How not to measure temperature, part 19

In traveling around California and Nevada to look at NOAA USHCN climate

monitoring weather stations I’ve seen some odd things. I’ve seen temperature

sensors near asphalt and concrete, sensors placed within feet of buildings and

cars, sensors placed near air conditioner exhausts, and sensors that had

barbeque grills in the vicinity.

Last Friday June 6th, I traveled to Santa Rosa, CA to the Press Democrat

Newspaper, a wholly owned subsidiary of the New York Times, which according to

NOAA, has the climate station of record for Santa Rosa.

SantaRosa_Press_Democrat_Building.JPG

I figured it would be a fairly straightforward survey, and that I’d probably

find the temperature sensor near the back of the building by the parking lot, as

I’ve found many others placed. I figured it would look a lot like our local

newspaper, the Chico Enterprise Record (owned by Media News Group), weather station. It is in the rear, in a bit of

disrepair, missing some slats and part of its roof assembly, but otherwise ok.

It is seen below:

ER-wxstation.JPG

But nothing prepared me for what I was about to find at the Santa Rosa Press

Democrat.

When I arrived, I couldn’t locate the NOAA MMTS sensor anywhere around the building, but I

did see a tower on the roof of the building, and in the rear of the building

they had a Davis Vantage Pro2 weather station on a pole. I knew that wasn’t

the official climate temperature sensor provided by NOAA. So, after doing a

perimeter search twice, I went inside to inquire within. Everything in the lobby said

"go away". I guess it was the bullet proof glass, and the cameras, and the

security guard. After getting a name of the person resonsible for their weather

page from the front desk, I called on my cell

phone, no answer.

Undeterred, I decided to try looking outside again. It was then I noticed the

5 level parking garage about a block north.

From the top of the parking garage a quick scan with my binoculars located the NOAA MMTS

temperature sensor. It was there, about 8-10 feet above the roof, surrounded by

a sea of air conditioners and exhaust vents!

Here is what I saw from my binoculars:

SantaRosa_Press_Democrat_MMTS.JPG

And here is a panorama of the entire rooftop of the Press Democrat. Click on

the image to get a full sized view with panning functions:

SantaRosa_PressDemocrat_rooftop_panorama.JPG

A complete photo essay is available on my surfacestations.org website.

An independent check of aerial photos that I had access to confirmed the

placement of the sensor in the middle of several air conditioning units.

 SantaRosa_Press_Democrat_aerialview.JPG

 I’ve seen some poorly thought out places to measure temperature, but

this one takes the cake. Not only do we have the sensor above a sea of air

conditioners with warm air exhausts, there are two rooftop building exhausts,

plus the roof and building itself, and then lets not forget that the Press

Democrat itself is in a sea of buildings in downtown Santa Rosa, all of which to

contribute to the Urban Heat Island (UHI) the thermometer is exposed to.

Yes folks, this is an official USHCN Climate station of record. The data from

this station goes into the national climatic database. But given the absurd and

irresponsible placement of this NOAA MMTS thermometer, is it any wonder at all

that the graph of temperature at Santa Rosa looks like it does?

SantaRosa_GISS_station_plot.gif

This isn’t a case of gradual encroachment by localized site changes that happened around the thermometer, like what happened in Marysville. This is a deliberate placement of an official thermometer in the worst possible measurement scenario. Somebody had to choose this location, the building and air conditioners did not grow up around it.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

27 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
January 3, 2009 4:12 pm

[…] and his findings often make incredible reading.  Indeed, many official weather stations are very poorly located – including one beside a barbeque and others immediately above air conditioner […]

January 4, 2009 11:01 pm

Great spotting Anthony. I wonder too who is responsible for placing the NOAA MMTS
temperature sensor in such a ridiculous location. Hmmm….someone’s obviously not at all concerned by the daily exaggerated daytime temperature spikes.