
I’ll have a lot more on this study later, but for now just a short rebuttal.
I believe this study is hopelessly flawed due to the fact that the authors take the data from the weather stations at face value without considering bias due to measurement error or siting error, both of which are rampant in the US surface station network.
Read my report at left.
While not all situations with poorly sited weather stations affect trends, a weather station like this one at the University of Arizona’s parking lot in front of the atmospheric science department is represenative of the kinds of problems that would lead to an increased number of new high temperature records set.

Plus then there’s the error problem. For example we saw this summer that Honolulu set new record highs, but they turned out to be in error. The kicker is that NOAA let the records stand anyway! The problem is that a number of climate stations are at airports. Watch this NWS employee say on record that these airport weather stations are “placed for aviation purposes…not necessarily for climate purposes.”
So take this NCAR study with a grain of salt, since the authors did not address any of these issues.
From NCAR: Record High Temperatures Far Outpace Record Lows Across U.S.
BOULDER—Spurred by a warming climate, daily record high temperatures occurred twice as often as record lows over the last decade across the continental United States, new research shows. The ratio of record highs to lows is likely to increase dramatically in coming decades if emissions of greenhouse gases continue to climb.
“Climate change is making itself felt in terms of day-to-day weather in the United States,” says Gerald Meehl, the lead author and a senior scientist at the National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR). “The ways these records are being broken show how our climate is already shifting.”
This graphic shows the ratio of record daily highs to record daily lows observed at about 1,800 weather stations in the 48 contiguous United States from January 1950 through September 2009.
Each bar shows the proportion of record highs (red) to record lows (blue) for each decade. The 1960s and 1970s saw slightly more record daily lows than highs, but in the last 30 years record highs have increasingly predominated, with the ratio now about two-to-one for the 48 states as a whole. [ENLARGE] (©UCAR, graphic by Mike Shibao.) News media terms of use*
The study, by authors at NCAR, Climate Central, The Weather Channel, and the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), has been accepted for publication in Geophysical Research Letters. It was funded by the National Science Foundation, NCAR’s sponsor, the Department of Energy, and Climate Central.
If temperatures were not warming, the number of record daily highs and lows being set each year would be approximately even. Instead, for the period from January 1, 2000, to September 30, 2009, the continental United States set 291,237 record highs and 142,420 record lows, as the country experienced unusually mild winter weather and intense summer heat waves.
A record daily high means that temperatures were warmer on a given day than on that same date throughout a weather station’s history. The authors used a quality control process to ensure the reliability of data from thousands of weather stations across the country, while looking at data over the past six decades to capture longer-term trends.
This decade’s warming was more pronounced in the western United States, where the ratio was more than two to one, than in the eastern United States, where the ratio was about one-and-a-half to one.
The study also found that the two-to-one ratio across the country as a whole could be attributed more to a comparatively small number of record lows than to a large number of record highs. This indicates that much of the nation’s warming is occurring at night, when temperatures are dipping less often to record lows. This finding is consistent with years of climate model research showing that higher overnight lows should be expected with climate change.
In addition to surveying actual temperatures in recent decades, Meehl and his co-authors turned to a sophisticated computer model of global climate to determine how record high and low temperatures are likely to change during the course of this century.
The modeling results indicate that if nations continue to increase their emissions of greenhouse gases in a “business as usual” scenario, the U.S. ratio of daily record high to record low temperatures would increase to about 20-to-1 by mid-century and 50-to-1 by 2100. The mid-century ratio could be much higher if emissions rose at an even greater pace, or it could be about 8-to-1 if emissions were reduced significantly, the model showed.
The authors caution that such predictions are, by their nature, inexact. Climate models are not designed to capture record daily highs and lows with precision, and it remains impossible to know future human actions that will determine the level of future greenhouse gas emissions. The model used for the study, the NCAR-based Community Climate System Model, correctly captured the trend toward warmer average temperatures and the greater warming in the West, but overstated the ratio of record highs to record lows in recent years.
However, the model results are important because they show that, in all likely scenarios of future greenhouse gas emissions, record daily highs should increasingly outpace record lows over time.
“If the climate weren’t changing, you would expect the number of temperature records to diminish significantly over time,” says Claudia Tebaldi, a statistician with Climate Central who is one of the paper’s co-authors. “As you measure the high and low daily temperatures each year, it normally becomes more difficult to break a record after a number of years. But as the average temperatures continue to rise this century, we will keep setting more record highs.”
An expanding ratio
The study team focused on weather stations that have been operating since 1950. They found that the ratio of record daily high to record daily low temperatures slightly exceeded one to one in the 1950s, dipped below that level in the 1960s and 1970s, and has risen since the 1980s. The results reflect changes in U.S. average temperatures, which rose in the 1950s, stabilized in the 1960s, and then began a warming trend in the late 1970s.
Even in the first nine months of this year, when the United States cooled somewhat after a string of unusually warm years, the ratio of record daily high to record daily low temperatures was more than three to two.
Despite the increasing number of record highs, there will still be occasional periods of record cold, Meehl notes.
“One of the messages of this study is that you still get cold days,” Meehl says. “Winter still comes. Even in a much warmer climate, we’re setting record low minimum temperatures on a few days each year. But the odds are shifting so there’s a much better chance of daily record highs instead of lows.”
Millions of readings from weather stations across the country
The study team analyzed several million daily high and low temperature readings taken over the span of six decades at about 1,800 weather stations across the country, thereby ensuring ample data for statistically significant results. The readings, collected at the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration’s National Climatic Data Center, undergo a quality control process at the data center that looks for such potential problems as missing data as well as inconsistent readings caused by changes in thermometers, station locations, or other factors.
Meehl and his colleagues then used temperature simulations from the Community Climate System Model to compute daily record highs and lows under current and future atmospheric concentrations of greenhouse gases.
About the article
Title: “The relative increase of record high maximum temperatures compared to record low minimum temperatures in the U.S.”
Authors: Gerald A. Meehl, Claudia Tebaldi, Guy Walton, David Easterling, and Larry McDaniel
Publication: Geophysical Research Letters (in press)
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

18th vs 20th century temps compared:
http://carbon-sense.com/2009/10/01/british-record/
This guy doesn’t believe them either, and he’s got the data to back it up.
http://hallofrecord.blogspot.com/2007/02/extreme-temperatures-wheres-global.html
A glimpse behind the curtain:
http://jennifermarohasy.com/blog/2009/06/how-the-us-temperature-record-is-adjusted/
The perversion of scientific integrity is staggering.
For heaven’s sake. This is by far the poorest study I have ever seen. No better than a grade school graph problem. And this low, low, low level scientific investigation gets published????????
They need to go back to the 1930s and 40s. Quitting when they did was curious, because they end up comparing a relatively mild (even cooling) period to a dramatically warming period. Apples to apples says you need to include the early 20th century warming period too.
For a view of the U of A site on Google Earth go to:
32°13’45.77″N
110°57’15.62″W
I’d put a link here but I am not sure how to code it in. It’s a shame none of the buildings in the area have been 3D’d on Google Earth but you can get an idea of the environment by clicking on the Gould-Simpson Building photographs just next to the thermometer site. Excellent representative site…
The satellite data will keep the surface stations (more or less) honest. But if it weren’t for the sats, I’d never trust the data.
The point was made earlier. We are at a warmer plateau. So it takes a huge cool anomaly to set a record, but only a very slight warming anomaly. That is what is going on here.
It’s not lying, but it seems to be desperately trying to avoid the fact that there is a slight cooling trend. That routine is getting old. heck, we could be setting new annual warming records every year and still fall ‘way short of IPCC projections. It all depends on the slope.
This is what bothers me:People listen to the BS-yet we are not even looking at the
possibility of extended cold.I frantically prepared my place for cold tonight, after finally
feeling better due to a pulled muscle. Winter’s here, and I hope it awakens more
to the possibility of real,dangerous ,cold…
Lubos Motl has a good summary of what to look for in determining whether the record highs and or lows are really meaningful, or just smoke and mirrors.
http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/01/record-cold-temperatures-in-2009.html
Any time you add more data points you’re going to get more “records”. In either direction, this is much ado about nothing.
Call me when the air temps over the entire Pacific Ocean show the same numbers.
Beat me to that one (also)
Strange how that base line (50-80) crops up so often.
Failure to address known and documented flaws with the source data makes this a junior high school science project and not professional research — no matter how fancy the computer model they drag in to give the impression of sophistication.
With the Surfacestations project information is taken into account, these results show more support for the measurement of station siting flaws than they do of GHG warming.
Let us not forget.
It’s a record!
It must be the salt content of the surrounding asphalt that is causing the readings to show warming. You know, the “jiffy pop theory”. Thought I would post it before Yaakoba does, …
Anthony,
Is Andrew Revkin foaming at the mouth, right now?
REPLY: No just unable to see the larger picture. – anthony
Talk about useless BS –
Nothing but more NCAR propaganda –
Unfortunately, about half of the US useful breathers believe this rubbish…
Anyone playing with a full deck can see directly through the game.
Of course it is cherry picked… we are nowhere near ‘record’ temps… high or low… no current viking farms on Greenland and no current mid-west glacial activity…(maybe I missed the news?)
How any one with a brain can put this tripe out is beyond me… last time I checked the ‘consensus report’ the Earth is Billions of years old and these ‘educated?’ clowns ignore all but 50-60 years – of that history… how do they find the way home at nite?… much less sleep soundly?
PS. – Thank You Anthony for keeping us posted!
ONE OF ANTHONY’S OLDER POSTS ON WHAT THE STATISTICS SAY WE SHOULD BE LOOKING FOR.
http://wattsupwiththat.com/2009/04/27/are-record-temperatures-abnormal/#more-7385
Layne Blanchard (15:55:00) :
I posted the data from Britain going back to 1800, above. Here it is again.
http://carbon-sense.com/2009/10/01/british-record/
There is no difference between 19th and 20th century over the whole 200 years.
I still can’t believe the…
Does this mean that there were no records prior to 1950 for the stations they focused on?
DaveE.
Classic cherry picking. If you do as Bruce Hall has done and look back to the full length of the record, it looks like this:
http://hallofrecord.blogspot.com/2009/01/where-is-global-warming-extreme_19.html
Nothing like The report at all.
But all they have shown is that the coldest days are getting warmer and the warmest days are too. But the ratio change means that the colder days are warming faster than the warmest days. A climate that is getting less extreme. What’s wrong with that?
It is runaway normalcy !!! ……… 8^D
RE:”Anthony,
Is Andrew Revkin foaming at the mouth, right now?
REPLY: No just unable to see the larger picture. – anthony”
Unable or just UNWILLING????
WxMark
The study says record highs are not increasing. Just record lows are descreaing because it isn’t cooling at night.
Isn’t that the classic UHI signature as the heat radiates from ashpalt, brick and buildings?
Does it really need scientists to produce a workpiece like that?
I am surprised. Seems to be a great time getting a doctor title in climatology.
Should I try?
I used to do shortwave radio in a German weatherstation building, with nothing but meadows around for miles. Today, 20 years later, there is industry, car dealerships, hundreds of buildings all over this place.
The weather station has not moved. I can imagine how the temperatures there are today, compared with the past.
It’s apples and oranges.
From the above article:
“This indicates that much of the nation’s warming is occurring at night, when temperatures are dipping less often to record lows. This finding is consistent with years of climate model research showing that higher overnight lows should be expected with climate change.”
Higher overnight lows? Could this possible be due to all of the new concrete and asphalt that was not around 50 years ago? It doesn’t take a climate scientist to know that concrete retains heat pretty well, just check with the local population of reptiles.
Lennart Bilén (16:29:52) :
If some weather stations are at or near airports, those well drained, concrete paved artificial deserts (notning grows there) isn’t this to be expected?
A very large percentage are at airports, and it is rising. Soon the ONLY temperatures from land stations in the pacific will be from Airports:
You are going to LOVE this: All Pacific Weather Service Offices to be located at Airports
http://www.faa.gov/news/conferences_events/pacific_aviation/agenda/media/NWS.pdf
REPLY: OMG, how could they! Well, at least it will be easy to identify what stations have an Airport Heat Island bias 8-{ ems.
From the comments section of:
http://chiefio.wordpress.com/2009/09/08/gistemp-islands-in-the-sun/
When I get a chance, I can cook up an “airport records as percent of total” report from GIStemp files…
I live near another great example of station siting and UHI: State College, PA, where the official temperature is taken on the Penn State Campus. The location of the weather station is near a golf course and there is a slight slope that in the past allowed cool air to drain downhill from the golf course toward the weather station on nights with good radiational cooling conditions. Several years ago a huge building was erected next to the weather station and it apparently is very effective at blocking the flow of cool air from the golf course. Temperatures on clear, calm nights run several degrees warmer than they did in the past. It is like pulling teeth to get record lows now, especially in the winter. Last winter a notable example was on January 17th, when the low at Penn State was -3 while much of the surrounding area was 10-20 below zero, even towns and airports. What is really amazing here is that the construction of one building near the weather station has greatly lowered the chances for record lows relative to the past. If the pace of building in the last couple of decades in the rest of the country has been anything like what I have seen in the places where I have lived, that could account for a large portion of the change shown in this study.