As a follow up to Bob Tisdale’s excellent post today, I just had to post this one from NOAA where they are so confident that the El Niño will happen, they expect the atmosphere to “get on board” with their predictions. The hubris is strong with this one…
EN…SO
By Emily Becker of NOAA CPC
Forecasters at the Climate Prediction Center haven’t declared El Niño conditions, even though the Niño3.4 index is currently around 0.5°C above normal, and has been for the past two months. What’s the hold up? In short, we’re waiting for the atmosphere to respond to the warmer sea-surface temperatures, and give us the “SO” part of ENSO.
SO what? The Southern Oscillation, that’s what. The Southern Oscillation is a seesaw in surface pressure between a large area surrounding Indonesia and another in the central-to-eastern tropical Pacific; it’s the atmospheric half of El Niño. Since ENSO is a coupled system, meaning the atmosphere and ocean influence each other, both need to meet the criteria for El Niño before we declare El Niño conditions.
During average (non-El Niño) times, the waters of the western tropical Pacific are much warmer than in the east/central area (Figure 1). As warmer water extends out to the east during an El Niño, it warms the air, causing it to rise (lower pressure) (Figure 2). In turn, there is less rising motion (higher pressure) near Indonesia, due to the relatively cooler waters and overlying air.
Figure 1. Average state of ocean temperatures, rainfall, pressure, and winds over the Pacific during ENSO-neutral conditions. Figure 2. Generalized state of the ocean and atmosphere during El Niño conditions. NOAA image created by David Stroud.
The pressure changes influence the wind patterns. The average (non-El Niño) state of the atmosphere over the tropical Pacific features convection and rainfall over Indonesia, low-level easterly winds (the trade winds that blow from east to west), and upper-level westerly winds (Figure 1). These are the basic components of the Pacific Walker Circulation.
During El Niño, the system shifts: we see weaker trade winds over the Pacific, less rain than usual over Indonesia, and more rain than usual over the central or eastern Pacific. During some El Niño events, the trade winds along the equator even reverse, and we see low-level westerlies… but not every time. In fact, every El Niño is different, and both the ocean and atmospheric characteristics vary quite a lot from event to event–but that’s a topic for another post!
This difference from average air pressure patterns across the Pacific is measured a few different ways. One is the Southern Oscillation Index (SOI), which is based on a long record of pressure measured by two stations: one in Darwin, Australia (south of Indonesia) and the other in Tahiti (east-central tropical Pacific) (Figure 3). A negative SOI indicates Darwin’s pressure is higher than average and Tahiti’s is lower than average: El Niño conditions. (I keep saying “higher than average” because we’re not just comparing Darwin’s pressure to Tahiti’s, but rather comparing the anomalies at each. Imagine comparing the price of a gallon of water to that of a gallon of gas. A negative index is if the price of the water goes up, and the gas goes on sale. The gas may still cost more than the water, but it’s the relative changes in the two prices that matter.)
A second way we describe the air pressure anomalies over the tropical Pacific is the Equatorial Southern Oscillation Index (EQSOI). The EQSOI is based on pressure differences between two regions located on the equator (Figure 3). The SOI is monitored because it has a very long record available, stretching back to the 19th century; the EQSOI depends on satellite observations, which means it is a shorter record, but it gives a better picture of what’s happening right along the equator.
Figure 3. Two ways of measuring the Southern Oscillation: the SOI and the EQSOI. Both depend on comparing the strength of pressure anomalies in different parts of the Pacific basin. Map by NOAA Climate.gov.
As of the end of June, both the SOI and the EQSOI are at +0.2 (they have trended downward over the past few months), and the wind patterns are roughly average over the tropical Pacific, with some slight weakening of the trade winds toward the end of the month. There is increased convection in the central Pacific, but also some over Indonesia… all of which says we’re still waiting for the atmosphere to get dressed in its El Niño clothes and come out to play.
However, we think it’s likely that the atmosphere will get on board soon, and we’re still predicting El Niño, with about a 70% chance that conditions will be met in the next few months, and around an 80% chance by this fall. If you’re interested in how the ocean and atmospheric conditions are evolving, CPC has weekly updates available.
Thanks to David Stroud for his help with this post.
source: http://www.climate.gov/news-features/blogs/enso/en-so
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Get on that Love Train
Once an El Niño is officially underway, what are the indicators as to its duration?
El Nado is such a tease. The downside is this in my opinion: As long as we are in El Nado land, we do not have clear sky conditions that allows ol’Sol to recharge the equatorial band with IR energy. So the question is this: Under these conditions, are the oceans running out of gas?
Translation: “Get yer butt in gear, ENSO. AGW is in a heap o’ trouble and we’re prayin’ to Gaia you’ll come through when we need ya.”
Didn’t Bob just explain that SOI was a noisy signal and that the trade winds were doing to opposite of what is needed for an El Niño? One thing is certain, I find Bob Tisdale much more reliable than NOAA.
Area’s below Median El Nino temp.. No Kelvin wave to push it, and no easterly’s to drive it home.. Even the Arctic Polar low is disrupting the southern jets causing wild bends and turns. This will slow the formation of any easterly winds.
Its looking like an El No-No
I’m sure this must be a stupid question. Why, when all this warm water that has been sitting in the western Pacific must it have to move to the eastern Pacific to warm the atmosphere? Surely it is busy warming away wherever it is! When it blows over to the east Pacific to do its warming, doesn’t the western Pacific then cool off?
It looks tremely unlikely. It’s now the middle of July and the indicators, e.g. SLP distribution, are against a Warm Event.
Gary Pearse says:
July 14, 2014 at 6:34 pm
I’m sure this must be a stupid question. Why, when all this warm water that has been sitting in the western Pacific must it have to move to the eastern Pacific to warm the atmosphere? Surely it is busy warming away wherever it is! When it blows over to the east Pacific to do its warming, doesn’t the western Pacific then cool off?
+++++++++++
The warm pool in the Western Pacific runs deep as it piles onto that coast. The ocean is higher there normally with the Easterly winds piling it up. When Easterlies relax, the ocean falls, spreading the warm water beneath over the surface and to the East… where it releases the stored energy up and down and all over sort of .
Mario
“Clap your hands if you believe!!” – Peter Pan
Don’t you just love how these people want conditions right to bring about their much hoped for catastrophe. If it happened, they’d be celebrating. It continues to amaze me that they don’t see anything wrong in that – If CAGW really existed and we really fried, with millions of deaths and the end of civilization, they’d be popping corks and dancing in the street.
And here they are, “However, we think it’s likely that the atmosphere will get on board soon”. Sure. Any minute now. What fun it will be. They can keep the money coming in and angry mobs won’t form. Maybe. Hopefully. The planet’s going to cooperate, right? They want to destroy civilization by legislation. You know, before the planet does, because that makes it all right. No one can blame them for it. Right? Right???
But only if they can get the warming restarted…
VA administrators are on hand to help with any required “adjustments.”
Was it Trenberth that was gleefully declaring himself and his “phantom vortex of Xtreme(tm) hotness!” vindicated at the first mention of the forecasted El Niño? I wonder when he’s going to get around to declaring he was wrong. After all, these cosmetologists are the only true upholders of science, right? As such, I am sure they will be the first to admit they were wrong and had been swayed by a pathological bias. (And now for the /sarc.)
I love the percentages they use. It’s another source of wiggle room that they can use to say, “Well, we aren’t wrong. There was a chance that it might not show up.” Amazing how often these minor chances are having such a major effect on their credibiility.
I don’t see anything wrong here. The article is obviously an attempt to explain things to the general public and uses colloquial language to do so. What is the problem?
To construe this as showing that they think they can tell the atmosphere what to do you have to turn off your common sense. The language in the article is clearly not intended to be interpreted so literally, as evidenced by the bit about waiting for the atmosphere to “get dressed in its El Niño clothes and come out to play”.
I call this nitpicking.
The farce is strong with NOAA.
“they expect the atmosphere to “get on board” with their predictions”
It will if it knows what’s good for it.
LOL, so ol’ Mister Atmosphere didn’t buy-in.
Heh.
Try bribery. It always works with the rest of the AGW Group.
*************************************************************
@ur momisugly Mario Lento — nicely stated (at 6:40pm). Precisely! #(:))
Good to see you posting!
14 July: Russia Today: Swimsuits for snow boots: Freak summer snow and hail hit Siberia, Urals (PHOTOS, VIDEO)
http://rt.com/news/172468-freaky-snow-urals-siberia/
As to whether the post is nitpicking as per Cynical Scientst July 14, 2014 at 6:56 pm, the real question is whether it’s reading too much into Emily Becker’s phrasings. But it’s darned hard to resist doing! This talk of expecting the atmosphere to “get on board,” it’s sounds so like then-VP Gore’s famous exhortation to then-President Bill Clinton to “get with the program!”
Re: “Emily Becker’s phrasings”
“Out of the overflow of the heart, the mouth speaks.”
Proverbs something:something.
Freudian — NO doubt.
NOAA’s CPC has given it 5 more months to “get on board” Surely some reverse trades can be congured up in that amount of time and if they can persist and the if the warmed water will move, and if they can foresee El Nino conditions sustaining for an additional 5 months. Well there you have it, a piece of cake. Just need to walk the walk now that talking the talk is done.
Cynical Scientst says:
July 14, 2014 at 6:56 pm
I’m in complete agreement.
Re: “language in the article is clearly not intended to be interpreted so literally,” LOL, that is not what we are laughing about, here.
We are chuckling over the subconscious desires and motivations such a choice of words reveals.
Waaaaaah, why isn’t the atmosphere cooperating and killing tens of millions of people and creating hundreds of millions of climate refugees and melting polar ice ? Waaaaah. I’m going to tell my Mommy ……..
SO …. SOD OFF you climate f*ckwits
Hubris is to a Climate Scientist what Stuck on Stupid is to Barack Obama.