VOTING OPEN: WUWT Nominated for Best Science Blog

Voting is now open, for anyone who wants to vote for any of the blogs below. A note about voting. Since you can vote once every 24 hours, this is a horse race. So to pick a winner, voting must be repeated until the poll closes next Tuesday at 5PM EST

VOTING LINK

I was surprised to be nominated for this. In fact I found out about it from gary Boden in an email by way of Lucia. The contest organizers didn’t notify me directly.

But still, it is rather fun.

Voting will open on Monday.

Last Year Climate Audit and Bad Astronomy tied…but is was only due to some “automated” voting that went on past poll closing time which made determining a winner nearly impossible. You can vote more than once, daily if I recall correctly, but word has it they’ve made the poll more secure this year.

Don’t get too wrapped up in this, which is really just a popularity contest. I’m just happy to be nominated. For me it’s about how to play the game, not being the winner, so in that spirit, here is the list of ALL finalists. Choose your favorite. If we (and I say we because WUWT is a community of people, it is not just about me) win, I promise I won’t get up on stage and promise to “work for world peace”. 😉

Best Science Blog

Vote for your choice for Best Science Blog.

Finalists:

Add to any feed reader Pharyngula (PZ Myers)

Add to any feed reader Improbable Research

Add to any feed reader Climate Audit

Add to any feed reader Bad Astronomy

Add to any feed reader Real Climate

Add to any feed reader NASA Watch

Add to any feed reader Watt’s Up with That

Add to any feed reader NeuroLogica Blog

Add to any feed reader 60-Second Science

Add to any feed reader Greg Laden

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
130 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
Terry Ward
January 7, 2009 3:13 am

Can someone do something like the Alexa comparison “thing” between the two current leaders please.
As our competition (my view solely based on the poll as there seems to be little science there and much belittling) is a sub-domain I cannot do a direct comparison – the top level domain scienceblogs.com is what is being compared there and I can smell fish. Lots.

SueC
January 7, 2009 7:00 am

I think one of the hallmarks of a worthwhile science blog is (or should be) a certain respect for differing opinions. I used to visit Pharyngula often, but found that there is a scathing lack of respect from PZ Myers for the positions of those who would differ from him- he is right, end of story. (i.e. he dismissed Climate Audit as pseudo-science, or anti-science, or some such). I am disappointed that his site is doing so well in the race – he gets a lot of traffic, but clearly mostly from those who agree with his view of reality (conventional medicine, conventional climate science).

tallbloke
January 8, 2009 4:42 am

Latest:
WUWT 4228
PZ M 2798
keep voting daily folks.

tallbloke
January 8, 2009 4:47 am

Bruce Cobb (17:10:42) :
Fantastic! I am the proud owner of 200K carbon offsets, which offsets (excuses) 200K metric tons of carbon I produce. Gives me a warm, fuzzy feeling. Certificate is suitable for framing, too. Get them while they last.

While doing part time forestry work a few years ago I planted around 100,000 carbon offsets. Now I feel fully justified when I fill the V8 with petrol and go for a blast for fun.

Adam Soereg
January 9, 2009 5:38 am

Current standing:
RC: 686 votes
WUWT: 5730 votes, or 8.3134 times more.

Remember – there’s really no dispute over the evidence that catastrophic anthropogenic climate change (or global waming) is underway. All the models predict it, the science is settled, the consensus amongst the scientific community is broad and unshakable.

….or could be the other way around?

1 4 5 6