
To: Chick Keller
Subject: Re: Hockey Sticks References
Date: Wed, 04 Oct 2000 08:47:50 +1000
Reply-to: daly@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: VINCENT GRAY , Onar Åm , “John L. Daly” , “P. Dietze” , mmaccrac@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, Michael E Mann , rbradley@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, wallace@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, Thomas Crowley , Phil Jones , sfbtett@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, jarl.ahlbeck@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, richard@xxxxxxxxx.xxx, McKitrick , Bjarnason , Harry Priem , balberts@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Dear all
Here’s another MWE reference, originally announced by the Idso’s. I looked up the abstract from the South African Journal of Science and here’s its URL
http://www.gheiss.de/Personal/Abstracts/SAJS2000_Abstr.html
That puts the MWE and LIA into South Africa.
Cheers
John L. Daly
“Still Waiting For Greenhouse”
This Email is fairly uncharacteristic, Daly usually didn’t let himself get this worked up about an issue, nevertheless he succinctly raises several issues, some which we overlook in the post McIntyre statistical debunking era.
http://www.anelegantchaos.org/cru/emails.php?eid=211&filename=981859677.txt
From: “John L. Daly”
To: Chick Keller
Subject: Re: Hockey Sticks again
Date: Sat, 10 Feb 2001 21:47:57 +1100
Reply-to: daly@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Cc: [Many people, including theodor.landscheidt!]
Dear Chick & all
> the first is Keith Briffa’s rather comprehensive treatment of getting
> climate variations from tree rings: Annual climate variability in
> the Holocene: “interpreting the message of ancient trees”, Quaternary
> Science Reviews, 19 (2000) 87-105. It should deal with many of the
> questions people raise about using them to determine temperatures.
Take this from first principles.
A tree only grows on land. That excludes 70% of the earth covered by water. A tree does no grow on ice. A tree does not grow in a desert. A tree does not grow on grassland-savannahs. A tree does not grow in alpine areas. A tree does not grow in the tundra
We are left with perhaps 15% of the planet upon which forests grow/grew. That does not make any studies from tree rings global, or even hemispheric.
The width and density of tree rings is dependent upon the following variables which cannot be reliably separated from each other.
sunlight – if the sun varies, the ring will vary. But not at night of course.
cloudiness – more clouds, less sun, less ring.
pests/disease – a caterpillar or locust plague will reduce photosynthesis
access to sunlight – competition within a forest can disadvantage or advantage some trees.
moisture/rainfall – a key variable. Trees do not prosper in a drought even if there’s a heat wave.
snow packing in spring around the base of the trees retards growth temperature – finally!
The tree ring is a composite of all these variables, not merely of temperature. Therefore on the 15% of the planet covered by trees, their rings do not and cannot accurately record temperature in isolation from the other environmental variables.
In my article on Greening Earth Society on the Hockey Stick, I point to other evidence which contradicts Mann’s theory. The Idso’s have produced more of that evidence, and a new article on Greening Earth has `unearthed’ even more.
Mann’s theory simply does not stack up. But that was not the key issue. Anyone can put up a dud theory from time to time. What is at issue is the uncritical zeal with which the industry siezed on the theory before its scientific value had been properly tested. In one go, they tossed aside dozens of studies which confirmed the existence of the MWE and LIA as global events, and all on the basis of tree rings – a proxy which has all the deficiencies I have stated above.
The worst thing I can say about any paper such as his is that it is `bad science’. Legal restraint prevents me going further. But in his case, only those restraints prevent me going *much* further.
Cheers
John Daly
—
John L. Daly
`Still Waiting For Greenhouse’
This fourth Email is not by John, but by Phil Jones to Mike Mann to forward news of Daly’s death. It will leave a sour taste in the mouths of people who haven’t read it before, an antidote is at http://www.john-daly.com/obituary.htm .
From: Phil Jones
To: mann@xxxxxxxxx.xxx
Subject: Fwd: John L. Daly dead
Date: Thu Jan 29 14:17:01 2004
From: Timo Hämeranta
To:
Subject: John L. Daly dead
Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 12:04:28 +0200
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook, Build 10.0.4510
Importance: Normal
Mike,
In an odd way this is cheering news ! One other thing about the CC paper – just found another email – is that McKittrick says it is standard practice in Econometrics journals to give all the data and codes !! According to legal advice IPR overrides this.
Cheers
Phil
“It is with deep sadness that the Daly Family have to announce the sudden death of John Daly.Condolences may be sent to John’s email account (daly@xxxxxxxxx.xxx)
”
Reported with great sadness
Timo Hämeranta
xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Timo Hämeranta, LL.M.
Moderator, Climatesceptics
Martinlaaksontie 42 B 9
01620 Vantaa
Finland, Member State of the European Union
…
For a secretive and exclusive agenda which sought to exclude the ‘unlearned’, half a billion are now served.
“Participation does not improve the quality of science, as stakeholders lack a reasonable level of knowledge to participate effectively, and are not capable of rational judgement.”
Rationalize this: The backlash of the masses who now can see clearly how cheaply your agenda valued thier lives. A real live negative feedback headed straight for your doorsteps.