More on Mark Hertsgaard's ridiculous claims – The Goldilocks Crop and the Impending Extinction of Pasta

Guest Post by David Middleton

Yesterday, WUWT covered the issue from one angle, and blew Hertsgaard’s riduculous claims out of the water. Today, here’s another independently arrived at conclusion that suggests Hertsgaard’s claims are pure fantasy.

It is apparently becoming too warm to grow wheat…

Bakken Oil Boom and Climate Change Threaten the Future of Pasta

Dec 10, 2012 12:00 AM EST

Temperatures are rising. Rainfalls are shifting. Droughts are intensifying. What will we eat when wheat won’t grow.

A world without pasta seems inconceivable. Mac-and-cheese-loving children across the United States would howl in protest. Italy might suffer a cultural heart attack. Social unrest could explode in northern China, where noodles are the main staple.

But if humans want to keep eating pasta, we will have to take much more aggressive action against global warming. Pasta is made from wheat, and a large, growing body of scientific studies and real-world observations suggest that wheat will be hit especially hard as temperatures rise and storms and drought intensify in the years ahead.

[…]

Three grains—wheat, corn, and rice—account for most of the food humans consume. All three are already suffering from climate change, but wheat stands to fare the worst in the years ahead, for it is the grain most vulnerable to high temperatures. That spells trouble not only for pasta but also for bread, the most basic food of all. (Pasta is made from the durum variety of wheat, while bread is generally made from more common varieties, such as red spring.)

“Wheat is a cool-season crop. High temperatures are negative for its growth and quality, no doubt about it,” says Frank Manthey, a professor at North Dakota State University who advises the North Dakota Wheat Commission. Already, a mere 1 degree Fahrenheit of global temperature rise over the past 50 years has caused a 5.5 percent decline in wheat production, according to David Lobell, a professor at Stanford University’s Center on Food Security and the Environment.

[…]

Newsweek

This is really funny because it wasn’t that long ago that it was too cold to grow wheat…

Little Ice Age

by Edna Sun

February 15 , 2005 — It was only a few hundred years ago that the earth experienced its last ice age. Global temperatures started falling during the 1300s and hit their lowest points in the late 1700s and early 1800s. New Yorkers could walk from Manhattan to Staten Island across a frozen harbor, while Londoners held “Frost Fairs” on a solid Thames River. Glaciers advanced in China, New Zealand, and Peru, and snow covered Ethiopian peaks. Diseases, aided by the change in climate, spread quickly throughout Europe and Asia. Iced waters delayed shipping from ports, growing glaciers engulfed farms and villages, tree lines receded, and agriculture deteriorated, leading to centuries of poor harvests, famine, and social unrest. Though the average global temperature dropped only one to two degrees Celsius below what they are today, the cold spell nevertheless drastically affected life at this time.

– – – – – – – – – – – –

Global temperatures naturally fluctuate slightly from year to year. However, in the past 10,000 years, there have been three relatively long global cold spells. The Little Ice Age (LIA) is the most recent and best documented, especially in Europe

It may have had a greater effect on history than its predecessors because it immediately followed several centuries of unusually warm temperatures. Between 800 and 1200, Europe basked in a warm spell known as the “Medieval Warm Period” (MWP); temperatures were 2 to 3 degrees Celsius higher than they are today.

[…]

Fatal Harvest

During the LIA, summers were wet and unusually cold and the growing season was shortened. Widespread crop failure resulted in famine that killed millions of people. To avoid starvation, people would eat the planting seed for next season, which created more of a shortage the following year.

During the MWP European farmers primarily grew cereal grains such as wheat, barley, and rye, which flourished. But the long thin stalks of these crops made them vulnerable to the strong winds and heavy rainfall that came during the LIA. The temperature drop in northern Europe made it difficult to raise these grains and many farmers gave up trying. Less grain was produced, creating a severe shortage and raising prices.

[…]

PBS

“[A] mere 1 degree Fahrenheit of global temperature rise over the past 50 years has caused a 5.5 percent decline in wheat production.” Yet wheat and cereal production flourished during the Medieval Warm Period, when “temperatures were 2 to 3 degrees Celsius higher than they are today”…

Obviously wheat can’t handle any temperature. The LIA was too cold. Today it’s too warm for wheat, even though the wheat flourished during the warmer MWP. I guess the Goldilocks temperature for wheat must have occurred sometime between 1975 and 1980, since Newsweek reported that we were on the verge of a new ice age in 1975 and anthropogenic global warming began with the election of Ronald Reagan in 1980 (intentional sarcasm).

Whenever I run into an Alarmists Gone Wild non sequitur, I always check the math.

Wheat production data for the period 1961-2010 are available from FAOSTAT and temperature data can easily be downloaded from Wood For Trees.

Figure 1. Wheat yield and production have more than doubled over the last 50 years. Data sources: FAOSTAT and Hadley Center & UEA CRU (via Wood for Trees). Yield is in hectograms per hectare (Hg/Ha), area harvested is in hectares (Ha) and production is in tonnes.

This explains why wheat liked the Medieval Warm Period and disliked the Little Ice Age.

The only explanation for this sort of nonsense, is Alarmists Gone Wild…

“Wheat is a cool-season crop. High temperatures are negative for its growth and quality, no doubt about it,” says Frank Manthey, a professor at North Dakota State University who advises the North Dakota Wheat Commission. Already, a mere 1 degree Fahrenheit of global temperature rise over the past 50 years has caused a 5.5 percent decline in wheat production, according to David Lobell, a professor at Stanford University’s Center on Food Security and the Environment.

Wheat yield and production have more than doubled over the past 50 years.

0 0 votes
Article Rating

Discover more from Watts Up With That?

Subscribe to get the latest posts sent to your email.

75 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
H.R.
December 13, 2012 2:15 am

5.5% drop in wheat production?
Could it just possibly be that every kid and his brother is growing corn for ethanol?

Peter Stroud
December 13, 2012 2:21 am

“Wheat is a cool-season crop. High temperatures are negative for its growth and quality, no doubt about it,” says Frank Manthey, a professor at North Dakota State University who advises the North Dakota Wheat Commission.” Just how can Mr Manthey be given the title professor? How can he be given any post in any university bearing in mind his utter ignorance of established empirical data? Even worse than the folk at CRU, UEA UK.

Otter
December 13, 2012 2:27 am

Aha! In that very PBS article, there is a bit about the MWP- and the fact that it was as much as 3C warmer than today. You would think the people who have done their best to keep skeptic views off the air, would notice they had let the Truth slip out, on their own website!

John S
December 13, 2012 2:34 am

How does wheat do in an atmosphere with a higher concentration CO2?

December 13, 2012 2:34 am

WoodForTrees has been chopped down for winter emergency fuel.

Ryan
December 13, 2012 2:36 am

The only trend I see is the trend for the Team AGW lies to get bigger and bigger,

Skeptik
December 13, 2012 2:55 am

“Wheat is a cool-season crop. High temperatures are negative for its growth and quality, no doubt about it,” says Frank Manthey, a professor at North Dakota State University.
Has this idiot ever been to the Mallee?

Graeme No.3
December 13, 2012 2:55 am

Well, farmers grow wheat in Australia. The last of the crop in Cowell (S.A.) was harvested today in 38 ℃ weather. There would have been many days over 35 ℃ in the lead up to harvest.
It would seem that varieties of wheat that cope with higher temperatures are already in use.

Scott
December 13, 2012 2:59 am

Too hot to grow wheat? WTF?! One of the largest wheat producing area’s is country Western Australia – check out the average tips in the “wheat belt” in WA

polistra
December 13, 2012 3:12 am

A large part of the soft white wheat suitable for pasta is grown here in Eastern Washington on the Palouse. The Palouse is slowly growing COOLER AND WETTER, not hotter and dryer.
http://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/temp-and-precip/time-series/index.php?parameter=pcp&month=11&year=2012&filter=12&state=45&div=10

December 13, 2012 3:17 am

Typical warmist bleat – “More is less.”

Simon C-S
December 13, 2012 3:26 am

What they’ll probably turn around and say, was that wheat production is 5.5% below what it would have been, except that would still only be a 10% drop in real terms (over 50 yrs), a figure that would have easily been compensated for by demand & pricing.
You are quite right. Utter BS!

janama
December 13, 2012 3:54 am

The problem now appears to be that the wheat strains are so inbred people are experiencing wheat intolerance and are turning to other grains.

December 13, 2012 3:54 am

“Wheat is a cool-season crop. High temperatures are negative for its growth and quality, no doubt about it,” says Frank Manthey, a professor at North Dakota State University who advises the North Dakota Wheat Commission.
Obviously Frank Manthey has never visited the wheatbelt regions of inland New South Wales or Western Australia down here in OZ. Daytime temperatures in the month or so leading up to, and including harvest time, are typically in the 30 – 40 deg C range.

Simon C-S
December 13, 2012 4:03 am

I also plotted the global population vs. wheat production from 1961 to 2009 (extent of the wheat data) from the FOASTAT data, and they trend almost exactly, with Wheat production moving above the population line in 1979 and staying there.

John Barrett
December 13, 2012 4:03 am

The drop is this year’s. Cold and wet in the UK has meant that the harvest was very poor and that Britain is net importing grain from Germany ( where the harvest was slightly down, caused by early year frosts).
The droughts in the US and the heatwaves in Europe put paid to the maize harvests although paradoxiaclly wheat in the US was up.
This is a good source
http://www.uswheat.org/reports

Gary
December 13, 2012 4:04 am

“wheat, corn, and rice …. All three are already suffering from climate change”
Is that so? USDA says rice production is setting records in the USA and globally.
http://usda01.library.cornell.edu/usda/current/RCS-yearbook/RCS-yearbook-04-09-2012.pdf
“In 2010/11, the U.S. produced a record 243.1 million cwt of rice, a result of a 16-percent increase in plantings.”
“In the global market, expanded area boosted 2010/11 world production more than 2 percent to 453.2 million tons, the largest to date. ”
” Global rice trade in calendar year 2011 rose 10 percent to a record 35.1 million tons (milled basis), with Asia and Sub-Saharan Africa accounting for most of the import expansion. ”
“U.S. 2010/11 Rice Plantings Were the Second-Highest on Record ”
“Larger Crops in South and Southeast Asia Boosted Global Production in 2010/11 to a Record 449.8 Million Tons “

Bloke down the pub
December 13, 2012 4:13 am

There are too many idiots out there who think that people will only read the headlines, and wont bother to look up the facts to disprove them. Unfortunately, too many people prove them right.

Dodgy Geezer
December 13, 2012 4:14 am

…Wheat production data for the period 1961-2010 are available from FAOSTAT and temperature data can easily be downloaded from Wood For Trees…
Woodfortrees is down, and has been for some time now.
Does anyone know why?

Espen
December 13, 2012 4:22 am

This is really the most silly alarmism ever, because even if most rambling alarmists were right about AGW, there wouldn’t be a wheat problem, because enormous new areas suitable for wheat would open up in Canada and Siberia.

John Silver
December 13, 2012 4:25 am

Good riddance to the evil carbohydrates.
Eat LCHF.

Jimbo
December 13, 2012 4:52 am

OK, here we go.

Medieval Climatic Optimum
Michael E Mann
University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA
………….It is evident that Europe experienced, on the whole, relatively mild climate conditions during the earliest centuries of the second millennium (i.e., the early Medieval period). Agriculture was possible at higher latitudes (and higher elevations in the mountains) than is currently possible in many regions, and there are numerous anecdotal reports of especially bountiful harvests (e.g., documented yields of grain) throughout Europe during this interval of time. Grapes were grown in England several hundred kilometers north of their current limits of growth, and subtropical flora such as fig trees and olive trees grew in regions of Europe (northern Italy and parts of Germany) well north of their current range. Geological evidence indicates that mountain glaciers throughout Europe retreated substantially at this time, relative to the glacial advances of later centuries (Grove and Switsur, 1994)……………..
http://www.meteo.psu.edu/holocene/public_html/shared/articles/medclimopt.pdf

December 13, 2012 4:55 am

Folks, apologies for the WFT downtime, it was caused by an IP address allocation cockup at my hosting provider. Should be fixed now but it may take some time to propagate through DNS.

Chris Wright
December 13, 2012 4:55 am

These morons seem to think that *everything* bad is caused by climate change/global warming.
But one thing is beyond dispute: global warming can drive people mad.
Chris

lurker passing through, laughing
December 13, 2012 4:58 am

Truly the most tragic aspect of AGW is the reduction of intelligence in its hardcore believers.
Hertsgaard’s pasta/wheat fear article is a great example of this reduction intelligence in action.
Newsweek is no longer a serious news magazine, but one would expect that editors would edit for reality and facts, but as sufferers of AGW dementia, they are unable, apparently.
The claims regarding the extinction of wheat and pasta are stupid on every level.

1 2 3