Counterintuitive, models wrong – rainfall more likely over drier soil

Lokaler Regen braut sich zusammen (Mali, Sahel). Bild: F. Guichard & L. Kergoat, AMMA project, CNRS copyright.
A storm is brewing (Mali, Sahel). Foto: F. Guichard & L. Kergoat, AMMA project, CNRS copyright.

From the Vienna University of Technology , what appears to be a negative drought feedback mechanism has been observed.

Summer rain more likely over drier soils

Summer rain is more likely over drier soil – this is the conclusion scientists have drawn from a detailed analysis of satellite data. State-of-the-art computer models predict the opposite effect; these models must now be reconsidered, says the study published in the journal “Nature“. Several international research groups were involved in the project: The Centre for Ecology and Hydrology (Wallingford, UK), the VU University Amsterdam, the Center of Meteorology CNRM in Toulouse, and the Vienna University of Technology. 

Convective Showers: Hot Air Moves Up

Frontal rain systems, moving from the ocean across the land, can lead to rain over large areas. Summer showers, which frequently occur at the end of a hot day, are often restricted to a rather small region. This kind of rain is a completely different phenomenon. Instead of moving across the land, the air moves from the hot ground upwards, forming clouds high up in the air, and finally leading to rain. This is called “convective precipitation”.

Does Soil Moisture Lead to More Rain?

“It’s tempting to assume that moist soils lead to higher evaporation, which in turn stimulates more precipitation”, says Wouter Dorigo (Vienna University of Technology), one of the authors of the study. “This would imply that there is a positive feedback loop: moist soils lead to even more rain, whereas dry regions tend to remain dry.” But observations suggest otherwise: “We have analyzed data from different satellites measuring soil moisture and precipitation all over the globe, with a resolution of 50 to 100 kilometers. These data show that convective precipitation is more likely over drier soils”, says Wouter Dorigo.

The new data contradicts established computer models. A conclusive explanation for this effect has yet to be found. “The air over dry soils heats up more easily. This could lead to a more intense vertical draft”, Dorigo suspects. However, this cannot yet be described at a sufficient level of detail with today’s computer simulations.

Microwaves from Space

Soil moisture can be measured with satellites using microwave radiation. Unlike visible light, microwaves can penetrate clouds. Satellites can either measure the Earth’s natural microwave radiation to calculate the local soil moisture (passive measurement) or the satellite sends out microwave pulses and measures how strongly the pulse is reflected by the surface (active measurement). From this data, the soil moisture can be calculated.

###

here’s a second press release:

From the Centre for Ecology & Hydrology

Parched soils trigger more storms

Afternoon storms are more likely to develop when soils are parched, according to a new study published this week in Nature which examined hydrological processes across six continents.

The results have important implications for the future development of global weather and climate models which may currently be simulating an excessive number of droughts.

The research team included scientists from the UK, Holland, Austria and France and was led by Dr Chris Taylor from the NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in the UK.

The scientists examined imagery from weather satellites which track the development of storm clouds across the globe. When they matched up where new storms appeared alongside images of how wet the ground was, they were somewhat surprised.

Dr Chris Taylor from NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology said, “We had been looking at storms in Africa and knew that rain clouds there tended to brew up in places where it hadn’t rained in the previous few days. We were surprised to see a similar pattern occurring in other regions of the world such as the US and continental Europe. In those less extreme climates, with more vegetation cover, we expected the soil wetness effect would be too weak to identify.”

The researchers compared their observations with six global weather and climate models used to simulate climate change. They found that the existing models do the wrong thing, triggering rain over wetter soils.

The implication is that existing climate models are more likely to go into a vicious circle whereby dry soils decrease rainfall, leading to even drier soil conditions. The paper concludes that fixing this problem is a priority for scientists developing the climate models.

Dr Taylor added, “Both heat and moisture are critical ingredients for rain clouds to build up during the afternoon. On sunny days the land heats the air, creating thermals which reach several kilometres up into the atmosphere. If the soil is dry, the thermals are stronger, and our new research shows that this makes rain more likely.”

Co-author Dr Françoise Guichard from CNRM-GAME (CNRS and Meteo-France) said, “We need to improve climate models so that we get a better idea of what global climate change will mean on smaller regional scales over land.”

###

The research team came from the NERC Centre for Ecology & Hydrology in the UK, CNRM-GAME (CNRS and Meteo-France) in France, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam in the Netherlands, and the Vienna University of Technology in Austria.

Get notified when a new post is published.
Subscribe today!
0 0 votes
Article Rating
65 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
GlynnMhor
September 12, 2012 4:29 pm

The behaviour of water vapour (the source of some two thirds of the supposed CO2 warming) remains, as the IPCC have described it, “poorly understood”.

azmom
September 12, 2012 4:48 pm

There is really nothing new about this. Here in the Valley of the Sun, it is common knowledge that if you get a good monsoon rain one night, it will be someone else’s turn the next.

David L. Hagen
September 12, 2012 4:55 pm

That corresponds to David Stockwell’s findings of increasing precipitation in Australia when the CSIRO’s models predicted increasing drought.
Tests of Regional Climate Model Validity in the Drought Exceptional Circumstances Report

JC
September 12, 2012 5:01 pm

But isn’t “negative feedback” secret code for “oil money”?

September 12, 2012 5:03 pm

My, my calibrating models with empirical data and actual observations. How novel. Anyone who lives in a semiarid climate with a mountain range next door know all about his effect. I guess it was simply to obvious to write it down before.

David L. Hagen
September 12, 2012 5:20 pm
September 12, 2012 5:30 pm

How novel! [sarc-off]
When I was growing up in Texas during the drought years of the early fifties, we were taught that our most common source of rain was the “air mass thunderstorm”. After the sun had heated the earth most of the day, the heat caused thermals to rise, condensing water to form clouds, and if we were lucky, to condense enough to bring rain before the cooling of the evening dissipated those thunderclouds.
These storms were always local, scattered about. I never associated their locations as eschewing damp ground, but it seems logical; I’ve never seen a dust devil (the archetypical local flat land thermal) where it wasn’t hot and dry.
I suppose I aught to cut these European researchers some slack. I doubt any of them have much experience with non- frontal storms.
cheers,
gary

Larry Ledwick (hotrod)
September 12, 2012 5:30 pm

Keep in mind that in arid climates rain storm development, does not necessarily mean that the rain actually reaches the ground.
In very dry climates you can have rain clouds every day with nary a drop reaching the ground (virga). The modelers should also consider the local humidity and height of the cloud base in their calculations to account for those situations where all the rain that develops in the cloud simply gets recycled back into cooler air of higher humidity, but little if any moisture reaches the surface.
(another minor monkey wrench in the models I suspect)
Larry

Pamela Gray
September 12, 2012 5:31 pm

And this is a surprise to dry land farmers how?

Jay Davis
September 12, 2012 5:49 pm

I love the “models wrong” in the title.

u.k.(us)
September 12, 2012 5:56 pm

Nothing like settled science.
But, why would we have, and keep collecting reams of weather data, other than its variability ?
Not a clear cycle to be found yet.
In any time frame.

john robertson
September 12, 2012 6:06 pm

State of the art climatcastrology models. Does anyone know of a naturally occurring positive feedback mechanism?

DaveA
September 12, 2012 6:17 pm

Skeptical Science will be reporting on this any minute now, yep, any minute now…
(/sarc)

jorgekafkazar
September 12, 2012 6:20 pm

“We need to improve climate models so that we get a better idea of what global climate change will mean on smaller regional scales over land.”
Notice the mandatory little genuflection of obeisance towards the high priests of AGW.

LamontT
September 12, 2012 6:21 pm

SHOCKING!!!! not really.
[/sarc] Actual research contraindicates the assumptions used for computer models? I never would have imagined that. [/sarc]

Nick in vancouver
September 12, 2012 6:33 pm

Any other positive feedback, run away catastrophes missing in action? Anybody? Hansen? Is your hand up? no, your scratching your head, time for more tweakage I guess.

Pamela Gray
September 12, 2012 6:38 pm

Dryland farmers strip field. What that means is that they divide their fields into strips, Every other strip is then used year one, and the other strips used in year two. Why? So that soil moisture can be replenished. How? Sequential thunderstorms. It is how we irrigate on dry land. It works quite well.
I take it most climate researchers have never asked farmers one single question.

September 12, 2012 6:39 pm

This is a 24carat crap: ”moist soils lead to even more rain, whereas dry regions tend to remain dry.” But observations suggest otherwise: “We have analyzed data from different satellites measuring soil moisture and precipitation all over the globe,” OTHERWISE?!?!
No, you have NOT!!! Where is topsoil moisture, water storages and ”water vapor” in the air -> attracts rain-clouds from the sea like a magnet . Where is dry – clouds go around the land as cars around a traffic island!!! Australia is a perfect example, so is Sahara, so is Brazil. Looks like those people cannot tell the truth, to save their lives… This post is a jewel, for when the whole truth is known – for when the time comes – for them to be put on the witness stand, under oath.

Tim Neilson
September 12, 2012 6:45 pm

Sorry but this paper contravenes all accepted climate science practice and procedures.
If real data contradicts a computer model, that doesn’t prove that the theory behind the model is dubious, it proves that there’s some unknown factor causing the data to be distorted. More research grants are necessary in order for the correctness of the theory to be properly vindicated.
(Shouldn’t this have a “/sarc” tag? – mod.)

Tom
September 12, 2012 6:50 pm

The atmosphere does not simply depend on what the local soil moisture content is at any given spot when it comes to how much precip will fall. All things being equal, the atmosphere is dynamic and not only convects but advects and large synoptic and meso-scale patterns determine where the rain will set up. The inner-workings of weather are absolutely chaotic and soil moisture is just one small part.

Rich Lambert
September 12, 2012 7:04 pm

I live in Oklahoma where it has been dry the past two summers. The sun quickly heats the ground, but I’ve failed to see those thunderstorms and rain. Recently, I was in eastern North Carolina which is quite humid this year and it rained about every other day. I guess the model applies somewhere else.

dp
September 12, 2012 7:12 pm

This is of course a heat conduit between the warm earth and the lower atmosphere which is carried to the high atmosphere via conduction, convection, and radiation. When the water vapor condenses at altitude the heat released has a shorter trip to space. And of course the clouds increase the albedo. When the rain hits the ground it carries heat from the warm soil below the surface. Perhaps Trenberth’s missing heat is in ground water. There is a lot of water down there.
http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2011/aug/26/underground-river-amazon

davidmhoffer
September 12, 2012 7:14 pm

The Univ of Vienna link is busted.
But more to the point, that’s Wolfgang Wagner’s turf.
Can a retraction or resignation and apology to Trenberth for not consulting the climate modeling community before publishing a paper showing the models are wrong be far behind?
If not…. why not?

Eric Barnes
September 12, 2012 7:25 pm

Pamela Gray says:
September 12, 2012 at 6:38 pm
I take it most climate researchers have never asked farmers one single question.
Why would they want to do that for free when they can get the government to pay them for “cutting edge research”?

GP Hanner
September 12, 2012 8:08 pm

Hmmmmmmmm. You mean those daily rain showers we experienced in the tropics of Southeast Asia (during the wet monsoon) were the result of drier soil? And those rainless, relatively pleasant days during the dry monsoon were, maybe, the result of wetter soil? Who’da thunk?

1 2 3