Climate Bill Passes in House

waxman-markey-sausage

Final vote: 219 Yea, 212 Nay

Lets hope for defeat in the Senate. The list of votes is below.

As they say, making legislation is like making sausage. There’s a final product, but you surely don’t want to see the ugly process of it being made.

Today, those of us watching CSPAN, saw the ugliness of the sausage factory.

Here is the link to the vote tally:

http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2009/roll477.xml

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

234 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
June 27, 2009 12:06 pm

Just Want Results… Wrote at (10:19:41) :
Guffaw : Did you see the Inhofe Videos ?
JWR: Sure, I’ve seen Inhofe on video.
>>>>>
Yes but you didn’t see these videos, did you ?
You didn’t listen to what Inhofe was saying about Boxer not having enough votes to pass any such Bill. 60 votes are required and Boxer has only a possible 34 votes, or so.
……………………………………………….
JWR: I’ve seen them. Waxman-Markey still passed.
>>>>>
Yes but Waxman and Markey are not Senators are they.
NO PREVIOUS SIMILAR BILL HAS PASSED THE SENATE.
In the USA Laws are neither proposed nor enacted by
The President, are they ? He may like to think so, but
according to The Constitution, that just isn’t the case.

Benjamin
June 27, 2009 12:10 pm

Just Want Results… (10:15:14) : “Nah, they have printing presses”
I wrote an exquiste response and I lost it. So I’m sorry if this sounds abrupt.
Yes, they can print up all they like. But you have to understand that the ONLY reason currencies (any kind) are accepted is because they can purchase gold, and gold futures contracts and leases. So a printing press is meaningless. Can’t print up GOLD gold, and GOLD gold will be demanded if we don’t ship more jobs to China.
That is why they voted in favor of the bank bail outs last year, despite (even among their own ranks) a very strong, if not overwhelming support against that. The Fed Chairman was even confronted, in front of both house and senate, about the possibility of gold default. Ben Bernanke told them something to the effect of “Hey… gold was supposed to be YOUR responsibility… not mine!”
So I have no reason to think they will vote in favor of a default when thus far they’ve been nothing but against that (we can go back years and see similar behavior). Its the elephant in the room that they are absolutely determined to avoid dealing with. I mean come on… How can so many of them actually beleive this dark fairytale of human emissions destroying the earth, given that politicians’ jobs is to take in information and deal with all sorts of people? They must be aware of what the dissent has to say, but why would they care to heed them when it’s the difference between a bit longer in power and wealth and the comfort of evasion?
Therefore, I would recommend that, in communitcating with your reps, that people also tell them that they do not want to prop up the market for govt securities any longer. Not with your health, not with your future nor that of your kids and grandkids.
That is what this all about: using silly stories to prop up the market for government debt obligations.
Vinny said: “Gee Benjamin and it only took Obama 4 months to nearly bankrupt us. Wait until he rams health care on us.”
He wants to tax it too. Repubs and Dems alike are just merely in minor disagreement on the details. Anyway, he had help from at least 30 years of politicians before him. He’s just the coup de grace, which will happen faster, I think, if we don’t errect windmills and nationalize hospitals and such.
Anyway, guys, nice talking to you both. I’ve done enough yapping for one day!

Brian in Alaska
June 27, 2009 12:22 pm


Here’s a book that may help explain why things keep getting worse politically, election after election.

“How does it become a man to behave toward this American government today? I answered that he cannot without disgrace be associated with it.” Henry David Thoreau

Max
June 27, 2009 12:46 pm

Anthropogenic Spongification!
A new danger now stalks the ecosphere. Outlined in the May 2009 Atlantic Monthly, “rampant sponge reproduction” threatens to suck up the world’s oceans. Before you snicker, remember there were other environmental alarms initially rejected as silly. Who would have thought, for instance, that carbon dioxide, an atmospheric trace gas vital to plant life, from crops to rainforests, would be revealed as a toxic pollutant?
The sponge, a marine invertebrate once thought harmless, even beneficial, soaks up ten times its weight in water. If sponge populations are permitted to escalate, our oceans will disappear, warns an upcoming report from a UN panel of sponging experts.
Evidence of the impending catastrophe rests on ingenious computer models that predict explosive growth in sponges over the next 50 years, 5 weeks, 8 hours, 26 minutes. Incorporating the assumption that love owes more to proximity than affinity, these models predict that as sponge population densities increase, sex-crazed sponges will multiply at an ever-accelerating rate. In science, this is known as “positive feedback.” The resulting, ominous “hockey puck” pie chart shows the oceans transformed into one, enormous sponge.
Media reports allow no doubt that sponges are proliferating. This appears to correlate with the post-industrial shift from natural sponge harvesting to manufactured, icky plastic sponges—proof that the looming disaster is anthropogenic, which is Greek for “all our fault.”
Skeptics are dismissed, since four out of five researchers whose funding relates to Anthropogenic Global Spongification believe it a real and swelling problem, even though an unaccountable sponge decline in the past few years has redefined the threat as “Anthropogenic Sponge Change.”
But don’t worry. The EPA has declared H2O a toxic pollutant, and Congress is responding to the crisis with a huge tax, called “Cap and Squeeze,” to reduce man-made sponge. In support, a certain former Vice President plans a new video, “An Inconvenient Sop,” featuring desolate vistas of the Potomac mudflats, and giant sucking sounds, designed to frighten schoolchildren (as well it should). Economic and job losses will be offset, the President assures us, as working Americans learn to subsist by diving for renewable, all-natural, organic sponges.

June 27, 2009 2:56 pm

“I can’t begin to tell you how many calls we’ve received,” said Rep. Charles Gonzalez, D-Texas. “And it’s disproportionately vote ‘no.'”
Gonzalez, who voted “yes,” believes special interest groups generated many of the calls on both sides, including the late surge of negative feedback.

http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/06/26/house.energy/index.html
I, for one, don’t belong to any special interest organization nor do I allow others to ask me to do something I personally do not have valid justification for doing.
I suspect that the vote Gonzalez cast was closely in line with requests of ‘special interest’ groups close to him.

Arn Riewe
June 27, 2009 4:33 pm

Max (12:46:43) :
Anthropogenic Spongification!
Too funny! Well done

UK Sceptic
June 27, 2009 4:52 pm

This is appalling news. And do you know what? It hasn’t been reported over this side of the pond. All we’re getting is Michael Jackson this and Michael Jackson that.
The MSM have really excelled themselves. NOT!

June 27, 2009 5:06 pm

Interesting that Dennis Kucinich (D-OH) voted nay. He opposed the TARP bill too, as I recall.

June 27, 2009 5:22 pm

Hu,
Dennis has a hard time thinking on his own. He’s awaiting orders from the mother ship: click

Ron de Haan
June 27, 2009 6:08 pm

Dr Reese (10:23:08) :
Now we can get on with moving forward! Odd how some folks cling to the 19th century — fraught with fear. There are no BOOGYMEN! We have brain power in America and finally we are going to be able to use it and address living in the 21st century. Hooray for change because it is opportunity in disguise!
Dr Reese,
Always interesting to meet people who confuse a “coup” against humanity with “opportunity”.

L
June 27, 2009 6:44 pm

Couple of things: Congressman Jeff Flake (R, AZ)’s website states that he was not present to vote on Waxman-Malarkey because of a “family obligation.” I’m not really certain, but I think I read that his father passed away, quite recently. Someone is welcome to correct this, but given Flake’s adamant opposition to the bill, he must have had a darn good reason and deserves a pass in the upcoming RINO hunt. He’s a real elephant.
Max (Headroom, I presume), that was a hoot. We’ve missed you since your TV show was cancelled back in the 70’s. Visit more often!
Finally, Henry “Meerkat” Waxman misses the most noticeable feature of Hank ‘da Wax.’ You know that operation thingy they do to turn up the tip of your beak- I think it’s called a “Nosejob?” Considering his home district, West Hollywood CA, it’s probably safe to assume he’s had a few too many.

Ron de Haan
June 27, 2009 7:10 pm

From: iceagenow.com for pdf download entire article.
The vindication of carbon means the vindication of human freedom
By Robert D. Brinsmead
The war on carbon is an ill-disguised war on humanity. It is time to rip
away the mask and expose the movement whose real aim is to put the
human race in chains to a system that controls every aspect of human
existence. It is time to stand up and say, “You take your jackboots off
my carbon and off my life.”
This is a good read for those who think that the Waxman Climate Bill is all about “opportunity”, promotion of green technology and the improvement of the environment.

Evan Jones
Editor
June 27, 2009 9:24 pm

Hooray for change because it is opportunity in disguise!
One hell of a disguise.

old construction worker
June 27, 2009 9:29 pm

Smokey (11:56:54) :
‘…….simply because it’s something that President Hopey Change wanted passed. It is a really huge tax increase, no more and no less — ‘
It is also a transfer of wealth to other nations with nothing in return.
President Obama says this will make us energy independent. What he doesn’t tell us we will be dependent to other nations for carbon credit.
Can you say support your local dictator

tallbloke
June 27, 2009 9:57 pm

Waxman Markey Bill
The longest suicide note in history

CodeTech
June 28, 2009 12:31 am

“I can’t begin to tell you how many calls we’ve received,” said Rep. Charles Gonzalez, D-Texas. “And it’s disproportionately vote ‘no.’”
Gonzalez, who voted “yes,” believes special interest groups generated many of the calls on both sides, including the late surge of negative feedback.

So much for that “servant of the people” idea. Oh, and throw the whole “REPRESENTATIVE GOVERNMENT” idea out the window too. The new meme of the week is “if too many people are against what I’m doing, they must be some ‘special interest’ group”.
I’m thinking the majority of the current crop of “D” representatives were exposed to too much LDS in the 60s (it’s a Star Trek 4 quote). There is nothing else I can think of that adequately explains their inability to see that what they are doing is wrong. Oh yeah, it would be easy to think they’re just going ahead and doing what they know is wrong… but why assume malice when ignorance is such an accurate assessment?
So in future, I read the names on what we used to call “Representatives” and I will always see the “D” as meaning “Dimwit”. Also possible: dense, dullard, dopehead, dented, deluded, deceived. The “R” people, on the other hand, appear to be “Realist”. Also possible: reliable, representative. Once in a while one of the “D” people puts an “R” beside their name, and it’s sad but true that the “R” in that case stands for “retarded”.

Michael Jennings
June 28, 2009 6:24 am

Obviously some of the posts here are a little over the top but the anger of most here is palpabl and understandable. However you should remember the adage “don’t get mad, get even” and that has always been done in this great country at the ballot box, which is where your energies should be directed. A calm rational approach led by someone like Anthony, Roger Pielke Sr., or Richard Lindzen is necessary for the masses to proceed in the same direction on this. A movement without a strong leader consists of aimlessly wandering in the wilderness and getting nowhere fast. This also is much more than a Democrat or Republican issue (both parties are interested only in keeping power) but more about who rules this country, the politicians or the people? By all means though contact your Senators and express your strong misgivings about spending our national treasure on a problem that most likely doesn’t even exist. We have enough TRUE problems in this country to get about solving than to throw money after one that is not. It is highly unlikely we can defeat this in the Senate so we should immediately start developing contingency plans (on a forum like this) that we all can get behind when B-HO ultimately signs this into law. To think we have come to this point largely as a result of two ideologues who have pushed this (Gore and Hansen) is terrifying to most sane Americans who understand this could very well be the death knell for what was once the greatest economy in history.

Pamela Gray
June 28, 2009 9:53 am

This is the part I don’t get. What do I do when my party changes its underlying premise to one I can’t support? The platforms of all our parties have morphed so many times it is hard to tell what century this is. The Republicans are hard bent to bow to the intelligently designed right, and the Democrats are hard bent to bow to the earth muffins of the left. They both worship psuedo-science complete with a god attached. The only difference is that one is manly and gray-haired, and the other is a woman with bugs in her dread locks.
Where did these groups come from? I wish they would form their own parties instead of hijacking mine. Even the Independent party candidate was of the intelligently designed right and forked up the same old tired line that there is a higher law that supersedes common sense and practicality. Are we growing fields of “stupid” and putting it into our milk along with the other stuff that’s in there? Has the iodine in salt been replaced by vitamin “S”? I am left lamenting my once dear home and the party my grandfather belonged to (granted, he was a prejudiced southern democrat but the party had changed when I came of age).
Little Bo-Peep has lost her peep,
And can’t tell where to find them;
They gave them a bone, they took my home,
Leaving me to wander around dem.

greg
June 28, 2009 10:54 am

Want to bring this to your attention, congress critters who voted YES to the bill can still change their vote by July 2nd:
http://www.dailypaul.com/node/97723
From the site:
The following republicans voted FOR the largest tax bill ever passed by a session of Congress.
1) Click on their link.
2) Select the ‘Contact’ tab.
Contact their local office as they are not in DC and home on vacation.
Mary Bono Mack R (CA)
Mike Castle R (DW)
Mark Steven Kirk R (IL)
Leonard Lance R (NJ)
Frank LoBiondo R (NJ)
John McHugh R (NY)
Dave Reichert R (WA)
Chris Smith R (NJ)

Norman Page
June 28, 2009 10:59 am

In the U S ones home is usually the greater part of ones personal property.If this bill passes the senate it will virtually abrogate personal property rights in the U S because the value and therefore the sales price of the property will be decided by Commissar Waxman’s and Comrade Pelosi’s Climate Police disguised as property appraisers. The bill nationalises all building codes and sets national standard for property appraisers and provides money to train the Appraisal Enforcers in the “right ” way to make the appraisal in line with government regulations.
Furthermore to emphasise that your house belongs to the state and not to you any alterations or improvements will have to be approved by inspectors using federal standards to ensure that they comply with their carbon – cap bill regulations. Such regulations will also override any deed restrictions, HOA bye laws , covenants etc.
All this based on the IPCC – Al Gore scientifically fraudulent paradigm of a world warming because of anthropogenic CO2 when the real world has been cooling for 5 years and when 2008 was cooler than 1997- 11 years with CO2 up 6% and no net warming.
This Bill should be the central issue in the mid -term elections and the subject of tea- parties all over the country. Please make sure that all the homeowners in your subdivision know what’s in this property nationalisation bill.

June 28, 2009 11:11 am

This is my perspective from across the pond
Your elected representatives will not have the time to read the complete bill in Senate, nor the wit to understand it. There is also no point in using this as an extension of the recent election by treating this as a political battle. The democrats have the majority and want this bill. You need to engage in rational arguements that cover the science and financial consequences. In that way you cover the whole political spectrum, not just part of it.
Surely you need;
a) a summary of printed information giving the facts succinctly that is sent to each senator
b) a dedicated web site which again succinctly, rationally and aploitically will sum up the situiation, with appropriate links to sensible and reasoned short articles that give the alternative view.
Your elected representatives then each need to be asked to read the printed summary and to visit the web site. If sufficient of their electorate ask them to do this they may listen.
Try and keep the politics out of it-there seem to be a fair few outraged right wingers commenting here, and at present they are outnumbered and it is pointless to fight the battle on such unpromising ground.
Tonyb

CodeTech
June 28, 2009 1:55 pm

Amazing, Brian. The Patriot Act was an attempt to respond to a real, confirmed, active threat (for those with REALLY bad memories, that threat took down New York City’s two tallest buildings, complete with people and contents, with no warning and caused thousands of deaths, and took an immeasurable amount of money out of the economy for an unknown amount of time, and caused millions, or maybe billions of people inconvenience and anguish. Also, for those who get their opinions from the media and missed this important point, that threat also attacked the Pentagon, which can ONLY be seen as a declaration of war).
In contrast, Cap-n-Tax is a tax-grab being justified by a belief.
Comparing the two is like, well, is there even an analogy? Maybe it’s like comparing apples to light.

Brian in Alaska
June 28, 2009 3:40 pm

Yep, I’d say it’s high time some folks began being as skeptical of their government as they are of AGW.

June 28, 2009 7:23 pm

Eight Republicans voted for this bill. Follow the link below to see who the RINOs are. If only four had voted with their party we would not have this yoke around our necks.
——- http://my.barackobama.com/page/community/blog/conservativerascal ——-
PS: Don’t let the “my.barackobama.com” part fool you. Just go there and you will see what I mean.