New emotification of global warming: selling the sizzle of melting glaciers

SoundofIceMelting_JJ[1]
“The sound of ice melting” Image by Paul Kos
From the American Institute of Physics, some research they lament doesn’t carry “the same emotional wallop as images” related to “climate trends”. Oh, darn.

Maybe they need to link up with artist Paul Kos whose performance art is seen at right. His emotive imagery and recordings of ice melting dates all the way back to 1970. Yes, regular man-made ice makes sounds while it melts too. According to the press release, this “research” was also done in a studio, rather than in situ. It’s all about the tiny bubbles escaping it seems, something I’ll bet Don Ho would appreciate.

Hmm, maybe they should team up with these guys and release an album: “City College of New York music professor Jonathan Perl teamed up with City University of New York climate professor Marco Tedesco to create musical soundscapes or “sonifications” that document the changes in the glacial ice in Greenland over the last 54 years.

Or maybe these guys: “Glaciers are dying, but they are not doing so quietly. The Glacier Music project of the Goethe Institutes in Tashkent and Almaty uses the sounds and powerful emotional image of melting glaciers as source of inspiration for festivals, open calls, concerts, sculpture, video and sound installations.“.

Emotifying ice melt has been a popular pastime with warmists, who have traditionally focused on the supposed plight of polar bears. However, the sound of melting ice is hardly anything new, explorers and the indigenous people of the Arctic have heard it for centuries. With 50 words for snow, I’m betting they even have a word for noisy melting ice since they’d hear it every spring.

Glaciers sizzle as they disappear into warmer water

The sounds of bubbles escaping from melting ice make underwater glacial fjords one of the loudest natural marine environments on earth

SAN FRANCISCO, Nov. 27, 2013 – Scientists have recorded and identified one of the most prominent sounds of a warming planet: the sizzle of glacier ice as it melts into the sea. The noise, caused by trapped air bubbles squirting out of the disappearing ice, could provide clues to the rate of glacier melt and help researchers better monitor the fast-changing polar environments. 

Geophysicist Erin Pettit, a researcher at the University of Alaska, had often heard popping, crackling sounds while out kayaking in the frigid northern waters. The sounds were also picked up by underwater microphones Pettit set up off the Alaskan coast, and at a much louder volume than above the surface.

“If you were underneath the water in a complete downpour, with the rain pounding the water, that’s one of the loudest natural ocean sounds out there,” she said. “In glacial fjords we record that level of sound almost continually.”

While Pettit suspected the din was caused by melting ice, she couldn’t confirm that hypothesis without a more controlled experiment. So she enlisted the help of Kevin Lee and Preston Wilson, acoustics experts from the University of Texas. Pettit sent the Texas researchers chunks of glacier, which they mounted in a tank of chilled water. Lee and Wilson recorded video and audio of the ice as it melted and were able to match sounds on the recording to the escape of bubbles from the ice.

“Most of the sound comes from the bubbles oscillating when they’re ejected,” Lee said. “A bubble when it is released from a nozzle or any orifice will naturally oscillate at a frequency that’s inversely proportional to the radius of the bubble,” he said, meaning the smaller the bubble, the higher the pitch. The researchers recorded sounds in the 1 – 3 kilohertz range, which is right in the middle of the frequencies humans hear.

Scientists have known for decades that the bubbles in glaciers form when snow crystals trap pockets of air and then get slowly squashed down under the weight of more snow. As the snow is compacted it turns into ice and the air bubbles become pressurized. The regular way the bubbles form means that they are evenly distributed throughout the ice, an important characteristic if you want to use the sound intensity of bubble squirts to measure ice melt rate.

While the symphony of melting ice might not carry the same emotional wallop as images, sound still has its own, sometimes very loud, story to tell. Pettit and Lee say they could imagine using hydrophone recordings in glacial fjords to monitor relative changes in glacier melting in response to one-time weather events, seasonal changes, and long-term climate trends. Because sound travels long distances underwater, recording microphones can be placed a safe distance from unstable ice sheets. The audio recordings would complement other measurements of ice melt, such as time-lapse photography and salinity readings.

###

Presentation 4aUW4, “Underwater sound radiated by bubbles released by melting glacier ice,” will take place on Thursday, Dec. 5, 2013, at 9:55 a.m. The abstract describing this work can be found here: http://asa2013.abstractcentral.com/planner.jsp.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

88 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
rogerknights
December 1, 2013 11:48 am

Fizzy physics!

Eyal Porat
December 1, 2013 11:50 am

Going from pathetic to utter silliness.
The face of (post)modern science.

Gary
December 1, 2013 11:53 am

Add some cow burps and automobile exhaust pipes and we have the start of a symphony.

John Trigge
December 1, 2013 11:59 am

If a bubble escapes from melting ice in the Arctic and nobody hears it, did the ice relly melt?

John Trigge
December 1, 2013 12:01 pm

‘relly’? I blame small virtual keyboards on tablets rather than my spelling skills.

UK Sceptic
December 1, 2013 12:10 pm

Pop goes the weasel words.

Pamela Gray
December 1, 2013 12:11 pm

I can imagine the next Christmas album filled with Arctic woe against a backdrop of whale songs. So which teary doe-eyed actress will they harness this time to gather our collective grief into the sound of money?

albertalad
December 1, 2013 12:22 pm

Lol – down in Newfoundland/Labrador in Canada the guys take boats out to icebergs and mine them for ice which they sell in their alcoholic beverages exactly for the sound of the ice popping and sizzling! Great ice cubes with the popping sound of nature at her best – that there is private enterprise my dear AGW deadbeats. Making icebergs pay – and they attract tourists by the thousands who also drink the iceberg beverages! That is what I call emotive responses done the Canadian way – fine drinks my friends! Lol! Who says we don’t have a sense of humor?

Tom J
December 1, 2013 12:26 pm

I’m surprised they don’t make a soundtrack of a nuclear bomb going off and then they could use it for James Hansen’s Hiroshima standard.
Or, they could record the sounds of Manhattan during a busy workday and call it the Manhattan measurement.
Best yet they could record the sounds of a large bull …
Ok, I won’t go there.

December 1, 2013 12:38 pm

Imagine a recording of polar bears drowning because CO2 melted the ice floe they were headed to. It’s not as bad as we thought!

December 1, 2013 12:51 pm

The sizzle of melting glaciers? Ice sizzles when it melts? My artillery ears aren’t good enough any more to hear that. There is a before and after picture show of Alaskan glaciers circulating on Facebook. All the glaciers are gone in the after pictures. So, I suppose by around 2005-2006 (date of afters) all the glaciers in Alaska must have melted.

December 1, 2013 12:51 pm

Huh? When I was in Alaska’s Glacier Bay a while back, the Park Rangers aboard the ship explained that the glacier ice was blue because the air had been squeezed from it.
So is this ice from the unsqueezed upper portions of the ice?
Like Bullwinkle, “I’m so confuuuuuuuzed!”

Bruce Cobb
December 1, 2013 12:52 pm

rogerknights says:
December 1, 2013 at 11:48 am
Fizzy physics!
Otherwise known as “fizzics”.

Bruce Cobb
December 1, 2013 12:55 pm

It’s The sound
Of Science

jorgekafkazar
December 1, 2013 12:57 pm

It’s not the CO2, it’s the other greenhouse gas, H2O, that causes the melting. I have proof:
http://www.blinkx.com/watch-video/i-m-melting-scene-the-wizard-of-oz-movie-1939-hd/44uhyHzqQpoCgKag9zVxSQ

hunter
December 1, 2013 1:08 pm

This is a nice example of how a $ billion per day is being spent on climate.
The rent seeking will not stop until the hypesters are brought to account.

Skeptik
December 1, 2013 1:16 pm

How bloody desperate can they get.

jones
December 1, 2013 1:19 pm

Stop anthropomorphising everything Anthony..
Ice has feelings too you know…….

December 1, 2013 1:32 pm

Why stop at sizzling glaciers? Why not go ahead with exploding glaciers. Followed, of course, by the mandatory “it is worse than we thought” pronouncement and “more money is required” statement.

PaulH
December 1, 2013 1:33 pm

So… they’ve discovered cavitation?

Gerry, England
December 1, 2013 1:39 pm

Recording the sound of rapid arctic ice regrowth and of record antarctic ice growth will be really useful too, surely?

jones
December 1, 2013 1:40 pm

alexwade
But it IS worse than we thought…..
Perhaps even more so…

CodeTech
December 1, 2013 1:50 pm

Try living on a lake. This thing bangs, crashes, pops, booms, echoes, reverberates, thumps, scrapes, roars, and any number of other onomatopoeic words. It freezes typically in early November and melts in April, so the emotional impact of melting ice is completely zero to me.

December 1, 2013 2:10 pm

Looking at the picture the ice could just as well be freezing as melting.

james griffin
December 1, 2013 2:13 pm

One suspects they have never checked the daily sea ice graphs….around the same average as 79-08.

1 2 3 4