Many WUWT readers have heard about this:
UPDATE: Video report on the DC snow here h/t to Stefan P
Here is my IntelliWeather Monday and hour by hour forecast for Washington, DC.
WINTER STORM WARNING IN EFFECT UNTIL 2 PM EST MONDAY
Includes the Counties: District Of Columbia, Arlington/Falls Church/Alexandria
Includes the cities: Washington, Alexandria, Falls Church
Tonight…Snow. Snow accumulation of 4 to 8 inches. Brisk with lows in the lower 20s. North winds 20 to 25 mph with gusts up to 35 mph. Chance of snow near 100 percent.
Monday…Cloudy. Snow likely in the morning…Then a chance of snow in the afternoon. Additional snow accumulation around an inch. Total snow accumulation 7 to 8 inches. Brisk with highs in the mid 20s. Northwest winds 20 to 25 mph with gusts up to 35 mph. Chance of snow 70 percent.
Hour by Hour, as of 4:30PM EST Sunday. Click for full sized image
By the time Partly Cloudy skies appear about 3PM Monday, there will be about 4-8″ of snow on the ground in DC.
Plus, in New York City, where Jim Hansen would likely depart from, they also have a Winter Storm Warning in effect to 6PM Monday with forecast of:
WINTER STORM WARNING IN EFFECT UNTIL 6 PM EST MONDAY
Includes the Counties: Hudson, New York (Manhattan), Bronx, Richmond (Staten Island), Kings (Brooklyn), Queens Tonight…Snow developing this evening…Heavy at Times. Snow accumulation of 6 to 10 inches. Windy with lows in the mid 20s. North winds 15 to 25 mph with gusts up to 35 mph. Chance of snow near 100 percent.
Monday…Snow in the morning…Then snow likely in the afternoon. Snow May be heavy at Times in the morning. Total snow accumulation of 8 to 12 inches. Windy. Near steady temperature in the mid 20s. North winds 20 to 30 mph. Chance of snow near 100 percent.
If Hansen hasn’t left NYC already, I’d say it is doubtful he’ll even make the protest given it is a Monday, and Monday’s are usually pretty bad commutes even without bad weather. Looks like it is going to be a…
More on the DC weather story form Justin Berk, Baltimore Weather Examiner
I interrupt the snowstorm updates to bring you this pressing issue. Monday, March 2nd 2009 is the date for a scheduled protest by Capitol Climate Action (CCA).

Heavy snow expected at the Nation’s Capitol on Monday
Their website labels it:
Mass civil disobedience at the coal fired power plant in Washington, DC
CCA claims this will be the largest mass civil disobedience for the climate in US history. There is actually a request to wear dress clothes. That seems odd. Is this a target to get young Americans in a vogue protest?
My forecast from this morning can be found here (I will have a new update by this evening). If you go just by the NWS forecast, then snow will range between 5-10 inches with wind gusts over 30 mph. The snowstorm forecast is ironic not only because it falls on the date of this protest, but also because it is a late season event. The normal high for the date in Washington, DC is 51F. What would be worse: Keep the protest on in the snowstorm, or cancel it because of the snowstorm?
The infamous Dr. James Hansen should be there leading the charge. My post last week about 2008 being the coldest year this decade included a reference to Hansen. I wrote, “This is the same man who turned off the air conditioning in the Capitol while speaking about Global Warming on a hot day in 1988.” I also mentioned his exposure of bad data for Russia just this past October. He used September data (a statistically warmer month) in place of cooler October data. This skewed the temperatures upward.
I don’t knock him for his extreme beliefs, but I do disagree with the questionable tactics he uses to get his message across. According to Fox News , he is in hot water since he works for NASA, yet is helping to organize a protest.
It seems like the Climate Crew has had some trouble getting their messages across. It’s almost as if mixed signals are coordinated by nature itself. Marc Marano, Communications Director for the GOP on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee (EPW) sent out a list of events that seem to follow the Gore Effect. This was labeled by Politico.com as:
The so-called Gore Effect happens when a global warming-related event, or appearance by the former vice president and climate change crusader, Al Gore, is marked by exceedingly cold weather or unseasonably winter weather.
Check out this list courtesy of Marc Marano:
Note: The “Gore Effect” has a long and storied history. What follows is a sampling of how Mother Nature enjoys mocking global warming fear promoters.
1) First October snow since 1922 blankets London as global warming bill debated – October 2008
3) HOUSE HEARING ON ‘WARMING OF THE PLANET’ CANCELED AFTER SNOW/ICE STORM – February 2007
4) NOT AGAIN! DC ‘Snow Advisory’ Issued on Day of Congressional Global Warming Hearing – March 2007
5) Gore decries ‘global warming’ in bitterly cold NYC – December 2006
9) Global warming protest in Maryland frosted with snow – January 2008
10) Global warming rally in the snow – April 2007
11) Snow won’t dampen global-warming rallies – April 2007
13) Global Warming Awareness Walk Braves Snow Storm – March 2007
14) The Gore Effect, Cont. – Gore speaks in Italy during ‘rare’ cold and snow
15) Tracking ‘The Gore Effect’ – Politico November 26,6, 2008
16) Climate protest cancelled ‘due to rain and cold’ – Nov. 23, 2008



There is actually a request to wear dress clothes.
Ahhh, I overlooked that information before. Now this is the reason for the person onstage wearing a peculiar combination of hemp crocheted hat AND a tie… However, there was not much of dress clothes around, but the more of thick parkas.
Reply to Canard
“manacker – any chance you could post the cites for your contradictions…. Thanks”
Contradiction #1:
IPCC projects global warming at a rate of 0.2C per decade in the early 21st century; so far the first 8 years of the 21st century have shown cooling at an average rate of around 0.1C per decade. Oops!
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_SPM.pdf
ftp://ftp.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/anomalies/annual.land_and_ocean.90S.90N.df_1901-2000mean.dat
http://vortex.nsstc.uah.edu/data/msu/t2lt/tltglhmam_5.2
http://hadobs.metoffice.com/hadcrut3/diagnostics/global/nh+sh/annual
ftp://ftp.ssmi.com/msu/monthly_time_series/rss_monthly_msu_amsu_channel_tlt_anomalies_land_and_ocean_v03_1.txt
Contradiction #2:
IPCC states that the rate of sea level rise has increased in the latter part of the 20th century, switching from tide gauge records to satellite altimetry; the tide gauge record shows a slight decrease in sea level rise in the second half of the 20th century, as compared to the first half. Hmm…
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_SPM.pdf
http://www.agu.org/pubs/crossref/2007/2006GL028492.shtml
Contradiction #3:
IPCC states that changes in solar irradiance since 1750 are estimated to cause a radiative forcing of only 0.12 W/m^2, equivalent to a net warming of around 0.02C; several studies by solar scientists conclude that the 20th century warming caused by the unusually high level of solar activity is around 0.35C. Ouch!
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_SPM.pdf
http://www.geo.umass.edu/faculty/bradley/lean1995.pdf
http://www.scribd.com/doc/334163/Phenomenological-solar-contribution-to-the-19002000-global-surface-warming
http://cc.oulu.fi/~usoskin/personal/nature02995.pdf
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/paleo/pubs/solanki2004/solanki2004.html
http://oldfraser.lexi.net/publications/books/g_warming/solar.html
http://www.wdc.rl.ac.uk/wdcc1/papers/grlcover.html.
http://www-das.uwyo.edu/~geerts/cwx/notes/chap02/sunspots.html
http://www.int-res.com/articles/cr/1/c001p161.pdf
http://sait.oat.ts.astro.it/MSAIt760405/PDF/2005MmSAI..76..969G.pdf
http://www.gsajournals.org/perlserv/?request=get-static&name=i1052-5173-14-3-e4&ct=1
(I’ve got more, but that should do)
Contradiction #4:
IPCC states that the warmth of the last half century is unusual in at least the previous 1,300 years, ignoring overwhelming physical and historical evidence of a warmer global Medieval Warm Period. Huh?
http://www.int-res.com/articles/cr2003/23/c023p089.pdf
http://www.ncasi.org/publications/Detail.aspx?id=3025
(plus many historical references from all over the civilized world at the time, in addition to many reports of physical evidence disci=overed under receding glaciers)
Contradiction #5:
IPCC claims that the satellite temperature record has shown a faster rate of tropospheric warming than that at the surface, confirming the anthropogenic cause of warming; both the satellite and radiosonde record show less warming than the surface record. Oops!
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter3.pdf
(See links to satellite and surface temperature records cited in #1 above)
Contradiction #6:
IPCC models all assume a strongly positive feedback from clouds with warming, resulting in 1.3C of the total assumed 2xCO2 climate sensitivity of 3.2C; actual physical observations show a strongly negative net feedback from clouds of around the same order of magnitude; correcting the 2xCO2 climate sensitivity for this factor brings it to around 0.6 to 0.8C, rather than 3.2C. Ouch!
http://www.ipcc.ch/pdf/assessment-report/ar4/wg1/ar4-wg1-chapter8.pdf
http://blog.acton.org/uploads/Spencer_07GRL.pdf
Contradiction #7:
IPCC staes confidently that the upward distortion of the surface temperature record due to the urban heat island effect has a negligible influence of less than 0.006C per decade; many studies from all over the world show that the UHI influence is thirty to fifty times as great as claimed by IPCC. Oh, oh!
(Correction: UHI is not “thirty to fifty times as great as claimed by IPCC” but rather around five to ten times.)
http://ipcc-wg1.ucar.edu/wg1/Report/AR4WG1_Print_SPM.pdf
http://www.uoguelph.ca/~rmckitri/research/nvst.html
http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Part3_UrbanHeat.htm
http://www.iop.org/EJ/abstract/1742-2140/2/4/S04
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2003AGUFM.U51A..03T
http://cat.inist.fr/?aModele=afficheN&cpsidt=16189789
http://gtresearchnews.gatech.edu/newsrelease/china-climate.htm
http://ams.allenpress.com/perlserv/?request=get-document&doi=10.1175%2F2007JCLI1348.1&ct=1
http://www.pubmedcentral.nih.gov/articlerender.fcgi?artid=470710
http://ff.org/centers/csspp/library/co2weekly/2005-04-21/temperature.htm
http://www.ejournal.unam.mx/atm/Vol18-4/ATM18404.pdf
http://www.appinsys.com/GlobalWarming/GW_Part3_UrbanHeat.htm
(There are more, but this should suffice)
Fox News is reporting that Nancy Pelosi had to cancel her appearance due to weather causing her to miss a flight… gotta love it.
Adolfo Giurfa (06:48:13) :
It is pitiful to watch, the once leading nation of the world, infected by such a noxious psychic disease, which resembles that of the Nazi rise in Germany. Hope you can stop this madness before is too late.
I would only point out that the name stood for National State Socialist… and now that we are a socialist economy it’s not surprising that their would be similarities in the socialist rhetoric.
Oddly enough, my neighbor (aeronautic engineer – masters) & spouse are planning to move to South America (somewhere near the equator, I forget where). My Mercedes mechanic ( from Germany ) is talking about selling his business and heading to Brazil with his Brazilian wife. My spouses childhood friend moved to Chile a few years back.
So I’m now thinking “Argentina, Chile, Brazil, ???” Leaning toward Chile due to the Mediterranean climate and wines… I’m OK with Spanish (it was my first second language 😉 and can sort of read Portuguese (close enough to Spanish, French, Esperanto, etc. to make good guesses) but the sounds are still hard for me to track. Then there are the French and English speaking islands and former colonies. Decisions decisions…
Folks with money and skills looking to get out of Dodge…
So Adolfo, you live down that way… You have any suggestions? (No, I don’t mean “stay home” 😉 Any ideas where all us US Expatriots (to be) would be most at ease? (My money is already invested in Brazil, so I’m not worried about the dollar any more…) Anybody down there need experienced computer programers or project managers? Professional teachers with US credentials and poor/accented Spanish? Retired guy with ‘accounts’?
I give it about another 3 months for the wheels to come of or for POTUS to moderate. I’m not holding out for moderation…
The good news is that at the present rate he will be saddled with a very republican house in 2 years. The bad news is that it will take 2 years…
E.M Smith
You know much more about investing than I ever will, but I may know some things about the Brazilian economy that you do not know (news that doesn’t make it out of the country). We may want to have that beer sooner rather than later.
Ron de Haan (08:02:17) : “The Ford Foundation and Roche Pharmaceuticals”.
Hmmm With Ford stock at $1.88 I wonder if the Ford Foundation could buy out the whole company?… Just thinkin… Profile says Ford market cap now $4.37 B and web search says Ford Foundation has an endowment of $13 B so I suppose they could… if they wanted to… Then they could run it as a charity for all the Ford retirees! By George, I think I have a solution!
jeez (02:26:15) :
E.M Smith
You know much more about investing than I ever will, but I may know some things about the Brazilian economy that you do not know (news that doesn’t make it out of the country). We may want to have that beer sooner rather than later.
Your on! You’ve got my number & email. Pick it. (Gordon B. is nice in Palo Alto…)
FWIW, I’m largely in the PBR Petrobras oils and CZZ (sugarcane, land, alcool – bought for about the price of the cash they had in the bank at the time). And some metals / miners. The “Drop it on your foot it hurts” paradigm… But facts on the ground are always valuable. My biggest concern is some socialist taking over and nationalizing things and running the money out of the country and … oh wait, wrong country 😉
A sillier statement has rarely been uttered.
I have lived in Brazil for 25 years and run a business here. Brazil is very anti-business and very anti-capitalist with a Kafkaesque bureaucracy. Brazil is the USA’s future if Obama suceeds in implementing his economic programme. The trouble is, that with the USA heading towards socialism there will be nowhere for disaffected Brazilans to escape to.
with the USA heading towards socialism
REALITY SETTING IN
“I give it about another 3 months for the wheels to come of or for POTUS to moderate. I’m not holding out for moderation… “
Even those who voted him are starting to have second thoughts…
http://mypetjawa.mu.nu/archives/196634.php
But it’s probably already too late,….
http://gatewaypundit.blogspot.com/2009/03/cnbcs-cramer-on-obama-its-amateur-hour.html
…and if my guess is correct, we ain’t seen nuthin yet!
Why would I say that? Well, because I think he isn’t making “honest mistakes.” He probably knows exactly what he’s doing,…
http://www.americanthinker.com/2008/09/barack_obama_and_the_strategy.html
I don’t mean this to judgmental at all, but when someone can consider leaving his country, that means he has no patriotism, no love of his country or sense of a national identity. I submit that may be what got us into this mess to begin with. But then, the Leftist school, news and entertainment systems have been undermining that aspect of our world view for at least the last generation, so it should be no surprise that at the first sign of national trouble one’s first thought is of where one can go to escape it.
Oh,and I meant to add at the end, …
… rather than ‘what can I do to fix the problem, no matter what it takes’.
DAV (17:21:15) :
Ok you got me. I’d like to be able to offer a really good excuse along the lines of “splint”, “splinch” … or maybe, “I’m a touch typist whose keyboard is out of alignment” … but I’m not, it isn’t and it was the vodka. Vodka and schadenfreud are a great combination.
Robert van der Veeke (21:09:19) :
Yes, he did. You can see it here at about the 1:53:00 mark.
http://www.ustream.tv/recorded/1205470
CO2 is good. Plants thrive at double the current amount. And as a TRACE GAS… the current amount is minuscule. Plant Killers.