In-betweeners: Enjoy the warmth while it lasts

Our “recent” (geologically speaking) temperature history:

Image by Joe D'Aleo via IntelliCast - data is oxygen isotopes - click to enlarge

By Lawrence Solomon in the Financial Post

Thank your lucky stars to be alive on Earth at this time. Our planet is usually in a deep freeze. The last million years have cycled through Ice Ages that last about 100,000 years each, with warmer slivers of about 10,000 years in between.

We are in-betweeners, and just barely — we live in (gasp!) year 10,000 or so after the end of the last ice age. But for our good fortune, we might have been born in the next Ice Age.

Our luck is even better than that. Those 10,000-year warm spells aren’t all cosy-warm. They include brutal Little Ice Ages such as the 500-year-long Little Ice Age that started about 600 years ago. Fortunately, we weren’t around during its fiercest periods when Finland lost one-third of its population, Iceland half, and most of Canada became uninhabitable — even the Inuit fled. While the cold spells within the 10,000 year warm spells aren’t as brutal as a Little Ice Age, they can nevertheless make us huddle in gloom, such as the period in history from about 400 AD to 900 AD, which we know as the Dark Ages. We’ve lucked out twice, escaping the cold spells within the warm spells, making us inbetweeners within the inbetween periods. How good is that?

We aren’t alone in having been blessed by good weather. About 2000 years ago, around the time of Caesar and Christ, temperatures were also gloriously warm, some say much warmer than those we’ve experienced in recent decades. That period — the centuries immediately before and after Caesar and Christ — are known as the Roman Warm Period, a time of wealth and accomplishment when the warmer weather filled granaries and extended grape and olive growing regions to lands that had previously been unarable.

Another period of unusual warmth came about 1000 years after the Roman Warm Period, during the centuries before and after the year 1000, in what is known as the Medieval Warm Period. In this period, again warmer than the present time, the world shucked off the insularity of the Dark Ages to allow civilization to once again blossom. England, then positively balmy, became a grape-growing region. In the North Atlantic, the Arctic sea ice released its grip over Greenland, making this vast island hospitable for Viking settlers. In the Canadian Rockies, majestic forests — trees larger than those of today — thrived before their decimation by the glaciers that came in with the Little Ice Age.

Another 1000 years and we come to our time, known to climatologists as the Modern Warm Period. What a great time of technological and cultural advancement we’ve known, one of unprecedented prosperity, human longevity, and human comfort. For a brief period in the 1970s it appeared to some scientists that the climate that had abetted our prosperity had turned — this was the fear of global cooling that then made headlines. Though many now mock those fears of climate cooling, the scientists were eminent and the science was sound — after all, given Earth’s history through the eons, and the passage of 10,000 years since the last ice age, it was hardly outlandish to believe that time of warmth was up.

It wasn’t then — the decades after the 1970s have been about as good as it gets. But it could be now. In fact, some of the same scientists who in the 1970s warned of a new cold spell still believe it could be imminent. Other eminent scientists with compelling new evidence have recently joined them in predicting the end of our Modern Warm Period. They and others note that the warming of the planet stopped 11 years ago and that the planet has begun to cool.

If a new Dark Age does come, it could be rapid, marked by plunging temperatures and extreme weather events. Such was the transition from the Roman Warm Period to the Dark Ages and from the Medieval Warm Period to the Little Ice Age. To date, we have seen no plunging temperatures, no uncharacteristically extreme weather.

If we are living on borrowed time, as the history of the world would suggest, this reprieve would be but one more blessing to count. We should enjoy the warmth while we can, and hope that it persists so that the world our children and grandchildren inherit will be no less warm and welcoming.

Financial Post

LawrenceSolomon@nextcity.com

Read more: http://network.nationalpost.com/np/blogs/fpcomment/archive/2009/10/30/lawrence-solomon-enjoy-the-warmth-while-it-lasts.aspx#ixzz0VcUM2rMH

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
94 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Patrick Davis
November 1, 2009 7:45 pm

I am surprised this was reported, but they predict warmer than average summer this year.
http://www.smh.com.au/environment/goodbye-cold-october-hello-warm-november-20091102-hs87.html
I can tell you it *was* cold throughout October.

Gene Nemetz
November 1, 2009 7:57 pm

RW (10:45:09) :
Trolls can’t read the evidence–no sun light under the bridge. Maybe trolls can’t even read—that must be it.

Gene Nemetz
November 1, 2009 8:21 pm

Jimbo (11:04:49) :
if we had already sacrificed our standard
Crops, young virgins, economies—people always want to sacrifice prime things. Whats up with that?

Gene Nemetz
November 1, 2009 8:29 pm

Put the data in a bingo jumbler…turn the handle…take the data out…scratch the results on the bottom side of the bridge…troll hieroglyphics showing no cooling trend since 1998.

Ron de Haan
November 1, 2009 9:01 pm

rbateman (14:39:30) :
Ron de Haan (14:23:58) :
“The snow that the Chinese have displaced is like the irritation of a virus to Climate. It will keep after it until it succeeds in collapsing that void, with force. It would be far better to move the Capital than move the snow”.
You’re quite right,
I thought the experiment was interesting since Moscow want want to use the same technology to keep snow out of the inner city.
Engineering the local weather growing fashionable these day’s
One advantage compared to the AGW mitigation, this time they do it to protect crops from hail, watering dry area’s or saving money on snow clearing, hence they keep an eye on the economic aspects. AGW mitigation is one big black hole and a lot of risks.

Don S.
November 1, 2009 9:07 pm

@Will. Thanks for taking on RW on the issue of “instrumental record” v historical record. This is not a good venue for anyone to be talking about what is in the “instrumental” record, since the only valid survey ever done on the accuracy of the USHCN portion of that record was done here. “Instrumental record”?? Show me the carfax.

Lennart Bilen
November 1, 2009 10:05 pm

It seems that Svensmark was right. It is the cosmic radiation.
SN 185, magnitude – 8 6000 light years away ended the Roman warm period.
SN 1006 magnitude -7.5 , 7500 light years away ended the Medieval warm period. (Southern hemisphere had the greatest influence)
SN 1054 magnitude -6 6500 light years away (the Crab Nebula) helped too
SN 1572 magnitude -4 8000 light years away (Tycho’s Nova) started the little ice age
SN 1604 magnitude -3 14000 light years away (Kepler’s Star) kept the little ice age going. Now its influence is fading. And this is the warming trend we are now experiencing.
There hasn’t been a supernova for a while, so the climate ought to be quite stable the next century. The scare mongers have gone from Global cooling (1970) to Global warming to Climare change. Maybe the best new mantra should be Climate No Change.

Purakanui
November 2, 2009 12:14 am

NZ also had a cold October.
Officially the coldest since 1945. Winter started very early in May; June and July were pretty grim, but August perked up briefly. The last month and a half has been very cool.
If this is a harbinger for the Northern Hemisphere, I’d be inclined to stack plenty of wood!
http://tvnz.co.nz/national-news/coldest-october-since-1945-in-nz-3107957

Norm/Calgary
November 2, 2009 12:57 am

In fact, if you plot the world temperatures from 2000 to 2009 you will see a slight increase in temperatures.
See
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/uah/from:2000/to:2009/plot/uah/from:2000/to:2009/trend

Patrick Davis
November 2, 2009 3:53 am

“Purakanui (00:14:59) :
NZ also had a cold October.”
Now that is interesting. NH cold, SH cold…I can’t burn wood here, so many have to spend more time warming up the wife (Global cooling *does* have positive spin-offs after all).

Richard M
November 2, 2009 6:09 am

RW and others love to jump on the natural variability bandwagon when temps are not following their faith. However, they seem to forget that the IPCC stated unequivocally that the reason CO2 is deemed the cause of GW is because there are no natural forcings that could cause the warming. If they can’t cause it then they can’t overpower the signal either.
A few, like Vicky Pope, realize this problem. RW should take the hint.

Paul
November 2, 2009 6:18 am

We should be ok until we get another Krakatau type event, then its time to worry.

Richard M
November 2, 2009 6:54 am

Norm/Calgary (00:57:02) :
“In fact, if you plot the world temperatures from 2000 to 2009 you will see a slight increase in temperatures.”
And, if you do it from 2001 you get a decrease. All this means is that the time period is too small. 30 years is likely too small as well. In fact, any useful conclusions probably require 100s (if not 1000s) of years which we don’t have on a global basis.
So many claims based on very little data.

November 2, 2009 8:04 am

Richard M (06:09:33):
“…the IPCC stated unequivocally that the reason CO2 is deemed the cause of GW is because there are no natural forcings that could cause the warming.”
This is a fine example of an argumentum ad ignorantiam: the fallacy of assuming something is true simply because it hasn’t been proven false. They argue that CO2 causes global warming because nobody has demonstrated conclusively that it does not. They are trying to put scientific skeptics in the position of having to prove a negative.
The fact that there are numerous other completely natural forcings that swamp any small effect from CO2 is not given any credence by the UN/IPCC and the rest of the alarmist crowd. They have made up their minds that CO2 is the cause of global warming; that human activity is the main cause of the rise in CO2 [false; only about 3% of CO2 is caused by human activity], and that they alone have the means to save humanity. All it will take is the transfer of $trillions from taxpayers in the U.S. and the West to grossly polluted countries like China, and to the scurrilous, truly evil reprobates in the UN.
The fact that they are deliberately lying is finally becoming apparent to the general public. Climate alarmists lie for money and control, or because they are afflicted with cognitive dissonance. Science has nothing to do with their conniving game playing.

Gene Nemetz
November 2, 2009 9:49 am

Patrick Davis (03:53:15) :
Yes, I can understand.
But cooler weather means less bikinis. 🙁

SteveSadlov
November 2, 2009 10:23 am

90% of the world’s population has built up during the past few hundred years (e.g. since the low point of the LIA). Yeah, that’s not a bubble.

Tim Clark
November 2, 2009 11:04 am

Norm/Calgary (00:57:02) :
In fact, if you plot the world temperatures from 2000 to 2009 you will see a slight increase in temperatures.

Here’s an old trick I learned from James Hansen, just take one year out of the average. Wow! Is it cold in here or what?
http://www.woodfortrees.org/plot/uah/from:2001/to:2009/plot/uah/from:2001/to:2009/trend

LarryOldtimer
November 2, 2009 2:05 pm

The nits are worrying, with no cause, IMHO, about a minor bit of warming which would be of little consequence did it happen. A good look should be taken at the year 1816, otherwise known as the “Year without a summer” or “The Poverty Year”. This disaster came upon the US, Canada and Europe in the blink of an eye. Great famine was on the land, and there were far fewer to feed and fuel then. There may be some argument as to what exactly caused it, but it did really happen, whatever the cause.
With at least 6 times the number of people know who need to be fed and fueled, the famine of that time would be mass starvation and mass death through hypothermia the next time around. And it will happen again . . . and again . . . and again.
Wasting our money and resources in attempting to deal with a little bit of warming, even if that would be to happen, which I very much doubt, will make quite sure that there is no money or resources to deal with very real problems when they do happen, as they surely will.

Robinsolana
November 3, 2009 5:06 pm

Just a great article.
This was the climate history that I was taught in college. I guess all those poli sci majors missed oceanography 101.