I’m pleased to announce that the www.surfacestations.org project has reached a major milestone, with 67% of the 1221 USHCN network now surveyed.
819 of 1221 stations have been examined in the USHCN network. Of the 819, 807 have been assigned a site quality rating. In some of those cases we’ve found the stations closed, or we are waiting for supplemental information to enable assigning a rating.
The Google Earth map below shows current coverage. We are in sight of the goal. However there are still some holes, especially in south Texas, Alabama, Idaho, Arkansas, Missouri and Illinois.
See this Google Earth generated image. The circles with question marks are stations left to be surveyed.
Click for a larger image
A Google Earth USHCN Station Rating Map (KML file used to generate the above image) is available – download here
You can download the Google Earth application for free from this link
Sincere thanks to Gary Boden for this contribution! This is a very useful tool to help locate stations as hi resolution lat/lon values and descriptions are available from each map icon. Of course, Google Earth will also plot driving directions too.
I’m hoping to reach a minimum of 75% before I start doing data analysis. I want to find more rural stations, with the hope of finding more of the better sited stations since the lions share is comprised of CRN3-5 stations. I’m hoping those of you that live near some of these “holes” can help. if you can, please leave a comment below and I’ll help you locate stations. You’ll also need to visit the website www.surfacestations.org and register as a volunteer. It’s free and easy.
Here is what the current rating breakdown looks like:
click for a larger image
For those unfamiliar with the rating system, it is identical to the one used by NOAA/NCDC to select sites for their new Climate Refernece Network (CRN) They drew this rating scheme from a paper published by Michel Leroy, of MeteoFrance, that he devised for their meteorological network. Here are the details:
Climate Reference Network Rating Guide – adopted from NCDC Climate Reference Network Handbook, 2002, specifications for siting (section 2.2.1) of NOAA’s new Climate Reference Network:
Class 1 (CRN1)- Flat and horizontal ground surrounded by a clear surface with a slope below 1/3 (<19deg). Grass/low vegetation ground cover <10 centimeters high. Sensors located at least 100 meters from artificial heating or reflecting surfaces, such as buildings, concrete surfaces, and parking lots. Far from large bodies of water, except if it is representative of the area, and then located at least 100 meters away. No shading when the sun elevation >3 degrees.
Class 2 (CRN2) – Same as Class 1 with the following differences. Surrounding Vegetation <25 centimeters. No artificial heating sources within 30m. No shading for a sun elevation >5deg.
Class 3 (CRN3) (error >=1C) – Same as Class 2, except no artificial heating sources within 10 meters.
Class 4 (CRN4) (error >= 2C) – Artificial heating sources <10 meters.
Class 5 (CRN5) (error >= 5C) – Temperature sensor located next to/above an artificial heating source, such a building, roof top, parking lot, or concrete surface.”
Here is how the survey status breaks down by state. States highlighted have less than 50% coverage and are in the need of the most help from volunteers.
| State | Number of Stations | Survey Report Done | Percent Reported |
| Alabama | 15 | 8 | 53% |
| Arizona | 26 | 21 | 81% |
| Arkansas | 15 | 7 | 47% |
| California | 54 | 54 | 100% |
| Colorado | 25 | 17 | 68% |
| Connecticut | 4 | 4 | 100% |
| Delaware | 5 | 4 | 80% |
| Florida | 22 | 21 | 95% |
| Georgia | 23 | 20 | 87% |
| Idaho | 26 | 17 | 65% |
| Illinois | 36 | 13 | 36% |
| Indiana | 36 | 33 | 92% |
| Iowa | 23 | 13 | 57% |
| Kansas | 32 | 27 | 84% |
| Kentucky | 13 | 7 | 54% |
| Louisiana | 18 | 17 | 94% |
| Maine | 12 | 10 | 83% |
| Maryland | 17 | 9 | 53% |
| Massachusetts | 12 | 12 | 100% |
| Michigan | 24 | 19 | 79% |
| Minnesota | 33 | 30 | 91% |
| Mississippi | 32 | 25 | 78% |
| Missouri | 25 | 11 | 44% |
| Montana | 44 | 27 | 61% |
| Nebraska | 45 | 27 | 60% |
| Nevada | 13 | 13 | 100% |
| New Hampshire | 5 | 4 | 80% |
| New Jersey | 12 | 8 | 67% |
| New Mexico | 28 | 17 | 61% |
| New York | 59 | 28 | 47% |
| North Carolina | 29 | 26 | 90% |
| North Dakota | 24 | 15 | 63% |
| Ohio | 26 | 15 | 58% |
| Oklahoma | 45 | 36 | 80% |
| Oregon | 41 | 28 | 68% |
| Pennsylvania | 24 | 11 | 46% |
| Rhode Island | 3 | 3 | 100% |
| South Carolina | 29 | 20 | 69% |
| South Dakota | 24 | 11 | 46% |
| Tennessee | 15 | 12 | 80% |
| Texas | 48 | 24 | 50% |
| Utah | 40 | 24 | 60% |
| Vermont | 7 | 6 | 86% |
| Virginia | 19 | 7 | 37% |
| Washington | 44 | 35 | 80% |
| West Virginia | 13 | 6 | 46% |
| Wisconsin | 22 | 13 | 59% |
| Wyoming | 33 | 26 | 79% |
For those that wish to help here is what you need to do:
1. Visit www.surfacestations.org and register as a volunteer. It’s free and easy.
2. Look over the the How To Guide for surveying a station. All you need is a digital camera, and optionally a portable GPS, but it is not mandatory. A GPS that can get you to a lat/lon you enter is helpful though.
3. Find a station that is unsurveyed by using either the Google Earth KML file download above, or by looking for stations with no entries yet in the Surfacestation image gallery database
When you decide on stations to survey, drop a comment here to make sure we don’t get duplication of effort.
4. Locate the details on station that you want to survey. The KML file has popup ballons for each station that gives details, and you can get lat/lon from doing a right click and “properties” for a station in Google Earth.Google Earth can give you driving directions. Note that lat/lon values are not alway accurate. I’ve seen them spot on, and sometimes they are as much as a 1/2 mile off., but they’ll generally get you close.
You can also visit the NCDC MMS database here: http://mi3.ncdc.noaa.gov/mi3qry/login.cfm and use the “guest login” button. Then do a search for the station name and match up with the city and the USHCN station # ID in the Google Earth KML file balloon. Getting that USHCN ID# right is crucial, as some towns may have 2 or three COOP stations which are not part of the USHCN network. Once you find the right station, click on the link. Be sure to note iuf it says “current” or not.
Another clue to make sure you have the right station in the NCDC database is the “station type” field which will say something like “COOP-A, COOP, LAND SURFACE, A, A” If there is no “A” in the description, then it is not a climate station.
Also check the “Location tab” in the NCDC database, which will say something like like “fire station” or “sewage treatment plant”…you maye have to look down a few entries from the top. Once you have that, some Google web searches will often help you narrow down a likely street address if the Google Earth imagery doesn’t help you visualize the location.
The “Equpiment tab” is also useful, since it will tell you what to look for. Here is a photo link that has most of the usual components of a climate station hat will help you get an idea.
5. If you determine that the station is located at a private residence, you’ll need help locating the observer. For that you need to find the observer name. Thankfully these exist on the NCDC database also, as a signature on many of the B91 forms the observers send in. To find B91 forms with observer names, go to this url:
http://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/IPS/coop/coop.html
Then narrow down the state and station name in the web form, and click through to see what B91 forms are available, if you don’t see any within the last 6 -12 months, chances are the station is closed (a growing problem).
Download one and you may see an observer name at the lower right. A web lookup for the name and address may lead you there. Most private observers are interested and helpful. Just be sure that you advise them that you only want to get photos of their station and immediate surroundings (6 photos minimum: NSEW at about 20-30 feet, and two overall wide shots showing the station in relation to it’s surrounding) and that you are not going to reveal their names, addresses or phone numbers in any way, or any other private info.
6. Plan your trip. If you have trouble, or need help locating a station, drop a comment here.
7. Set your camera for 3.1 megapixels (2048×1536) for best results. Or use a photo editor program later to shrink the images to that size if you use a higher resolution. High resolution is good for long distance shots, such as are sometimes required when the station is at a fenced public facility like a water plant. You can then later crop out areas of the hi-res image. It’s like having an extra zoom level. All images should be 2 megabytes or less in size for uploading.
8. Fill out the station survey form (available here ) as best you can, making notes about the station. be sure to save it as a Adobe Acrobat PDF file, which is what is need to upload into the database. A free print to PDF application is available here at www.primopdf.com should you need one.
9. Navigate to the empty folder for the station you surveyed at the Surfacestation image gallery database and click on “add a photo” or “add items” on the left menu. Don’t try to do them all at once, as you may get a time out if your connection speed is slow. Doing 4 at a time really works well. Here at this link is what a completed survey looks like after uploading.
10. Drop us note at info { at } surfacestations dot org to let us know! Or if you need help.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.


Hi Peter and fellow Canadians,
I was the “Gentleman” Anthony alluded to in the previous post who had attempted to start a Canadian survey surfacestations.ca. As Anthony also pointed out in 2007, at the same time I started the project my 2 year old boy contracted Chron’s disease and spend a few months in hospital not allowing any work on any projects. When he finally was stabilized I tried going back into the system but found I had much less time, and it was much more difficult to find the weather stations than I thought. Several people did come forward to help out, but the project really needs the experience on a qualified meteorologist or climatologist to head the project.
I am willing to start the project up again if I can find someone experienced to head it up, I’m very good at server management and web design, but I have no meteorological or climate science experience.
Jim B
callonjim@gmail.com
REPLY: Hi Jim, I knew that, but didn’t want to put you on the spot by announcing your name. Thanks for the note. – Anthony
Your list seems to be missing some important US colonies – like Alaska, Hawaii, Puerto Rico & Guam. Why’s that? Doesn’t the US Gov’t collect any useful climate data there?
REPLY: They do, but the USHCN was a subset of the larger COOP network specifically for CONUS. – Anthony
Jeff & Anthony,
About the Seattle station, I don’t think the lat/long are sufficiently accurate to narrow that one down. About three blocks south and three west is the Seattle Yacht Club @ur momisugly 1807 E Hamlin St. (About 1500 feet due southwest in Google maps) This happens to be right next to a NOAA Fisheries building, and I think this is ‘the correct’ site for this station.
If you switch back and forth between the various source material, you’ll see “Portage bay” and “Seattle Yacht Club” pop up in some of the ancillary information. (It’s been awhile, so I’ve forgotten the details.)
The height puts it on the roof of the building which visually has some clear indications of weather monitoring gear.
Alan thanks for that, but I don’t see how that is possible. There are no COOP records from Seattle newer than 2002
Check here: http://www7.ncdc.noaa.gov/IPS/coop/coop.html
I’m pretty sure the station has been closed.
What about the eastern coast of Australia? Anything happening there?
Too bad they closed that one on Seattle if it was on a rooftop or near the Husky Stadium parking lot. That would have been a nice hot one, good for Hansen to try and “influence the nature of the measurements obtained.”
Hello,
I had a look at the station list database in
http://www.surfacestations.org/USHCN_stationlist.htm
It looks like this list has not been updated since long, or at least that the table at the end was not (says 536 stations were surveyed).
Are there any newest table somewhere, or plans to update ?
Many thanks to all for this extraordinary piece of team work !
REPLY: That will not be updated until I have a chance to do my own analysis first. I reserve the right to be able to analyse and publish the results from my own project before others. Then of course that data will be made publicly available. – Anthony
FatBigot: there are also satellite measurements, and they agree quite well in general with station-based ones.
What, no survey done yet in Stehekin, WA yet? I can’t vouch for the station, but I am pretty sure it isn’t effected by an urban heat!
http://www.stehekinvalley.com/index.html
There are no roads to Stehekin, a 55 mile boat ride through the deepest gorge in North America, a float plane or a long hike is the only way in.
This site has to be in the running for the least accessible site in the continental US.
It is a beautiful place!
I see that there are several in far upstate NY not far from my home. I will try to plan some weekends over the next several months. If anyone else can get to them earlier, that would be great. If not, by summer, I should be able to have these done.
Antony,
Is there a contact for the UK survey? Do you know if it is possible to get involved in some way?
Many thanks
P
Just registered and would like to help. I live in VA and travel extensively in most of the states in the NE (East of the Mississippi and from VA/KY north to the Canadian border) for business so a prioritized list would be great and I will survey some as I pass by. Also, I vacation each summer at Priest Lake, ID so I can certainly hit the Priest River station and maybe Sandpoint or some in the Spokane, WA area.
sonicfrog wrote “Funny, Just the other day I read at one of the sanctioned AGW sites that the purveyors of Surfacestations.org (that’s us) had lost interest in the process of surveys and has become nothing more than a mouthpiece for denialists.”
You’d think that the pro-AGW people would want to *help*, as surely better data will prove their point, and perhaps shut some of us up… Of course it is a lot easier to just throw insults & stay with the majority (aka “consensus”).
I am familiar with the Weaverville, RS. I went looking for where they moved it from the Weaverville, RS in 2003 and found it up behind the Weaverville Airport. Reason for this is that the local Meteorologist in Redding, CA couldn’t believe that a 2500 ft elevation station in Trinity County could beat out the hottest Sacramento Valley city in summertime temps.
The uptick in the Weaverville, RS graph probably dates the metal building erected there, otherwise the 1930’s would be our warmest on record.
I got in the Forest Service hair repeatedly, so they probably resurrected the Weaverville, RS weather station. I will have to go drive by and check to see if they simply put it up temporarily for pr.
REPLY: I surveyed that station over a year ago, it was moved to a private residence from it’s “hot” location. You can find it here:
http://gallery.surfacestations.org/main.php?g2_itemId=706
At that time, the wife of the deceased station curator (the local long time pharmacist) was having medical issues, and there is a possibility the station has been closed or moved yet again. – Anthony
Anthony,
One of the few places in WA that the Healy’s haven’t done yet is Grapeview. I decided to look at it on the “?” mark on the google map and the lat/lon puts the site a few miles SW in a salt water channel. Are the “?” marks at the lat/lon for the sites?
Anthony gets props from Joe D’Aleo! 😉
http://scienceandpublicpolicy.org/images/stories/papers/originals/DAleo-DC_Brief.pdf
Anthony,
when I look at the Google Earth app w/the overlay added, it shows two stations in Mass as question marks, Bedford and Great Barrington.
However, the list above shows Massachusetts as 12/12 completed?
If those stations need to be done I can probably help. I’ll be travelling to Great Barrington 2nd week of Feb, and could expand my trip. And Bedford is likely on the all-but-shutdown airbase…that could go either way.
JimB
REPLY: The states list was arrived at using a different method, some stations have been surveyed and submitted to the online database, but have not been put through QC yet. When we finish QC, then they will show up in the final tally.
In this case, Great Barrington was closed in November 2001, Bedford remains open, and does need surveyed, but apparently has been moved. – Anthony
Just registered. I live just outside Rocky Mount, VA so I can easily survey that site. I may also be able to get Farmville on my next trip to DC. Danville is fairly close by also.
REPLY: Thanks Roger, let me know if you need any help. Anthony
Anthony,
Your KML file download link goes to a page of code.
-Alan
Oops, my question being: how do you get that into Google Earth?
Alan
REPLY: Right Click, “save Target as…” then save the file to disk, Open in GE – Anthony
That’s ok, I’m sure there’s an adjustment for that. 😉
I was surprised there wasn’t one on Whidbey Island, where I live. I’m sure there’s something on the NAS, but that wouldn’t be part of the station networks we’re looking at.
p.s. Whidbey NAS got their first EA-18G Growler, sucker was flying right over my house a week ago (didn’t have the camera handy then). I snapped this picture the same day of a rare clear day in January, from my kitchen window. Looking soutwest across Crescent Harbor toward the Olympics: http://jalberts.net/images/DSC_0078.JPG
Thanks. I managed to figure it out. Sorry for the trouble.
Alan
I’ve looked at it quickly a couple of times and I think there’s an error somewhere (sorry if this has already been mentioned).
The pie chart immediately below the Google Earth map shows almost 60% CRN1 and 20% CRN2. So I expect to see a lot of CRN1 and CRN3 in the map. But the map is strngly dominated by CRN4.
Did i miss something?
Thanks.
Nevermind – the “CRN=4” looks very much like “CRN=1” on the pie chart. It’s a resolution problem with the chart. Thanks again.