Surfacestations update – we are within sight of the goal

I’m pleased to announce that the www.surfacestations.org project has reached a major milestone, with 67% of the 1221 USHCN network now surveyed.

819 of 1221 stations have been examined in the USHCN network. Of the 819, 807 have been assigned a site quality rating. In some of those cases we’ve found the stations closed, or we are waiting for supplemental information to enable assigning a rating.

The Google Earth map below shows current coverage. We are in sight of the goal. However there are still some holes, especially in south Texas, Alabama, Idaho, Arkansas, Missouri and Illinois.

See this Google Earth generated image. The circles with question marks are stations left to be surveyed.

surfacestations_usa_googlemap_012509

Click for a larger image

A Google Earth USHCN Station Rating Map (KML file used to generate the above image) is available – download here

You can download the Google Earth application for free from this link

Sincere thanks to Gary Boden for this contribution! This is a very useful tool to help locate stations as hi resolution lat/lon values and descriptions are available from each map icon. Of course, Google Earth will also plot driving directions too.

I’m hoping to reach a minimum of 75% before I start doing data analysis. I want to find more rural stations, with the hope of finding more of the better sited stations since the lions share is comprised of CRN3-5 stations. I’m hoping those of you that live near some of these “holes” can help. if you can, please leave a comment below and I’ll help you locate stations. You’ll also need to visit the website www.surfacestations.org and register as a volunteer. It’s free and easy.

Here is what the current rating breakdown looks like:

surfacestations-ratings-012509

click for a larger image

For those unfamiliar with the rating system, it is identical to the one used by NOAA/NCDC to select sites for their new Climate Refernece Network (CRN) They drew this rating scheme from a paper published by Michel Leroy, of MeteoFrance, that he devised for their meteorological network. Here are the details:

Climate Reference Network Rating Guide – adopted from NCDC Climate Reference Network Handbook, 2002, specifications for siting (section 2.2.1) of NOAA’s new Climate Reference Network:

Class 1 (CRN1)- Flat and horizontal ground surrounded by a clear surface with a slope below 1/3 (<19deg). Grass/low vegetation ground cover <10 centimeters high. Sensors located at least 100 meters from artificial heating or reflecting surfaces, such as buildings, concrete surfaces, and parking lots. Far from large bodies of water, except if it is representative of the area, and then located at least 100 meters away. No shading when the sun elevation >3 degrees.

Class 2 (CRN2) – Same as Class 1 with the following differences. Surrounding Vegetation <25 centimeters. No artificial heating sources within 30m. No shading for a sun elevation >5deg.

Class 3 (CRN3) (error >=1C) – Same as Class 2, except no artificial heating sources within 10 meters.

Class 4 (CRN4) (error >= 2C) – Artificial heating sources <10 meters.

Class 5 (CRN5) (error >= 5C) – Temperature sensor located next to/above an artificial heating source, such a building, roof top, parking lot, or concrete surface.”

Here is how the survey status breaks down by state. States highlighted have less than 50% coverage and are in the need of the most help from volunteers.

State Number of Stations Survey Report Done Percent Reported
Alabama 15 8 53%
Arizona 26 21 81%
Arkansas 15 7 47%
California 54 54 100%
Colorado 25 17 68%
Connecticut 4 4 100%
Delaware 5 4 80%
Florida 22 21 95%
Georgia 23 20 87%
Idaho 26 17 65%
Illinois 36 13 36%
Indiana 36 33 92%
Iowa 23 13 57%
Kansas 32 27 84%
Kentucky 13 7 54%
Louisiana 18 17 94%
Maine 12 10 83%
Maryland 17 9 53%
Massachusetts 12 12 100%
Michigan 24 19 79%
Minnesota 33 30 91%
Mississippi 32 25 78%
Missouri 25 11 44%
Montana 44 27 61%
Nebraska 45 27 60%
Nevada 13 13 100%
New Hampshire 5 4 80%
New Jersey 12 8 67%
New Mexico 28 17 61%
New York 59 28 47%
North Carolina 29 26 90%
North Dakota 24 15 63%
Ohio 26 15 58%
Oklahoma 45 36 80%
Oregon 41 28 68%
Pennsylvania 24 11 46%
Rhode Island 3 3 100%
South Carolina 29 20 69%
South Dakota 24 11 46%
Tennessee 15 12 80%
Texas 48 24 50%
Utah 40 24 60%
Vermont 7 6 86%
Virginia 19 7 37%
Washington 44 35 80%
West Virginia 13 6 46%
Wisconsin 22 13 59%
Wyoming 33 26 79%

For those that wish to help here is what you need to do:

1. Visit www.surfacestations.org and register as a volunteer. It’s free and easy.

2. Look over the the How To Guide for surveying a station. All you need is a digital camera, and optionally a portable GPS, but it is not mandatory. A GPS that can get you to a lat/lon you enter is helpful though.

3. Find a station that is unsurveyed by using either the Google Earth KML file download above, or by looking for stations with no entries yet in the Surfacestation image gallery database

When you decide on stations to survey, drop a comment here to make sure we don’t get duplication of effort.

4. Locate the details on station that you want to survey. The KML file has popup ballons for each station that gives details, and you can get lat/lon from doing a right click and “properties” for a station in Google Earth.Google Earth can give you driving directions. Note that lat/lon values are not alway accurate. I’ve seen them spot on, and sometimes they are as much as a 1/2 mile off., but they’ll generally get you close.

You can also visit the NCDC MMS database here: http://mi3.ncdc.noaa.gov/mi3qry/login.cfm and use the “guest login” button. Then do a search for the station name and match up with the city and the USHCN station # ID in the Google Earth KML file balloon. Getting that USHCN ID# right is crucial, as some towns may have 2 or three COOP stations which are not part of the USHCN network. Once you find the right station, click on the link. Be sure to note iuf it says “current” or not.

Another clue to make sure you have the right station in the NCDC database is the “station type” field which will say something like “COOP-A, COOP, LAND SURFACE, A, A” If there is no “A” in the description, then it is not a climate station.

Also check the “Location tab” in the NCDC database, which will say something like like “fire station” or “sewage treatment plant”…you maye have to look down a few entries from the top. Once you have that, some Google web searches will often help you narrow down a likely street address if the Google Earth imagery doesn’t help you visualize the location.

The “Equpiment tab” is also useful, since it will tell you what to look for. Here is a photo link that has most of the usual components of a climate station hat will help you get an idea.

5. If you determine that the station is located at a private residence, you’ll need help locating the observer. For that you need to find the observer name. Thankfully these exist on the NCDC database also, as a signature on many of the B91 forms the observers send in. To find B91 forms with observer names, go to this url:

http://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/IPS/coop/coop.html

Then narrow down the state and station name in the web form, and click through to see what B91 forms are available, if you don’t see any within the last 6 -12 months, chances are the station is closed (a growing problem).

Download one and you may see an observer name at the lower right. A web lookup for the name and address may lead you there. Most private observers are interested and helpful. Just be sure that you advise them that you only want to get photos of their station and immediate surroundings (6 photos minimum: NSEW at about 20-30 feet, and two overall wide shots showing the station in relation to it’s surrounding) and that you are not going to reveal their names, addresses or phone numbers in any way, or any other private info.

6. Plan your trip. If you have trouble, or need help locating a station, drop a comment here.

7. Set your camera for 3.1 megapixels (2048×1536) for best results. Or use a photo editor program later to shrink the images to that size if you use a higher resolution. High resolution is good for long distance shots, such as are sometimes required when the station is at a fenced public facility like a water plant. You can then later crop out areas of the hi-res image. It’s like having an extra zoom level. All images should be 2 megabytes or less in size for uploading.

8. Fill out the station survey form (available here ) as best you can, making notes about the station. be sure to save it as a Adobe Acrobat PDF file, which is what is need to upload into the database. A free print to PDF application is available here at www.primopdf.com should you need one.

9. Navigate to the empty folder for the station you surveyed at the Surfacestation image gallery database and click on “add a photo” or “add items” on the left menu. Don’t try to do them all at once, as you may get a time out if your connection speed is slow. Doing 4 at a time really works well. Here at this link is what a completed survey looks like after uploading.

10. Drop us note at info { at } surfacestations dot org to let us know! Or if you need help.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

90 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Ivan
January 26, 2009 8:22 am

Anthony,
as for Canada, I can contribute inspecting Quebec stations, Montreal where I am living, maybe other cities as well. But, I can start working by mid March.

AnonyMoose
January 26, 2009 8:55 am

the usual components of a climate station hat

Very peculiar hats.

Jeff Alberts
January 26, 2009 9:04 am

I’ve gotten the Ok from the Company Commander (read: wife) to give the Olga, WA station a go. So some weekend in the next month or so we’ll try to get out there. She tried to talk me into waiting until it was warmer, but lots of whining changed her mind 😉
I’ve been reading through the survey How-to, looks pretty straightforward. The biggest challenge with Olga will be locating the right property, since Google Maps doesn’t have good imagery for that area.
We might even do the Cle Elum and Stehekin sites in the summer (after the melt…) if they haven’t already been done.

John-X
January 26, 2009 9:16 am

Article in this month’s “Weather” (journal of the (UK) Royal Meteorological Society):
“Using Google Earth to Evaluate GCOS Weather Station Sites”
by I.C. Strangeways
http://www3.interscience.wiley.com/journal/121585298/abstract

Jeff Alberts
January 26, 2009 9:19 am

Anthony, I see there are GISS Global stations. Are they being surveyed too? Looks like there’s one on Whidbey NAS, which is about 3 miles from my house.
http://data.giss.nasa.gov/cgi-bin/gistemp/gistemp_station.py?id=425742010030&data_set=1&num_neighbors=1
The Lat and Lon from the link above place it about 1.6 miles offshore in the middle of the Sound, and about 3 miles from the base proper.

Joel
January 26, 2009 9:26 am

Anthony,
I live near Pittsburgh, PA. I see some gaps in west central PA and east central Ohio. Id be more than willing to help out with those. Let me know which ones need to be looked at around there.

Jeff Alberts
January 26, 2009 9:45 am

The lat/lon for Grapeview, WA is also in the middle of the water, no islands visible that would make sense…

jae
January 26, 2009 9:59 am

Anthony: I see there are still a couple of unsurveyed stations in SW Oregon. Let me know the locations and I’ll try to survey them.
REPLY: Will do. Brookings and a powerhouse which is near Medford, I’ll look up and email you. – Anthony

Paddy
January 26, 2009 10:53 am

Jeff Albers: We are neighbors. I would like to talk to you. If you are interested, please contact me at: paddy_wagon@comcast.net.

January 26, 2009 10:54 am

I’m in south Alabama, and it looks like there are three sites, maybe more depending on the actual location, that I might be able to get to. I’ve just signed up at surfacestations.org and am awaiting further info.

Jeff Alberts
January 26, 2009 11:33 am

Email sent, Paddy.

Jerry
January 26, 2009 12:10 pm

Ok, I’m confused.
I may be able to get a few of the Colorado stations, like the one in Canon City (USHCN number 51294).
However, when I do a search on MMS using that number, I get nothing at all.
What’s up with that?
Jerry
REPLY: try switching the selector to COOP ID and then search – Anthony

AEGeneral
January 26, 2009 1:26 pm

I can handle Hernando, MS and Covington, TN. Once again my previous plans fell through, so I’ll try to be realistic & say by March 31st.
My volunteer for Corinth, MS backed out. If it’s still needed this summer, I’ll be traveling through there myself.
REPLY Need ’em faster than that if possible. – Anthony

January 26, 2009 1:31 pm

Anthony,
From Google earth, I’m not sure which stations still need to be done around me. Can you send an email with the nearest ones?
REPLY: and you are where? – Anthony

Robert Bateman
January 26, 2009 1:45 pm

Anthony: That station in your link is the Weaverville US Forest Service building.
The highway you see is 299W. I drove by it this morning. Nothing changed there from your images. Perhaps the previous ‘hot’ location was up behind the Lonnie Pool Airport (I have visited that one too…usfs Fire Weather Station to be exact.
There is a much more accurate station up on Oregon Hill Summit (299W about 5 miles west of USFS Weaverville Ranger station). It is a Cal-Trans station, and it does not suffer from the blistering readings of the the Weaverville Stations.
The reason being that air flow at the top counteracts the Highway (>25m distant).

hereticfringe
January 26, 2009 2:12 pm

Anthony,
Do you have either of these? If not, I can survey them for you:
IDAHO/ADA [BOISE AIR TERMINAL] 1898-12-01 Current 101022 24131 BOI 72681 20005225 [ 43.5666
43°33’59.76″N ] -116.2405
116°14’25.8″W AIRPORT: 2857 FEET
BAROMETRIC: 2874 FEET
GROUND: 2814 FEET
COOP, LAND SURFACE, ASOS-NWS, ASOS, WSO, WBAS, WSFO, CAA, AB [ 3 ]
IDAHO/ADA [BOISE LUCKY PEAK DAM] 1951-01-01 Current 101018 None None None 20005224 [ 43.5253
43°31’31.08″N ] -116.0542
116°03’15.12″W GROUND: 2840 FEET
COOP-A, COOP, LAND SURFACE, B, BC [ 2 ]
REPLY: Thank you but, neither of these are USHCN stations, in fact there is no USHCN station in Boise. These are regular COOP stations.
See the stations in the Idaho folder that have/have not been surveyed.
http://gallery.surfacestations.org/main.php?g2_itemId=115
Anthony

Robert Wood
January 26, 2009 3:23 pm

Best thing people like me can do is DONATE!!!!

Robert Wood
January 26, 2009 3:26 pm

Peter, I started looking at Canada, being based in Ottawa. I got the list of stations but Canada is a really big place … as you know :^).
I could only do two (NRC, Ottawa, and Brockville) which seemed a bit pointless.

hereticfringe
January 26, 2009 3:54 pm

I can do Glenn’s Ferry for you… it is right next to the airport. I have flown in there before.

Chris D.
January 26, 2009 4:30 pm

Anthony, just sent you what I could as a start for White Hall, IL.

January 26, 2009 5:41 pm

The happy town of Morris Illinois. I applied to the surfacestations project but haven’t received an email yet.

January 26, 2009 5:47 pm

Actually, if there is an up to date file where I could be sure that it wasn’t looked at yet I would be happy to do the legwork. I just don’t want to waste several hours if the work has been done.
– Buy a man a fish or teach a man to fish 🙂
REPLY: Just visit the gallery and look at the stations surveyed. That’s update date daily.
http://gallery.surfacestations.org/main.php and select the USHCN > state of interest – Anthony

January 26, 2009 7:19 pm

Hi Jim B, Anthony, and all,
For those interested in looking at Canadian stations I might be of some help. I have a Ph.D. in Cloud Physics and worked 25 years at Environment Canada’s AES/MSC in Toronto, and I still know a lot of people involved in atmospheric, weather and climate research there. I could possibly help, for example, locate station information and other data.
Unfortunately, I don’t have time available to lead the effort to evaluate Canadian surface stations, though I could look at individual stations in and around Kamloops, BC. I already run a charity called “FogQuest: sustainable water solutions” on a full-time volunteer basis. It provides water to villages in arid regions using very large fog collectors. I mention this because a changing climate affects where we can produce water. One positive thing to come out of more low-cloud over the oceans, if it occurs, is that there will be more of it to be pushed by the wind over coastal hills and mountains, which will produce fog in these locations, and thus more water for trees and plants adapted to collecting the fog droplets, and more water for FogQuest to provide to people. Also, colder sea (and land) temperatures lead to lower cloud base heights, which in turn will lead to more frequent fog on mountains and longer duration fog events. This will deposit more fog water in places like coastal California, the west coast of South America, and many other coastal and inland locations.
There is an informal association of retired professionals from the Meteorological Service of Canada, Jim, and you may find a suitable person in that group to help. I’ll send you a contact person’s name and address.
Cheers!

Nelson
January 26, 2009 8:06 pm

Anthony
I also would like to offer up my congratulations and thanks for this effort. I am fairly new to the ranks of the “skeptics”, but I’m scared to death by the looming disaster that could be foisted upon the world by the “concensus” scientists and their alarmist backers in government. Let’s hope that minds can be changed before we undertake the largest and most damaging tax in the history of mankind.
Could someone point me to a study that shows US temp trends broken out by station rating (or is this the core reason that you have undertaken this effort)? I have read much about the UHI effect and how some climatologists have not disclosed how they “adjust” their data for same. I would be very curious to see how the UHI impacts the lower quality stations compared to the higher quality stations using unadjusted numbers.
REPLY: Thanks, the study you ask for has yet to be written. -Anthony

Chris D.
January 26, 2009 8:15 pm

Well…for Pete’s sake, White Hall, IL, has been done already. What’s that old saying about assuming?