Links to documents follow.
Not so much fanfare now, since leaks pretty much revealed earlier that it’s alarmism on steroids. The always dependably worrisome Seth Borenstein, AP’s science reporter, sums up the alarmism quite well with this tweet:
IPCC report: Warming harms dialed up to new level as world in for wild climate ride, 'we're sitting ducks'; http://t.co/KRIgBFqRGT
— @borenbears (@borenbears) March 31, 2014
I note Dr. Richard Tol’s name is not on it, as he said it was too alarmist.
The Working Group II contribution to the Fifth Assessment Report considers the vulnerability and exposure of human and natural systems, the observed impacts and future risks of climate change, and the potential for and limits to adaptation. The chapters of the report assess risks and opportunities for societies, economies, and ecosystems around the world.
=============================================================
Headline Statements from the Summary for Policymakers *
Observed Changes in the Climate System
Each of the last three decades has been successively warmer at the Earth’s surface than any preceding decade since 1850. In the Northern Hemisphere, 1983–2012 was likely the warmest 30-year period of the last 1400 years (medium confidence).
Ocean warming dominates the increase in energy stored in the climate system, accounting for more than 90% of the energy accumulated between 1971 and 2010 (high confidence). It is virtually certain that the upper ocean (0–700 m) warmed from 1971 to 2010, and it likely warmed between the 1870s and 1971.
Over the last two decades, the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets have been losing mass, glaciers have continued to shrink almost worldwide, and Arctic sea ice and Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover have continued to decrease in extent (high confidence).
The rate of sea level rise since the mid-19th century has been larger than the mean rate during the previous two millennia
(high confidence). Over the period 1901 to 2010, global mean sea level rose by 0.19 [0.17 to 0.21] m.
The atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased to levels unprecedented in at least the last 800,000 years. Carbon dioxide concentrations have increased by 40% since pre-industrial times, primarily from fossil fuel emissions and secondarily from net land use change emissions. The ocean has absorbed about 30% of the emitted anthropogenic carbon dioxide, causing ocean acidification.
Drivers of Climate Change
Understanding the Climate System and its Recent Changes
Climate models have improved since the AR4. Models reproduce observed continental-scale surface temperature patterns and trends over many decades, including the more rapid warming since the mid-20th century and the cooling immediately following large volcanic eruptions (very high confidence).
Observational and model studies of temperature change, climate feedbacks and changes in the Earth’s energy budget together provide confidence in the magnitude of global warming in response to past and future forcing.
Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes. This evidence for human influence has grown since AR4. It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.
Future Global and Regional Climate Change
Global surface temperature change for the end of the 21st century is likely to exceed 1.5°C relative to 1850 to 1900 for all RCP scenarios except RCP2.6. It is likely to exceed 2°C for RCP6.0 and RCP8.5, and more likely than not to exceed 2°C for RCP4.5. Warming will continue beyond 2100 under all RCP scenarios except RCP2.6. Warming will continue to exhibit interannual-to-decadal variability and will not be regionally uniform.
Changes in the global water cycle in response to the warming over the 21st century will not be uniform. The contrast in precipitation between wet and dry regions and between wet and dry seasons will increase, although there may be regional exceptions.
The global ocean will continue to warm during the 21st century. Heat will penetrate from the surface to the deep ocean and affect ocean circulation.
It is very likely that the Arctic sea ice cover will continue to shrink and thin and that Northern Hemisphere spring snow cover will decrease during the 21st century as global mean surface temperature rises. Global glacier volume will further decrease.
Global mean sea level will continue to rise during the 21st century. Under all RCP scenarios, the rate of sea level rise will very likely exceed that observed during 1971 to 2010 due to increased ocean warming and increased loss of mass from glaciers and ice sheets.
Climate change will affect carbon cycle processes in a way that will exacerbate the increase of CO2 in the atmosphere (high confidence). Further uptake of carbon by the ocean will increase ocean acidification.
Cumulative emissions of CO2 largely determine global mean surface warming by the late 21st century and beyond. Most aspects of climate change will persist for many centuries even if emissions of CO2 are stopped. This represents a substantial multi-century climate change commitment created by past, present and future emissions of CO2.
* Headline statements are the overarching highlighted conclusions of the approved Summary for Policymakers which, taken together, provide a concise narrative. The four statements in boxes here are those summarizing the assessment in the Summary for Policymakers, sections B-E.
=============================================================
The Summary for Policymakers is available here and the unedited accepted Final Draft Report is available here.
Discover more from Watts Up With That?
Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.
Lies, lies and more lies. These people are experts at avoiding the facts.
That headache you feel is either bits of the sky falling on your head, or a reaction to the overweening stupidity.
Borestein, personal gullibility dialled up to all time high.
Seth is a shoe-in for dissinformer of the year.
The IPCC simply cannot abandon their most cherished delusions.
Don’t they sound like some fake clairvoyant and astrologist. It has nothing but predictions like some Old Moore’s Almanack. Reduce their funding for not doing their jobs properly.
“We’re sitting ducks”
– was that a quack I heard?
From the report ” It is extremely likely that human influence has been the dominant cause of the observed warming since the mid-20th century.”
This is, of course, the key issue. If you believe that this has been shown, then the rest of the report may be valid. However, since climate sensitivity has never been measured, CAGW remains an uncorroborated hypothesis. And it is wrong to base such conclusions on the basis of only a hypothesis.
When less is more, always more, more than more…
http://31.media.tumblr.com/9e2470ca39a177809025afe73b4dacc5/tumblr_mud2q6RYo91r8kiyko1_500.jpg
This reeks of desperation as all their apocalyptic predictions have failed thus far.
And yet, the actual report is to contain more cautious assessments of climate change impact (per Matt Ridley’s article)? They broadcast scary propaganda and then dial back the hype with the science, figuring the public will never see that information. I get it.
Let’s find out much more about everyone of the USA Authors. I am going to be busy the next few hours doing some internet research.
Northern Hemisphere SPRING snow cover has continued to DECREASE in extent (high confidence).
_____________________________
Yeah, but Northern Hemisphere WINTER snow cover has continued to INCREASE in extent (high confidence). Giving only half the data and half the story, is the same as lying.
This was the kind of USSR PRAVDA misinformation that we in the West used to laugh at in the 1980s, and now we have the same half-truth lies distributed by every media outlet in the West. What ever happened to truth, honesty and integrity? Whatever happened to the moral compass of the ‘enlightened’ West?
Ralph
Were they able to quantify the energy released from constantly moving the goalposts?
The answer is here – NIPCC Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts (1062 pgs)
http://climatechangereconsidered.org/
NIPCC Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts – Summary for Policy Makers
http://heartland.org/media-library/pdfs/CCR-IIb/Summary-for-Policymakers.pdf
“The human impact on global climate is small, and any warming that may occur as a result of human carbon dioxide (CO2) and other greenhouse gas emissions is likely to have little effect on global temperatures, the cryosphere (ice-covered areas), hydrosphere (oceans, lakes, and rivers), or weather.
Climate Change Reconsidered II: Biological Impacts, the subject of this Summary for Policymakers, examines the scientific research on the impacts of rising temperatures and atmospheric CO2 levels on the biological world. It finds no net harm to the global environment or to human health and often finds the opposite: net benefits to plants, including important food crops, and to animals and human health.“
The Northern Hemisphere is not the globe.
CO2 follows temperature.
Anthropogenic CO2 flux is 3 percent of natural CO2 flux.
CO2 never accumulates in the atmosphere, any more than water accumulates in a river.
Antarctica is gaining ice mass recently.
2014 global temperature (measured by satellite) is within 0.2 degrees of the 1980 value.
Adding CO2 to the atmosphere benefits plant/crop growth.
Global sea level is rising at about 1mm per year using all modern technology.
Sea level is about the same as 2000 years ago by historical accounts.
Current sea level is lower than 6000 years ago.
Arctic ice melt (if any) will not raise sea level.
They write what the policy makers want to see and expect that is all they will see. Feed their agenda, not facts.
Crystal ball gazers, the lot. Watch your deciduous trees, when they start to bud that will herald warmer weather as their sap starts to move upwards and the soil heats up. If it doesn’t then crops will suffer of course and there maybe not enough spring rain. Either way they think they will be proven correct. Gosh what a load of dispensable eunichs
But why didn’t they also inform their readers that there is nothing humans can do to mitigate CAGW for thousands of years?
This is the finding from the latest,joint RS and NAS report . Bloody eco-loons and numbskulls the lot of them..
I am hiding under the bed
“Carbon dioxide concentrations have increased by 40% since pre-industrial times, primarily from fossil fuel emissions and secondarily from net land use change emissions. The ocean has absorbed about 30% of the emitted anthropogenic carbon dioxide, causing ocean acidification.”
If the total CO2 concentration displays no correlation to anthropogenic emission rates how can anyone say they are the cause of the increase?
“Human influence has been detected in warming of the atmosphere and the ocean, in changes in the global water cycle, in reductions in snow and ice, in global mean sea level rise, and in changes in some climate extremes.”
I have not seen any credible data supporting any of this statement. These are all likely effected by human activity but the effects have not been measured or even proved to my knowledge.
“Changes in the global water cycle in response to the warming over the 21st century will not be uniform. The contrast in precipitation between wet and dry regions and between wet and dry seasons will increase, although there may be regional exceptions.”
I think this says ‘Some things will change and some won’t.’ but it sounds ominous.
My, what fast readers commenters here are. I’d be impressed, if I actually thought many of you had bothered read a single page…
[criticism is easy, anyone can do it. How many did you read in the same amount of time, anonymous person? – mod]
On the bright side, I realized that here in the US, I didn’t hear a single thing about “earth hour”. None of the papers I read mentioned it, none of the local news talked about it, it was a non event.
I don’t think anyone is paying attention to any of this nonsense anymore, except for a handful of increasingly shrill ideologues.
Look at Figure SPM.4.(B) on page 38. Global temperatures look very flat to me. I guess that’s why this pretty picture is rendered small and buried in the back of the report…