Harris Poll: Europeans Tend to Care More Strongly about Climate Change than Americans

UPDATE: Related, a Pew Poll says fewer respondents also see global warming as a very serious problem; 35% say that today, down from 44% in April 2008.

harris_poll

From a press release by the Harris Poll sponsored by the Financial Times

Fewer Americans than people in 5 largest European countries give “green” responses in 6-nation Financial Times/Harris Poll on climate change

New York, NY — October 22, 2009 — A new Financial Times/Harris Poll in the United States and the five largest European countries finds that Americans under 65 are less likely than Europeans to see climate change as a major threat, to see the need for a new international agreement on climate change as a top priority or to favor increased aid to developing countries to help them deal with climate change. However, most people in all six countries agree, when asked, that signing a new treaty on climate change should be one of our top priorities.

These are some of the findings of a Financial Times/Harris Poll conducted online by Harris Interactive among 6,463 adults aged less than 65 in France, Germany, Britain, Spain, Italy and the United States between September 30 and October 7, 2009.

While there are a few exceptions, smaller proportions of Americans than of Europeans under 65 seem to be worried about climate change or to support policies to address it.

For example:

• While large majorities of people over 65 in all six countries see climate change as posing a threat to the world, fewer Americans (27%), than people in Britain (31%), France (46%), Italy (49%) or Spain (35%) see it as a “large threat.”

• In Europe, between 60% (in Britain) and 89% (in Italy) believe that, when governments meet in Copenhagen, “signing a new treaty . . . on climate change” should be one of the top priorities. In the United States, a lower 53% feel this way.

• Majorities of working people in France (67%), Spain (67%), and Italy (57%) believe that their employers “should be doing more” to “reduce their environmental impact.” Slightly less than half of workers in the United States (45%), Britain (44%) and Germany (48%) feel this way.

• Not many people under 65 in any of the six countries say they would be willing to pay more taxes to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and on this question the United States (21%) is in the middle of the pack, below Spain (29%), and Italy (23%) but above Britain (16%) France (15%) and Germany (15%).

• Far fewer people under 65 in the United States (12%) and in Britain (12%) than in Spain (36%), France (30%), Italy (26%) and Germany (20%) would like the products they buy to have labels showing “the amount of carbon emitted in the course of their production.”

• Americans (20%) are also much less likely than the Italians (54%), Spaniards (53%), French (52%) or Germans (51%) to support additional aid to developing countries to help them deal with climate change. The British (31%) are somewhat closer to Americans on this issue.

• Majorities in all five European countries, 51% in Britain and more than 60% in France, Italy, Spain and Germany believe that the world will be in a worse position “if there is no agreement at the Climate Change Conference in Copenhagen in December.” In the United States, a lower 45% believe this.

There is one related issue, however, on which Americans are more likely to feel strongly. Fully 83% of Americans under 65 believe the United States needs to reduce oil and gas imports from other countries. Those who feel this way in the other five countries vary from 50% in France to 71% in Italy.

So what?

In the early days of the environmental movement, following the publication of Rachel Carson’s Silent Spring, Americans were probably more concerned about the environment than people in most, possibly all, other countries. This poll shows that this is no longer the case. This is important because democratically elected governments are responsive to public opinion, even if they do not always do what majorities would like them to do.

Having said that, it is important to note that majorities, mostly large majorities, in all six countries including the United States, believe that signing a new climate change treaty should be “one of the top priorities.”

Note: The full questions asked can be seen here

Methodology

This FT/Harris Poll was conducted online by Harris Interactive among a total of 6,463 adults aged 16-64 within France (1,151), Germany (1,033), Great Britain (1,126), Spain (1,076) and the United States (1,017), and adults aged 18-64 in Italy (1,060) between September 30 and October 7, 2009. Figures for age, sex, education, region and Internet usage were weighted where necessary to bring them into line with their actual proportions in the population. Propensity score weighting was used to adjust for respondents’ propensity to be online.

All sample surveys and polls, whether or not they use probability sampling, are subject to multiple sources of error which are most often not possible to quantify or estimate, including sampling error, coverage error, error associated with nonresponse, error associated with question wording and response options, and post-survey weighting and adjustments. Therefore, Harris Interactive avoids the words “margin of error” as they are misleading. All that can be calculated are different possible sampling errors with different probabilities for pure, unweighted, random samples with 100% response rates. These are only theoretical because no published polls come close to this ideal.

Respondents for this survey were selected from among those who have agreed to participate in Harris Interactive surveys. The data have been weighted to reflect the composition of the adult populations of the respective countries. Because the sample is based on those who agreed to participate in the Harris Interactive panel, no estimates of theoretical sampling error can be calculated.

These statements conform to the principles of disclosure of the National Council on Public Polls and of the British Polling Council.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

176 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Editor
October 22, 2009 8:15 am

From the Pew Research Center for the People & the Press. “The number of Americans who believe there is solid evidence that the Earth is warming because of pollution is at its lowest point in three years.”
http://people-press.org/report/556/global-warming
http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5h-ZiXMrCMn_Vo2QQJncPTUGp-sJAD9BG6BN80
Congrats Anthony, you are a significant contributor to this success.

Henry Galt
October 22, 2009 8:16 am

Question the uninformed and you get…. dibs on uninformation if the word doesn’t already exist.

October 22, 2009 8:16 am

Spaniards use to call us, southamericans, “sudacas” (those stupids and poor southerners), but my guess is that when the americas were discovered and europeans began to emigrate here, the strongest individuals of their race came here, so the nowadays europeans are the descendants of those ,the feebler among them, who did not dare to make the trip.

October 22, 2009 8:16 am

Interpretation.
“Our Government needs to do something to save the world, and give aid to poor contries, but they better not increase my taxes”
This makes no scence. The people of the world are stupeder than I thought possible. I now have no hope that this will blow over because no one has the capability of rational thought.

George Tobin
October 22, 2009 8:17 am

Headline that was not used: “Large majorities in US and Europe do not think climate change is a big threat” even when push-polled on green attitudes.
By the way, what is the official doom-for-the-planet-if-no-treaty deadline now? 20 days? Did we already miss it?

Henry Galt
October 22, 2009 8:21 am

Ah, I see. UN information. As opposed to dis-information, non-information, lack-of-information, uneducated guesswork, etc, etc.
All this poll seems to “prove” is that so long as you pay attention to those who have drunk the kool-aid, dispense the kool-aid or recommend the kool-aid you do not need to drink any yourself.

Don B
October 22, 2009 8:25 am

Could it possibly be that Americans are better informed than Europeans?
We do read such things as, Trail Ridge Road, the highway through Colorado’s Rocky Mountain National Park, had its seasonal closure on October 3 9:27 p.m., nearly 3 weeks earlier than the average closing date of October 23.
http://archive.9news.com/news/local/article.aspx?storyid=125506
This is not, directly, an Al Gore snowy event, but Senators Udall and McCain did tour the park in August “…to look for signs of global climate change.”
Not all Americans are well informed.

October 22, 2009 8:27 am

The newest Pew poll shows that the number of Americans believing in AGW dropped by 14 percentage points since 2008. For details, see
http://motls.blogspot.com/2009/10/us-public-support-for-agw-orthodoxy.html

October 22, 2009 8:33 am

Europe, after failing to catch USA until 2010 as a technology leader (it was official plan of EU in typical 5-years Soviet planning way) hopes that a carbon burden would slow US development more than it will slow EU development. USA is vivid embarrassment for all European elites, because despite socialist theories, it was free market and personal responsibility, which made US so rich.
It is similar when lazy scum votes for socialists promising tax increase for rich – they hope they will somehow parasite on those money, or at least they will do some harm to the rich because of pure jealousy.

JT
October 22, 2009 8:36 am

I guess this shows that Americans are realists. I have always contended that people who are crammed into a small spaces look at the world as a small and limited. People who live in the city view polution differently than those living in the country or the suburbs. They live in a bubble and feel impacts of polution, noise, heat, cold immedialty. Europoeans seem to have the same phobias.
Look at these population density figures;
Germany 232 people per sq/km
Netherlands 238 people per sq/km
Italy 193 people per sq/km
UK 246 people per sq/km
Compared to the United States…………..31 people per sq/km
If somone passes gas in Europe, they all know about it.

Justin Ert
October 22, 2009 8:41 am

Slightly OT…
And in the UK, the home of extreme climate politics and behavioural modification par-excellance, the Act on Co2 government propoganda machinery has launched another attack to labotomize the public perception:
http://www.actoncopenhagen.decc.gov.uk/content/en/embeds/flash/4-degrees-large-map-final
…an interactive advertisement for the 12c rise in temperatures (yes 12c!!!) to be seen on the US Eastern seaboard by 2060. And apparently the “data” has been peer reviewed:
http://www.reuters.com/article/latestCrisis/idUSLM467305
Nice flash anim tho’.

jeroen
October 22, 2009 8:43 am

how can you make policy with only 60% off the majority behind you. While they probaly dont know what they are talking about.

BernardP
October 22, 2009 8:45 am

Results reflect the fact that there is more political and media brainwashing about AGW in Europe.
There generally is more control of the media by the State.
Also, because of the language barrier, many Europeans don’t have access to dissenting opinions on the web. For example, there are only a handful of french-language AGW-skeptical web sites.

Jack Hughes
October 22, 2009 8:47 am

We are talking about a different mindset here.
People in Europe are passive and expect their leaders and/or governments to solve problems and tell them what to do.
People in New World countries are active and pragmatic: they tackle problems themselves or get together with neighbors and friends to solve real problems.

Robinson
October 22, 2009 8:48 am

The reason is simple enough: we don’t have an effective opposition. Both the left and the right agree with the consensus (the US left is like our right, by the way!). If you add to that the fundamentally undemocratic EU layer on top of national governments, they are all free to ramp up the propaganda as they please, as our own government here in the UK has been doing with a recent idiotic advertising campaign.

tallbloke
October 22, 2009 8:52 am

Not many people under 65 in any of the six countries say they would be willing to pay more taxes to cut greenhouse gas emissions, and on this question the United States (21%) is in the middle of the pack, below Spain (29%), and Italy (23%) but above Britain (16%) France (15%) and Germany (15%).
In a parallel study it was found similarly small percentages of Turkeys were willing to vote for christmas.

Sandy
October 22, 2009 8:53 am

When fed fake data about student polls people who’d been vocally ‘pro’ wound their necks in, according to the Ohio paper.
Would enough adverse poll data shut us up ?

Indiana Bones
October 22, 2009 8:55 am

In this case Americans are better informed than the Euros – who are bathed in Euro-guilt and love their Parliaments. Americans by nature are skeptical of government and when it comes to government sponsored boogiemen – they’re showing admirable disinterest. TheReason will pay.

Richard deSousa
October 22, 2009 9:06 am

I feel sorry for the Europeans… they’re being taxed to death and now they want more taxes heaped on them… of course if they can some how wrangle a deal to have the USA pay for global warming instead of the Europeans, they will approve.

October 22, 2009 9:07 am

I am from Europe, I suppose that is related with a more pavlovian european press response.
The so called ‘journalism of causes’. Journalism that is supposed to ‘deliver the correct things’.
.

Carlo
October 22, 2009 9:07 am

In the Netherlands we being Brainwashed by the news media every day.

Tim S.
October 22, 2009 9:11 am

That’s what happens when you poll only people whose last name is “Harris.” Undoubtedly, some of them are related and share the same opinions.

Tim Clark
October 22, 2009 9:12 am

In Europe, between 60% (in Britain) and 89% (in Italy) believe that, when governments meet in Copenhagen, “signing a new treaty . . . on climate change” should be one of the top priorities. In the United States, a lower 53% feel this way.
In the U.S. only 14% thought it should the top priority, whereas 39% thought it should be one of the top. I think that is a poorly constructed question. The only reason for holding the %4#* conference is to sign a treaty, and when 86% of the people (US) don’t think signing is the #1 priority, that implies to me it isn’t a priority at all.

matt v.
October 22, 2009 9:13 am

I think a lot of the poll result has to do with the wording of the question. Asking people “IS THERE EVIDENCE THAT THE EARTH IS WARMING” is different from DO YOU BELIEVE IN GLOBAL WARMING. What do we define as global warming to the people , the IPCC version[ due to greenhouse gases] or just normal warming.Also over what period . Many people feel that the earth is not warming if you look at what has happened this past year where thing have been cool over the summer and winter in the northern half of US. Europe has had warmer winters than North America . Also there is less information being presented to the public in Europe about natural variability causes and more IPCC version of the science .

Neo
October 22, 2009 9:19 am

PewResearch reports …
There has been a sharp decline over the past year in the percentage of Americans who say there is solid evidence that global temperatures are rising. And fewer also see global warming as a very serious problem — 35% say that today, down from 44% in April 2008.

Over the same period, there has been a comparable decline in the proportion of Americans who say global temperatures are rising as a result of human activity, such as burning fossil fuels. Just 36% say that currently, down from 47% last year.

1 2 3 8